Industry Promotion Research (산업진흥연구)

Industrial Promotion Institute (산업진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A comparative study on the business value assessment of local government open data assets in China based on AHP technique

AHP기법을 활용한 중국 지방정부 공공데이터 자산의 상업적 가치평가 대한 비교연구

  • 윤가명 (중국 구이저우 혜주 빅데이터 유한회사) ;
  • 심재연 (세한대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2023.06.08
  • Accepted : 2023.07.17
  • Published : 2023.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is based on data ecology theory and takes Chinese local governments' open public data as the research object. Data asset value assessment methods are compared from a new perspective of data business operations. The results show that the assessment model constructed using the hierarchical analysis method (AHP) can more objectively reflect the commercial value of government open data assets than the traditional cost, revenue and market methods, has the advantage of a comprehensive assessment of data value index, and better reflects the findings of a comprehensive index of regional data value. The data show that the local government data value assessment index is positively proportional to the region's digital economy development index, highlighting the driving effect on the digital economy. The results of the study provide a good help for the identification of local government data value rights. The research and practice of promoting the construction of data innovation and data business operation models, improving social well-being and promoting the rapid development of the digital economy to achieve data realisation provides a good reference.

본 연구는 데이터 생태학 이론에 기초하여 중국 지방자치단체의 공개 공공 데이터를 연구 대상으로 삼았다. 데이터 자산가치 평가방법을 데이터 비즈니스 운영의 새로운 관점에서 비교하였다. 계층적 분석방법(AHP)을 사용한 평가 모형을 이용한 연구결과는 전통적인 비용, 수익 및 시장 방법보다 정부 개방형데이터 자산의 상업적 가치를 더 객관적으로 반영할 수 있었으며, 데이터 가치지수를 종합적으로 평가할 수 있다는 장점을 보여주었다. 그리고 지역 데이터 가치에 대한 종합적인 검색결과를 더 잘 반영되고 있었다. 자료를 보면 지방정부의 데이터 가치평가지수는 지역의 디지털 경제발전지수에 비례하여 디지털 경제에 대한 효과가 나타났다. 본 연구는 지방정부의 데이터 가치를 이해하는데 기여하였다. 이로 인하여 데이터 혁신 및 데이터 비즈니스 운영모델구축을 촉진하고, 사회복지를 개선하며, 데이터 실현을 위해 디지털 경제의 빠른 발전을 촉진하는 연구 및 실천하는 계기를 만들고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. World Economic Forum.(2012). Big Data, Big Impact: New Possibilities for International Development https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TC_MFS_BigDataBigImpact_Briefing_2012.pdf
  2. U. S. (2018). OPEN Government Data Act. [EB/OL]. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill
  3. Chinanews. (2020). http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2020/content_5503537.htm
  4. Korea National Decree Information Center. (2020). https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/main.htm
  5. Forbes news.(2018). https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomcoughlin/2018/11/27/175-zettabytes-by-2025/?sh=683923035459
  6. China Academy of Information and Communications. (2020). White Paper on the New Landscape of the Global Digital Economy.
  7. OECD. (2019). Open Useful and Re-usable data (OUR data) Index. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/open-government-data.htm
  8. Korea news. (2023). https://www.msit.go.kr/bbs/view.do?sCode=user&mId=113&mPid=238&pageIndex=&bbsSeqNo=94&nttSeqNo=3182805&searchOpt=ALL&searchTxt=
  9. China Academy of Information and Communications. (2022). The Global Digital Economy Development Report.
  10. China news. (2022). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2022-12/19/content_5732695.htm
  11. China news.(2023). http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2023-02/27/content_5743484.htm
  12. Policy and Economic Research Institute of China Academy of Information and Communication Technology. (2021). Report on Data Value and Market Development of Data Elements http://www.dgworkshop.cn/Public/data/info/fujian/hangye/222.pdf
  13. 양경란, 박수경, 박이봉규. (2021). 마이데이터 비즈니스 생태계 모델 연구. "디지털융복합연구 19.11 pp. 167-180: 167.
  14. Jiaming Yin and Qing Fei. (2021). "Data cage" helps industry self-discipline and ecological purification. Network security and informatization. (6): 3.
  15. Open Knowledge Foundation.(2018). What is Open Government Data?. https://opencouncildata.org/what-is-open-data/
  16. China Market Supervision and Administration and China Standardization Administration. (2021). GB/T 40685-2021.
  17. DAMA International.(2012). The DAMA guide to the data management body of knowledge. https://www.dama.org/cpages/body-of-knowledge
  18. OECD. (2019). Open Useful and Re-usable data (OUR data) Index:2019. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digitalgovernment/open-government-data.htm
  19. OECD. (2019). Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/open-government-data.htm
  20. OECD. (2015). Open Government Data: The Global Context and the Way Forward. https://read.oecdilibrary.org/governance/open-government_9789264268104-en#page1
  21. You Jianxin and Xu Tao. (2021). Data asset quality evaluation model based on multi-criteria decision-making method. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science). (04), 585-590.
  22. Sun Lili and Yuan Qinqin. (2019). Research on E-commerce Data Quality Evaluation Index System from the Perspective of Data Asset Management. Journal of Modern Information (11), 90-97.
  23. Li Chunqiu and Li Ranhui. (2020). Research on Data Asset Value Evaluation Based on Business Plan and Income-Taking Data Asset Value Evaluation of a Unicorn Company as an Example. Appraisal Journal of China (10), 18-23.
  24. Shanghai Deloitte Assets Appraisal Co., Ltd. and Ali Research Institute. (2019). The Road to Data Assetization-Valuation of Data Assets and Industry Practice.
  25. Lin Feiteng. (2020). Research on Big Data Asset Value Evaluation Based on Cost Method. Market Modernization (10), 59-60.
  26. Hangzhou International Digital Trading Alliance. (2023). Research Report on Data Asset Value Realization.
  27. China Asset Appraisal Association. (2019). Guidelines for Asset Appraisal Experts No. 9-Data Asset Appraisal.
  28. 김옥기, 박정, 박천웅 및 조완섭. (2021). 데이터자산가치평가모델리뷰. 한국빅데이터학회지, 6(1), 153-160.
  29. PWC. (2021). Open Data Asset Valuation White Paper.
  30. Zhu Xiaoqin and Wang Xuantong.(2023). Review and prospect of data asset evaluation research under the background of digital economy. Finance and Accounting Monthly (06), 78-84.
  31. Fu, S. (2018). Thinking about the framework of data asset value evaluation.
  32. Gartner.(2015). https://www.taodocs.com/p-286795983.html
  33. Liang Yan.(2020). Data asset value evaluation of Internet enterprises. Master's degree thesis. Hebei University of Economics and Business. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=Sea5Lprb1OpZaoyIop1biVUFNrjIO4C43mXFn4I_mgCO5V9Vyb3tJKX3RMZFG0PeddU9AWbch_X6wXAHcmVsU2pN0PsLv5KMWWURJ1_HsCerTVcLZ9yG8FPGNXGMtwsZUiZN-ZAUqVY=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
  34. Yin Chuanru and Jin Tao and Zhang Peng and Wang Jianmin adn Chen Jiayi.(2021). Data asset value evaluation and pricing: research summary and prospect. Big Data Research. 7, (04): 14-27.
  35. China news. (2023). https://www.miit.gov.cn/gxsj/index.html