대한정형도수물리치료학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy)

  • 제29권2호
  • /
  • Pages.69-75
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-3680(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-7282(eISSN)
대한정형도수물리치료학회 (Korean Academy of Orthopedic Manual Physical Therapy)
권호 표지

어깨의 능동 수축을 동반한 관절가동술이 부리돌기와 위팔뼈 머리 사이의 거리에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Mobilization Combined with Shoulder Active Contraction of Depth between the Coracoid Process and Humeral Head

  • 김선민 (한국교통대학교 일반대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 장상훈 (한국교통대학교 보건생명대학 물리치료학과)
  • Sun-min Kim (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • Sang-hun Jang (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 투고 : 2023.08.11
  • 심사 : 2023.08.24
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study examined the distance between the coracoid process and the humeral head using an ultrasonography device when shoulder active contraction were applied according to the guided direction in the end range of shoulder mobilization. This study aims to provide essential data on treating shoulder disease patients. Methods: The subjects of this study were 20 adults with healthy shoulder joints. ultrasonography (US) equipment was used to examine shoulder joint mobilization under two conditions: (1) anteroposterior (AP) joint mobilization and (2) superoinferior (SI) joint mobilization. Shoulder active contraction was assessed in the end range. The distance between the coracoid process and the humeral head was measured. A linear probe was used for US; the frequency was set to 7.5MHz, and the US image display method was set to B-mode. The US measurement values were measured in (1) the starting position, (2) the end range position, and (3) the end range position of the shoulder active contraction, and the moving distance was drawn in a straight line through the US image. The distance was determined as the measurement value, and the average values were compared. Reults: The results were as follows: (1) the measured AP Joint mobilization increased by an average of .52cm from the end range of the joint mobilization with shoulder active contraction; (2) the measured SI Joint mobilization increased by an average of .49cm from the end range of the joint. Conclusion: When shoulder mobilization is applied, the distance between the coracoid process and the humeral head increases when muscle contraction occurs through shoulder active contraction in the end range, according to the therapist's guidance. Therefore, shoulder mobilization combined with shoulder active contraction is an effective treatment method for patients with shoulder injuries.

키워드

과제정보

본 과제(결과물)는 2023년도 교육부의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 지자체-대학 협력기반지역혁신 사업의 결과이다(2021RIS-001)(134570811).

참고문헌

  1. Ajit D, Shika S. Effects of mobilization with movement (MWM) in shoulder impingement syndrome patients on acromiohumeral distance using ultrasonography. Journal of Exercise Science & Physiotherapy. 2016;12(2):28-35. https://doi.org/10.18376/jesp/2016/v12/i2/111262
  2. Azzoni R, Cabitza P, Parrini M, et al. Sonographic evaluation of subacromial space. Ultrasonics. 2004;42(1-9):683-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2003.11.015
  3. Cholewinski JJ, Kusz DJ, Wojciechowski P, et al. Ultrasound measurement of rotator cuff thickness and acromio-humeral distance in the diagnosis of subacromial impingement syndrome of the shoulder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:408-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-007-0443-4
  4. Djordjevic OC, Vukicevic D, Katunac L, et al. Mobilization with movement and kinesiotaping compared with a supervised exercise program for painful shoulder: Results of a clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35(6):454-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.07.006
  5. Ellenbecker TS, Cools A. Rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome and rotator cuff injuries: An evidence-based review. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(5):319-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058875
  6. Elly H, Kevin B. Management of Neuromusculoskeletal Disorders-Volume 1. Churchill Livingstone. London. 2013.
  7. Hing W, Bigelow R, Bremner T, et al. Mulligan's mobilization with movement: A systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(2):39-66. https://doi.org/10.1179/jmt.2009.17.2.39E
  8. Hing W, Hall T, Mulligan B, et al. The Mulligan Concept of Manual Therapy-eBook: Textbook of Techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences. Chatswood. 2014.
  9. Ludewig PM, Cook TM. Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther. 2000;80(3):276-291. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/80.3.276
  10. Luque-Suarez A, Navarro-Ledesma S, Petocz P, et al. Short term effects of kinesiotaping on acromiohumeral distance in asymptomatic subjects: A randomised controlled trial. Man Ther. 2013;18(6):573-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.06.002
  11. Mannion AF, Pulkovski N, Gubler D et al. Muscle thickness changes during abdominal hollowing: An assessment of between-day measurement error in controls and patients with chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:494-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0589-x
  12. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Survey of anesthesiology. 1967;11(2):89-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/00132586-196704000-00002
  13. Michener LA, Subasi Yesilyaprak SS, Seitz AL, et al. Supraspinatus tendon and subacromial space parameters measured on ultrasonographic imaging in subacromial impingement syndrome. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015;23:363-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2542-8
  14. Mulligan B. The painful dysfunctional shoulder. A new treatment approach using 'Mobilisation with Movement'. New Zealand J Physiother. 2003;31(3):140-143.
  15. Neer CS. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat R. 1983;173:70-77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198303000-00010
  16. Tandon A, Bhatt S, Bhargava SK, et al. Dynamic musculoskeletal sonography. JIMSA, 2013;26(1):21-24.
  17. Wise CH. Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy: from Art to Evidence. FA Davis. Philadelphia. 2015.