Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Color Stability and Surface Roughness of 3D Printing Resin by Polishing Methods

연마 방법에 따른 3D 프린팅 레진의 색조 안정성과 표면 조도의 비교

  • Heeju Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Yujin Kim (Department of Biomaterials Science, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jongsoo Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Joonhaeng Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Mi Ran Han (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jisun Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jongbin Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 김희주 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김유진 (단국대학교 치과대학 생체재료학교실) ;
  • 김종수 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이준행 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 한미란 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신지선 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2023.03.08
  • Accepted : 2023.04.25
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the color stability and surface roughness of three-dimensional (3D) printing resin according to polishing methods. 3D-printed resin specimens were fabricated at TC-80DP (Graphy, Seoul, Korea) with a stereolithography 3D printer, and the specimens were divided into three groups, each of which was not polished, was polished using Enhance®, and was polished using a Sof-LexTM disc. The CIE L*a*b* value and the surface roughness of each group were measured and immersed in artificial saliva and orange juice after 0, 1, 7, 30, and 60 days, and the color difference (ΔE*) was calculated. As a result of the study, no noticeable color change was observed in artificial saliva, but a noticeable color change was demonstrated in orange juice after 60 days of immersion, and the difference was significant. In the Sof-LexTM group, surface roughness according to the solution was found to be significantly higher in the orange juice than that in artificial saliva. No significant difference in color change was found according to the polishing method, but surface roughness was significantly lower in the Sof-LexTM group than both that of the unpolished group and that of the Enhance® group. Nevertheless, all groups exhibited clinically acceptable properties regardless of their higher surface roughness than the threshold for plaque accumulation. Overall, this study recommends utilizing Sof-LexTM for polishing 3D printing resin when used in primary anterior tooth coverage.

이 연구의 목적은 3D 프린팅 레진의 연마 방법에 따른 색조 안정성과 표면 조도를 시간에 따라 비교하는 것이다. 3D 프린터와 TC-80DP 레진을 이용하여 3D 프린팅 레진 시편을 제작하였고, 각 시편은 연마하지 않은 군, Enhance®군, Sof-LexTM군으로 분류되었다. 각 군은 연마 직후 기준점을 측정하고, 다시 인공 타액과 오렌지 주스에 나누어 침전시킨 뒤, 침전 1, 7, 30, 60일에 CIE L*a*b* 값의 색차(ΔE*)와 각 시점의 표면 조도가 측정되었다. 연구 결과, 60일 침전 후 인공 타액에서는 육안으로 확인 가능한 정도의 색조 변화는 일어나지 않았으나 오렌지 주스에서는 육안으로 확인 가능한 색조 변화가 나타났고, 용액에 따른 차이는 유의미했다. 표면 조도는 Sof-LexTM군에서만 오렌지 주스가 인공 타액보다 유의하게 높았다. 연마 방법에 따른 색조 변화의 차이는 없었으나 표면 조도는 Sof-LexTM군이 연마하지 않은 군과 Enhance®군보다 유의하게 낮았으며, 모든 군에서 치태 침착 임계 조도보다는 높았지만, 임상적으로 허용 가능한 정도였다. 이번 연구 결과, 유전치 전장관 수복을 위해 영구 수복용 3D 프린팅 레진 사용 시 착색제 섭취에 유의해야 하며, SofLexTM를 이용하여 연마하는 것이 권장된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Scotti CK, Velo MMAC, Rizzante FAP, Nascimento TRL, Mondelli RFL, Bombonatti JFS : Physical and Surface Properties of a 3D-Printed Composite Resin for a Digital Workflow. J Prosthet Dent, 124:614.E1-E5, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.029
  2. Alharbi N, Osman RB, Wismeijer D : Factors Influencing the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Full-Coverage Dental Restorations Using Stereolithography Technology. Int J Prosthodont, 29:503-510, 2016. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4835
  3. Almejrad L, Yang CC, Morton D, Lin WS : The Effects of Beverages and Surface Treatments on the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Interim Restorations. J Prosthodont, 31:165-170, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13377
  4. Shin JW, Kim JE, Choi YJ, Shin SH, Nam NE, Shim JS, Lee KW : Evaluation of the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Crown and Bridge Materials against Various Sources of Discoloration: An In Vitro Study. Materials (Basel), 13:5359, 2020.
  5. Radwan H, Elnaggar G, Deen ISE : Surface Roughness and Color Stability of 3D Printed Temporary Crown Material in Different Oral Media (In vitro study). Int J Appl Dent Sci, 7:327-334, 2021. https://doi.org/10.22271/oral.2021.v7.i1e.1150
  6. Waggoner WF : Restoring Primary Anterior Teeth: Updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent, 37:163-170, 2015.
  7. Kim N, Kim H, Kim IH, Lee J, Lee KE, Lee HS, Kim JH, Song JS, Shin Y : Novel 3D Printed Resin Crowns for Primary Molars: In Vitro Study of Fracture Resistance, Biaxial Flexural Strength, and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis. Children, 9:1445, 2022.
  8. Paditar N, Kaurani P : Colour Stability: An Important Physical Property of Esthetic Restorative Materials. Int J Clin Dent Sci, 1:81-84, 2010.
  9. Karaarslan ES, Bulbul M, Yildiz E, Secilmis A, Sari F, Usumez A : Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Resin Composites after Accelerated Aging. Dent Mater J, 32:58-67, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2012-045
  10. Schmitt VL, Puppin-Rontani RM, Naufel FS, Nahsan FP, Sinhoreti MAC, Baseggio W : Effect of the Polishing Procedures on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Composite Resins. ISRN Dent, 2011:617672, 2011.
  11. Berber A, Cakir FY, Baseren M, Gurgan S : Effect of Different Polishing Systems and Drinks on the Color Stability of Resin Composite. J Contemp Dent Pract, 14:662-667, 2013. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1382
  12. Baik MK, Kim CC, Jang KT : Effects of Polishing Methods on the Surface Characteristics of Composite Resins. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 43:275-283, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2016.43.3.275
  13. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL : Color and Opacity Variations in Three Different Resin-based Composite Products after Water Aging. Dent Mater, 20:530-534, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2002.11.001
  14. Berastegui E, Canalda C, Brau E, Miquel C : Surface Roughness of Finished Composite Resins. J Prosthet Dent, 68:742-749, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90195-G
  15. Garcia CR, Rumpf RC, Tsang HH, Barton JH : Effects of Extreme Surface Roughness on 3D Printed Horn Antenna. Electronics Letters, 49:734-736, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2013.1528
  16. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D : Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Compos B Eng, 143:172-196, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
  17. Alifui-Segbaya F, Bowman J, White AR, George R, Fidan I : Characterization of the Double Bond Conver sion of Acrylic Resins for 3D Printing of Dental Prostheses. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 40:E7-E11, 2019.
  18. Bagheri A, Jin J : Photopolymerization in 3D Printing. ACS Appl Polym Mater, 1:593-611, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.8b00165
  19. Tahayeri A, Morgan M, Fugolin AP, Bompolaki D, Athirasala A, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL, Bertassoni LE : 3D Printed versus Conventionally Cured Provisional Crown and Bridge Dental Materials. Dent Mater, 34:192-200, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.10.003
  20. Lin CH, Lin YM, Lai YL, Lee SY : Mechanical Properties, Accuracy, and Cytotoxicity of UV-polymerized 3D Printing Resins Composed of Bis-EMA, UDMA, and TEGDMA. J Prosthet Dent, 123:349-354, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.002
  21. Schneider LFJ, Cavalcante LM, Prahl SA, Pfeifer CS, Ferracane JL : Curing Efficiency of Dental Resin Composites Formulated with Camphorquinone or Trimethylbenzoyl-diphenyl-phosphine Oxide. Dent Mater, 28:392-397, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.014
  22. Engler MLPD, Guth JF, Keul C, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Liebermann A : Residual Monomer Elution from Different Conventional and CAD/CAM Dental Polymers during Artificial Aging. Clin Oral Investig, 24:277-284, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02947-4
  23. Berli C, Thieringer FM, Sharma N, Muller JA, Dedem P, Fischer J, Rohr N : Comparing the Mechanical Properties of Pressed, Milled, and 3D-printed Resins for Occlusal Devices. J Prosthet Dent, 124:780-786, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.10.024
  24. Imirzalioglu P, Karacaer O, Yilmaz B, Ozmen IO : Color Stability of Denture Acrylic Resins and a Soft Lining Material against Tea, Coffee, and Nicotine. J Prosthodont, 19:118-124, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00535.x
  25. Barakah HM, Taher NM : Effect of Polishing Systems on Stain Susceptibility and Surface Roughness of Nanocomposite Resin Material. J Prosthet Dent, 112:625-631, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.007
  26. Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri RK : Evaluation of the Effect of Surface Polishing, Oral Beverages and Food Colorants on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Nanocomposite Resins. J Int Oral Health, 7:63-70, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2015.2
  27. Brooksbank A, Owens BM, Phebus JG, Blen BJ, Wasson W : Surface Sealant Effect on the Color Stability of a Composite Resin Following Ultraviolet Light Artificial Aging. Oper Dent, 44:322-330, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2341/18-053-L
  28. Hwang SS, Im YW, Kim SC, Jun SK, Lee HH : Influence of Polishing Methods on Surface Roughness and Gloss of Acrylic Denture Base Resins. Korean J Dent Mater, 41:305-310, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2014.41.4.305
  29. Tasin S, Ismatullaev A, Usumez A : Comparison of Surface Roughness and Color Stainability of 3-Dimensionally Printed Interim Prosthodontic Material with Conventionally Fabricated and CAD-CAM Milled Materials. J Prosthet Dent, 128:1094-1101, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.027
  30. Dede DO, Sahin O, Koroglu A, Yilmaz B : Effect of Sealant Agents on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Nanohybrid Composite Resins. J Prosthet Dent, 116:119-128, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.024
  31. Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, Van Eldere J, Schepers E, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D : The Influence of Abutment Surface Roughness on Plaque Accumulation and Peri-implant Mucositis. Clin Oral Implants Res, 7:201-211, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070302.x
  32. Jung M, Hornung K, Klimek J : Polishing Occlusal Surfaces of Direct Class II Composite Restorations in vivo. Oper Dent, 30:139-146, 2005.
  33. Shah P, Sharma P, Goje SK, Kanzariya N, Parikh M : Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding Using Four Finishing and Polishing Systems for Residual Resin Removal - an in vitro study. Prog Orthod, 20:18, 2019.
  34. Howell S, Weekes WT : An Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Enamel Surface Subsequent to Various Debonding Procedures. Aust Dent J, 35:245-252, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb05402.x
  35. Hassan AM, Nabih SM, Mossa HM, Baroudi K : The Effect of Three Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness of Flowable, Microhybrid, and Packable Resin Composites. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 5:242-247, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.159965
  36. Bitencourt SB, Kanda RY, de Freitas Jorge C, Barao VAR, Sukotjo C, Wee AG, Goiato MC, Pesqueira AA : Long-term Stainability of Interim Prosthetic Materials in Acidic/staining Solutions. J Esthet Restor Dent, 32:73-80, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12544
  37. Liebermann A, Wimmer T, Schmidlin PR, Scherer H, Loffler P, Roos M, Stawarczyk B : Physicomechanical Characterization of Polyetheretherketone and Current Esthetic Dental CAD/CAM Polymers after Aging in Different Storage Media. J Prosthet Dent, 115:321-328.E2, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.004
  38. Sunbul HA, Silikas N, Watts DC : Surface and Bulk Properties of Dental Resin Composites after Solvent Storage. Dent Mater, 32:987-997, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.007
  39. Attar N : The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Procedures on the Surface Roughness of Composite Resin Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract, 8:27-35, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-1-27