Acknowledgement
This research was supported by a grant(NRF- 2021R1F1A1046321) from the National Research Foundation of Korea by Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.
References
- Ministry of Public Administration and Security. 2016 Announcement of Results of Promotion of seismic retrofit measures for existing public facilities. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Public Administration and Security; 2017. p. 129-303.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Guidelines for evaluating seismic performance of previously constructed facilities (buildings). Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2019. 19 p.
- Jo JR, Kwack YJ, Han JT, Shin HS, Jo CB, Jin WJ, Kim JM, Lee SH, Lee YH, Shin JW, Jeon JS, Jang YG, Park DH, Oh CK, Ha IS, Song JH. Strategic study on seismic performance level inspection and management system of deteriorated infrastructure. Goyang (Korea): Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology. 2019 Dec. 189 p. Report No.: KICT 2019-109.
- Lee YJ, Kim JY. Determining the seismic-retrofit priority for school facilities. Journal of The Korea Society of Hazard Mitigation. 2019 Jun;19(7):11-20. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2019.19.7.11
- Chung L, Woo S. Seismic performance preliminary evaluation method of reinforced concrete apartments with bearing wall system, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2007 Jun;19(3):293-300. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2007.19.3.293
- Santarsiero G, Masi A, Manfredi V, Ventura G. Requalification of RC frame apartment buildings: Comparison of seismic retrofit solutions based on a multi-criteria approach. Sustainability. 2021 Sep;13(17):9962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179962
- Hur J, Kim HK, Shin MJ. Improvement plan of seismic retrofitting support system for establishing earthquake disaster prevention policy. Journal of the Korea Academia Industrial cooperation Society. 2017 Jul;18(7):611-7. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.7.611
- Lee JS. A study on the U.S. legislation for earthquake response - Focused on the United States Federal Earthquake Hazards Reduction Act and California Emergency Service Act. 2017 Mar;34(1):25-57. https://doi.org/10.18018/HYLR.2017.34.1.027
- David B, Brian E, Mike H, Ian M, Mark T, Reid Z, Amit K, Andrew P. Unreinforced masonry(URM) seismic retrofit project. Portland (OR): Portland Bureau of Emergency Management. 2015 Apr. p. 1-31.
- Park J, Kim S. A study on evaluation criteria for infrastructure importance regarding earthquake. Journal of The Korean Society of Industry Convergence. 2018 Jun;21(6):317-27. https://doi.org/10.21289/KSIC.2018.21.6.317
- Ha KJ, Lee DL. Support schemes to encourage seismic retrofitting of existing buildings for earthquakes. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2022 Dec;24(6):121-8.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Guidelines for evaluating seismic performance of previously constructed facilities. Sejong (Korea): Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2021 May. 19 p.
- Shin JS, Kim JH, Lee KH. Seismic assessment of damaged piloti-type RC building subjected to successive earthquakes. The Journal of The International Association for Earthquake engineering. 2014 Feb;43(11):1603-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2412
- Gong M, Zuo Z, Wang X, Lu X, Xie L. Comparing seismic performances of pilotis and bare RC frame structures by shaking table tests. Engineering Structures. 2019 Nov;199:109442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109442
- Hong DV, Lee DH, Shin JU, Lee KH. Influence of shear-axial force interaction on the seismic performance of a piloti building subjected to the 2017 earthquake in Pohang Korea. Structural Concrete. 2020 Feb;21(1):220-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800291
- Jintendra K, Bothara P, Dhakai, Jhon B. Seismic performance of an unreinforced masonry building: An experimental investigation. The Journal of The International Association for Earthquake engineering. 2010 Jan;39(1):45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.932
- Cardoso R, Lopes M, Bento R. Seismic evaluation of old masonry buildings. Part I: Method description and application to a case-study. Engineering structures. 2005 Dec;27(14):2024-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.012
- D'Ayala D. Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Cambridge(UK): Civil and Structural Engineering; c2013. Chapter 13, Assessing the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings; p. 334-65. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857098986.3.334
- Repapis C, Vintzileou E, Zeris C. Evaluation of the seismic performance of existing rc buildings i: Suggested methodology. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2006 Oct;10(2):265-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350596
- Celarec D, Dolsek M. The impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Engineering Structures. 2013 Jul;52:340-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.036
- Giordano D, Maiorana F. Teaching algorithms: Visual language vs flowchart vs textual language. 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). 2015 Mar 18-20; Tallin, Estonia. Manhattan (NY): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2015. p. 15092691. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096016
- Andrzejewska M, Stolinska A, Blasiak W, Peczkowski P, Rosiek R, Rozek B, Wcislo D. Eye-tracking verification of the strategy used to analyse algorithms expressed in a flowchart and pseudocode. Interactive learning environments, 2016 Aug; 24(8):1981-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1073746