Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the 2021 Hip and Pelvis Research grant funded by the Korean Hip Society.
References
- Zheng H, Gu H, Shao H, et al. Treatment and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B:293-300. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0935.R1
- Kim YH, Mansukhani SA, Kim JS, Park JW. Use of locking plate and strut onlay allografts for periprosthetic fracture around well-fixed femoral components. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:166-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.064
- Schopper C, Luger M, Hipmair G, Schauer B, Gotterbarm T, Klasan A. The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures: Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05240-w
- Gausden EB, Beiene ZA, Blevins JL, et al. Periprosthetic femur fractures after total hip arthroplasty: does the mode of failure correlate with classification? J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:2597-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.048
- Froberg L, Troelsen A, Brix M. Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:648-52. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747925
- Powell-Bowns MFR, Oag E, Ng N, et al. Vancouver B periprosthetic fractures involving the Exeter cemented stem. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B:309-20. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0695.R1
- Ricciardi BF, Nodzo SR, Oi K, Lee YY, Westrich GH. Radiographic outcomes of cable-plate versus cable-grip fixation in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur. Hip Int. 2017;27:584-8. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000496
- Lunebourg A, Mouhsine E, Cherix S, Ollivier M, Chevalley F, Wettstein M. Treatment of type B periprosthetic femur fractures with curved non-locking plate with eccentric holes: retrospective study of 43 patients with minimum 1-year followup. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101:277-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.015
- Pavlou G, Panteliadis P, Macdonald D, et al. A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures--stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int. 2011;21:21-9. https://doi.org/10.5301/hip.2011.6301
- Yoon BH, Kim KC. Does teriparatide improve fracture union?: a systematic review. J Bone Metab. 2020;27:167-74. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2020.27.3.167
- Zelle BA, Salazar LM, Howard SL, Parikh K, Pape HC. Surgical treatment options for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Int Orthop. 2022;46:1111-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05314-3
- Tsai MH, Chen CC, Chang CH, Chang Y, Hsieh PH, Hu CC. Revision total hip arthroplasty with primary stem or fullporous-coated long stem for aseptic femoral component loosening: a matched-pair study. Orthop Res Rev. 2022;14:25-33. https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S346891
- Asa'ad F, Thomsen P, Kunrath MF. The role of titanium particles and ions in the pathogenesis of peri-implantitis. J Bone Metab. 2022;29:145-54. https://doi.org/10.11005/jbm.2022.29.3.145
- Van Rysselberghe NL, DeBaun MR, Sanchez M, et al. Drilling the cement mantle in well-fixed periprosthetic femur fractures is not associated with arthroplasty-related complications. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. Published online July 5, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03308-w
- Moon JK, Lee H, Yoon PW, Park KC, Chang JS, Kim JW. Total hip arthroplasty for failed acetabular fracture: a double-center comparative study on failed proximal femur fracture. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48:2319-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01744-7
- Marino S, Giuliani A, De Mauro D, et al. Treatment options for proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a single center experience. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(1 Suppl):113-8. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202211_30290
- Agostini G, Angelini I, Citarelli C, et al. Clinical and radiographical outcome after surgical treatment of periprosthetic type B proximal femur fractures: a retrospective study. Musculoskelet Surg. 2022;106:83-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-020-00676-6
- Niikura T, Sakurai A, Oe K, et al. Clinical and radiological results of locking plate fixation for periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip arthroplasties: a retrospective multi-center study. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19:984-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0622-3
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
- Min BW, Lee KJ, Cho CH, Lee IG, Kim BS. High failure rates of locking compression plate osteosynthesis with transverse fracture around a well-fixed stem tip for periprosthetic femoral fracture. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3758. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113758
- Slullitel PA, Garcia-Barreiro GG, Onativia JI, et al. Selected Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished femoral components can be safely treated with osteosynthesis. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B:1222-30. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-1809.R1
- Manara JR, Mathews JA, Sandhu HS. Cable plating with a single strut allograft in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur. Hip Int. 2019;29:58-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018761519
- Lv H, Guo X, Wang YH, et al. Open reduction and locked compression plate fixation, with or without allograft strut, for periprosthetic fractures in patients who had a well-fixed femoral stem: a retrospective study with an average 2-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05008-2
- Kubik JF, Bornes TD, Gausden EB, Klinger CE, Wellman DS, Helfet DL. Surgical outcomes of dual-plate fixation for periprosthetic femur fractures around a stable hip arthroplasty stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:3605-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03950-9
- Taha A, ElZaher EH, ElGanzoury I, Ashoub M, Khairy A. Osteosynthesis and outcomes of traumatic periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2021;3:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00089-1
- Roche-Albero A, Mateo-Agudo J, Martin-Hernandez C, Arnaudas-Casanueva M, Gil-Albarova J. Osteosynthesis in Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic fractures. Injury. 2021;52:2451-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.023
- Del Chiaro A, Piolanti N, Bonicoli E, Pd P, Marchetti S, Scaglione M. Treatment of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures using Intrauma Iron Lady® locking plate: a retro-spective study on 32 patients. Injury. 2021;52:2459-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.089
- Bhalchandra Londhe S, Churhe S, Omprakash Agrawal P, Shirishkar R, Malcolm Pestonji J, Antao N. Early experience with the use of trochanteric reattachment plate for the treatment of Vancouver type B 1 periprosthetic hip fractures. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;23:101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101644
- Zajonz D, Ponick C, Edel M, et al. Results after surgical treatment of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures. Osteosynthesis with prosthesis preservation vs. prosthesis change. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2020;9:Doc02. https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000146
- Ciriello V, Chiarpenello R, Tomarchio A, Marra F, Egidio AC, Piovani L. The management of Vancouver B1 and C periprosthetic fractures: radiographic and clinic outcomes of a monocentric consecutive series. Hip Int. 2020;30(2_suppl):94-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700020971727
- Min BW, Cho CH, Son ES, Lee KJ, Lee SW, Min KK. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Injury. 2018;49:1336-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.020
- Lee JM, Kim TS, Kim TH. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis. 2018;30:78- 85. https://doi.org/10.5371/hp.2018.30.2.78
- Yeo I, Rhyu KH, Kim SM, Park YS, Lim SJ. High union rates of locking compression plating with cortical strut allograft for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2016;40:2365-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3107-x
- Russo M, Malekzadeh AS, Hampton C, Hymes R, Schwartzbach C, Schulman J. Reversed contralateral LISS plate for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures. Orthopedics. 2015;38:e467-72. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150603-53
- Kinov P, Volpin G, Sevi R, Tanchev PP, Antonov B, Hakim G. Surgical treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: our institutional experience. Injury. 2015;46:1945-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.017
- Holder N, Papp S, Gofton W, Beaule PE. Outcomes following surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures: a single centre series. Can J Surg. 2014;57:209-13. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014813
- Dargan D, Jenkinson MJ, Acton JD. A retrospective review of the Dall-Miles plate for periprosthetic femoral fractures: twenty-seven cases and a review of the literature. Injury. 2014;45:1958-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.034
- Khashan M, Amar E, Drexler M, Chechik O, Cohen Z, Steinberg EL. Superior outcome of strut allograft-augmented plate fixation for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around a stable femoral stem. Injury. 2013;44:1556-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.025
- Baba T, Kaneko K, Shitoto K, Futamura K, Maruyama Y. Comparison of therapeutic outcomes of periprosthetic femoral fracture between treatments employing locking and conventional plates. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23:437-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1005-0
- Apivatthakakul T, Phornphutkul C, Bunmaprasert T, Sananpanich K, Fernandez Dell'Oca A. Percutaneous cerclage wiring and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO): a percutaneous reduction technique in the treatment of Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:813-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1489-4
- Ebraheim NA, Gomez C, Ramineni SK, Liu J. Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures adjacent to a well-fixed femoral stem with reversed distal femoral locking plate. J Trauma. 2009;66:1152-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e318182561f
- Buttaro MA, Farfalli G, Paredes Nunez M, Comba F, Piccaluga F. Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1964-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01224
- Old AB, McGrory BJ, White RR, Babikian GM. Fixation of Vancouver B1 peri-prosthetic fractures by broad metal plates without the application of strut allografts. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1425-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17749
- Gonzalez-Martin D, Pais-Brito JL, Gonzalez-Casamayor S, Guerra-Ferraz A, Martin-Velez P, Herrera-Perez M. Periprosthetic hip fractures with a loose stem: open reduction and internal fixation versus stem revision. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:3318-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.003
- Smitham PJ, Carbone TA, Bolam SM, et al. Vancouver B2 peri-prosthetic fractures in cemented femoral implants can be treated with open reduction and internal fixation alone without revision. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:1430-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.003
- Park JS, Hong S, Nho JH, Kang D, Choi HS, Suh YS. Radiologic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for cementless stems in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019;53:24-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2018.10.003
- Solomon LB, Hussenbocus SM, Carbone TA, Callary SA, Howie DW. Is internal fixation alone advantageous in selected B2 periprosthetic fractures? ANZ J Surg. 2015;85:169-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12884
- Lewis DP, Tarrant SM, Cornford L, Balogh ZJ. Management of Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, revision total hip arthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002148
- Vialla T, Tran-Minh D, Barbotte F, et al. Comparison of the functional outcomes after treatment of periprosthetic hip fractures with femoral stem loosening: locking plate fixation with or without femoral stem revision. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022;108:103300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103300
- Scalici G, Boncinelli D, Zanna L, et al. Periprosthetic femoral fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): a comparison between osteosynthesis and revision in a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05159-2
- Pfluger P, Bolierakis E, Wurm M, Horst K, Hildebrand F, Biberthaler P. Revision rate is higher in patients with periprosthetic femur fractures following revision arthroplasty in comparison with ORIF following our algorithm: a two-center 1 analysis of 129 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48:1913-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01832-8
- Yoon BH, Seo JG, Koo KH. Comparison of postoperative infection-related complications between cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9:145-52. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.2.145
- Yoon BH, Ha YC, Lee YK, Koo KH. Postoperative deep infection after cemented versus cementless total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1823-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.041
- Schmidutz F, Schreiner AJ, Ahrend MD, et al. Risk of periprosthetic joint infection after posttraumatic hip arthroplasty following acetabular fractures. Z Orthop Unfall. Published online May 23, 2022; https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1810-7379
- Keller DM, Pizzo RA, Patel JN, Viola A, Yoon RS, Liporace FA. Use of antibiotic-cement coated locking plates in the setting of periprosthetic infection and infected nonunion. Injury. 2022;53:2567-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.040
- Gonzalez-Martin D, Hernandez-Castillejo LE, Herrera-Perez M, Pais-Brito JL, Gonzalez-Casamayor S, Garrido-Miguel M. Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;49:87-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-02032-8