Acknowledgement
This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFE0191700) and by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2008085MA23).
References
- Y.C. Wu, S. S, ahin, Fusion energy production, Compr. Energy Syst. 13 (2018) 538-589, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809597-3.00330-8.
- L.M. Giancarli, X. Bravo, S. Cho, et al., Overview of recent ITER TBM Program activities, Fusion Eng. Des. 158 (2020), 111674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111674.
- X.H. Wu, H.B. Liao, X.Y. Wang, et al., Design optimization and analysis of CN HCCB TBM-set, Fusion Eng. Des. 136 (2018) 839-846, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.04.018.
- F. Hernandez, P. Pereslavtsev, Q. Kang, et al., A new HCPB breeding blanket for the EU DEMO: evolution, rationale and preliminary performances, Fusion Eng. Des. 124 (2017) 882-886, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.02.008.
- F.A. Hernandez, F. Arbeiter, L.V. Boccaccini, et al., Overview of the HCPB research activities in EUROfusion, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 46 (2018) 2247-2261, https://doi.org/10.1109/tps.2018.2830813.
- F.A. Hernandez, P. Pereslavtsev, G. Zhou, et al., Consolidated design of the HCPB breeding blanket for the pre-conceptual design phase of the EU DEMO and harmonization with the ITER HCPB TBM program, Fusion Eng. Des. 157 (2020), 111614, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111614.
- P. Pereslavtsev, U. Fischer, F. Hernandez, et al., Neutronic analyses for the optimization of the advanced HCPB breeder blanket design for DEMO, Fusion Eng. Des. 124 (2017) 910-914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.01.028.
- D. Zhang, S. Cui, J. Cheng, et al., Improving the optimization algorithm of NTCOC for application in the HCSB blanket for CFETR Phase II, Fusion Eng. Des. 135 (2018) 216-227, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.07.027.
- J. Aubert, G. Aiello, C. Bachmann, et al., Optimization of the first wall for the DEMO water cooled lithium lead blanket, Fusion Eng. Des. 98 (2015) 1206-1210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.01.008.
- F. Gaudier, URANIE: the CEA/DEN uncertainty and sensitivity platform, Procedia Soc. Behav Sci. 2 (2010) 7660-7661, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.166.
- I. Antcheva, M. Ballintijn, B. Bellenot, et al., ROOT-a C++ framework for petabyte data storage, statistical analysis and visualization, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 1384-1385, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2011.02.008.
- C.H. Noh, W. Chung, J. Lim, et al., Optimization of the outer support in the ITER lower cryostat thermal shield, Fusion Eng. Des. 103 (2016) 85-92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.12.014.
- C. Coello, C.A. Coello, A short tutorial on evolutionary multiobjective optimization, in: International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 21-40, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44719-9_2.
- P. Seferlis, M.C. Georgiadis (Eds.), The Integration of Process Design and Control, Elsevier, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1570-7946(04)80052-x.
- N. Srinivas, K. Deb, Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms, Evol. Comput. 2 (1994) 221-248, https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221.
- K. Deb, S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, et al., A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II, in: International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000, pp. 849-858, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83.
- E. Zitzler, Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Methods and Applications, vol. 63, Shaker, Ithaca, 1999.
- E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm, TIK-report. 103 (2001), https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-004284029.
- D.W. Corne, N.R. Jerram, J.D. Knowles, et al., PESA-II: region-based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization, in: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, July 2001, pp. 283-290.
- K. Deb, H. Jain, An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18 (4) (2013) 577-601, https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2013.2281535.
- H. Ishibuchi, R. Imada, Y. Setoguchi et al., Performance comparison of NSGA-II and NSGA-III on various many-objective test problems. In 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). pp. 3045-3052. doi: 10.1109/cec.2016.7744174.
- G.C. Ciro, F. Dugardin, F. Yalaoui, et al., A NSGA-II and NSGA-III comparison for solving an open shop scheduling problem with resource constraints, IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (2016) 1272-1277, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.07.690.
- V. Yannibelli, E. Pacini, D. Monge, et al., A comparative analysis of NSGA-II and NSGA-III for autoscaling parameter sweep experiments in the cloud, Sci. Program. 6 (2020) 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4653204.
- A. Teymourifar, A.M. Rodrigues, J.S. Ferreira, A comparison between NSGA-II and NSGA-III to solve multi-objective sectorization problems based on statistical parameter tuning, in: 2020 24th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC), IEEE, 2020, pp. 64-74, https://doi.org/10.1109/cscc49995.2020.00020.
- R. Storn, K. Price, Differential evolutionea simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optim. 11 (4) (1997) 341-359, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328.
- J. Qiang, A Unified Differential Evolution Algorithm for Global Optimization.
- F. Ge, K. Li, Y. Han, Solving interval many-objective optimization problems by combination of NSGA-III and a local fruit fly optimization algorithm, Appl. Soft Comput. 114 (2022), 108096, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108096.
- G. Rudolph, Convergence analysis of canonical genetic algorithms, IEEE Trans. Neural Network. 5 (1) (1994) 96-101, https://doi.org/10.1109/72.265964.
- S. Das, P.N. Suganthan, Differential evolution: a survey of the state-of-the-art, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 15 (1) (2010) 4-31, https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2010.2059031.
- S. Huband, P. Hingston, L. Barone, et al., A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10 (5) (2006) 477-506, https://doi.org/10.1109/tevc.2005.861417.
- C. Audet, J. Bigeon, D. Cartier, et al., Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization, Eur. J. Oper. Res. 292 (2) (2021) 397-422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.016.
- W. Zhou, G. Sun, Z. Yang, et al., BP neural network based reconstruction method for radiation field applications, Nucl. Eng. Des. 380 (2021), 111228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111228.
- M. Ni, C. Lian, S. Zhang, et al., Structural design and preliminary analysis of liquid leadelithium blanket for China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor, Fusion Eng. Des. 94 (2015) 61-66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.03.018.
- W. Li, W. Shi, Q. Zeng, et al., The assessment of shutdown dose rate and radioactive waste of HCSB during its replacement in CFETR, Fusion Eng. Des. 131 (2018) 15-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.04.031.
- Z. Lv, H. Chen, C. Chen, et al., Preliminary neutronics design and analysis of helium cooled solid breeder blanket for CFETR, Fusion Eng. Des. 95 (2015) 79-83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.04.038.
- S. Cui, D. Zhang, Y. Lang, et al., A new method for improving the tritium breeding and releasing performance of China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor phase II helium-cooled ceramic breeder blanket, Int. J. Energy Res. 44 (7) (2020) 5977-5989, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5392.
- Y.C. Wu, Multifunctional neutronics calculation methodology and program for nuclear design and radiation safety evaluation, Fusion Sci. Technol. 74 (4) (2018) 321-329, https://doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2018.1475162.
- R.A. Forrest, R. Capote, N. Otsuka, et al., FENDL-3 Library-Summary Documentation (No. INDC (NDS)-0628), International Atomic Energy Agency, 2012.
- K.L. Lawrence, ANSYS Workbench Tutorial Release 14, SDC publications, 2012.
- H. Chen, M. Li, Z. Lv, et al., Conceptual design and analysis of the helium cooled solid breeder blanket for CFETR, Fusion Eng. Des. 96 (2015) 89-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.02.045.
- M. Moscardini, Helium Cooled Pebble Bed Test Blanket Module for a Nuclear Fusion Reactor: Thermo Mechanical Analyses of the Breeder Unit, 2013.
- J. Reimann, S. Hermsmeyer, Thermal conductivity of compressed ceramic breeder pebble beds, Fusion Eng. Des. 61 (2002) 345-351, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-3796(02)00165-5.
- P. Kittisuwan, Relation between Penalized Least Squares Regression and Bayesian Estimation in AWGN Based on Novel Penalty Function of Pareto Density, ICT Express, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2022.01.012.
- J. Li, Q. Zeng, M. Chen, J. Jiang, S. Zheng, FDS Team, Comparison analysis of 1D/2D/3D neutronics modeling for a fusion reactor, Fusion Eng. Des. 83 (10-12) (2008) 1678-1682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2008.06.051.
- J.C. Helton, F.J. Davis, Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 81 (1) (2003) 23-69, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0951-8320(03)00058-9.
- L. El-Guebaly, V. Massaut, K. Tobita, et al., Evaluation of Recent Scenarios for Managing Fusion Activated Materials: Recycling and Clearance, Avoiding Disposal, UWFDM-1333, University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology Institute~ Sep, 2007.