DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of CBCT parameters on image quality and the diagnosis of vertical root fractures in teeth with metallic posts: an ex vivo study

  • Larissa Pereira Lagos de Melo (Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz (Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Larissa Moreira-Souza (Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Mariana Rocha Nadaes (Dental Clinic Department, Division of Oral Radiology, Dental School, Federal Fluminense University) ;
  • Gustavo Machado Santaella (Department of Diagnosis and Oral Health, University of Louisville, School of Dentistry) ;
  • Matheus Lima Oliveira (Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Deborah Queiroz Freitas (Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.09
  • 심사 : 2023.02.24
  • 발행 : 2023.05.31

초록

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of peak kilovoltage (kVp) and a metal artifact reduction (MAR) tool on image quality and the diagnosis of vertical root fracture (VRF) in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Twenty single-rooted human teeth filled with an intracanal metal post were divided into 2 groups: control (n = 10) and VRF (n = 10). Each tooth was placed into the socket of a dry mandible, and CBCT scans were acquired using a Picasso Trio varying the kVp (70, 80, 90, or 99), and the use of MAR (with or without). The examinations were assessed by 5 examiners for the diagnosis of VRF using a 5-point scale. A subjective evaluation of the expression of artifacts was done by comparing random axial images of the studied protocols. The results of the diagnoses were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and the Tukey post hoc test, the subjective evaluations were compared using the Friedman test, and intra-examiner reproducibility was evaluated using the weighted kappa test (α = 5%). Results: The kVp and MAR did not influence the diagnosis of VRF (p > 0.05). According to the subjective classification, the 99 kVp protocol with MAR demonstrated the least expression of artifacts, while the 70 kVp protocol without MAR led to the most artifacts. Conclusions: Protocols with higher kVp combined with MAR improved the image quality of CBCT examinations. However, those factors did not lead to an improvement in the diagnosis of VRF.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to thank the examiners.

참고문헌

  1. Ferreira LM, Visconti MA, Nascimento HA, Dallemolle RR, Ambrosano GM, Freitas DQ. Influence of CBCT enhancement filters on diagnosis of vertical root fractures: a simulation study in endodontically treated teeth with and without intracanal posts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140352.
  2. Yamamoto-Silva FP, de Oliveira Siqueira CF, Silva MA, Fonseca RB, Santos AA, Estrela C, de Freitas Silva BS. Influence of voxel size on cone-beam computed tomography-based detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic posts. Imaging Sci Dent 2018;48:177-184. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.3.177
  3. Chang E, Lam E, Shah P, Azarpazhooh A. Cone-beam computed tomography for detecting vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review. J Endod 2016;42:177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.005
  4. Freitas DQ, Vasconcelos TV, Noujeim M. Diagnosis of vertical root fracture in teeth close and distant to implant: an in vitro study to assess the influence of artifacts produced in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:1263-1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2558-z
  5. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:265-273. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039
  6. Queiroz PM, Oliveira ML, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ. Evaluation of metal artefact reduction in cone-beam computed tomography images of different dental materials. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:419-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2128-9
  7. Bechara BB, Moore WS, McMahan CA, Noujeim M. Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:248-253. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/80899839
  8. Helvacioglu-Yigit D, Demirturk Kocasarac H, Bechara B, Noujeim M. Evaluation and reduction of artifacts generated by 4 different root-end filling materials by using multiple cone-beam computed tomography imaging settings. J Endod 2016;42:307-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.11.002
  9. Bezerra IS, Neves FS, Vasconcelos TV, Ambrosano GM, Freitas DQ. Influence of the artefact reduction algorithm of Picasso Trio CBCT system on the diagnosis of vertical root fractures in teeth with metal posts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140428.
  10. Bechara B, Alex McMahan C, Moore WS, Noujeim M, Teixeira FB, Geha H. Cone beam CT scans with and without artefact reduction in root fracture detection of endodontically treated teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120245.
  11. de Rezende Barbosa GL, Sousa Melo SL, Alencar PN, Nascimento MC, Almeida SM. Performance of an artefact reduction algorithm in the diagnosis of in vitro vertical root fracture in four different root filling conditions on CBCT images. Int Endod J 2016;49:500-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12477
  12. Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140224.
  13. Freitas DQ, Fontenele RC, Nascimento EH, Vasconcelos TV, Noujeim M. Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2018;47:20180151.
  14. Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GM, Haiter-Neto F. Influence of exposure factors on the variability of CBCT voxel values: a phantom study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014;43:20140128.
  15. Vasconcelos TV, Bechara BB, McMahan CA, Freitas DQ, Noujeim M. Evaluation of artifacts generated by zirconium implants in cone-beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017;123:265-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.10.021
  16. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  17. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, van der Stelt P, Wesselink PR. Comparison of five cone beam computed tomography systems for the detection of vertical root fractures. J Endod 2010;36:126-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.013
  18. Neves FS, Freitas DQ, Campos PS, Ekestubbe A, Lofthag-Hansen S. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of vertical root fractures: the influence of imaging modes and root canal materials. J Endod 2014;40:1530-1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.012
  19. Pinto MG, Rabelo KA, Sousa Melo SL, Campos PS, Oliveira LS, Bento PM, Melo DP. Influence of exposure parameters on the detection of simulated root fractures in the presence of various intracanal materials. Int Endod J 2017;50:586-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12655
  20. Gaeta-Araujo H, Silva de Souza GQ, Freitas DQ, de Oliveira-Santos C. Optimization of tube current in cone-beam computed tomography for the detection of vertical root fractures with different intracanal materials. J Endod 2017;43:1668-1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.003
  21. Gaeta-Araujo H, Alzoubi T, Vasconcelos KF, Orhan K, Pauwels R, Casselman JW, Jacobs R. Cone beam computed tomography in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a two-decade overview. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020;49:20200145.
  22. Codari M, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Ferreira Pinheiro Nicolielo L, Haiter Neto F, Jacobs R. Quantitative evaluation of metal artifacts using different CBCT devices, high-density materials and field of views. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:1509-1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13019
  23. Brady E, Mannocci F, Brown J, Wilson R, Patel S. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 2014;47:735-746. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12209
  24. Makeeva IM, Byakova SF, Novozhilova NE, Adzhieva EK, Golubeva GI, Grachev VI, Kasatkina IV. Detection of artificially induced vertical root fractures of different widths by cone beam computed tomography in vitro and in vivo. Int Endod J 2016;49:980-989. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12549
  25. Zhang L, Wang T, Cao Y, Wang C, Tan B, Tang X, Tan R, Lin Z. In vivo detection of subtle vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2019;45:856-862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.006
  26. Bechara B, McMahan CA, Geha H, Noujeim M. Evaluation of a cone beam CT artefact reduction algorithm. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:422-428. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/43691321
  27. Dalili Kajan Z, Taramsari M, Khosravi Fard N, Khaksari F, Moghasem Hamidi F. The efficacy of metal artifact reduction mode in cone-beam computed tomography images on diagnostic accuracy of root fractures in teeth with intracanal posts. Iran Endod J 2018;13:47-53.
  28. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics. AAE and AAOMR joint position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2015;120:508-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.07.033
  29. Patel S, Brown J, Semper M, Abella F, Mannocci F. European Society of Endodontology position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics: European Society of Endodontology (ESE) developed by. Int Endod J 2019;52:1675-1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13187