Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Shared Leadership on Team Efficacy, Team Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover Intentions

공유리더십이 팀효능감과 팀조직시민행동, 이직의도에 미치는 영향

  • 최영민 (동의대학교 평생교육원 경영학과) ;
  • 한나영 (고신대학교 의료경영학부)
  • Received : 2023.05.24
  • Accepted : 2023.07.07
  • Published : 2023.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In a world of uncertainty and complexity, leadership is essential to lead collaborative and positive interactions among employees. In other words, if members share opinions and work through voluntary leadership, they will respond more effectively to uncertain challenges and get closer to the targeted management performance. Therefore, in this study, we would like to elucidate the importance of shared leadership, which has recently become an issue. We will examine the impact of shared leadership on team efficacy, team organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover intention. A survey was conducted among members working in a team organization in Busan, and the results were as follows. First, the effects of shared leadership on team efficacy were found to have significant positive(+) effects, such as the hypotheses set at planning and organizing 0.202(C.R.=2.853), problem solving 0.463(C.R.=5.620), support and caring 0.237(C.R.=3.326), and development and mentoring 0.366(C.R.=5.132), respectively. Second, the effects of team efficacy on team organizational citizenship behavior and turnover intention were 0.545(C.R.=5.895) and -0.143(C.R.=-0.817), respectively, and team efficacy was found to have a positive(+)positive(+) effect on team organizational citizenship behavior, but team efficacy did not have a significant effect on turnover intention.

기업환경이 불확실해지고 복잡화되고 있는 상황에서 구성원들의 협력적이고 긍정적인 상호작용을 이끌어갈 리더십이 필수적이다. 즉, 구성원들이 자발적 리더십을 통해 의견을 공유하고 업무를 진행할 경우 불확실한 도전에 보다 효과적으로 대응하고, 목표하는 경영성과에 가까워진다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 최근에 이슈가 되고 있는 공유리더십의 중요성을 밝히고자 한다. 공유리더십이 팀효능감과 팀조직시민행동, 이직의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보고자 한다. 부산 내 팀조직에서 근무하는 구성원을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였고 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 공유리더십이 팀효능감에 미치는 영향은 각각 계획과 조직화 0.202(C.R.=2.853), 문제해결 0.463(C.R.=5.620), 지원과 배려 0.237(C.R.=3.326), 개발과 멘토링 0.366(C.R.=5.132)으로 설정된 가설과 같이 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 팀효능감이 팀조직시민행동과 이직의도에 미치는 영향은 각각 0.545(C.R.=5.895), -0.143(C.R.=-0.817)로 팀효능감은 팀조직시민행동에 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났지만 팀효능감은 이직의도에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ashford, S. J., N. P. Rothbard, S. K. Piderit, and J. E. Dutton(1998), Out on a Limb: The Role of Context and Impression Management in Selling Gender-Equity Issues, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 23-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393590
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change, Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  3. Bang, H. J. (2013). The effects of shared leadership and psychological safety climate on team performance, team commitment, and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the role of team reflexivity as a mediator, Sungkyunkwan University Ph. D. thesis.
  4. Chen, G., Gully, S. M. and Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale, Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
  5. Choi, S. B. and Yoon, Y. R. (2012). The Impacts of Emotional Intelligence, Job Satisfaction and Self-efficacy on the Organizational Citizenship Behavior- The Case of Nurse in University Hospital, Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 19(5), 73-93.
  6. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  7. Greenberg-Walt, C. & A. G. Robertson. (2001). The evolving role of executive leadership. in W. Bennis, G. M. Spreitzer, & T. G. Cummings(Eds). The future of leadership. Jossey-Bass. San Francisco, 139-156.
  8. Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V. and Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness:A field study, The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.004
  9. Hoch, J. E. (2013). Shared leadership and innovation: The role of vertical leadership and employee integrity, Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-012-9273-6
  10. Hong, S. C. and Kwon, Y. J. (2019). The Effects of Millennials Shared Leadership on Team Efficacy and Organizational Well-being in the Hotel Industry: The mediating effect of team efficacy, Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 31(5), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2019.5.31.5.229
  11. Hwang, M. J. and Lee, H. S. (2020). The Effect of Shared Leadership on Organizational Effectiveness: Mediating of Psychological Empowerment, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 33(12), 2257-2286. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2020.33.12.2257
  12. Hwang, S. O. (2020). The effect of shared leadership on team creativity in R&D project team: The mediating effects of team efficacy, team-based learning and team trust, Dankook University Ph.D. thesis.
  13. Jeong, Y. J. and Kim, M. J. (2014). The Effects of Shared Leadership on Team Efficacy and Team Innovativeness, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 27(5), 635-655.
  14. Kim, M. J. Shin, Y. H. (2013). The Mediating Role of Team Efficacy in the Relationship between Team Goal Orientation and Team Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Korean Corporation Management Review, 20(5), 175-193.
  15. Kim, Y. J. (2020). The Effect of Team Competency on Team Performance in Startup Clubs: The Mediating Effect of Team Efficacy and Team Commitment, Dongguk University Master's thesis.
  16. Kim, Y. G. (2014). A study on influences of social workers' job stress and self-efficacy upon organization effectiveness, Dongguk University Ph. D. thesis.
  17. Kim, D. S. (2015). The Effects of Team Learning Behavior and Shared Mental Model on Team Performance, Gachon University Ph. D. thesis.
  18. Kim, M. H. (2020). The Impact of Shared Leadership on Innovation Behavior in Chinese Luxury Hotel Industry: Mediating Effect of Positive Psychological Capital, Korea Research Academy of Distribution and Management Review, 23(6), 65-82.
  19. Kizilos, M. A., Cummings, C. and Cummings, T. G. (2013). How high-involvement work processes increase organization performance: The role of organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(4), 413-436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886313479998
  20. Ko, K. M. (2016). Effect of shared leadership on organizational learning capability and mediation effect of shard leadership, Chung-Ang University Master's Thesis.
  21. Koo, I. S. (2020). The effect of shared leadership on organizational commitment and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating effect of positive psychological capital and the moderating effect of LMX, Hanyang University Ph. D. thesis.
  22. Koo, I. S. and Jung, K. S. (2019). The Effect of the Shared Leadership on the Change Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Mediating Effects of the Positive Psychological Capital, The Korean Leadership Quarterly, 10(4), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.22243/tklq.2019.10.4.119
  23. Koo, I. S. and Jung, K. S. (2021). The Structural Relationship between Shared leadership, Positive Psychological Capital, Organizational Commitment, Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior and LMX, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 34(10), 1839-1875. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2021.34.10.1839
  24. Lee, H. J. and Jeong, Y. J. (2018). Reconsideration of Narcissism: A Study on the Effects of Team Leaders Positive Narcissism on Team Innovativeness, The Korean Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 3-34. https://doi.org/10.22243/tklq.2018.9.4.3
  25. Lee, O. J. (2015). The Effect of Hotel Culinary Employees Perceived Organizational Support and Self-Efficacy on Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Turnover Intention, Journal of Hotel & Resort, 14(2), 105-122.
  26. Lee, J. H. and Moon, S. G. (2015). A Study on Relationship among Self-efficacy, Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention of Medical Tourism Coordinators, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies, 17(5), 1-18.
  27. Lee, S. B. (2022). Factors affecting dental hygienists turnover intention: Focusing on self-efficacy and social support, Hunam University Master's thesis.
  28. Lim, Y. A. (2021). The Effect of Infection Prevention Environment and Self-efficacy on Turnover Intention of Hospital Staff, The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 12(2), 2323-2336. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.12.2.164
  29. Oh, H. S. and Cho, Y. H. (2022). The Relationship between Shared Leadership, Team-based Self-esteem, Organizational Justice(Distributive, Procedural) and Voice Behavior: Team Level Analysis, Korea Journal of Business Administration, 35(5), 883-905. https://doi.org/10.18032/kaaba.2022.35.5.883
  30. Oren, L., Tziner, A., Nahshon, Y. and Sharoni, G. (2013). Relations between OCBS, organizational justice, work motivation and self efficacy, Amfiteatru Economic, 15(34), 505-516.
  31. Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M. and MacKenzie, S. B. (2005). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Sage Publications.
  32. Park, J. H. and Cho, Y. S. (2020). Effect of job satisfaction on turnover intention and intention to stay in dental hygienists, Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene, 20(1), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20200010
  33. Park, J. C. and Kim, S. H. (2015). The Relationships among Leader-member Exchange(LMX), Leader Integrity, Perceived Team Efficacy, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 15(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.04.420
  34. Parker, L. E. (1994). Working together: Perceived self-and collective efficacy at the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00552.x
  35. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M. and Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
  36. Parker, S. K. (2000). From Passive to Proactive Motivation: The Importance of Flexible Role Orientations and Role Breadth Self-Efficacy, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 447-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00025
  37. Pearce, C. L., and Sims, H. P. (2002). The relative influence of vertical vs. shared leadership on the longitudinal effectiveness of change management teams, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172-197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
  38. Shamir, B., House, R. J. and Arthur, M. B. (1993). The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-concept Based Theory, Organization Science, 4(4), 577-594. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.4.4.577
  39. Shin, Y. and Choi, J. N. (2010), What Makes a Group of Good Citizens? The Role of Perceived Group-Level Fit and Critical Psychological States in Organizational Teams, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 531-552. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X440233
  40. Sung G. W. and Om, G. Y. (2022). Influence of Organizational Factors on Business Performance in INNOBIZ SMEs: Focusing on the Mediating Effects of Absorption Capacity, Journal of the Korea industrial information systems society, 27(3), 59- 88.