DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Implementation of STEM -Identification of Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs-

융합 프로그램의 개발과 적용 -수학 교사의 신념을 중심으로-

  • Noh, Jihwa (Department of Mathematics Education Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2023.08.04
  • Accepted : 2023.08.16
  • Published : 2023.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to investigate mathematics teachers' beliefs regarding the implementation of STEM approaches in secondary school mathematics classes and to identify the factors influencing their beliefs. A survey on teachers' beliefs about applying STEM in mathematics classes was developed and distributed online to mathematics teachers from middle and high schools in two metropolitan areas. Eighty-two surveys were returned from the teachers. Factor analysis revealed that the items were distributed among five main aspects. The findings indicated that most teachers believed in the necessity of implementing STEM education. However, some teachers expressed concerns about the effectiveness of implementation due to the lack of materials, resources, and equipment needed for STEM implementation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a 2-year Research Grant of Pusan National University.

References

  1. Asghar, A., Ellington, R., Rice, E., Johnson, F., & Prime, G. M. (2012). Supporting STEM education in secondary science contexts. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 6(2), 85-125. 
  2. Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112-128.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.991099
  3. Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
  4. Cantrell, P., Pekcan, G., Itani, A., & Velasquez-Bryant, N. (2006). The effects of engineering modules on student learning in middle school science classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 301-309.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00905.x
  5. Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2018). Characterizing elementary teachers' enactment of high leverage practices through engineering design-based science instruction. Science Education, 102(2), 342-376.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21325
  6. Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Driven by beliefs: understanding challenges physical science teachers face when integrating engineering and physics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(2), 47-61. 
  7. Goodpaster, K. P. S., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers' perceptions of rural STEM teaching: implications for rural teacher retention. Rural Educator, 33(3), 9-22. 
  8. Graves, L. A., Hughes, H., & Balgopal, M. M. (2016). Teaching STEM through Horticulture: Implementing an Edible Plant Curriculum at a STEM-Centric Elementary School. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(3), 192-207.  https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.03192
  9. Guzey, S. S., Ring-Whalen, E. A., Harwell, M., & Peralta, Y. (2019). Life STEM: A case study of life science learning through engineering design. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 23-42.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9860-0
  10. Hargreaves, A., & Moore, S. (2000). Curriculum Integration and Classroom Relevance: A Study of Teachers' Practice. Journal of curriculum and supervision, 15(2), 89-112. 
  11. Herro, D. & Quigley, C. (2017). Exploring teachers' perceptions of STEAM teaching through professional development: implications for teacher educators. Professional Development in Education, 43, 416-438.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507
  12. Hsu, M. C., Purzer, S., & Cardella, M. E. (2011). Elementary teachers' views about teaching design, engineering, and technology. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 31-39. 
  13. Koklu, O. (2019). Effects of school characteristics on students' mathematics performances in high schools: Does stem education make any difference? International Journal of Development Research. 9(10), 30737-30746. 
  14. Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  15. Lesseig, K., Elliott, R., Kazemi, E., Kelley-Petersen, M., Campbell, M., Mumme, J., & Carroll, C. (2017). Leader noticing of facilitation in video cases of mathematics professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20(6), 591-619.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-016-9346-y
  16. Levitt, K. E. (2002). An analysis of elementary teachers' beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science education, 86(1), 1-22  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1042
  17. Martinez-Sierra, G., Garcia-Garcia, J., Valle-Zequeida, M., & Dolores-Flores, C. (2020). High School Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs About Assessment in Mathematics and the Connections to Their Mathematical Beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 485-507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09967-2
  18. Maass, K., Swan, M., & Aldorf, A. M. (2017). Mathematics teachers' beliefs about inquiry- based learning after a professional development course An International Study. Journal of Education - and Training Studies, 5(9), 1-17.  https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2556
  19. McMullin, K., & Reeve, E. (2014). Identifying perceptions that contribute to the development of successful project lead the way pre-engineering programs in Utah. Journal of Technology Education, 26(1), 22-46. 
  20. McNeill, K. L., & Knight, A. M. (2013). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of scientific argumentation: The impact of professional development on K-12 teachers. Science Education, 97(6), 936-972. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21081
  21. Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C. D. (2008). Middle-school science through design- based learning versus scripted inquiry: Better overall science concept learning and equity gap reduction. Journal of engineering education, 97(1), 71-85.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x
  22. Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157-168.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.667014
  23. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
  24. Park, H., Byun, S., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers' perceptions and practices of STEAM education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753.
  25. Park, M., Dimitrov, D. M., Patterson, L. G., & Park, D. (2017). Early childhood teachers' beliefs about readiness for teaching science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 15, 275-291.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X15614040
  26. Smith, R. C., Kim, S., & McIntyre, L. (2016). Relationships between prospective middle grades mathematics teachers' beliefs and TPACK. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 359-373.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1189624
  27. Srikoom, W., Hanuscin, D. L., & Faikhamta, C. (2017). Perceptions of in-service teachers toward teaching STEM in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 1-23. 
  28. Van Haneghan, J. P., Pruet, S. A., Neal-Waltman, R., & Harlan, J. M. (2015). Teacher beliefs about motivating and teaching students to carry out engineering design challenges: Some initial data. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 5(2), 1-9. 
  29. Weinberg, A. E., & McMeeking, L. B. (2017). Toward meaningful interdisciplinary education: High school teachers' views of mathematics and science integration. School Science and Mathematics, 117(5), 204-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12224