Journal of Nutrition and Health

  • 제56권3호
  • /
  • Pages.315-329
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2288-3886(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3959(eISSN)
한국영양학회 (The Korean Nutrition Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

20-30대 성인의 밀키트 소비 실태와 밀키트 선택속성에 대한 중요도-만족도 분석

Study on the consumption practices and Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of meal-kit selection attributes among adults in their 20s and 30s

  • Se-Eun Kim (Department of Food and Nutrition, Daegu University) ;
  • Hyun-Joo Bae (Department of Food and Nutrition, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.27
  • 심사 : 2023.05.25
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

전국의 20-30대 성인남녀 249명을 대상으로 밀키트 소비 실태와 밀키트 선택속성에 대한 중요도-만족도 분석을 한 결과 조사대상자의 85.5%가 밀키트 구매 경험이 있었고, 밀키트 구매 경험은 여자가 남자에 비해 (p < 0.01), 기혼자가 미혼자에 비해 (p < 0.05), 직장인이 직장이 없는 경우에 비해 (p < 0.05) 유의적으로 많았다. 밀키트는 주로 대형할인마트 (44.6%), 온라인 쇼핑몰 (33.3%)에서 식사용 (60.6%), 여행용 (18.3%), 야식용 (13.1%)으로 구매하였다. 밀키트 구매 이유는 재료 손질 및 조리가 간편해서 (89.2%), 여러 식재료를 한 번에 구매할 수 있어서 (60.1%), 요리를 잘 못해서 (27.7%)의 순이었고, 밀키트를 혼자 먹는 경우는 전체의 31.0%였으며 전체적인 만족도 (5점 척도)는 평균 4.11점이었다. 밀키트 중 구매 비율이 높은 제품은 한식 국물요리 (69.5%), 한식 주찬류 (47.4%), 분식류 (46.9%) 순이었고, 여자가 남자에 비해 분식류 (p < 0.01), 샐러드류 (p < 0.05), 동남아 음식 (p < 0.05)의 구매 비율이 유의적으로 높았으며, 서양식 육류요리의 구매 비율은 1인 가구가 다인 가구에 비해 (p < 0.05), 혼자 섭취하는 경우가 가족이나 친구와 함께 섭취하는 경우에 비해 (p < 0.05) 유의적으로 높았고, 밀키트를 식사용으로 구매하는 경우는 20대가 30대에 비해 유의적으로 높았다 (p < 0.05). 밀키트 선택 속성에 대한 요인분석 결과 '식품의 품질', '포장과 다양성', '밀키트의 품질', '편리성과 가격'으로 4개 요인이 추출되었다. '밀키트의 품질'과 '편리성과 가격'은 중요도 평가 점수 평균이 4점 이상이었고 '식품의 품질'요인의 중요도는 다인 가구가 1인 가구에 비해 유의적으로 높았으며 (p < 0.05), '포장과 다양성'요인의 중요도는 여자가 남자에 비해 (p < 0.01), 기혼자가 미혼자에 비해 (p < 0.05), 다인 가구가 1인 가구에 비해 (p < 0.05), 30-39세가 20-24세에 비해 (p < 0.05) 유의적으로 높았다. '밀키트의 품질'요인의 중요도는 기혼자가 미혼자에 비해 (p < 0.001), 다인 가구가 1인 가구에 비해 (p < 0.001), 30-39세와 25-29세가 20-24세에 비해 (p < 0.01) 유의적으로 높았다. 밀키트 선택속성에 대한 ISA 결과 가장 우선적으로 개선이 필요하다고 분석된 항목은 '가격'이었다. 밀키트 이용 고객의 만족도 향상을 위해서는 가성비가 좋은 다양한 용도의 밀키트 제품 개발이 필요하다고 판단된다.

Purpose: This study examined the meal-kit consumption practices of adults in their 20s and 30s and analyzed the properties that should be given priority for improvement among the selection attributes to improve the quality of meal-kits. Methods: Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS program (ver. 28.0) for χ2-test, t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Duncan's multiple range test, factor analysis, and Importance-Satisfaction Analysis (ISA). Results: Of the 249 subjects surveyed, 85.5% had some experience of purchasing meal-kits, with significantly more females than males (p < 0.01), significantly more married people than single people (p < 0.05), significantly more employed people than unemployed people (p < 0.05). Meal-kits were purchased most frequently for meals (60.6%), from discount stores or supermarkets (44.6%), and priced between 10,000 won and 20,000 won per person (46.9%). The overall satisfaction with meal-kits was 4.1 out of 5.0 points. The frequency of purchases was Korean soup dishes (69.5%), Korean main dishes (47.4%), and Korean street snacks (46.9%). Factor analysis of the meal-kit selection attributes revealed, 4 factors: 'quality of food,' 'packaging and diversity,' 'quality of meal-kit,' and 'convenience and price.' Compared to single-person households, multi-person households placed significantly higher importance on the 'quality of food,' 'packaging and diversity,' and 'quality of meal-kit.' The factor, 'packaging and diversity' were significantly higher in the importance evaluation scores for females (p < 0.01), married people (p < 0.05), and people in their 30s (p < 0.05) among meal-kit consumers. According to the ISA results, a critical aspect that meal-kit manufacturers or sellers should strengthen is 'price.' Conclusion: Meal-kit products will need to be developed for various purposes that offer high value for money that can satisfy the consumers' needs to improve the satisfaction of meal-kit consumers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR). Food statistics story about simple cook set (meal-kit products) edition [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 6]. Available from: https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/board/boardDetail.do?menu_no=3862&bbs_no=bbs091601&ntctxt_no=1089803. 
  2. Lee SH. What is the future outlook for the meal-kit market, where sales are increasing despite complaints that it is not tasty and expensive? [Internet]. Seoul: Maeil Business News; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.mk.co.kr/news/business/view/2022/05/391692/. 
  3. Hwang J, Eom H, Lee D, Moon J. Influence of meal kits selection attributes on willingness to buy at-home concept and eating-out concept meal kits. J Korea Contents Assoc 2021; 21(3): 352-363.
  4. Eom HR, Hwang JH, Park NH, Moon JH, Lee DM. An exploratory research of Korean meal-kit products for new product development and commercialization strategy: focused on characteristics of meal-kit products. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2021; 27(6): 15-32. 
  5. Park S, Hwang JH. A study on the effect of meal-kit selection properties on consumers' purchasing. Res Inst Soc Sci 2021; 28(1): 157-175.  https://doi.org/10.46415/jss.2021.03.28.1.157
  6. Chung HC, Kim CW. A study on the meal kit product selection attributes on purchasing behavior and satisfaction. J Korea Contents Assoc 2020; 20(6): 381-391.
  7. Lee EY, Kim YM, Choi MK. Meal-kit purchasing behavior and relationship with the nutrition quotient of young adults in Chungnam. J Nutr Health 2021; 54(5): 534-546. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2021.54.5.534
  8. Kim HY, Lee H. Analysis of preference attributes of HMR (home meal replacement) products by segmented market according to consumer transaction competency Index. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2020; 26(10): 44-58.
  9. Koh JY, Choi SK, Nam KY. The effect of the benefits of meal kit on customer behavioral intentions: application of theory of planned behavior. Korean J Hosp Tourism 2022; 31(1): 37-60. https://doi.org/10.24992/KJHT.2022.1.31.01.37
  10. Kim ES, Kim JE, Kim KY. The effect of selection attributes of meal kits on customer satisfaction and behavioral intention: focused on middle aged consumers. Int J Tourism Hosp Res 2022; 36(5): 185-197.  https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2022.5.36.5.185
  11. Lee YJ, Lee KW, Keum SY, Ryu SH. Purchasing behavior and selection attributes for meal-kit products according to food-related lifestyle types. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2021; 31(4): 268-279. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2021.8.31.4.268
  12. Lee SC, Kim DB. A study on the consumption of meal-kit by dietary lifestyle types: focused on moderating effect of gender and age. J Tourism Leis Res 2022; 34(1): 389-411. https://doi.org/10.31336/JTLR.2022.1.34.1.389
  13. Choi T, Lee MC, Kim DS. The effect of selection attributes of meal-kit home replacement food on satisfaction and repurchase intention. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2020; 26(5): 119-128.
  14. Oh WK, Hong JY. IPA analysis on selection attributes of RTC (ready to cook) type milk kit HMR (home meal replacement). Culin Sci Hosp Res 2019; 25(11): 69-81.
  15. Yang YY, Kwon YS, Park YH, Yun Y. Importance-performance analysis regarding selective attribution of meal-kit products. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2019; 29(6): 519-528. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2019.12.29.6.519
  16. Park SB, Lee HJ, Kim HY, Hwang HS, Park DS, Hong WS. A study on domestic consumers' needs and importance-performance analysis of selective attributes for developing home meal replacement products. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2016; 32(3): 342-352. https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2016.32.3.342
  17. Kim HA, Bae JR, Song CP. A study on meal kit consumption behavior and IPA of women in their 30s. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2021; 27(11): 92-104.
  18. Joe MY. Effect of type of nutrition labeling on the healthfulness evaluation and purchase intentions of home meal replacements in South Korea. Korean J Community Nutr 2022; 27(5): 387-396. https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2022.27.5.387
  19. Yoon SH, Choi MK. Assessment of nutrient contents using food and nutrition labeling of meal kit sold in Korea. J East Asian Soc Diet Life 2022; 32(2): 103-112. https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2022.4.32.2.103
  20. Kim CW, Lee KY. Subjectivity type analysis study of single-person households on meal kit products of food service industry. J Korea Contents Assoc 2022; 20(4): 406-415.
  21. Mun JY, Ban HJ, Kim HS. A study on consumers' perception of meal-kit; after the spread of coronavirus infectious disease-19. Culin Sci Hosp Res 2020; 26(10): 198-207.
  22. Lee GT. A study on the consumer perceptions of meal-kit using big data: anticipation after the COVID-19 pandemic ends. Int J Tourism Hosp Res 2021; 35(11): 227-239. https://doi.org/10.21298/IJTHR.2021.11.35.11.227
  23. Han SK, Shin SY, Lee MG. Study on the information provision methodology for elimination of unnecessary expenditures of the millennials and generation Z. Proceedings of 2019 Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers; 2019 June 26-28; Jeju, Korea. Seoul: Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers; 2019. p.1663-1665. 
  24. Park MS, Bae HJ. A study on the consumption practices and satisfaction of adults with delivery food in South Korea. Korean J Food Cookery Sci 2022; 38(4): 250-259.  https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2022.38.4.250
  25. Park MS, Bae HJ. Analysis of the factors influencing customer satisfaction of delivery food. J Nutr Health 2020; 53(6): 688-701. https://doi.org/10.4163/jnh.2020.53.6.688
  26. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis With Reading. New York (NJ): Macmillan Publishing Company; 2006. 
  27. Kim KS. Analysis of Structural Equation Modeling. Seoul: Hannarae Publishing Company; 2007. 
  28. Wang H, Hong CS. The convergence effects of meal-kit packaging design on brand image and customer satisfaction. Korean Soc Sci Art 2021; 39(4): 271-283. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2021.09.30.271
  29. Kim DS, Kim CW. Effect of HMR meal kit product selection attributes on consumers satisfaction and other recommendation intention. J Korea Contents Assoc 2021; 21(1): 258-267. 
  30. Jang HH, Kang SG, Yan Z. A study on new consumption behaviors in the Korean online and offline retail markets -focusing on showrooming and reverse showrooming. Korea E-Trade Res Inst 2014; 12(1): 29-51.  https://doi.org/10.17255/etr.12.1.201402.29
  31. Lee YN, Jang HJ, Choi YW, Choi WS, Oh JE. A study on the consumer perception and importance-performance analysis of the vegetarian meal-kit development. J Korea Contents Assoc 2021; 21(3): 324-335.
  32. Yang JY, Lee HJ. Analysis of factors affecting customer repurchase decisions in food delivery services. Acad Customer Satisf Manag 2020; 22(4): 65-82. https://doi.org/10.34183/KCSMA.22.4.4
  33. Jung HW. Eating out behavior and selection attributes under the COVID-19 [dissertation]. Cheongju: Chungbuk National University; 2022. 
  34. Seong BS, Moon SS. Importance-performance analysis of selection attribute for users on foodservice comparison of franchise and individual brand. J Korea Entrepreneurship Soc 2014; 9(2): 50-74.
  35. Bei LT, Chiao YC. An integrated model for the effects of perceived product, perceived service quality, and perceived price fairness on consumer satisfaction and loyalty. J Consum Satisf Dissatisfaction Complain Behav 2001; 14(1): 125-140. 
  36. Yee SH. The price of eating out continues to rise, with bibimbap being 10,000 won and grilled pork belly being 20,000 won [Internet]. Seoul: News1; 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 6]. Available from: https://www.news1.kr/articles/4973250.