청정기술 (Clean Technology)

  • 제29권2호
  • /
  • Pages.151-159
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1598-9712(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0690(eISSN)
한국청정기술학회 (The Korean Society of Clean Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

탄소중립 거버넌스 참여 과학기술전문가의 활동 기준 제시를 위한 공통성공요인 분석 (서울시 기후환경분야 거버넌스 사례를 통한 검증)

Analysis of Governance Common Success Factors for Activity Standards of Science and Technology Experts (Verification by a case of Climate and Environment Governance of Seoul City)

  • 천지광 (한양대학교 자원환경공학과) ;
  • 김혜애 (한양대학교 자원환경공학과) ;
  • 지민규 (한국환경연구원 환경평가본부) ;
  • 전병훈 (한양대학교 자원환경공학과)
  • Ji-Kwang Cheon (Department of Earth Resources & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hea-Ae Kim (Department of Earth Resources & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Min-Kyu Ji (Environmental Assessment Group, Korea Environment Institute) ;
  • Byong-Hun Jeon (Department of Earth Resources & Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.17
  • 심사 : 2023.05.03
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

탄소중립의 실현을 위해서는 다양한 이해관계자의 공동협력을 기반으로 거버넌스 제도를 활용하는 것이 합리적이다. 성공적인 거버넌스 운영은 구성원들이 어떤 활동 기준을 가지고 참여하는지가 중요하며, 특히 정책 집행 과정에서 과학적 조언을 할 수 있는 전문가에게는 성공적인 합의점 도출을 위한 가이드 공유가 필요하다. 본 연구에서는 거버넌스 참여 과학기술전문가의 활동기준 제시를 위한 공통성공요인을 도출하고자 거버넌스 모형이론과 모형구조, 사례별 공통성공요인, 서울시 기후환경분야 거버넌스 사례적용 등의 조사 분석을 수행하였다. 모형이론 연구결과, 모형구조는 공통적으로 '조건-과정-결과'의 구조로 되어 있으며 구성원들의 활동시기인 '과정' 단계에서 공통성공요인을 도출할 수 있음을 확인하였다. 공통성공요인의 사례조사를 통해 중복요인은 신뢰성, 책임성, 투명성 및 네트워크로 도출되었다. 공통성공요인의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 서울시 거버넌스의 참여자 만족도 조사자료를 활용하여 분석한 결과, 결과값은 신뢰성 > 네트워크 > 투명성 > 책임성의 순으로 확인되었으며, 관련 요인들이 적절하게 도출됨을 알 수 있었다. 본 연구결과가 향후 과학기술분야 전문가의 활동요인으로 활용되어 탄소중립 정책의 수용성과 효용성을 높일 수 있기를 기대한다.

The realization of carbon neutrality requires cooperation from various stakeholders and the utilization of a governance system. The criteria for participating members are crucial for the successful operation of governance, and it is especially necessary for experts who can provide scientific advice for policy implementation to share a framework for successful consensus. In this study, governance model theory and model structure, governance common success factors by case, and the application of governance cases in the climate and environmental sector of Seoul, were investigated and analyzed to derive common success factors in order to present the activity standards of the science and technology experts participating in governance. The study of the model theory suggested that the model structure is commonly composed of a basic condition-process-result structure, and it was confirmed that common success factors can be derived at the process stage which is the activity period of members. Through the case study of common success factors, overlapping factors were found to be reliability, accountability, transparency, networks, and related factors. The validity of the common success factors was verified using the analysis results of satisfaction survey data from Seoul Governance Committee participants. The results confirmed that reliability was the most valuable factor followed by networks, transparency, and responsibility, and it was found that the related factors were appropriately derived. The findings of this study are expected to be used as an activity factor for science and technology experts to increase the acceptability and effectiveness of carbon-neutral policies in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Dong, A. H., Kang, J. E., Lee, S. H., Ha, J. H., and Lee, J. Y., "Development and Application of Sustainability Evaluation Methodology for Climate Change Adaptation Policies and Measures," J. Climate Change Res., 12(1), 49-66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2021.12.1.049
  2. Hong, Y.S. and Lee, D. K., "A study on Korean Climate Change Governance in Mass Media: Focused on Daily Newspapers," JKCA, 19(12), 38-56 (2019).
  3. Joo, J. B., "Critical factors for a Successful Collaborative Governance among Municipalities: A Case Study of the Council for Water Quality Improvement of the Anyang Stream," J. Korean Policy Stud., 13(3), 355-374 (2013).
  4. Ahn, S. H. and Yun, S. J., "The Process of Change in Climate Change Governance of Gwangju Metropolitan City," KGR, 22(2), 209-236 (2015).
  5. Suh, S. T. and Min, B. G., "A Study on Collaborative Governance for Regional Development," KOREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY, 30(2), 25-44 (2005).
  6. Kooiman, J., "Modern Governance: New Government- Society Interactions," ISBN-13: 978-0803988910, SAGE Publication Ltd. (1993).
  7. Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., and Balogh, S., "An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance," J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, 22(1), 1-29 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
  8. Ahn, H. K. and Ham, J. S., "Building Collaborative Governance Between the Central and Local Governments," Korea Institute of Public Administration, ISBN: 978-89-5704-604-3 (2015).
  9. Wood, D. J. and Gray, B., "Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration," J. Appl. Behav. Sci., 27(2), 139-162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001
  10. Thomson, A. M. and Perry, J. L., "Collaboration Processes Inside the Black Box," Public Adm. Rev., 66(1), 20-32 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
  11. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., and Stone, M. M., "Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature," Public Adm. Rev., 66(1), 44-55 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
  12. Ansell, C. and Gash, A., "Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice," J. Public Adm. Res. Theory., 18(4), 543-571 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  13. Bae, E. H., "Empirical Analysis of the Collaborative Administration: The Success Factors of NIMBY Program Decision Making," Korean Public Adm. J., 25(3), 91-128 (2016).
  14. Kang, S. K., "The Influential Factors of Collaborative Governance in Community based tourism: Case Study of Goryeong-county Tourism Association," J. Region Culture, 6(2), 1-23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.26654/iagc.2019.6.2.001
  15. Bae, K. H., and Kang, Y. J., "A Study on Critical Factors of Successful Collaborative Governance for Resolving Environmental Problems: Focusing upon the Taehwa River," Korean Policy Sci. Rev., 22(2), 155-187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.31553/kpsr.2018.06.22.2.155
  16. Oh, C. H. and Ko, S. H., "Is Collaborative Governance Working?: A Case Study," KSPA, 22(4), 27-49 (2012).
  17. Kang, A., "A Study on the Influence of Interpersonal Trust and Government Trust on Collaborative Governance," J. Huma. Soci. Scie., 12(2), 277-290 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.12.2.20
  18. Chae, H, "Research on Overflowing Governance," Ngo Stud., 15(1), 1-42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35225/kdps.2020.15.1.1
  19. Choo, J. M., "A Study on the Development of Environmental Governance and Environmental Policy Task to Respond to Future Environmental Issues," Korea Environment Institute, ISBN 979-11-5980-068-9 93530 (2016).
  20. Oh, J. K., "Successful Factors of Offshore Wind Energy Development in Denmark: An Analysis of Collaborative Governance," Theses (Master's Degree) (2018).
  21. Kwon, H. W., "Prospects of the Role of Government and the Structure of Governance in the Post-COVID19 Era: Focusing on the Notion of Public Value," J. Gover. Stud., 15(4), 1-35 (2020).
  22. Park, J. A., "Policy implications for governance system and participant role in the process of environmental energy policy," Theses (Master's Degree) (2018).
  23. Kim, H. A., Lee, Y. J., and Kim, T. W., "Governance Operational Performance and Tasks in the Climate and Environment Sector of Seoul Metropolitan City," Seoul Institute, 2020-CR-26 (2021).