한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제62권3호
  • /
  • Pages.303-326
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개인 맞춤형 수학 학습을 위한 인공지능 교육시스템의 기능과 적용 사례 분석

Analysis of functions and applications of intelligent tutoring system for personalized adaptive learning in mathematics

  • 성지현 (서울대학교사범대학부설초등학교)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.10
  • 심사 : 2023.08.17
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

수학은 계통성이 강한 학문으로 이전 단계에서의 학습 결손이 다음 학습에 큰 영향을 주기 때문에 학생들의 학습이 잘 이루어졌는지 수시로 확인하고, 즉각적으로 피드백을 제공해 주는 것이 필요하며, 이를 위해 수학교육에서 인공지능 교육시스템(ITS)을 활용할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 개인 맞춤형 수학 학습을 실행하기 위해 적용될 수 있는 인공지능 교육시스템의 기능이 무엇인지 살펴보고, 이를 실제로 적용해 본 결과를 분석하여 인공지능 교육시스템을 활용한 개인 맞춤형 수학 학습의 효과성을 구체적으로 살펴보는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 개인 맞춤형 학습과 수학교육에서 인공지능이 활용된 선행연구 내용을 분석하여 개인 맞춤형 수학 학습을 위한 인공지능 교육시스템의 기능을 추출하고, 이것을 반영한 학습 및 수업을 설계하여 초등학교 5학년 학생들에게 약 3개월 간 적용해 본 결과를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 개인 맞춤형 수학 학습을 위해 활용될 수 있는 인공지능 교육시스템의 기능은 크게 진단 및 평가, 분석 및 예측, 피드백 및 콘텐츠 제공으로 나눌 수 있었다. 또한 이러한 기능을 반영한 학습 설계를 초등학생들에게 적용한 결과, 개인 맞춤형 수학 학습에 인공지능 교육시스템이 어떻게 효과적으로 활용될 수 있는지에 대한 시사점을 얻었다. 그리고 앞으로 인공지능 교육시스템을 활용한 개인 맞춤형 수학 학습이 더욱 효과적으로 이루어질 수 있기 위해 더 정교한 기술과 자료 개발이 필요하다는 점을 제언하였다.

Mathematics is a discipline with a strong systemic structure, and learning deficits in previous stages have a great influence on the next stages of learning. Therefore, it is necessary to frequently check whether students have learned well and to provide immediate feedback, and for this purpose, intelligent tutoring system(ITS) can be used in math education. For this reason, it is necessary to reveal how the intelligent tutoring system is effective in personalized adaptive learning. The purpose of this study is to investigate the functions and applications of intelligent tutoring system for personalized adaptive learning in mathematics. To achieve this goal, literature reviews and surveys with students were applied to derive implications. Based on the literature reviews, the functions of intelligent tutoring system for personalized adaptive learning were derived. They can be broadly divided into diagnosis and evaluation, analysis and prediction, and feedback and content delivery. The learning and lesson plans were designed by them and it was applied to fifth graders in elementary school for about three months. As a result of this study, intelligent tutoring system was mostly supporting personalized adaptive learning in mathematics in several ways. Also, the researcher suggested that more sophisticated materials and technologies should be developed for effective personalized adaptive learning in mathematics by using intelligent tutoring system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bray, B., & McClaskey, K. (2014). Make learning personal: The what, who, wow, where, and why. Corwin Press.
  2. Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Promoting personalized learning in flipped classrooms: Systematic review study. MDPI, 14(18), 11393. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811393
  3. Chang, H. W., & Nam, J. H. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in elementary mathematics education. -Focusing on the math class support system "Knock-knock! math expedition"- The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31, Supplement, 105-123. http://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.31..202101.105
  4. Choi, S. Y. (2022). Development of an instructional design model for elementary mathematics classes for elementary mathematics classes based on an artificial intelligence education system [Master's thesis, Seoul National University]. https://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/public_resource/pdf/000000169790_20230708201423.pdf
  5. Ee, J. H., & Huh, N. (2020). Developing adaptive math learning program using artificial intelligence. East Asian Math. 36(2), 273-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2020.018
  6. Kim, H. K., Park, C. S., Jeong, S. H., & Ko, H. K. (2018). A view on complementary relation of human teacher and AI teacher in future education. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.6.189
  7. Kim, S. H. (2019). Delphi study on the concept and the teaching and learning methods of meta-affect in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 29(2), 321-338. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2019.5.29.2.321
  8. Kim, S. H. (2021). Development and application of meta-affect learning strategies in mathematics. School Mathematics, 23(4), 593-615. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.12.23.4.593
  9. Kim, S. Y., & Cho, M. K. (2022). AI-based educational platform analysis supporting personalized mathematics learning. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(3), 417-438. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2022.36.3.417
  10. Kim, T. R., Ryu, M. Y., & Han, S. W. (2020). Framework research for AI education for elementary and middle school students. Journal of The Korean Association of Artificial Intelligence Education, 1(1), 31-42.
  11. Lee, H. G. (2023). Development of data-based personalized instruction design principals using artificial intelligence education system: Focusing on elementary school mathematics [Master's thesis, Seoul National University]. https://dcollection.snu.ac.kr/public_resource/pdf/000000176418_20230708201501.pdf
  12. Lee, J. H., & Lee, J. S. (2009). The relationship between metacognition and self-regulated learning abilities of gifted students: The mediating effect of self-determined motivation. Secondary Education Institute, 57(1), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.25152/ser.2009.57.1.89
  13. Lee, W. S., Chun, J. Y., Lee, Y. M., Park, K. S., & Parck, S. R. (2022). Contrastive learning for knowledge tracing. WWW '22: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. 2330-2338. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512105
  14. Lim, M. I., Kim, H. M., Nam, J. H., & Hong, O. S. (2021). Exploring the application of elementary mathematics supporting system using artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. School Mathematics, 23(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.06.23.2.251
  15. Lim, W., & Park, M. M. (2021). AI-based mathematics education: A review of issues in international research. Korean Association of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(14), 621-635. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.14.621
  16. Ministry of Education (2022). 2022 Revised curriculum: General introduction. Ministry of Education.
  17. Office of Educational Technology U.S. Department of Education (2010). Transforming American education: Learning technology plan. retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/netp2010.pdf
  18. Park, M. G. (2020a). The trends of using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.31..202008.91
  19. Park, M. G. (2020b). Applications and possibilities of artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.545
  20. Peng, H., Ma, S., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Personalized adaptive learning: an emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0089-y
  21. Seong, T. J., & Si, K. J. (2006). Research methodology. Hakjisa.
  22. Shin, D. J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in primary and secondary education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(3), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.30.3.531
  23. So, Y. H. (2007). Does choice improve motivation to learn? -Current issues in research on the effects of choice and its implications- The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 19(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2007.19.1.77
  24. Son, B. E., & Ko, H. K. (2021). Exploring the conceptual elements and meaning of meta-affect in mathematics learning. Communications of Mathematical Education, 35(4), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2021.35.4.359
  25. Wang, S., Christensen, C., Cui, W., Tong, R., Yarnall, L., Shear, L., & Feng, M. (2020). When adaptive learning is effective learning: comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 793-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1808794