DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Comparison Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Models for Estimating Remaining Capacity of Lithium-Ion Batteries

  • Received : 2023.07.17
  • Accepted : 2023.08.30
  • Published : 2023.09.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to predict the remaining capacity of lithium-ion batteries and evaluate their performance using five artificial intelligence models, including linear regression analysis, decision tree, random forest, neural network, and ensemble model. We is in the study, measured Excel data from the CS2 lithium-ion battery was used, and the prediction accuracy of the model was measured using evaluation indicators such as mean square error, mean absolute error, coefficient of determination, and root mean square error. As a result of this study, the Root Mean Square Error(RMSE) of the linear regression model was 0.045, the decision tree model was 0.038, the random forest model was 0.034, the neural network model was 0.032, and the ensemble model was 0.030. The ensemble model had the best prediction performance, with the neural network model taking second place. The decision tree model and random forest model also performed quite well, and the linear regression model showed poor prediction performance compared to other models. Therefore, through this study, ensemble models and neural network models are most suitable for predicting the remaining capacity of lithium-ion batteries, and decision tree and random forest models also showed good performance. Linear regression models showed relatively poor predictive performance. Therefore, it was concluded that it is appropriate to prioritize ensemble models and neural network models in order to improve the efficiency of battery management and energy systems.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Following are results of a study on the "Leaders in INdustry-university Cooperation 3.0" Project, supported by the Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea.

References

  1. S.-B. Kim and S.-H. Lee, "Design and Development of a Public Waste Battery Diagnostic Device." International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 281-86. September 30, 2022. DOI:10.17703/IJACT.2022.10.3.281.
  2. S.-B. Kim and S.-H. Lee, "Development of Aging Diagnosis Device Through Real-Time Battery Internal Resistance Measurement." International Journal of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 129-35, May 31, 2022. DOI:10.7236/IJIBC.2022.14.2.129.
  3. S.-B. Kim and S.-H. Lee, "Battery Balancing Algorithm for an Agricultural Drone Using a State-of-Charge-Based Fuzzy Controller" Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 15: pp. 5277, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155277
  4. S.-B. Kim and S.-H. Lee, "Design and development of less than 1Kw Lithium rechargeable battery pack," International journal of internet, broadcasting and communication (IJIBC), Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 104-108, 2018. DOI : 10.7236/IJIBC.2018.10.3.104
  5. J. S. Jung, S. K. Jung and T. M. Roh, "Battery State-of-Health Estimation Using Machine Learning and Preprocessing with Relative State-of-Charge," Energies, Vol. 14, pp. 7206, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217206
  6. T. Cao, Y. Zheng and H. Dong, "Control of odor emissions from livestock farms: A review," Environmental Research, Vol. 225, pp. 115545, May 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.06.039.
  7. P. Sharma, B. J. Bora, "A Review of Modern Machine Learning Techniques in the Prediction of Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-Ion Batteries," Batteries, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 13, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010013.
  8. Y. Zhou and M. Huang, "On-board capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on charge phase," Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 13, no.2, pp. 733-741, 2018.