Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회지)

Korea Home Economics Education Association (한국가정과교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on College Students' Perceptions of ChatGPT

ChatGPT에 대한 대학생의 인식에 관한 연구

  • Rhee, Jung-uk (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Dongguk Univ.-Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Hee Ra (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Dongguk Univ.-Seoul) ;
  • Shin, Hye Won (Dept. of Home Economics Education, Dongguk Univ.-Seoul)
  • 이정욱 (동국대학교-서울 가정교육과 ) ;
  • 김희라 (동국대학교-서울 가정교육과 ) ;
  • 신혜원 (동국대학교-서울 가정교육과)
  • Received : 2023.10.30
  • Accepted : 2023.12.29
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

At a time when interest in the educational use of ChatGPT is increasing, it is necessary to investigate the perception of ChatGPT among college students. A survey was conducted to compare the current status of internet and interactive artificial intelligence use and perceptions of ChatGPT after using it in the following courses in Spring 2023; 'Family Life and Culture', 'Fashion and Museums', and 'Fashion in Movies' in the first semester of 2023. We also looked at comparative analysis reports and reflection diaries. Information for coursework was mainly obtained through internet searches and articles, but only 9.84% used interactive AI, showing that its application to learning is still insufficient. ChatGPT was first used in the Spring semester of 2023, and ChatGPT was mainly used among conversational AI. ChatGPT is a bit lacking in terms of information accuracy and reliability, but it is convenient because it allows students to find information while interacting easily and quickly, and the satisfaction level was high, so there was a willingness to use ChatGPT more actively in the future. Regarding the impact of ChatGPT on education, students said that it was positive that they were self-directed and that they set up a cooperative class process to verify information through group discussions and problem-solving attitudes through questions. However, problems were recognized that lowered trust, such as plagiarism, copyright, data bias, lack of up-to-date data learning, and generation of inaccurate or incorrect information, which need to be improved.

ChatGPT의 교육적 활용에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있는 시점에서 대학생을 대상으로 ChatGPT에 대한 인식을 알아보는 것은 필요하다. D대학교 2023년도 1학기 '가정생활과 문화', '패션과 미술관', '영화로 만나는 패션' 수강생을 대상으로 인터넷과 대화형 인공지능 사용실태 그리고 수업에서 ChatGPT를 활용한 후 그에 대한 인식을 설문지, 비교분석 보고서, 성찰일지로 살펴보았다. 대학생은 수업을 위한 정보는 주로 인터넷 검색과 논문에서 주로 얻고 있었으며 대화형 인공지능을 이용하는 경우는 아직 미비함을 알 수 있었다. ChatGPT는 대부분 2023년 1학기에 처음 사용하였으며 대화형 인공지능 중 주로 ChatGPT를 사용하였다. ChatGPT는 정보의 정확성과 신뢰도면에서는 조금 부족하나 쉽고 빠르게 상호작용을 하면서 정보를 찾을 수 있어 편리하며 만족도가 높아 앞으로 ChatGPT를 보다 적극적으로 활용할 용의가 있었다. ChatGPT가 교육에 미치는 영향에 대해 학생들은 자기 주도적이며 질문을 통한 문제해결 태도와 정보에 대한 검증과정을 위해 모둠별 토의·토론을 통해 확인하는 협동수업의 과정을 학습자 스스로가 설정하는 것이 긍정적이라고 하였다. 그러나 표절과 저작권, 데이터 편향성, 최신 데이터 학습부족, 정확하지 않거나 잘못된 정보를 생성하는 등의 신뢰를 저하시키는 문제점이 있다는 것을 인식하였으며 이에 대한 보완이 필요하다고 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Allam, H., Dempere, J., Akre, V., Parakash, D., Mazher, N., & Ahamed, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: An argument of Chat-GPT us e in education. 9th International Conference on Information Technology Trends (pp. 151-156). Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  2. Bozkurt, A. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The inevitable paradigm shift. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 198-204.
  3. Chang, J. A., Park, J. H., & Park, J. S. (2021). An analysis on the trends of education research related to 'Artificial Intelligence chatbot' in Korea: Focusing on implications for use in science education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(13), 729-743. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.13.729
  4. Choi, N. R., & Kim, M. R. (2023). Education with Chat GPT, exploration of keywords and research trends through the analysis of academic paper abstracts Chat GPT. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 27(2), 69-72.
  5. Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846
  6. Han, H. (2023). Instructional strategies for integrating and utilizing ChatGPT into higher education. Journal of Education & Culture, 29(4), 243-275. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2023.29.4.243
  7. Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 15873-15892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1
  8. Jeong, J., Cho, H., Hwang, J., Moon, M., & Kim, I. (2023). 챗 GPT 교육혁명. CHATGPT를 활용한 하이터치 하이테크 미래교육 [ChatGPT education revolution. High-touch high-tech future education using CHATGPT]. Seoul: Porche.
  9. Jung, Y. K. (2023). A study on the use of Chat GPT and copyright issues. Science, Technology and Law, 14(1), 141-180. https://doi.org/10.34267/cbstl.2023.14.1.141
  10. Kang, D. (2023). The advent of ChatGPT and the response of Korean language education. Korean Language and Literature, 82, 469-496.
  11. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Kuchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F.,...Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  12. Kim, M. (2023, March 20). 국내 대학 "챗GPT 피할 수 없어"...활용 가이드 제시 韓 대학, 챗GPT 사용법 구체화...英대학 챗GPT 활용 시 퇴학 [Korean universities present a guide to using ChatGPT. Korean universities specify how to use ChatGPT... expelled from the UK university when using ChatGPT]. ZD Net Korea. https://zdnet.co.kr/view/?no=20230320080706
  13. Kim, S., Shim, J., & Shim, J. (2023). A study on the utilization of openAI ChatGPT as a second language learning tool. Journal of Multimedia Information System, 10(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.33851/JMIS.2023.10.1.79
  14. Kim, T. (2023). 생성형 AI의 수업 활용방안 [How to use classes for generative AIs]. Analysis of Educational Trends, 12. https://www.jbedu.kr/board/view.jbedu?boardId=BBS_0000089&menuCd=DOM_000000226002000000&orderBy=REGISTER_DATE%20DESC&startPage=1&dataSid=971712
  15. Kim, Y. D. (2020). Study on planning and composition of OTT service survey (KCA Research 2019). Korea: Korea Communications Agency.
  16. Lee, S. H. (2023). GPT 제너레이션: 챗GPT가 바꿀 우리 인류의 미래 [GPT generation: The future of our humanity that ChatGPT will change]. Seoul: Book Moment.
  17. Lee, T. Y., & Yoon, D. J. (2003). A study on the interface evaluation guidelines for integrated information retrieval system. Korea Society for Information Management, 20(3), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2003.20.3.177
  18. Lim, J. Y. (2023, September 4). 성큼 다가온 ChatGPT 시대...생성형 AI 활용한 교육은 선택 아닌 필수 [The ChatGPT era has come...Education using Generative AI is a must, not an option]. University News Network. https://news.unn.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=551792
  19. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/4/410 102/13/4/410
  20. Ministry of Education (2023). AI 디지털교과서로 1:1 맞춤 교육 시대 연다 [Opening a new era of personalized education with AI digital textbooks]. https://blog.naver.com/moeblog/223123439288
  21. Noveck, B. S. (2023, May 19). Boston isn't afraid of generative AI. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/boston-generative-ai-policy/
  22. Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
  23. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2023). 챗GPT 시대, 현장교사에게 묻다 [ChatGPT age, ask a field teacher]. https://enews.sen.go.kr/news/view.do?bbsSn=182562&step1=3&step2=1
  24. Shin, D. (2023, April 24). 챗GPT 대응 나선 대학가...생성형 AI 가이드라인 제정 [University responding to ChatGPT...Establishing Generative AI guidelines]. 교수신문. https://www.kyosu.net/news/articleView.html?idxno=103779
  25. Shin, D., Jung, H., & Lee, Y. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT as a content-based English learning and teaching tool. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 22(1), 171-192.
  26. Son, T., & Lee, K.-H. (2023). Exploring the method of using ChatGPT in mathematics education. The Korea Contents Association 2023 A National Academic Conference (pp. 151-152). Kunsan: The Korea Contents Association.
  27. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x
  28. Yoon, O.-H. (2023). The emergence of Chat GPT and exploration of the direction of liberal arts education. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 23(5), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2023.23.05.086
  29. Yoon, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence and accounting education: Focusing on ChatGPT and its applications. Korean Computers and Accounting Review, 21(1), 1-29.
  30. Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712
  31. Yu, J. J. (2023). Application of Artificial Intelligence for geography education -Focusing on question answering on ChatGPT-. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers, 33(1), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.35149/jakpg.2023.33.1.011