1. Introduction
Online consumer reviews (OCRs) are a type of user-generated content that provides essential information for experiential products [1]. The OCRs have become an important source of information for consumers and businesses [2], successfully transferring marketing communication rights from marketers to consumers, and involving them in the information creation and selection process [3]. According to previous studies, 90 percent of customers who search for and experience products sold online base their purchasing decisions on OCRs [4]. The hotel service industry is an example of experiential service [5]. As consumers cannot accurately assess the content and quality of experiential services before booking, it is necessary to explore a large amount of information during the decision-making process to reduce perceived risk [6]. When OCR is digital, consumers are influenced by online reviews to make informed purchases of experiential products. Consumers leave open-text comments, photos, videos, and other details sharing their experiences and providing a brief evaluation of a product or service. The Internet's massive, anonymous, and ephemeral nature has led to new methods for capturing, analyzing, interpreting, and managing the impact of one consumer on another. Hotels can promote their products and services by incentivizing customers to write OCRs [5].
The most critical factor in attracting customers is review content because information quality is crucial for reducing uncertainty [7]. Although online reviews provide consumers with a comprehensive understanding of a hotel, consumers would be unable to read all reviews before making decisions because each hotel receives numerous online reviews, and these are overloaded with information. Consequently, TripAdvisor has created a feature called "Was this review helpful?" To assist customers in quickly identifying the most helpful reviews among numerous reviews [8]. This function is important for the customers as well as hotel managers because reviews serve as a tool for consumers in decision-making and for managers to improve their service quality and affect overall hotel ratings. These reviews have a significant impact and are considered the most valuable [9]. Therefore, before influencing a potential customer's decision, managers should identify and fix the issues reported in reviews that are rated as most helpful.
In addition to the content of the reviews, consumer reviews with different power distances influence hotel ratings [10]. Globalization has made it easier for people to travel worldwide and increased the number of international guests in hotels. The hotel industry is highly globalized, with clients from various cultural backgrounds. Therefore, cultural factors influence consumers’ choice of hotels and the hotel industry. Globalization has enhanced the growth of online hotel industry review data. This data enhances the provision of service evaluation by consumers from various cultural backgrounds. Existing research has found cultural differences in the generation and utilization of online reviews [11]. According to previous analyses of online review data, consumers’ individualism affects their propensity to conform to prior emotions [12]. Emphasizes the importance of additional cross-cultural comparisons of online review generation and dissemination behavior [13]. Consequently, online hotel industry reviews provide ideal and rich data on customers from various backgrounds, allowing us to discuss how customers' cultural values influence their hotel ratings.
Additionally, individuals tend to seek advice from experts when making purchasing decisions, because they perceive the information provided by experts to be more accurate. In previous studies, reviews by experts were perceived as more helpful than others, and the credibility of information was based on the expertise of the reviewers [14]. Online reviews are customers' honest feedback on hotel facilities and services because online reviews are a kind of unstructured text, and data analysis is difficult. A previous study applied sentiment analysis to unstructured natural language processing of online reviews [15]. Primary text sentiment analysis examines text sentiment polarity and intensity [16]. Sentiment polarity is divided into two poles: Positive appreciation and affirmation; and negative criticism and negation [17]. Mining the emotional tendencies of customers' online reviews plays a significant role in the context of big data and innovative business models for marketing strategies [18]. A customer satisfaction database was built by converting the natural language descriptions of customers into structured data. The opinions and emotional attitudes expressed by customers in the evaluation of a specific aspect of the hotel's software and hardware can be interpreted as the customer's "vote" on the hotel's satisfaction level in the review and can be transformed into the customer's opinion of the hotel. In this context, this study further discusses the impact of the complexity of evaluation information on hotel ratings using Elaboration Likelihood Model(ELM) . The cognitive fluency theory states that an individual's subjective experience of difficulty in processing information and the recipient's attitude or behavior is influenced by the complexity of that information. According to this theory, when people cannot process complex information, they resort to peripheral routes. However, individuals who can process more information prefer to use a central route. Therefore, we distinguish between two sets of OCR features: Peripheral and central routes.
Furthermore, although previous research has demonstrated that OCR content influences consumer decision-making, we categorize OCR characteristics as follows: Peripheral Route: 1.Platform (APP) information(including helpful votes, number of comments, comment length and city ranking of hotels). 2.hotel characteristic information (including room types, price and country). And Cure Route: customer review information (including date of writing, date of stay and customer comments) (see Fig. 1 and Table 1). Simultaneously, we differentiate between receivers (i.e., professional reviewers and novices) to determine whether information processing ability in a complex information environment affects hotel ratings for five-star and budget hotels. The data is obtained by applying Python programming to crawl the page information, and the classification of the data is shown in Figure 1. And the further processing of customer reviews, that is, the conversion of customer reviews from text to vector, the resulting vector data will be further evaluated satisfaction calculation, the calculation process is shown in the formula (2) of part 3.3.2 of this article.
Fig. 1. Classification of information features
Table 1. Online review example
Our empirical investigation yields three intriguing results. First, the five-star and budget hotels differ in obtaining more reviews that help vote for hotel ratings. Second, reviewers from high power distance cities or regions positively and significantly impact hotel ratings. Third, expert evaluations have a restrictive moderating effect on consumers' online evaluation satisfaction and hotel ratings.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 discusses the related literature and hypothesis development. Section 3 describes the econometric model specifications and variables. Section 4 presents the empirical results. Section 5 discusses the primary findings, implications, limitations, and directions for future research.
2. Literature Review and Hypothesis Development
Given the significance of online reviews, this study investigates the effect of peripheral and central routes in ELM on hotel ratings for various types of hotels (five-star hotels and budget hotels). The first type of cue is peripheral route, which is a simple cue in a message that can influence the recipient's attitude. These routes temporarily affect the recipient's attitude, and may not indicate the recipient's final judgment of the message. The central route is the second type of cue, which refers to the more complex cues of the message that require more cognitive effort for the recipient to evaluate. Individuals begin processing information via the peripheral route, and if these routes do not affect their attitudes, they stop analyzing additional information [19]. A study on Yelp.com hotel reviews revealed that the peripheral route is associated with reviewers and platform recommendations, whereas the central route is associated with reviews. Consequently, the peripheral route is defined as a simple sign that influences perception during the early stages. Central cues are more complex and influence information processing in the later stages. For example, if the platform's recommendation information is on the periphery, the hotel's characteristics are on the central route, and customer reviews are on the central route.
In terms of simple information processing, we first investigate how helpful votes affect online hotel ratings in the platform's recommendation information. Several studies were conducted to determine the value of reviews by analyzing their content using natural language processing. The effect of review length was investigated using machine learning approaches, such as support vector machines and found that review length significantly influences perceived helpfulness [20, 21]. Second, regarding a hotel’s characteristic information, research power distance influences online hotel ratings. Numerous studies have confirmed that external factors such as society influence the online ratings [22] Previous research has found that customers' power distance has a significant impact on their service expectations, perceived service quality, and relationship quality [23, 24].
In terms of complex information processing, consumer satisfaction with the hotel experience is reflected in the evaluation valence (positive/negative). Positive reviews boost sales, whereas negative reviews are more likely to attract votes and are regarded as useful [25]. Negative reviews are less ambiguous than positive reviews in terms of decision-making [26]. Negative reviews are more credible than positive ones for consumers of experiential products who rely on others’ opinions and advice, particularly when reviewers disclose their identities (which most reviewers do) [27]. On TripAdvisor, destination experts receive more assistance from other community voting members than from general members, demonstrating that the review generator status is significantly positively correlated with review usefulness [28]. The users on review platforms who are designated as experts by the platform, such as TripAdvisor's "contributions" reviewers are considered as professional online reviewers in this study. To define review experts, professional online reviewers must have a large number of above-average-quality reviews. Readers are more likely to perceive favorable reviews from reviewers.
A hotel rating is a consumer's overall assessment of a product or service [29]. It typically reflects consumers' satisfaction with products or services on a scale of one to five stars, with one star indicating extreme dissatisfaction and "five stars" indicating extreme satisfaction [28, 30]. Hotel ratings enable potential customers to quickly assess reviewers' attitudes and the quality of products or services [8]. Moreover, hotel ratings enable potential customers to quickly assess reviewers' attitudes and the quality of products or services [31], which evoke the interest of potential customers and influence their purchasing decisions.
Skewness is a measure of the asymmetry in distributions. We can determine the author's rating habits for attractions based on the skewness of the rating distribution and discover the author's rating habits for hotel ratings. In contrast to the mean, the skewness measures the relative positions of the mode and mean, making the shape of the distribution more intuitive. Fig. 2 depicts three types of skewness. There is negative skewness on the left, indicating that authors are more likely to give higher ratings. In the middle, neutral corresponds to a nearly normal rating distribution. The one on the right represents positive skewness indicating that the authors are likely to give it a lower score. The means of all three distributions are comparable (3.18 on the left, 3 in the middle, and 2.82 on the right). According to the distribution, consumers are more willing to heed negative voices to avoid loss when searching for information online. According to prospect theory, consumers are more likely to read negative reviews to avoid loss and provide useful votes [32]. Emotions from pain and loss are stronger than happiness [33]. Consequently, consumers are more willing to hear negative voices to avoid losses when searching for information online. We hypothesize that receiving more review usefulness votes is often associated with negative news reviews, which impact hotel ratings. Thus, we propose the following hypotheses:
Fig. 2. Three types of skewness
Hypothesis 1a. Obtaining more helpful review votes negatively affects five-star hotels.
Hypothesis 1b. Obtaining helpful review votes negatively affects budget hotels.
Globalization has enhanced the growth of online hotel review data that provide service evaluation for consumers from various cultural backgrounds. According to the existing research, there are cultural differences in the generation and use of online reviews [11]. Based on a previous analysis of online review data, consumers' individualism influences their proclivity to adapt to prior emotions [12]. Power distance is defined as "the extent to which a society accepts the fact that power is distributed unequally in institutions and organizations" [34]. There exists differentiated power between service providers and customers in societies with greater power distance because of the philosophy of "the consumer is always right" or "the customer is king" [10]. Consumers from high-power-distance societies are likely to perceive service quality as low quality and rate service providers very poor owing to their high expectations for service [35].
Table 2. The Nations and Cities - Power Distance Point
We selected cities in various countries and regions based on the power distance points, as presented in Table 1. Chain hotels operate in various markets. As such hotels are designed to meet the needs of varied consumers from different countries rather than the needs of customers in specific regions, they require a standardized operational strategy to survive and succeed in multiple markets. As hotel chain staff can comprehensively understand the different needs of various cultural values and methods for dealing with customer problems, this knowledge must be exchanged to meet the requirements of different customer cultures [36]. While hotels in the same chain group operate in different locations and differ in quality, country, and procedure, they use similar procedures and principles to meet certain quality standards [37]. Global online hotel industry reviews provide ideal and rich customer data from various backgrounds, allowing us to discuss how customers' cultural values influence their hotel ratings. Based on the literature, the following hypotheses are formulated:
H2a. Reviewers from high power distance regions and cities positively impact five-star hotels.
H2b. Reviewers from high power distance regions/cities positively impact budget hotels.
Consumers express their real experiences, feelings, and opinions in the form of short evaluations after consumption based on cyberspace's equality and vitality [38]. According to the uncertainty reduction theory of searchable products, consumers search for and inquire about more products or services to obtain more information [39]. A large amount of review data provides consumers with deterministic reference information for their purchasing decisions. Each online review represents genuine customer feedback on hotel amenities and services. However, this unstructured text is not conducive to scientific data analysis. We investigate the use of sentiment analysis in unstructured natural language processing of online reviews [15]. Positive online reviews of hotels can bring some benefits, whereas negative reviews can negatively impact customers' perceptions and hotel purchases [40].
Professional online reviewers have higher source credibility than newcomers [10]. Researchers have discovered discrepancies between the opinions of professional online reviewers and novices [41]. In general, when the experience is extreme, consumers are more likely to write and post reviews, and evidence suggests that novices are more polarized/dichotomous in their assessments [14]. Professional reviewers with greater expertise in generating reviews have more limitations in their extreme summative evaluations. Professional online reviewers (as opposed to novices) have less influence on overall valence metrics, influencing page rankings and consumer considerations [42]. Based on the literature, we formulated the following hypotheses:
H3a. Evaluators' professionalism negatively moderates the relationship between online evaluation satisfaction and five-star hotel ratings.
H3b. Evaluators' professionalism negatively moderates the relationship between online evaluation satisfaction and five-star hotel ratings.
3. Research methodology
3.1 Econometric Model
The research model proposed in this study is based on different routes embedded in OCR. This research model investigates the impact of peripheral and central OCR routes on consumers’ hotel ratings as the outcome variable. Each online review contains numerous cues that may affect performance, necessitating more cognitive effort on the part of the person reading it. The proposed research model divides these cues into two categories based on the ELM and assesses their impact on OCR performance. Consequently, we proposed two econometric models to examine the impacts of these two sets. H1a, H1b, H2a, and H2b are tested using negative binomial regression econometric models, whereas H3a and H3b are tested using Tobit regression econometric models.
3.1.1. Peripheral route model
Model of Peripheral Route (Model I): Hotel rating is the dependent and non-negative count variable. As Helpful Votes and Cities are count variables, this study employs a count data model. The Poisson regression model assumes that a Poisson process plots the dependent variable, and is a common count data model. However, the Poisson process requires the mean to equal variance. In this study, the mean of the Helpful Votes variable is less than the variance (mean = 1.91, standard variance = 13.63), and the mean of the Cities variable is less than the variance (mean = 2.83, standard variance = 1.32). This overdispersion necessitates the use of an extended Poisson regression model. Consequently, we present the negative binomial regression model in Equation (1), relaxing the Poisson assumption that the mean should equal the variance [43].
\(\begin{aligned}P\left(Y=y_{i} \mid x_{i}\right)=\frac{\Gamma\left(\theta+y_{i}\right)}{\Gamma\left(1+y_{i}\right) \Gamma(\theta)} r_{i}^{y_{i}}\left(1-r_{i}\right)^{\theta}\end{aligned}\) (1)
\(\begin{aligned}\text {Where }\lambda_{i}=\exp \left(x_{i}^{\prime} \beta\right), r_{i}=\lambda_{i} /\left(\theta+\lambda_{i}\right)\end{aligned}\)
In Equation(1), 𝑥𝑖 represents the vector of the independent variable and 𝑃(𝑌 = 𝑦𝑖|𝑋𝑖) is the probability of 𝑖𝑡ℎ hotel place 𝑦 rating under the condition of 𝑥𝑖 is the hotel rating probability , 𝑦𝑖 can represent the probability of Platform (APP) information and hotel characteristic information, respectively, and the 𝛽 vector of the parameter to be estimated. Moreover, 𝛤, 𝑟, and 𝜃 are the distribution parameters.
3.1.2. Central route model
Model of the central route (Models II and III): Model II represents the influence of various customer review variables on hotel ratings. Model III represents the influence of customer evaluation variables on hotel rankings under the moderating effect of experts. We consider merged data with practical research significance; that is, we collect hotel data with more online evaluations compressed to a point. Uncontrolled review satisfaction is a non-negative variable, and because it is a continuous variable, it would be more appropriate to use the type II Tobit model for the central route model, 𝑦𝑖 represents the probability of the impact of guest satisfaction on a hotel's ranking, 𝑥𝑖 represents the vector of customer satisfaction for the independent variable in Equation (2), 𝛽 is a parameter vector of each variable of the customer testimonial information to be estimated and 𝑢𝑖 stands for unoberviced factor.
\(\begin{aligned}\begin{array}{l}y_{i}=\left\{\begin{array}{r}y_{i}^{*} \quad \text { if } y_{i}^{*}>0 \\ 0 \quad \text { if } y_{i}^{*}<0\end{array}\right. \\ \text { where } y_{i}^{*}=x_{i}^{\prime} \beta+u_{i}\end{array}\end{aligned}\) (2)
3.2. Data Collection and Processing
Fig. 3 depicts the system design for the data collection and mining processes. We write a web crawler in Python to obtain review data for hotels on TripAdvisor.com for automatically crawling data from December 2021 to June 2015. Figure 1 depicts the system design for the data collection and mining processes. TripAdvisor.com is the most popular travel website in the world, with over 500 million travel reviews and recommendations, and over 200,000 new reviews added every day. From the website, we collected the data of 57,853 reviews from 80 hotels in five cities and excluded null or abnormal values from all 9,143 observations of data, yielding 37,023 observations of valid data.
Fig. 3. System design of data collection and mining process
3.3. Variables
3.3.1. Dependent variable
Hotel ratings are the dependent variable. Based on consumer evaluations of hotel products or services, the booking platform rates partner hotels from one to five, with one being the lowest rating and five being the highest.
3.3.2. Independent variables
We considered two groups of independent variables. One set includes variables from the peripheral route model. The first is called Helpful Votes. According to previous research, reviews of usefulness vote pairs have a significant effect on hotel ratings. The second is the City. We classify numbers 1–5 as 1. USA, 2. Japan, 3. South Korea, 4. Singapore, and 5. China.
Using sentiment mining technology, natural language user evaluations are transformed into a structured user sentiment database. The customer's opinion and emotional attitude toward a specific aspect of the hotel expressed in the evaluation can be interpreted as the customer's "vote" on the level of satisfaction with this element of the hotel in the review. Count the frequency of hotel feature words in the evaluation set [44] and the emotion frequency vector of hotel feature words in (1), (i =1, 2, 3, …, n), 𝐹(𝑊𝑖 +) represents the frequency of positive views of the feature word and 𝐹(𝑊𝑖 −) represents the frequency of negative views of the feature word. Therefore, consumer satisfaction with hotel feature Wi is given by (3).
\(\begin{aligned}\begin{array}{c}F\left(w_{i}\right)=\left\{F\left(w_{i}+\right), \quad F\left(w_{i}-\right)\right\} \\ S\left(w_{i}\right)=\frac{F\left(w_{i}+\right)}{F\left(w_{i}+\right)+F\left(w_{i}^{-}\right)}\end{array}\end{aligned}\) (3)
3.3.3. Moderator Variables
We contend that peripheral cues relate to popularity, whereas central cues relate to OCR usefulness. Peripheral cues to reviews can be found on an online vendor’s webpage without much cognitive effort. We predict the hotel rating impact based on the platform's recommendation information and its feature information.
The information in the OCR is the central route, which requires consumers to spend more time and cognitive effort evaluating it [45]. We investigate the impact of multiple moderating variables on hotel ratings in customer review data. Online professional reviewers are defined as those with a large number of above-average quality reviews and higher source credibility than novice reviewers [46]. Online professional reviewers are review platform users who have been designated as experts by the platform, such as the "contributions" metric, which reflects the number of users' contributions to the platform. Generally, consumers are more likely to write or post reviews when the experience is extreme. There is evidence that novices' assessments are more polarized/dichotomous [14]. Professional reviewers with greater expertise in generating reviews have more limitations in their extreme summative evaluations.
3.3.4. Control Variables
As previously stated, the review process can be divided into two steps: (1) Consumers choose to read reviews that they believe are related to popularity and (2) consumers choose to rate the usefulness of reviews. The central cue is associated with OCR content information. Consumers stop analyzing more information once they start processing information from peripheral cues if they influence their decision-making. Peripheral cues can influence attitudes and persuade individuals to seek additional information [19]. However, consumers continue to obtain central route information if they do not receive effective decision-making guidance through peripheral line information. Finally, when conducting the statistical analysis using Models II and III, the variables in Model I serve as control variables.
Table 3 describes the variables in this study’s model, and Table 4 lists the corresponding descriptive statistics.
Table 3. Description of variables
Table 4. Descriptive statistics of variable
4. Empirical Results
We employ Pearson's correlation between the independent variables (see Table 5) to test for multicollinearity. The correlation between the independent variables is not strong, ranging from -.260 to.579, and the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values indicate that multicollinearity is not a problem in this study. This study combines data processing methods from Test Mining with Python's Text Blob package to analyze each comment [16]. In this study, the White and DW test methods are employed in the regression analysis to further test the model, removing some of their influence on the research model.
Table 5. Variable correlations
For research Model I, we use a negative binomial regression model, and the results are presented in Table 6. The results rejected the hypothesis that the dispersion parameter is equal to zero because the likelihood-ratio 𝜒2 is 5518.02 with a p-value 0.1, and 8733.05 and with p-value 0.1 between five-star hotels and budget hotels. According to this result, the dependent variable distribution is more likely to be a negative binomial distribution than a Poisson distribution. Thus, our model selection is supported.
Table 6. Effects of the peripheral route on hotel ratings
*p < 0.1, **p< 0.05, ***p < 0.001
Hypothesis 1a: Increasing the number of helpful review votes negatively impacts five-star hotels. This is because Helpful Votes are negative and significant (b = -.0634, p-value < 0.5), this hypothesis is supported. The negative coefficient of Helpful Votes for five-star hotels indicates that when consumers are more willing to heed negative voices and avoid losses when searching for information online, the results follow the prospect theory and reviews written by pessimists receive more useful votes. A hotel with a higher overall rating receives more votes for usefulness and less, supporting H1a. However, H1b (getting more helpful reviews negatively impacts budget hotels) is not supported (b =.0015, p-value > 0.1). Table 6 indicates that Helpful Votes positively impact the hotel rating of economy hotels; that is, when optimists have more usefulness votes, the hotel rating is higher. However, this effect is only directional and has no statistical significance. Interestingly, the weight of the Discounted Prices variable in the results is very large (coef. = -0.2681), nearly 180 times that of Helpful Votes, indicating that discounted prices in economy hotels are a larger factor driving hotel ratings.
Table 6 presents that the Power Distance with rating coefficient is significantly positive (p-value 0.001) for both five-star and budget hotels. Thus, normalizing operating values for a variety of cultures can allow hotels to moderate customers' ratings of cultural factors (e.g., power distance) toward them, with reviewers with higher power distances leaving higher ratings for hotels, and hotels with established internationally standardized operations to respond to the preferences and values of customers of different cultures. Thus, H2a and H2b are supported. Table 7 showed that results supported H3a and H3b.
Table 7. Effects of cure route on ratings
*p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001
5. Discussion, Implications, Limitations and Further Research
5.1 General Discussion and Implications
This study investigated the performance of OCR and examined the impact of central and peripheral routes on hotel ratings and the impact of useful voting and power distance on hotel ratings in the peripheral route. This study demonstrated this in two dimensions of peripheral routes: The platform's recommendation information and the hotel's characteristic information. First, when individuals search for information, they focus on the peripheral route and their response to the environment is determined by emotion and recognition. Based on the emotional dimension, budget hotel customers are likely to believe that the hotel they select is more suitable and cost-effective. According to the cognitive dimension, consumers of five-star hotels are more likely to anticipate the theory and pay more attention to unfavorable information. Participation in helpful votes embodies online consumers' cognition of and emotions toward websites. Second, notably, the hotel's international standard operation, which is open to various cultural values, can enable the hotel to reduce customers’ cultural factors (e.g., power distance) in their ratings, thereby avoiding cultural differences among consumers in countries or regions with high power distance. Simultaneously, this study investigated the impact of customer satisfaction as an OCR performance indicator on hotel ratings. When professional reviewers act as moderators in the central route, it is important to note that greater expertise of professional reviewers in generating reviews leads to greater constraints on extreme summative evaluations.
This study makes three major theoretical contributions and discusses the practical implications for academia and practice. First, the impact of the complexity of online review information on hotel ratings has implications for future hotel management research. We investigated the OCR performance in two stages using ELM from a theoretical standpoint. In the first stage, consumers decide whether to read reviews influenced by a side trip. The second stage of consumer decision-making concerns whether the central route influences reviews. We integrate the platform's recommendation information of the peripheral path of simple information, the characteristic information of the hotel itself, and the complex information of the customers of the central path of comment information owing to the high value of online reviews. While most studies on the impact of hotel ratings have concentrated on aspects such as hotel pricing or service quality [46, 47]. Unlike previous studies that only considered one or two influencing factors to determine the impact on the hotel industry, this study considered the differences in the cognitive fluency of different individuals when it comes to information. Cognitive fluency makes it difficult for individuals to process information. a degree of subjective experience [48]. Consumers use OCR to find the information they require or to compare different options. When people seek information, they prioritize the peripheral route during the reading phase, whereas the central route is useful for surrogate comparisons. This study described OCR as a potentially cost-effective method for marketing hotels and discusses some of the emerging technological and ethical issues that marketers must deal with as they seek to capitalize on these emerging technologies. Second, this study helps improve the prediction and regression models for online hotel reviews. To the best of our knowledge, this review aims to discuss the dependent variables in the context of different cognitive paths or to conduct research on two types of representative hotels (five-star and budget hotels).
This study explored the value of reviewers' historical helpful votes for hotel ratings, whereas previous research has focused only on aggregated reviewer statistics [49], such as the number of comments received and the number of helpful votes cast. Simultaneously, we investigated the impact of customers from cities with different power distances on hotel ratings, whereas previous research focused merely on cultural differences [50] to avoid cultural differences and disregard the standardization of hotel internationalization. Furthermore, we investigated the relationship between customer satisfaction and hotel ratings, whereas previous studies have only examined the impact of the valence of online consumer reviews on hotels [51]. The primary results indicate a moderating relationship between expert satisfaction and hotel ratings. The empirical findings indicate that different cognitive pathways influence hotel ratings. This finding has implications for research related to prediction as well as causality/correlation relationship research. Investigate the online hotel review prediction problem to improve prediction accuracy.
Finally, from a methodological perspective, we employed a negative binomial regression model to investigate the factors influencing peripheral routes. Most previous studies used linear regression models with ordinary least squares (OLS) estimates or logistic models. However, while a count model would more appropriately avoid biased estimates of the number of helpful votes, the negative binomial regression model is better suited for the data in this study. Simultaneously, we employed the Tobit model to investigate the factors influencing the central route. The data were highly concentrated and merged, and at one point, the observed data were compressed into a non-negative variable. This necessitated the use of the negative binomial regression model and Tobit model in this study. The research on hotel management methodologies paves the way for new research directions, which is crucial for hotel management.
5.2 Limitations and Further Research
This study has some limitations that require additional research. First, we only used hotel OCR in New York, Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore, and Shanghai. Although these cities are ideal for our research, the stability of the model must be confirmed using a broader range of hotel data. Secondly, in the process of crawling pages using python, incomplete data crawling, data loss, etc., so there will be default values in the process of measuring statistics, although there is no impact on the results. However, programming techniques should be refined in subsequent research to obtain more stable and accurate databases. Finally, in addition to considering the three types of information variables of Platform (APP) information,hotel characteristic information and customer review information, we can further consider the weather on the day of check-in and the weather on the day of departure in future , and measure the impact of bad weather changes on customer review satisfaction. In addition to, the influence of word attributes (such as rational meaning, color meaning, stylistic color, etc.) in customer reviews on the helpful of consumers' reviews can be further explored. Alternatively, measuring how long consumers are separated from their review dates can have a positive impact on readers. The above ideas have not been realized due to the limited space of the article, and it is hoped that this part of the work will be carried out when the opportunity and ability are available.
References
- X. Liu, X. Wu, W. Shi, W. Tong, and Q. Ye, "The impacts of electronic word-of-mouth on highinvolvement product sales: Moderating effects of price, brand origin, and number of customers," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 177-189, 2022.
- D. Setiagraha, Z. Wahab, M. S. Shihab, and D. Susetyo, "Effect of word of mouth, price perception, and product quality on purchase decision pempek the local culinary products in palembang city," International Social Science Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 52-59, Mar. 2021. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1125
- U. M. Ananthakrishnan, B. Li, and M. D. Smith, "A Tangled Web: Should Online Review Portals Display Fraudulent Reviews?," Information System Research., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 950-971, Sep. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0925
- N. Donthu, S. Kumar, N. Pandey, N. Pandey, and A. Mishra, "Mapping the electronic word-ofmouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of. Business. Reserch., vol. 135, pp. 758-773, Oct. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.015
- X. Sun, M. Han, and J. Feng, "Helpfulness of online reviews: Examining review informativeness and classification thresholds by search products and experience products," Decis. Support System., vol. 124, p. 113099, Sep. 2019.
- L. R. Klein, "Evaluating the potential of interactive media through a new lens: Search versus experience goods," Journal of business research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 195-203, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00062-3
- A. I. Lopes, N. Dens, P. P. De, and K. F. De, "Which cues influence the perceived usefulness and credibility of an online review? A conjoint analysis," Online Inf. Rev., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2019-0287
- B. Fang, Q. Ye, D. Kucukusta, and R. Law, "Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics," Tourism Management, vol. 52, pp. 498-506, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.018
- L. Luo, S. Duan, S. Shang, and Y. Pan, "What makes a helpful online review? Empirical evidence on the effects of review and reviewer characteristics," Online Information Review, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 614-632, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0186
- B. Gao, X. Li, S. Liu, and D. Fang, "How power distance affects online hotel ratings: The positive moderating roles of hotel chain and reviewers' travel experience," Tourism Management, vol. 65, pp. 176-186, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.007
- A. X. Liu, Y. Xie, and J. Zhang, "It's Not Just What You Say, But How You Say It: The Effect of Language Style Matching on Perceived Quality of Consumer Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 70-86, May 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.11.001
- Y. Hong, N. Huang, G. Burtch, and C. Li, "Culture, conformity, and emotional suppression in online reviews," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 737-758, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00443
- R. A. King, P. Racherla, and V. D. Bush, "What we know and don't know about online word-ofmouth: A review and synthesis of the literature," Journal of interactive marketing, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 167-183, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001
- P. Nguyen, X. Wang, X. Li, and J. Cotte, "Reviewing experts' restraint from extremes and its impact on service providers," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 654-674, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucaa037
- Z. Xiang, Z. Schwartz, J. H. Gerdes Jr, and M. Uysal, "What can big data and text analytics tell us about hotel guest experience and satisfaction?," International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 44, pp. 120-130, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.10.013
- E. Cambria, B. Schuller, Y. Xia, and C. Havasi, "New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 15-21, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.30
- H. Li, Q. Ye, and R. Law, "Determinants of customer satisfaction in the hotel industry: An application of online review analysis," Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 784-802, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2012.708351
- L. Zhu, G. Yin, and W. He, "Is this opinion leader's review useful? Peripheral cues for online review helpfulness," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 267,
- R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo, "The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion," in Communication and persuasion: Springer Series in Social Psychology, YN, USA: Springer, 1986, pp. 1-24.
- B. Liu, J. Feng, M. Liu, H. Hu, and X. Wang, "Predicting the quality of user-generated answers using co-training in community-based question answering portals," Pattern Recognition. Letter., vol. 58, pp. 29-34, Jun. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.02.015
- N. Sahoo, C. Dellarocas, and S. Srinivasan, "The Impact of Online Product Reviews on Product Returns," Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 723-738, Sep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0736
- S. Dash, E. Bruning, and M. Acharya, "The effect of power distance and individualism on service quality expectations in banking," International Journal of Bank Marketing, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 336-358, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320910979870
- C. S. Kim and P. Aggarwal, "The customer is king: culture-based unintended consequences of modern marketing," Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 193-201, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-01-2015-1273
- P. Pia, F. Wei, S. Maria, and S. Pei, "Cultural values and health service quality in China," International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 55-73, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861311288640
- A. H. Huang, K. Chen, D. C. Yen, and T. P. Tran, "A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 48, pp. 17-27, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.010
- S. Karimi and F. Wang, "Online review helpfulness: Impact of reviewer profile image," Decision Support Systems, vol. 96, pp. 39-48, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.02.001
- S. Kusumasondjaja, T. Shanka, and C. Marchegiani, "Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: The roles of reviewer's identity and review valence," Journal of Vacation Marketing, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 185-195, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766712449365
- S. P. Eslami, M. Ghasemaghaei, and K. Hassanein, "Which online reviews do consumers find most helpful? A multi-method investigation," Decision Support Systems., vol. 113, pp. 32-42, Sep. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.06.012
- P. Racherla and W. Friske, "Perceived 'usefulness' of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 548-559, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2012.06.003
- S. Zhou and B. Guo, "The order effect on online review helpfulness: A social influence perspective," Decision Support Systems, vol. 93, pp. 77-87, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.016
- L. Kwok and K. L. Xie, "Factors contributing to the helpfulness of online hotel reviews: does manager response play a role?," International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2156-2177, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2015-0107
- A. Y. Chua and S. Banerjee, "Understanding review helpfulness as a function of reviewer reputation, review rating, and review depth," Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 354-362, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23180
- R. T. Cenfetelli and A. Schwarz, "Identifying and testing the inhibitors of technology usage intentions," Information systems research, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 808-823, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0295
- G. Hofstede, "Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context," Online readings in psychology and culture, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.
- M. Morales and R. Ladhari, "Comparative cross-cultural service quality: an assessment of research methodology," Journal of Service Management, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 241-265, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111124244
- K.-Y. Kwahk and D.-H. Park, "The effects of network sharing on knowledge-sharing activities and job performance in enterprise social media environments," Computers in Human. Behavor, vol. 55, pp. 826-839, Feb. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.044
- A. Cezar and H. Ogut, "Do domestic and international customers behave alike in online hotel booking?," Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 225-240, 2014.
- E. E. K. Kim, A. S. Mattila, and S. Baloglu, "Effects of gender and expertise on consumers' motivation to read online hotel reviews," Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 399- 406, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965510394357
- M. Lee, M. Jeong, and J. Lee, "Roles of negative emotions in customers' perceived helpfulness of hotel reviews on a user-generated review website," International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 762-783, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0626
- V. Browning, K. K. F. So, and B. Sparks, "The influence of online reviews on consumers' attributions of service quality and control for service standards in hotels," Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, vol. 30, no. 1-2, pp. 23-40, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2013.750971
- B. De Langhe, P. M. Fernbach, and D. R. Lichtenstein, "Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings," Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 817-833, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv047
- Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and Y. Yang, "The power of expert identity: How website-recognized expert reviews influence travelers' online rating behavior," Tourism Management, vol. 55, pp. 15-24, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.01.004
- K. Webel, Greene, W. H., Econometric analysis: Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, Stat. Pap, 2008.
- T. Allard, L. H. Dunn, and K. White, "Negative Reviews, Positive Impact: Consumer Empathetic Responding to Unfair Word of Mouth," Journal of Marketing, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 86-108, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920924389
- M. Mousavizadeh, M. Koohikamali, M. Salehan, and D. J. Kim, "An investigation of peripheral and central cues of online customer review voting and helpfulness through the lens of elaboration likelihood model," Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 24, pp. 211-231, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10069-6
- D. Gavilan, M. Avello, and G. Martinez-Navarro, "The influence of online ratings and reviews on hotel booking consideration," Tourism Management, vol. 66, pp. 53-61, Jun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.10.018
- C. A. Enz, L. Canina, and Z. Liu, "Competitive Dynamics and Pricing Behavior in US Hotels: The Role of Co-location," Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 230- 250, Oct. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250802305303
- A. L. Alter and D. M. Oppenheimer, "Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation," Personality and social psychology review, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 219-235, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
- Z. Liu and S. Park, "What makes a useful online review? Implication for travel product websites," Tourism management, vol. 47, pp. 140-151, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.020
- S. H. Ivanov and M. G. Ivanova, "Market penetration of hotel chains: Does culture matter?," Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 57, pp. 259-264, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.11.021
- Y.-C. Chou, H. H.-C. Chuang, and T.-P. Liang, "Elaboration likelihood model, endogenous quality indicators, and online review helpfulness," Decision Support Systems, vol. 153, 2022.