Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research

Center for Asian Public Opinion Research & Collaboration Initiative (충남대학교 아시아여론조사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Still Aquamarine: China Factor and the 2020 Election Revisited

  • Received : 2023.04.13
  • Accepted : 2023.05.24
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The DPP's victory over the KMT in Taiwan's 2020 elections has been interpreted as a triumph for anti-China sentiment. However, the rise of political outsiders and their influence on voting behavior in this election were overlooked and underestimated. In this article, we examined different sources of data and found that supporters of these political outsiders mentioned sovereignty and cross-Strait issues less than the incumbent Tsai Ing-wen. However, when faced with the choice between Tsai and challenger Han Kuo-yu, voters who were concerned about governance chose Tsai, contributing to her winning a record number of votes. This article suggests that economic and governance issues had a considerable role in the election's result and will probably be the main focus of the 2024 presidential election. With the potential for a conflict in the Taiwan Strait increasing, anti-China sentiment is unlikely to be the deciding factor this time around.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions. This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan (108L893502).

References

  1. Barr, R. R. (2009). Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics. Party Politics, 15(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808097890 
  2. Batto, N. F. (2020, January 12). Opinion: Still, President Tsai of Taiwan wasn't re-elected just because she's tough on China. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/12/opinion/taiwan-election-tsai-han-populism.html
  3. BBC News. (2020, January 11). Taiwan election: Tsai Ing-wen wins second presidential term. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51077553
  4. Bélanger, E., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001 
  5. Budge, I. (2015). Issue emphases, saliency theory and issue ownership: A historical and conceptual analysis. West European Politics, 38(4), 761-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039374 
  6. Budge, I., & Farlie, D. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. Taylor & Francis. 
  7. Chang, C., & Jennings, R. (2020, January 11). Tsai Ing-wen reelected, promises to defend Taiwanese sovereignty from China. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2020-01-11/taiwans-president-sweeps-to-re-election-setting-the-stage-for-chilly-relations-with-china
  8. Chen, C. (2020, January 21). Tsai's victory speech at international press conference. Embassy of the Republic of China (Taiwan) to the Holy See. https://www.taiwanembassy.org/va_en/post/3411.html 
  9. Chu, Y.-H., Huang, K.-P., Lagos, M., & Mattes, R. (2020). A lost decade for third-wave democracies? Journal of Democracy, 31(2), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0029 
  10. Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties. Wiley. 
  11. Fell, D. (2005). Measuring and explaining party change in Taiwan: 1991-2004. Journal of East Asian Studies, 5(1), 105-133. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800006275 
  12. Fell, D. (2021). Challengers to mainstream parties in Taiwan's 2020 elections: Continuity rather than the expected change. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 17(1), 141-160. https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/35278 
  13. Golder, M. (2006). Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation. American Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00168.x 
  14. Hanley, S., & Sikk, A. (2016). Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in eastern Europe. Party Politics, 22(4), 522-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814550438 
  15. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). stealth democracy: americans' beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=roOhDUnlulsC 
  16. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279 
  17. Hsiao, Y.-C., & Yu, E. C.-H. (2020). Polarization perception and support for democracy: The case of Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(8), 1143-1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620911150 
  18. Hsieh, J. F.-S., & Niou, E. M. S. (2005). Measuring Taiwanese public opinion on Taiwanese independence. The China Quarterly, 181, 158-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741005000093 
  19. Huang, C.-H., & James, P. (2014). Blue, green or aquamarine? Taiwan and the status quo preference in cross-Strait relations. The China Quarterly, 219, 670-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741014000745. 
  20. Lin, T.-J., & Hsiao, Y.-C. (2021). Weisheme bu xihuan guomindang yu min jin dang? Tansuo taiwan minzhong fan zhengdang qingxu de laiyuan [Why do people dislike both the KMT and the DPP? Exploring the sources of anti-party sentiment in Taiwan]. zhengzhi xue luncong [Taiwanese Journal of Political Science], 89, 89-120. https://doi.org/10.6166/TJPS.202109_(89).0003 
  21. Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives, (pp. 1-64). Free Press New York. 
  22. Liu, C.-L. (2020). Cong 2020 nian daxuan kan lan lu jiben bankuai de yidong yu liang dang zai xuanju celue de sikao [The power shift between Taiwan's ruling & opposition parties and their election strategies based on Taiwan's 2020 presidential election]. Zhanwang yutansuoyuekan [Prospect & Exploration], 18(4), 52-62. 
  23. Liu, L.-W. (2022). 2018 nián jiǔhéyīxuǎnjǔwǎngluòfǎn dǎng qíngxù: Dàshùjùde wéidùyǔláiyuán [Anti-party sentiment on the Internet in the nine-in-one election in 2018: Dimension and source in big data]. shehui kexue yu zhexue zazhi [Journal of Social Sciences and Philosophy], 34(1), 75-116. 
  24. Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. The American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701 
  25. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825-850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797 
  26. Pop-Eleches, G. (2010). Throwing out the bums: Protest voting and unorthodox parties after communism. World Politics, 62(2), 221-260.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000043
  27. Rich, T. S. (2018). Coattails and mixed electoral systems: Evidence from Taiwan's 2016 election. Journal of East Asian Studies, 18(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.25 
  28. Sikk, A. (2012). Newness as a winning formula for new political parties. Party Politics, 18(4), 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810389631 
  29. Sweetser, K. D., & Lariscy, R. W. (2008). Candidates make good friends: An analysis of candidates' uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180802178687 
  30. Templeman, K. (2020). How Taiwan stands up to China. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0047 
  31. Thelen, K., & Conran, J. (2016). Institutional Change. In O. Fioretos, T. G. Falleti, & A. Sheingate (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (pp. 51-70). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.3 
  32. Tiezzi, S. (2020, January 12). Taiwan "shouts back": President Tsai wins re-election despite China's pressure campaign. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2020/01/taiwan-shouts-back-president-tsai-wins-re-election-despite-chinas-pressure-campaign/
  33. TVBS Poll Center (2019). Guomindang chuxuan hou 2020 nian zongtong daxuan min diao [Polls after the KMT primary for the 2020 presidential election]. https://cc.tvbs.com.tw/portal/file/poll_center/2019/20190718/92ae63afafc8669dd8cbd2de127cd5c4.pdf 
  34. van der Brug, W. (2004). Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies, 23(2), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00061-6 
  35. Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1962.10480664