References
- Sivananthan S, Arif M, Choon DS. Small stem Exeter total hip replacement: clinical and radiological follow-up over a minimum of 2.5 years. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003;11:148-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900301100208
- Chiu KH, Shen WY, Cheung KW, Tsui HF. Primary Exeter total hip arthroplasty in patients with small femurs: a minimal of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:275-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.014
- Stryker. Exeter V40 femoral stem surgical technique [Internet]. Stryker; 2014 [cited 2022 Jul 13]. Available from: www.strykermeded.com/media/1216/exeter-using-modular-broach-surgical-technique.pdf
- Chiu KH, Cheung KW, Chung KY, Shen WY. Exeter small femoral stem for patients with small femurs. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011;19:279-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900303
- Choy GG, Roe JA, Whitehouse SL, Cashman KS, Crawford RW. Exeter short stems compared with standard length Exeter stems: experience from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:103-9.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.016
- Williams HD, Browne G, Gie GA, Ling RS, Timperley AJ, Wendover NA. The Exeter Universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:324-34. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:1091. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12261
- Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJ, Ling RS. Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am. 1988;19:477-89. Erratum in: Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20:preceding 519.
- Hook S, Moulder E, Yates PJ, Burston BJ, Whitley E, Bannister GC. The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:1584-90. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:421. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.18345
- Beckenbaugh RD, Ilstrup DM. Total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:306-13. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197860030-00005
- Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14:231-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90146-2
- Tai CC, Nam HY, Abbas AA, Merican AM, Choon SK. First series of Exeter small stem primary total hip arthroplasty minimum 5 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:1200-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.001
- Hamilton DF, Ohly NE, Gaston P. Can Arthroplasty Stem INfluence Outcome? (CASINO): a randomized controlled equivalence trial of 125 mm versus 150 mm Exeter V40 stems in total hip arthroplasty. Trials. 2018;19:226. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2621-8
- Sandiford NA, Jameson SS, Wilson MJ, Hubble MJ, Timperley AJ, Howell JR. Cement-in-cement femoral component revision in the multiply revised total hip arthroplasty: results with a minimum follow-up of five years. Bone Joint J. 2017;99- B:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.BJJ2016-0076.R1
- Quinlan JF, O'Shea K, Doyle F, Brady OH. In-cement technique for revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:730-3. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17037
- Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, et al. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1010-4. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424
- Bilbao A, Garcia-Perez L, Arenaza JC, et al. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: reliability, validity and responsiveness. Qual Life Res. 2018;27:2897-908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1929-x
- Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(141):17-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197906000-00002
- Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370:1508-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
- Wyatt M, Hooper G, Frampton C, Rothwell A. Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement. World J Orthop. 2014;5:591-6. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591
- Maggs J, Wilson M. The relative merits of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51:377-85. https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_405_16
- Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW, Timperley AJ, Howell JR, Wilson MJ. The Exeter V40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10-year follow-up: the first 540 cases. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:1002-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1
- Evans J, Salar O, Whitehouse S, et al. Survival of the Exeter V40 short revision (44/00/125) stem when used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA): analysis of the national joint registry (NJR). Orthop Proc. 2022;104-B(Suppl 4):25. https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.2022.4.025
- Kjaergaard N, Kjaersgaard JB, Petersen CL, Jensen MU, Laursen MB. Thresholds for the Oxford Hip Score after total hip replacement surgery: a novel approach to postoperative evaluation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2017;18:401-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-017-0465-8
- Judge A, Arden NK, Kiran A, et al. Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:412-8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27425
- Beard DJ, Harris K, Dawson J, et al. Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:73-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.009
- Rosenlund S, Broeng L, Holsgaard-Larsen A, Jensen C, Overgaard S. Patient-reported outcome after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between lateral and posterior approach. Acta Orthop. 2017;88:239-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2017.1291100