DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

2009-2022 Thailand public perception analysis of nuclear energy on social media using deep transfer learning technique

  • Wasin Vechgama (Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (Public Organization)) ;
  • Watcha Sasawattakul (Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University) ;
  • Kampanart Silva (National Energy Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.01
  • 심사 : 2023.03.27
  • 발행 : 2023.06.25

초록

Due to Thailand's nuclear energy public acceptance problem, the understanding of nuclear energy public perception was the key factor affecting to re-consideration of the nuclear energy program. Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology and its alliances together developed the classification model for the nuclear energy public perception from the big data comments on social media using Facebook using deep transfer learning. The objective was to insight into the Thailand nuclear energy public perception on Facebook social media platform using sentiment analysis. The supervised learning was used to generate up-to-date classification model with more than 80% accuracy to classify the public perception on nuclear power plant news on Facebook from 2009 to 2022. The majority of neutral sentiments (80%) represented the opportunity for Thailand to convince people to receive a better nuclear perception. Negative sentiments (14%) showed support for other alternative energies due to nuclear accident concerns while positive sentiments (6%) expressed support for innovative nuclear technologies.

키워드

과제정보

This work was mainly supported by Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT: Ministry of Science and ICT) (No. RS-2022-00143695). Moreover, the authors must thank the opportunity from the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation (MHESI), Thailand, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), and University of Science and Technology (UST) for time resources and support in period of the publication process.

참고문헌

  1. S.S.S. Ahmad, A.N.B.S. Osman, H. Basiron, The impact of social media on human interaction in an organisation based on real-time social media data, Int. J. Data Sci. 4 (3) (2019) 260, https://doi.org/10.1504/ijds.2019.102793.
  2. P. Verduyn, J.C.C. Schulte-Strathaus, E. Kross, U.R. Hulsheger, When do smartphones displace face-to-face interactions and what to do about it? Comput. Hum. Behav. 114 (2021), 106550 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106550.
  3. World Intellectual Property Organization, World Intellectual Property Report 2017: Intangible Capital in Global Value Chains, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  4. B. Auxier, M. Anderson, Social Media Use in 2021, Pew Research Center, Washington DC, USA, 2021.
  5. K. Harris, D. Keen, T. Mitchell, When Disasters and Conflicts Collide: Improving Links between Disaster Resilience and Conflict Prevention, Overseas Development Institute, London, UK, 2013.
  6. D.S. Kim, J.W. Kim, Public opinion sensing and trend analysis on social media: a study on nuclear power on Twitter, Int. J. Multimedia Ubiquitous Eng. 9 (11) (2014) 373-384, https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.11.36.
  7. R. Satapathy, I. Chaturvedi, E. Cambria, S.S. Ho, J.C. Na, Subjectivity detection in nuclear energy tweets, Computacion y Sistemas 21 (4) (2017) 657-664, https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-21-4-2783.
  8. S.Y. Jeong, J.W. Kim, Y.S. Kim, H.Y. Joo, J.H. Moon, Sentiment analysis of nuclear energy-related articles and their comments on a portal site in Rep. of Korea in 2010-2019, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2021) 1013-1019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.07.031.
  9. D. Contu, E.E. Elshareif, I. Gurrib, Assessing views towards energy sources with social media data: the case of nuclear energy in the, UAE. Process. 9 (2021) 1945, https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9111945.
  10. M. Singh, A.K. Jakhar, S. Pandey, Sentiment analysis on the impact of coronavirus in social life using the BERT model, Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. 11 (33) (2021), https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-021-00737-z.
  11. Y. Chen, Z. Zhang, Exploring public perceptions on alternative meat in China from social media data using transfer learning method, Food Qual. Prefer 98 (2022), 104530, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104530.
  12. S.S. Ho, T. Oshita, J. Looi, A.D. Leong, A.S.F. Chuah, Exploring public perceptions of benefits and risks, trust, and acceptance of nuclear energy in Thailand and Vietnam: a qualitative approach, Energy Policy 127 (2019) 259-268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.011.
  13. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Power Development Plan 2012-2030 (PDP2010: Revision 3), Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012.
  14. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Development Plan 2018-2037 (PDP2018), Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2018.
  15. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, National Energy Plan 2022, Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2022.
  16. United Nations, Transforming our World, The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1, United Nations, New York, USA, 2015.
  17. S.O. Edosomwan, S.K. Prakasan, D. Kouame, J. Watson, T. Seymour, The history of social media and its impact on business, J. Appl. Manag. Entrep. 16 (3) (2011) 79-91.
  18. W. Vechgama, W. Sasawattakul, K. Silva, J. Cho, Development of classification model for public perception of nuclear energy in social media platform using machine learning: Facebook platform in Thailand, in: Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management 16 (PSAM16), 2022. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, June 26 - July 1.
  19. W. Vechgama, W. Sasawattakul, K. Silva, J. Cho, Investigation of data preprocessing step of classification model development for understanding nuclear energy public perception in Thailand, in: Asian Symposium on Risk Assessment and Management 2022 (ASRAM2022), 2022. Daejeon, Republic of Korea, November 30 - December 2.
  20. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com, 2022. (Accessed 6 December 2022).
  21. Export Comments. https://exportcomments.com, 2022. (Accessed 6 December 2022).
  22. Google Translate. https://translate.google.com, 2022. (Accessed 6 December 2022).
  23. Natural Language Toolkit. https://www.nltk.org, 2022. (Accessed 7 December 2022).
  24. The Porter Stemming Algorithm. https://tartarus.org/martin/PorterStemmer, 2022. (Accessed 7 December 2022).
  25. J. Devlin, M.W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding, Computation and Language, Cornell University, 2019, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805 arXiv:1810.04805.
  26. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Power Development Plan 2007-2021 (PDP2007), Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2007.
  27. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Power Development Plan 2012-2030 (PDP2010: Revision 1), Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012.
  28. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Power Development Plan 2012-2030 (PDP2010: Revision 2), Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012.
  29. Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Power Development Plan 2015-2036 (PDP2015), Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, Bangkok, Thailand, 2015.
  30. Thailand Now Has 18 Million Social Media Users, 2013. https://tartarus.org/martin/PorterStemmer. (Accessed 14 December 2022).
  31. A. Azaria, A. Ventouris, Gender differences regarding the use of Facebook by Greek users: implications for marketing, in: The 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Marketing Issues (ICCMI2014), 2020. Athens, Greece, October 30 - November 1.