DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Secondary Mathematics Teachers' Perceptions on Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Math and Math for Artificial Intelligence (AI)

도구로서 인공지능과 교과로서 인공지능에 대한 중등 수학 교사의 인식 탐색

  • Sim, Yeonghoon (Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kim, Jihyun (Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Kwon, Minsung (California State University Northridge)
  • Received : 2023.05.10
  • Accepted : 2023.06.28
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore secondary mathematics teachers' perceptions on Artificial Intelligence (AI). For this purpose, we conducted three focus group interviews with 18 secondary in-service mathematics teachers and analyzed their perceptions on AI for math and math for AI. The secondary in-service mathematics teachers perceive that AI allows to implement different types of mathematics instruction but has limitations in exploring students' mathematical thinking and having emotional interactions with students. They also perceive that AI makes it easy to develop assessment items for teachers but teachers' interventions are needed for grading essay-type assessment items. Lastly, the secondary in-service mathematics teachers agree the rationale of adopting the subject <Artificial Intelligence Mathematics> and its needs for students, but they perceive that they are not well prepared yet to teach the subject and do not have sufficient resources for teaching the subject and assessing students' understanding about the subject. The findings provide implications and insights for developing individualized AI learning tools for students in the secondary level, providing AI assessment tools for teachers, and offering professional development programs for teachers to increase their understanding about the subject.

본 연구는 초점 집단 면담(FGI)을 활용하여 인공지능에 대한 중등 수학 교사의 인식을 도구로서 인공지능과 교과로서 인공지능으로 나누어 분석하였다. 도구로서 인공지능 중 수학 교수 및 학습 도구 측면에서 수학 교사들은 인공지능을 활용하면 다양한 유형의 수학 수업이 가능할 것이라는 긍정적인 의견을 제시하였으나 학생들의 수학적 사고 과정의 면밀한 파악 및 학생들과 정서적 상호작용에 있어 인공지능 활용에 한계를 제시하였다. 도구로서 인공지능 중 수학 평가 도구로서의 측면에서 수학 교사들은 인공지능을 활용하면 문항 출제 및 채점을 용이하게 할 수 있다는 긍정적인 의견이 있었던 반면, 논술형 문항 채점에서는 교사의 개입이 필요하다는 의견이 있었다. 교과로서 인공지능 측면에서 수학 교사들은 <인공지능 수학> 교과의 도입 취지와 학습의 필요성에는 공감하였으나 이를 가르치기 위한 교사의 준비와 교수 학습 및 평가 자료가 다소 부족한 실정이라고 응답하였다. 따라서 본 연구를 통해 중·고등학교 수학에서도 맞춤형 인공지능 학습 도구가 개발되어야 하고, 교사들의 평가를 도울 수 있는 인공지능 평가 도구를 개발 및 보급할 필요가 있으며, <인공지능 수학> 교과에 대한 교사의 이해를 높일 수 있는 전문성 향상 프로그램과 학생들에게 의미 있는 학습을 도울 수 있는 컨텐츠 위주로 교과 내용을 구성할 필요가 있음을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT. (2019). National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence(AI). MSIT. 
  2. Ministry of Education. (2020a). The 3rd comprehensive plans for mathematics education. MOE. 
  3. Ministry of Education. (2020b). Mathematics curricuum.. Proclamation of the Ministry of Eduction #2020-236[Annex 8.]. 
  4. Kwon, O., Lee, K., Oh, S., & Park, J. (2021). An analysis of 'related learning elements' reflected in <Artificial Intelligence Mathematics> textbooks. Communications of Mathematical Education, 35(4), 445-473.  https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2021.35.4.445
  5. Kwon, S., & Kyun, S. (2018). Pre-service early childhood teachers' recognition of artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence teachers. Global Creative Leader, 8(4), 87-102.  https://doi.org/10.34226/gcl.2018.8.4.87
  6. Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2019). A research on mathematics teachers' perceptions of mathematics education. The Mathematical Education, 58(3), 423-442. 
  7. Kim, Y., & Choi, H. (2022). Kindergarten teachers' perception of early childhood AI education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 22(6), 163-178 
  8. Kim, C., & Jeon, Y. (2021). The core concepts of mathematics for AI and an analysis of mathematical contents in the <AI Mathematics> textbook. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 24(4), 391-405.  https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2021.24.4.004
  9. Kim, T., & Han, S. (2020). A study on elementary and secondary teachers' perceptions on AI education. The Journal of Education, 40(3), 181-204. 
  10. Kim, H., Park, C., Jeong, S., & Ko, H. (2018). A view on complementary relation of human teacher and AI teacher in future education. Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 181-204.  https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2018.24.2.181
  11. Na, G., Park, K., & Park, Y. (2016). Examining SENKs' and teachers' recognition about mathematics teaching and learning. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 26(1), 63-77. 
  12. Na, G., Park, M., Park, Y., & Lee, H. (2018). A study on mathematical descrptive evaluation: Focusing on examining the recognition of mathematics teachers and searching for supportive way. School Mathematics, 20(4), 635-659. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.12.20.4.635
  13. Ryu, M., & Han, S. (2018). The educational perception on artificial intelligence by elementary school teachers. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(3), 317-324  https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.3.317
  14. Park, M. (2020). The trends of using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 31(supplement), 91-102. 
  15. Shin, D. (2020). An analysis prospective mathematics teachers' perception on the use of artificial intelligence(AI) in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 215-234.  https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.3.215
  16. Shin, D. (2022). Mathematics teachers' professional development through artificial intelligence. Journal for Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 33-50. 
  17. Oh, S., & Kim, H. (2021). The effects of instructional design for high school mathematics class using artificial intelligence applications: Focusing on academic achievement and affective area. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 27(2), 401-422.  https://doi.org/10.15833/KAFEIAM.27.2.401
  18. Yoon, T., & Jung, J. (2021). A comparative study of recognition on AI-embedded instruction between Korean english teachers and Non-Korean english teachers. Studies in Linguistics, 58, 295-319.  https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..58.202101.295
  19. Lee, E., & Cho, J. (2015). A study on mathematics teachers' beliefs about their use technology experiences: Focused group interviews. The Mathematical Education, 54(2), 99-117.  https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2015.54.2.99
  20. Lee, J., & Huh, N. (2018). A study on the relationship between artificial intelligence and change in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 32(1), 23-36.  https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2018.32.1.23
  21. Yim, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, K., Kim, J., & Hong, O. (2021). The effects of an AI-based class support system on student learning: Focusing on the case of toctoc math expedition in Korea. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 32(4), 61-73.  https://doi.org/10.20972/KJEE.32.4.202112.61
  22. Jang, H., & Nam, J. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in elementary mathematics education -Focusing on the math class support system "Knock-knock! Math Expedition"-. Korean Journal of Elementary Education, 31(Supplement), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.20972/KJEE.31..202101.105
  23. Jang, H., KIm, S., & Lim, W. (2019). An analysis of the differences in the perception of elementary and secondary teachers of english learning platform based on artificial intelligence. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(22), 1143-1170. 
  24. Choi, I. (2022). Exploring teaching and learning methods using artificial intelligence (AI) in the mathematics classroom: Focusing on the development of middle school statistic scenarios. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics, 25(2), 149-174.  https://doi.org/10.30807/KSMS.2022.25.2.003
  25. Choi, J. (2013). A study of the effectiveness of mathematics taecher's training program focused on the construction of test items. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(2), 193-212. 
  26. Han, H., Kim, K., & Kwon, H. (2020). The analysis of elementary school teachers' perception of using artificial intelligence in education. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(7), 47-56.  https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2020.18.7.047
  27. Hong, S. & Choi, I. (2020). The concept and use of artificial intelligence(AI) in school education. (ORM 2020-21-3). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  28. Chan, K. S., & Zary, N. (2019). Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13930.
  29. He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019). The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0
  30. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative frameworkVfor collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1-21.
  31. Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications.
  32. Wartman, S. A., & Combs, C. D. (2019). Reimagining medical education in the age of AI. AMA J ournal of Ethics, 21(2), 146-152.