DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

초등학생의 수학 청해력 실태 조사 연구

South Korean Elementary Students' Mathematical Listening Ability

  • 투고 : 2023.05.10
  • 심사 : 2023.06.16
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30

초록

수학 청해력이란 수학적 원리와 개념이 내포된 음성 언어를 듣고 그 의미를 파악하는 능력을 지칭한다. 수학 청해력은 타 교과 수업, 일상생활 속 듣기와 구분된다. 본 연구에서는 수학 청해력 측정 도구를 활용하여 초등학교 학생 834명의 수학 청해력 실태를 조사하였다. 설문조사의 통계 분석 결과를 통해 학생들의 수학 청해력은 성별, 학년, 학교의 위치와 통계적으로 유의미한 상관관계가 있음을 확인하였다. 여학생의 수학 청해력이 남학생보다 높으며, 수학 청해력은 학년에 따라 증가하다가 6학년에서 다시 감소하는 것을 알 수 있었다. 또한 학교의 위치에 따라 학생들의 수학 청해력이 유의미한 차이를 보였다. 본 연구의 결과는 수학 청해력 관련 후속 연구, 교수·학습 자료 개발의 토대로 활용될 수 있다.

Mathematical listening ability(MLA) refers to the capability to listen to speech languages that contain mathematical principles and concepts and understand their meanings, distinguishing it from daily life and listening in other subject classes. In this study, I investigated 834 elementary school students' MLA adapting a MLA survey items. Through the statistical analysis results of the survey, I confirmed that students' MLA had a significant correlation with gender, grade, and school location. Female students' MLA was statistically significantly higher than that of male students. MLA increased with grade and then decreased again in 6th grade. In addition, students' MLA was statistically significant differences according to the location of the school. The results of this study might be used as the basis for follow-up research and development of teaching and learning materials related to MLA.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics Curriculum, Ministry of Education Notice No. 2022-33 [Annex 8]. Retrieved from http://if-blog.tistory.com/939
  2. Kim, R. (2019). Study on the meaning of gender in mathematics education research. Communication of Mathematics Education, 33(4), 445-453.
  3. Kim, R. (2021). Analysis of changes in mathematical anxiety of elementary school students: A longitudinal study. Communication of Mathematics Education, 35(1), 1-14.
  4. Kim, R. (2022). South Korean elementary teachers' perception about students' mathematics listening ability. Education of Priamry School Mathematics, 25(4), 343-360.
  5. Kim, R. (2019). Development of mathematics listening ability surveys for elementary school students. Communication of Mathematics Education, 37(1), 1-19.
  6. Kim, E. H., & Paik, S. (2019). A study on determining factors of elementary students' attitudes towards mathematics. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 12(2), 125-148.
  7. Lee, H., Kim, H., & Ko, H. (2021). Analysis of recognition and needs for parents in elementary, middle, and high schools for mathematics education. Communication of Mathematics Education, 35(3), 213-231.
  8. Acat, M. B., Demiral, H., & Kaya, M. F. (2016). Measuring listening comprehension skills of 5th grade school students with the help of web based systems. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9116a
  9. Allen, C. (2013). Does god listen to rap?: Christians and the world's most controversial music. Cruciform Press.
  10. Asia, A., Tolla, A., & Salam, S. (2019). Indonesian vocabulary mastery of early-aged children in Paud Melati Makassar. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 535-540. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1003.17
  11. Balyan R., McCarthy K. S., & McNamara D. S. (2020). Applying natural language processing and hierarchical machine learning approaches to text difficulty classification. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(3), 337-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00201-7
  12. Barker, L., Edwards, R., Gaines, C, Gladney, K., & Holley, E (1980). An investigation of proportional time spent in various communication activities by college students. J ournal of Applied Communication Research, 8, 101-109.
  13. Beall, M. L., Gill-Rosier, J., Tate, J., & Matten, A. (2008). State of the context: Listening in education. Journal of Listening, 22(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904010802174826
  14. Bentley, S. (1999, November). Listening in the 21st century. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention. 
  15. Bentley, S. (2000). Listening in the 21st century. Journal of the International Listening Association, 14, 130
  16. Beard, D., & Bodie, G. D. (2014). Listening research in the communication discipline. In P. J. Gehrke & W. M. Keith (Eds.), The unfinished conversation: 100 years of communication studies. Routledge.
  17. Bommelje, R., Houston, J. M., & Smither, R. (2003). Personality characteristics of effective listeners: A five factor perspective. International J ournal of Listening, 17(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2003.10499054
  18. Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. Harper and Row.
  19. Brownell, J. (2002). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills(2nd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
  20. Campbell, R. (2011). The power of the listening ear. English Journal, 100(5), 66.
  21. Campbell, J. (2014). Bedtime stories. African American Review, 47(2), 431-434. https://doi.org/10.1353/afa.2014.0038
  22. Clinton-Lisell, V. (2022). Listening ears or reading eyes: A meta-analysis of reading and listening comprehension comparisons. Review of Educational Research, 92(4), 543-582. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211060871
  23. Davis, D. (2001, summer). Two ears and one mouth: Two eyes and one hand. ILA Listening Post, 77, 10-13.
  24. Dickinson, D. K., McCabe, A., Anastasopoulos, L., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Poe, M. D. (2003). The comprehensive language approach to early literacy: The interrelationships among vocabulary, phonological sensitivity, and print knowledge among preschool-aged children. Journal of Educational psychology, 95(3), 465.
  25. Emmert, P. (1994). A definition of listening. Listening Post, 51, 6.
  26. Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The modern language journal, 75(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05348.x
  27. Glen, E. (1989). A content analysis of fifty definitions of listening. International J ournal of Listening, 3, 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1932586xijl0301_3
  28. Goh, M., & Aryadoust, V. (2016). Learner listening: New insights and directions from empirical studies. International Journal of Listening, 30(1-2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1138689
  29. Gorman T. E., & Green C. S. (2016). Short-term mindfulness intervention reduces the negative attentional effects associated with heavy media multitasking. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
  30. Groshek, J., & Thompson, K. (1994, Summer). Exploring student listening competency at Alverno College. A project and presentation at Alverno College, Milwaukee, WI.
  31. Halpern, D. F., Wai, J., & Saw, A. (2005). A psychobiosocial model: Why females are sometimes greater than and sometimes less than males in math achievement. In A. M. Gallagher & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 48-72). Cambridge University.
  32. Hintz, A. B. (2011). Understanding students' experiences as listeners during mathematical discussion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.595883
  33. Hoyles, C. (1985). What is the point of group discussion in mathematics?. Educational studies in mathematics, 16(2), 205-214.
  34. Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321(5888), 494-495. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1160364
  35. Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2006). Gender similarities in mathematics and science. Science, 314(5799), 599-600. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132154
  36. Imhoff, M. (1998). What makes a good listener? Listening behavior in instructional settings. International Journal of Listening, 12, 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.1998.10499020
  37. Jansen, A. (2006). Seventh graders' motivations for participating in two discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School J ournal, 106(5), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.1086/505438
  38. Janusik, L. A. (2002). Teaching listening: What do we do? What should we do?. International Journal of Listening, 16(1), 5-13 https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2002.10499047
  39. Janusik, L. A., & Wolvin, A. D. (1999). Listening treatment in the basic communication course text. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Listening Association, Albuquerque, NM.
  40. Justice L. M., Lomax R., O'Connell A., Pentimonti J., Petrill S. A., Piasta S. B., Gray S., Restrepo M. A., Cain K., Catts H., Bridges M., Nielsen D., Hogan T., Bovaird J., Nelson J. R., Jiang H., Farquharson K. (2018). Are working memory and behavioral attention equally important for both reading and listening comprehension? A developmental comparison. Reading and Writing, 31(7), 1449-1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9840-y
  41. Kraemer, K. L (1991). The information systems research challenge: Survey research methods(Vol. 3). Harvard Business School Press.
  42. Lewis, T. R. (1958). Chapter II: Listening. Review of Educational Research, 28(2), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543028002089
  43. Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2009). Sex differences in reading achievement. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 13(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2009.1.01
  44. Mason, J. (2020). Questioning in mathematics education. In Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 705-711). Springer.
  45. McDevitt, T. M., Sheenan, E. P., & McMenamin, N. (1991). Self-reports of academic listening activities by traditional and non-traditional college students. College Student Journal, 25(1), 478-486.
  46. Mitchell, R., Sihn, H. G., & Kim, R. (2014). South Korean elementary teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching numbers and operations. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(15), 336.
  47. Molly, P. J. (1997). The role of individual differences in working memory in reading and listening comprehension in intermediate grade students [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia].
  48. O'Mara, D. A. (1981). The process of reading mathematics. Journal of Reading, 25(1), 22-30.
  49. Pinker, S. (2005). The science of gender and science: Pinker vs. Spelke, A Debate. Mind Brain and Behavior Initiative (MBB), Harvard University. Retrieved May 1, 2023, http://edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index. html.
  50. Purdy, M. (1991). What is listening? In D. Borisoff and M. Purdy (Eds.), Listening in everyday life: A personal and professional approach (pp. 3-20). University Press of America.
  51. Rankin, P. T. (1926). The measurement of the ability to understand spoken language [Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan].
  52. Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (2010). How (well-structured) talk builds the mind. In D. D. Preiss & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 163-194). Springer.
  53. Robertson, K. (2005). Active listening: more than just paying attention. Australian Family Physician, 34(12), 1053-5.
  54. Scheiner, T., Montes, M. A., Godino, J. D., Carrillo, J., & Pino-Fan, L. R. (2019). What makes mathematics teacher knowledge specialized? Offering alternative views. International J ournal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9859-6
  55. Setiawan, E. P., Pierewan, A. C., & Montesinos-Lopez, O. A. (2021). Growth mindset, school context, and mathematics achievement in Indonesia: A multilevel model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13690.279-294
  56. Steil, L. K., Barker, L. L., & Watson, K. W. (1983). Effective listening: Key to your success. Random House.
  57. Thompson, K., Leintz, P., Nevers, B., & Witkowski, S. (2004). The integrative listening model: An approach to teaching and learning listening. The Journal of General Education, 53(3-4), 225-246. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2005.0011
  58. Tighe, E. L., Spencer, M., & Schatschneider, C. (2015). Investigating predictors of listening comprehension in third-, seventh-, and tenth-grade students: a dominance analysis approach. Reading Psychology, 36(8), 700-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.963270
  59. Ungadi, B. A. (2015). " I was just done with calculations…. I realized that I like working with people" understanding why women abandon careers in mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(19), 234-250.
  60. Varao-Sousa T. L., Smilek D., & Kingstone A. (2018). In the lab and in the wild: How distraction and mind wandering affect attention and memory. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 1-9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0085-0
  61. Verlaan W. (2019). Relative contributions of literal and inferential reading and listening comprehension to the reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts in middle grade students. In Babino A., Cossa N., Araujo J., Johnson R. (Eds.), ALER yearbook (pp. 273-300). Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers.
  62. Wagner, E., & Toth, P. D. (2017). The role of pronunciation in the assessment of second language listening ability. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (Vol. 107, pp. 72-92). Multilingual Matters
  63. Witkin, B. R., & Trochim, W. W. (1997). Toward a synthesis of listening constructs: A concept map analysis. International Journal of Listening, 11(1), 69-87. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1932586xijl1101_5
  64. Wolfgramm, C., Suter, N., & Goksel, E. (2016). Examining the role of concentration, vocabulary and self-concept in listening and reading comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 30(1-2), 25-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1065746
  65. Wolvin, A. D., & Coakley, C. G (1992). Listening.(4th ed.). William C. Brown Publishers.
  66. Zapalska, A. M., & Dabb, H. (2002). Learning styles. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 13(3-4), 77-97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J066v13n03_06