DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공동 출원 특허정보와 정형적 개념분석을 활용한 기술협력 성과 분석 연구

Exploring Technology Cooperation Performance Using co-patent Information and Formal Concept Analysis

  • 박찬호 (한양대학교 기술경영전문대학원) ;
  • 이희정 (한양대학교 산업융합학부)
  • Chan-Ho Park (Graduate School of Technology and Innovation Management, Hanyang University) ;
  • Heejung Lee (School of Interdisciplinary Industrial Studies, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.30
  • 심사 : 2023.09.18
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31

초록

Recently, the market competition has been fiercer due to the acceleration of technological change and the launch of intelligent products. In this situation, technology cooperation activities through networks rather than independent technological innovation activities of a single company or institution are recognized as a crucial strategy to gain competitiveness. Technology cooperation can take various forms depending on the target technology, and researchers have conducted performance analyses of technology cooperation types. However, there have not been data-based quantitative studies on the types and trends of technology cooperation for the target technology. In this paper, we explored the difference between the technology cooperation types by technology and time using the formal concept analysis method and co-patent information. In particular, the proposed methodology has been verified through the case study of electric vehicles, and it is intended to suggest the direction of technological cooperation according to specific technologies and cooperation targets in the future

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barnes, T., Pashby, I., and Gibbons, A., Effective university-industry interaction: A multi-case evaluation of collaborative R&D projects, European Management Journal, 2002, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 272-285.
  2. Baum, J., Calabrese, T., and Silverman, B., Don't Go It Alone: Alliance Network Composition and Startups Performance in Canadian Biotechnology, Strategic Management Journal, 2000, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 267-295. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8
  3. Bonaccorsi, A. and Piccaluga, A., A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships, R&D Management, 1994, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1994.tb00876.x
  4. Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., Stumme, G., and Tane, J., Conceptual Knowledge Processing with Formal Concept Analysis and Ontologies, In International Conference on Formal Concept Analysis, 2004, pp. 189-207.
  5. Formica, A., Ontology-based Concept Similarity in Formal Concept Analysis, Information Sciences, 2006, Vol. 176, No. 18, pp. 2624-2641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2005.11.014
  6. Hagedoorn, J., Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering : Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences, Strategic Management Journal, 1993. Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505
  7. Hakanson, L., Managing Cooperative Research and Development: Partner Selection and Contract Design, R&D Management, 1993, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1993.tb00834.x
  8. Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., and Griliches, Z., Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship, Econometrica, 1984, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 909-938. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911191
  9. Jang, S.S. and Lee, J.H., Analysis of Patent Cooperation Network by Industry of Artificial Intelligence Technology, Management Information Systems Review, 2023, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 95-113.
  10. Ju, S.H. and Seo, H.J., Study of the Effects of Co-Patent Network Factors on Technological Innovation: Focus on IT industry in Korea, Journal of Technology Innovation, 2017, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 211-238. https://doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2017.25.4.211
  11. Kang, S.M. and Seo, M.K., An Empirical Study on Technological Cooperation, Innovation, and Absorptive Capability, Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 2013, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 945-959.
  12. Kim, B.K. and Cho, H.J., An Empirical Study on the Relationship between R&D Collaboration Characteristics and Patent Performance in the Biotechnology Research in Korea Using Network Analysis, Journal of Industrial Property, 2016, Vol. 51, pp. 299-326.
  13. Kim, G.H. and Kim, B.K., An Analysis of Technological Convergence and Collaborative, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 2021, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 518-527. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2021.22.7.518
  14. Kim, H.K., Kang, W.J., Park, J.H., and Yeo., I.K., Comparing Efficiencies of R&D Projects Using DEA: Focused on Core Technology Development Project, Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2013, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 126-132. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2013.36.3.126
  15. Kim, S.H. and Kim, J.H., An Exploratory Study on the Performance of Open Product Innovation: Product Innovation Strategy, Source and Partner Contribution Perspectives, Korean Journal of Business Administration, 2011, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 685-703.
  16. Kim, Y.J., Technological Collaboration Linkages and the Innovation Output in Small and Medium-sized Firms: A Study on the Moderating Effects of Absorptive Capacity, Korean Management Review, 2005, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 1365-1390.
  17. Lanjouw, J. and Schankerman, M., Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators, Economic Journal, 2004, Vol, 114, No. 495. pp. 441-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00216.x
  18. Lee, C.Y., The Success Factors on Private-Public Technology Collaboration of SMEs, Korea Technology Innovation Society, 2019, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 416-445. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.06.22.3.416
  19. Lim, H.G., Kim, B.K., and Jeong, E.S., Technological Cooperation Network Analysis through Patent Analysis of Autonomous Driving Technology, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 2020, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp. 688-701.
  20. Mohr, J. and Spekman, R., Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, 1994, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150205
  21. Mora-Valentin, E., Montoro-Sanchez, A., and Guerras-Martin, L., Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations, Research Policy, 2004, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00087-8
  22. Park, W.J., An empirical study on the influence of collaborative performance of large corporations and SMEs on innovative capabilities of SMEs, [Seoul, Korea]: Han-Yang University, 2014.
  23. Poelmans, J., Elzinga, P., Viaene, S., and Dedene, G., Formal Concept Analysis in Knowledge Discovery : A Survey, In: Croitoru M., Ferre S., Lukose D. (eds) Conceptual Structures : From Information to Intelligence, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2010, Vol. 6208.
  24. Poelmans, J., Ignatov, D. I., Kuznetsov, S. O., and Dedene, G., Formal Concept Analysis in Knowledge Processing: A Survey on Applications, Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, Vol. 40, No. 16, pp. 6538-6560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.009
  25. Poshyvanyk, D. and Marcus, A., Combining Formal Concept Analysis with Information Retrieval for Concept Location in Source Code, In 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, 2007, pp. 37-48.
  26. Putnam and Jonathan, The Value of International Patent Rights, [United States: Yale University], 1996
  27. Santoro, M.D. and Chakrabarti, A.K., Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions, Research Policy, 2002, Vol. 31, No. 7, pp. 1163-1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
  28. Seo, H.S., Yoon, S.M., and Lee, H.J., Identifying Significances of Attributes, Objects and Concepts based on Weighted Formal Concept Analysis, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 2020, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 603-615. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2020.46.6.603
  29. Shin, I.S. and Kim, H.S., An Empirical Analysis of R&D Cooperation Effect on Firm Performance of Biotechnology SMEs, Korea Society of innovation, 2020, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 25-55.
  30. Small Business Technology Roadmap, http://smroadmap.smtech.go.kr.
  31. Stumme, G., Wille, R., and Wille, U., Conceptual Knowledge Discovery in Databases Using Formal Concept Analysis Methods. In: Ztkow J. M., Quafafou M. (eds) Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, PKDD 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1998, Vol. 1510.
  32. Tilley, T., Cole, R., Becker, P., and Eklund, P., A survey of Formal Concept Analysis Support for Software Engineering Activities, In Formal Concept Analysis, 2005, pp. 250-271.
  33. Trajtenberg. and Manuel, A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations, RAND Journal of Economics, 1990, Vol. 21, pp. 172-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555502
  34. Wille, R., Restructuring lattice theory: An approach based on hierarchies of concepts, NATO Advanced Studies Institute, 1982, Vol. 83, pp. 445-470.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_15