Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제55권9호
  • /
  • Pages.3241-3251
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyses on the recriticality and sub-critical boron concentrations during late phase of a severe accident of pressurized water reactors

  • 투고 : 2023.02.20
  • 심사 : 2023.06.10
  • 발행 : 2023.09.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The potential for recriticality and sub-critical boron concentrations is analyzed during the relocation of the fuel rods in the assembly, which we call late phase of a severe accident, via coupling between MELCOR and whole-core Monte Carlo analyses by Serpent 2. The recriticality, initiated during the early phase, is found to maintain when the fuel assemblies containing intact fuel rods are submerged by the cooling water. It is also found that the effect of the negative reactivity insertion via remaining fission products in the fuel debris increases as the burnup increases. The sub-critical boron concentrations during the late phase are found to be 76~544 ppm lower than those during the early phase. Therefore, it can be concluded that the boron concentration that prevents recriticality not only during the early phase but also during the late phase is the sub-critical boron concentration during the early phase.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KoFONS) using financial resources granted by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC) of the Republic of Korea (No. 2106007). The authors also would like to thank the reviewers for giving very detailed and useful reviews to strengthen the paper.

참고문헌

  1. B.R. Sehgal, et al., Nuclear Safety in Light Water Reactor - Severe Accident Phenomenology, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2012.
  2. W.B. Scott, et al., Recriticality in a BWR Following a Core Damage Event, NUREG/CR-5653, U.S. NRC, Washington, D.C, 1990.
  3. W. Frid, et al., Severe Accident, Recriticality Analyses (SARA), Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate, Stockholm, Sweden, 1999.
  4. Fauke, L.L.C. Associates, MAAP5 Modular Accident Analysis Program, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, 2008.
  5. J. Leppanen, The Serpent Monte Carlo code : status, development and application in 2013, Ann. Nucl. Energy 82 (2015) 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.08.024
  6. F.J. Rahn, et al., Technical Evaluation of Fukushima Accidents Phase 2 - Potential for Recriticality during Degraded Core Reflood, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, 2016.
  7. P. Darnowski, et al., Investigation of the recriticality potential during reflooding phase of Fukushima Daiichi Unit-3 accident, Ann. Nucl. Energy 99 (2017) 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.10.004
  8. R.O. Gauntt, et al., MELCOR Computer Code Manuals Vol. 1 : Primer and Users' Guide, Version 1.8.6, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 2005.
  9. Y. Lee, et al., Whole-core analyses on recriticality of conventional high power pressurized water reactor in Korea during early phase of severe accident, Ann. Nucl. Energy 143 (2020), 107461.
  10. U. S. NRC, 10CFR 72.124, Criteria for nuclear criticality safety, Washington, DC, 1988.
  11. M. Barrachin, et al., Late phase fuel degradation in the Phebus FP tests, Ann. Nucl. Energy 61 (2013) 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.03.041
  12. A. Seibert, et al., Thermophysical properties of U, Zr-oxides as prototypic corium materials, J. Nucl. Mater. 520 (2019) 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.019
  13. M. Salam, C.J. Hah, Comparative study on nuclear characteristics of APR1400 between 100% MOX core and UO2 core, Ann. Nucl. Energy 119 (2018) 374-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.05.008
  14. B. Cho, et al., User's Manual for the Rectangular Three-Dimensional Diffusion Nodal Code COREDAX-2 Version 1.0, KINS/HR-1355, NURAPT-2014-01, Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety (KINS), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon, Korea, 2011 (In Korean).
  15. R.M. Erick, R.A. Sallach, Fission Product Chemistry in the Primary System, Proc. Int'l. Mtg. On LWR Severe Accident Evaluation, 1983 (Cambridge. MA).
  16. D.A. Powers, J.E. Brockmann, A.W. Shiver, VANESA: A Mechanistic Model of Radionuclide Release and Aerosol Generation during Core Debris Interactions with Concrete, NUREC/CR-4308, SAND85-1370, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1986.
  17. O. De Luze, Degradation and oxidation of B4C control rod segments at high temperatures. A review and code interpretation of the BECARRE program, Nucl. Eng. Des. 259 (2013) 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.02.038
  18. T. Haste, et al., Study of boron behavior in the primary circuit of water reactors under severe accident conditions: a comparison of Phebus FPT3 results with other recent integral and separate-effect data, Nucl. Eng. Des. 246 (2012) 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.08.031
  19. G. Repetto, et al., B4C oxidation modelling in severe accident codes: applications to PHEBUS and QUENCH experiments, Ann. Nucl. Energy 52 (2010) 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.09.017
  20. M. Steinbruck, Influence of boron carbide on core degradation during severe accidents in LWRs, Ann. Nucl. Energy 64 (2014) 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.09.027