DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between a bulk-fill resin-based composite and three luting materials on the cementation of fiberglass-reinforced posts

  • 투고 : 2023.04.25
  • 심사 : 2023.07.04
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31

초록

Objectives: This study verified the possibility of cementing fiberglass-reinforced posts using a flowable bulk-fill composite (BF), comparing its push-out bond strength and microhardness with these properties of 3 luting materials. Materials and Methods: Sixty endodontically treated bovine roots were used. Posts were cemented using conventional dual-cured cement (CC); self-adhesive cement (SA); dual-cured composite (RC); and BF. Push-out bond strength (n = 10) and microhardness (n = 5) tests were performed after 1 week and 4 months of storage. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), 1-way ANOVA, t-test, and Tukey post-hoc tests were applied for the push-out bond strength and microhardness results; and Pearson correlation test was applied to verify the correlation between push-out bond strength and microhardness results (α = 0.05). Results: BF presented higher push-out bond strength than CC and SA in the cervical third before aging (p < 0.01). No differences were found between push-out bond strength before and after aging for all the luting materials (p = 0.84). Regarding hardness, only SA presented higher values measured before than after aging (p < 0.01). RC and BF did not present 80% of the maximum hardness at the apical regions. A strong positive correlation was found between the luting materials' push-out bond strength and microhardness (p < 0.01, R2 = 0.7912). Conclusions: The BF presented comparable or higher push-out bond strength and microhardness than the luting materials, which indicates that it could be used for cementing resin posts in situations where adequate light curing is possible.

키워드

과제정보

The authors thank Voco for the donation of the luting materials and posts used in this study.

참고문헌

  1. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AH, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:vi, 397-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.011
  2. Santos AF, Meira JB, Tanaka CB, Xavier TA, Ballester RY, Lima RG, Pfeifer CS, Versluis A. Can fiber posts increase root stresses and reduce fracture? J Dent Res 2010;89:587-591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510363382
  3. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bertini F, Giuliani V. Translucent fiber post cementation using a lightcuring adhesive/composite system: SEM analysis and pull-out test. J Dent 2004;32:629-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.06.004
  4. Bitter K, Meyer-Lueckel H, Priehn K, Kanjuparambil JP, Neumann K, Kielbassa AM. Effects of luting agent and thermocycling on bond strengths to root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2006;39:809-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01155.x
  5. Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:220-227.
  6. Schwartz RS. Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system-the promise and the problems: a review. J Endod 2006;32:1125-1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2006.08.003
  7. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Fabianelli A, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the adhesion of fiber posts to intraradicular dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:627-635. 
  8. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:121-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200111
  9. Nakano EL, de Souza A, Boaro L, Catalani LH, Braga RR, Goncalves F. Polymerization stress and gap formation of self-adhesive, bulk-fill and flowable composite resins. Oper Dent 2020;45:E308-E316. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-166-L
  10. Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gomez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:492-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12394
  11. Helvey GA. Creating super dentin: using flowable composites as luting agents to help prevent secondary caries. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013;34:288-300.
  12. Tomaselli LO, Oliveira DCRS, Favarao J, Silva AFD, Pires-de-Souza FCP, Geraldeli S, Sinhoreti MAC. Influence of pre-heating regular resin composites and flowable composites on luting ceramic veneers with different thicknesses. Braz Dent J 2019;30:459-466. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902513
  13. Ghodsi S, Aghamohseni MM, Arzani S, Rasaeipour S, Shekarian M. Cement selection criteria for different types of intracanal posts. Dent Res J 2022;19:51.
  14. Sarkis-Onofre R, Skupien JA, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Pereira-Cenci T. The role of resin cement on bond strength of glass-fiber posts luted into root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Oper Dent 2014;39:E31-E44. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-070-LIT
  15. Bergoli CD, Brondani LP, Wandscher VF, Pereira G, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Valandro LF. A multicenter randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial of fiber post cementation strategies. Oper Dent 2018;43:128-135. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-278-C
  16. Moorthy A, Hogg CH, Dowling AH, Grufferty BF, Benetti AR, Fleming GJ. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with bulk-fill flowable resin-based composite base materials. J Dent 2012;40:500-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.02.015
  17. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Ferracane JL. Factors involved in the development of polymerization shrinkage stress in resin-composites: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005;21:962-970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.018
  18. do Carmo SS, Nespoli FFP, Bachmann L, Miranda CES, Castro-Raucci LMS, Oliveira IR, Raucci-Neto W. Influence of early mineral deposits of silicate- and aluminate-based cements on push-out bond strength to root dentine. Int Endod J 2018;51:92-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12791
  19. Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007;35:827-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.009
  20. De-Deus G, Souza E, Versiani M. Methodological considerations on push-out tests in Endodontics. Int Endod J 2015;48:501-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12445
  21. Palin WM, Leprince JG, Hadis MA. Shining a light on high volume photocurable materials. Dent Mater 2018;34:695-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.009
  22. Watts DC, Amer O, Combe EC. Characteristics of visible-light-activated composite systems. Br Dent J 1984;156:209-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805312
  23. Shortall AC, Wilson HJ, Harrington E. Depth of cure of radiation-activated composite restoratives--influence of shade and opacity. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:337-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00782.x
  24. Rosado L, Munchow EA, de Oliveira E, Lacerda-Santos R, Freitas DQ, Carlo HL, Verner FS. Translucency and radiopacity of dental resin composites - is there a direct relation? Oper Dent 2023;48:E61-E69. https://doi.org/10.2341/22-056-L
  25. Vieira C, Bachmann L, De Andrade Lima Chaves C, Correa Silva-Sousa YT, Correa Da Silva SR, Alfredo E. Light transmission and bond strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2021;125:674.e1-674.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.031
  26. Shimokawa C, Turbino ML, Giannini M, Braga RR, Price RB. Effect of curing light and exposure time on the polymerization of bulk-fill resin-based composites in molar teeth. Oper Dent 2020;45:E141-E155. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-126-L
  27. Montanari M, Prati C, Piana G. Differential hydrolytic degradation of dentin bonds when luting carbon fiber posts to the root canal. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e411-e417. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e411
  28. Ramos MB, Pegoraro TA, Pegoraro LF, Carvalho RM. Effects of curing protocol and storage time on the micro-hardness of resin cements used to lute fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:556-562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000500011
  29. Tay FR, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Water movement across bonded dentin - too much of a good thing. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:12-25. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000500003
  30. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJ. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:295-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02148.x
  31. Ferracane JL. Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict? Dent Mater 2013;29:51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013