의학교육논단 (Korean Medical Education Review)

  • 제25권2호
  • /
  • Pages.84-101
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2092-5603(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-6370(eISSN)
연세대학교 의과대학 (Yonsei university college of medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

의학교육의 코호트 구축을 위한 종단 데이터베이스 설계방안 연구

Designing a Longitudinal Database for Cohort Construction in Medical Education

  • 정한나 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 김혜원 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 이이레 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실) ;
  • 안신기 (연세대학교 의과대학 의학교육학교실)
  • Hanna Jung (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hae Won Kim (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • I Re Lee (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shinki An (Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.24
  • 심사 : 2023.05.16
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Longitudinal data can provide important evidence with the potential to stimulate innovation and affect policies in medical education and can serve as a driving force for further developments in medical education through evidence-based decisions. Tracking and observing cohorts of students and graduates using longitudinal data can be a way to link the past, present, and future of medical education. This study reviewed practical methods and technical, administrative, and ethical considerations for the establishment and operation of a longitudinal database and presented examples of longitudinal databases. Cohort study design methods and previous examples of research using longitudinal databases to explore major topics in medical education were also reviewed. The implications of this study are as follows: (1) a systematic design process is required to establish longitudinal data, and each university should engage in ongoing deliberation about this issue; (2) efforts are needed to alleviate "survey fatigue" among respondents and reduce the administrative burden of those conducting data collection and analysis; (3) it is necessary to regularly review issues of personal information protection, data security, and ethics regarding the survey respondents; and (4) a system should be established that integrates and manages a longitudinal database of medical education at the national level. The hope is that establishing longitudinal data and cohorts at individual medical schools will not be a temporary phenomenon, but rather that they will be well utilized at the national level to innovate and implement ongoing changes in medical education.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation. Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019 [Internet]. Seoul: Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation; 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. Available from: https://kimee.or.kr/medical-education/criteria/ 
  2. Oxford University Press. Cohort [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford Learner's Dictionaries; c2023 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/cohort?q=cohort 
  3. Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang KY, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. 
  4. Carraccio C, Wolfsthal SD, Englander R, Ferentz K, Martin C. Shifting paradigms: from Flexner to competencies. Acad Med. 2002;77(5):361-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200205000-00003 
  5. Triola MM, Hawkins RE, Skochelak SE. The time is now: using graduates' practice data to drive medical education reform. Acad Med. 2018;93(6):826-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002176 
  6. Gonnella JS, Callahan CA, Veloski JJ, DeSantis J, Hojat M. Fifty years of findings from the Jefferson Longitudinal Study of Medical Education. Cham: Springer; 2022. 
  7. Jung H, Lee IR, Kim HW, An S. Design of a model to structure longitudinal data for medical education based on the I-E-O model. Korean Med Educ Rev. 2022;24(2):156-71. https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.2022.24.2.156 
  8. Kim HK, Gu NW, Kim ML, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Kim IS, et al. Integrated management and utilization of KICE educational data [Internet]. Jincheon: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation; 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 5]. Available from: https://www.kice.re.kr/filedown8.do?fileNM=ORM202004002.pdf&filePath=/resrchBoard/2020/07/1595487871950_29455727464934279.pdf 
  9. Rosenberg ME, Gauer JL, Smith B, Calhoun A, Olson AP, Melcher E. Building a medical education outcomes center: development study. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(2):e14651. https://doi.org/10.2196/14651 
  10. Wilhite JA, Altshuler L, Zabar S, Gillespie C, Kalet A. Development and maintenance of a medical education research registry. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02113-5 
  11. Gillespie C, Zabar S, Altshuler L, Fox J, Pusic M, Xu J, et al. The Research on Medical Education Outcomes (ROMEO) Registry: addressing ethical and practical challenges of using "Bigger," Longitudinal Educational Data. Acad Med. 2016;91(5):690-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000920 
  12. Ellaway RH, Topps D, Pusic M. Data, big and small: emerging challenges to medical education scholarship. Acad Med. 2019;94(1):31-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002465 
  13. Gonnella JS, Hojat M, Veloski JJ. Jefferson longitudinal study of medical education. Philadelphia (PA): Jefferson Medical College; 2005. 
  14. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G. Creating a longitudinal database in medical education: perspectives from the pioneers. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016;29(3):266-70. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.204214 
  15. Birnie F, Smith F. 2002 Cohort of UK medical graduates. Oxford: UK Medical Careers Research Group, Oxford University; 2016. 
  16. Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand. National Data Report 2020: 2015-2019 data from final year students at Australian medical schools. Sydney (NSW): Medical Deans Australia and New Zealand; 2020. 
  17. The New Zealand MSOD Steering Group. National report on doctors one year after graduating from New Zealand medical schools in 2011-2015. [place unknown]: The New Zealand MSOD Steering Group; 2019. 
  18. The New Zealand MSOD Steering Group. National report on doctors one year after graduating from New Zealand medical schools in 2015-2019. [place unknown]: The New Zealand MSOD Steering Group; 2019. 
  19. Hojat M, Callahan CA, Gonnella JS. Students' personality and ratings of clinical competence in medical school clerkships: a longitudinal study. Psychol Health Med. 2004;9(2):247-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500410001670771 
  20. Belfrage A, Grotmol KS, Lien L, Moum T, Wiese RV, Tyssen R. Medical school predictors of later perceived mastery of clinical work among Norwegian doctors: a cohort study with 10-year and 20-year follow-up. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e014462. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014462 
  21. Poole P, Shulruf B, Rudland J, Wilkinson T. Comparison of UMAT scores and GPA in prediction of performance in medical school: a national study. Med Educ. 2012;46(2):163-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04078.x 
  22. Shulruf B, Bagg W, Begun M, Hay M, Lichtwark I, Turnock A, et al. The efficacy of medical student selection tools in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust. 2018;208(5):214-8. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00400 
  23. Law IR, Walters L. The influence of international medical electives on career preference for primary care and rural practice. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0483-2 
  24. Goldacre MJ, Fazel S, Smith F, Lambert T. Choice and rejection of psychiatry as a career: surveys of UK medical graduates from 1974 to 2009. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202(3):228-34. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.111153 
  25. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Erdmann JB, Vogel WH. Medical students' cognitive appraisal of stressful life events as related to personality, physical well-being, and academic performance: a longitudinal study. Pers Individ Dif. 2003;35(1):219-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00186-1 
  26. McManus IC, Keeling A, Paice E. Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: a twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates. BMC Med. 2004;2:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-2-29 
  27. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55 
  28. McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC. Intercalated degrees, learning styles, and career preferences: prospective longitudinal study of UK medical students. BMJ. 1999;319(7209):542-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7209.542 
  29. Chahine S, Kulasegaram KM, Wright S, Monteiro S, Grierson LE, Barber C, et al. A call to investigate the relationship between education and health outcomes using big data. Acad Med. 2018;93(6):829-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002217 
  30. Porter SR, Whitcomb ME, Weitzer WH. Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Dir Inst Res. 2004;2004(121):63-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.101 
  31. Ellaway RH, Pusic MV, Galbraith RM, Cameron T. Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education. Med Teach. 2014;36(3):216-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.874553
  32. Dyrbye LN, Thomas MR, Mechaber AJ, Eacker A, Harper W, Massie FS Jr, et al. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions. Acad Med. 2007;82(7):654-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318065be1e 
  33. Yoon YC. A study on the problems and improvements of the 'Personal Information Protection Act'. Hannam J Law Technol. 2012;18(2):105-60. https://doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2012.18.2.105