Nuclear Engineering and Technology

  • 제55권5호
  • /
  • Pages.1878-1884
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-5733(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-358X(eISSN)
한국원자력학회 (Korean Nuclear Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Asymmetric linkages between nuclear energy and environmental quality: Evidence from Top-10 nuclear energy consumer countries

  • Jinglei Zhang (Beijing Tiandi Huatai Mining Management Company) ;
  • Sajid Ali (School of Economics, Bahauddin Zakariya University) ;
  • Lei Ping (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.07
  • 심사 : 2023.01.06
  • 발행 : 2023.05.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

To lay a solid basis for prosperity and competitiveness, countries should achieve balance in the three fundamental aspects: energy availability, energy affordability and ecological balance. Nuclear energy has attracted international interest as one of the most crucial environmental quality strategies. The objective of this study is to analyze the non-linear link between nuclear energy and environmental quality in the top-10 nuclear energy consumer countries (USA, China, Russia, France, Canada, Spain, Sweden, South Korea, Ukraine, and Germany). Earlier research employed panel data methodologies to examine the linkage between nuclear energy and the environment, despite the fact that many nations did not independently demonstrate such a correlation. On the alternative, this study uses a novel approach known as 'Quantile-on-Quantile,' which allows for the analysis of time-series dependence in each country by giving universal yet country-specific insights into the relationship between the variables. Estimates show that the consumption of nuclear energy improves environmental quality by lowering ecological footprint in the majority of the nations studied at certain quantiles of data. Moreover, the data demonstrate that the degree of asymmetries between our variables changes by nation, emphasizing the importance of policymakers exercising caution when adopting nuclear energy and environmental quality regulations.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. K. Saidi, A. Omri, Reducing CO2 emissions in OECD countries: do renewable and nuclear energy matter? Prog. Nucl. Energy 126 (2020), 103425.
  2. M. Naimoglu, The impact of nuclear energy use, energy prices and energy imports on CO2 emissions: evidence from energy importer emerging economies which use nuclear energy, J. Clean. Prod. 373 (2022), 133937.
  3. N. Ahmed, et al., Nexus between nuclear energy consumption and carbon footprint in asia pacific region: policy toward environmental sustainability, Energies 15 (19) (2022) 6956.
  4. M. Usman, et al., Do nuclear energy, renewable energy, and environmental-related technologies asymmetrically reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from Pakistan, Energies 15 (9) (2022) 3448.
  5. IEA, Climate Change and Nuclear Power, International Energy Agency, 2019.
  6. Bp, Statistical, Review of World Energy, 2018.
  7. R. Sharma, A. Sinha, P. Kautish, Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia, J. Clean. Prod. 285 (2021), 124867.
  8. M. Usman, M. Radulescu, Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Sci. Total Environ. 841 (2022), 156662.
  9. A.A. Syed, M.A. Kamal, R. Tripathi, An empirical investigation of nuclear energy and environmental pollution nexus in India: fresh evidence using NARDL approach, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 28 (39) (2021) 54744-54755.
  10. M.K. Anser, et al., Progress in nuclear energy with carbon pricing to achieve environmental sustainability agenda: on the edge of one's seat, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 28 (26) (2021) 34328-34343.
  11. S.A. Sarkodie, S. Adams, Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa, Sci. Total Environ. 643 (2018) 1590-1601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.320
  12. T. Jin, J. Kim, What is better for mitigating carbon emissions-Renewable energy or nuclear energy? A panel data analysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91 (2018) 464-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.022
  13. K. Saidi, M.B. Mbarek, Nuclear energy, renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth for nine developed countries: evidence from panel Granger causality tests, Prog. Nucl. Energy 88 (2016) 364-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2016.01.018
  14. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Rej, Can nuclear energy fuel an environmentally sustainable economic growth? Revisiting the EKC hypothesis for India, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 28 (44) (2021) 63065-63086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15220-7
  15. Z. Xiao, Quantile cointegrating regression, J. Econom. 150 (2) (2009) 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.005
  16. B. Xu, et al., Have electric vehicles effectively addressed CO2 emissions? Analysis of eight leading countries using quantile-on-quantile regression approach, Sustain. Prod. Consum. 27 (2021) 1205-1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.002
  17. P. Saikkonen, Asymptotically efficient estimation of cointegration regressions, Econom. Theor. 7 (1) (1991) 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466600004217
  18. N. Sim, H. Zhou, Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles, J. Bank. Finance 55 (2015) 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013
  19. A. Sharif, et al., The renewable energy consumption-environmental degradation nexus in Top-10 polluted countries: fresh insights from quantile-on-quantile regression approach, Renew. Energy 150 (2020) 670-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.149
  20. A. Usman, et al., Analysis of asymmetries in the nexus among clean energy and environmental quality in Pakistan, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 27 (17) (2020) 20736-20747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08372-5
  21. S.P. Nathaniel, et al., The roles of nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth in the abatement of carbon dioxide emissions in the G7 countries, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 28 (35) (2021) 47957-47972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13728-6