대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국어판 HIV 감염인의 건강관리 자기효능감 도구의 타당도와 신뢰도

Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Self-Efficacy for HIV Disease Management Skills

  • 김광숙 (연세대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 김라영 (연세대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 심미소 (계명대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 백서영 (연세대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 김남희 (연세대학교 원주간호대학) ;
  • 박민경 (연세대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 이영진 (연세대학교 간호대학 4단계 두뇌한국(BK)21 S-L.E.A.P 미래간호인재 교육연구단)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.08
  • 심사 : 2023.05.22
  • 발행 : 2023.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study evaluated the validity and reliability of Shively and colleagues' self-efficacy for HIV disease management skills (HIV-SE) among Korean participants. Methods: The original HIV-SE questionnaire, comprising 34 items, was translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation process. To enhance clarity and eliminate redundancy, the author and expert committee engaged in multiple discussions and integrated two items with similar meanings into a single item. Further, four HIV nurse experts tested content validity. Survey data were collected from 227 individuals diagnosed with HIV from five Korean hospitals. Construct validity was verified through confirmatory factor analysis. Criterion validity was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficients with the new general self-efficacy scale. Internal consistency reliability and test-retest were examined for reliability. Results: The Korean version of HIV-SE (K-HIV-SE) comprises 33 items across six domains: "managing depression/mood," "managing medications," "managing symptoms," "communicating with a healthcare provider," "getting support/help," and "managing fatigue." The fitness of the modified model was acceptable (minimum value of the discrepancy function/degree of freedom = 2.49, root mean square error of approximation = .08, goodness-of-fit index = .76, adjusted goodness-of-fit index = .71, Tucker-Lewis index = .84, and comparative fit index = .86). The internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = .91) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = .73) were good. The criterion validity of the K-HIV-SE was .59 (p < .001). Conclusion: This study suggests that the K-HIV-SE is useful for efficiently assessing self-efficacy for HIV disease management.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to express gratitude to Martha Shively and Jill Bormann, who developed the original HIV-SE tool and granted permission to translate for research. We thank Ki Jun Song for the advics on statistical analysis.

참고문헌

  1. Katz I, Jha AK. HIV in the United States: Getting to zero transmissions by 2030. JAMA. 2019;321(12):1153-1154. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1817
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Consolidated guidelines on HIV prevention, testing, treatment, service delivery and monitoring: Recommendations for a public health approach [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; c2021 [cited 2022 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240031593
  3. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Prevailing against pandemics by putting people at the centre- World AIDS Day report 2020 [Internet]. Geneva: UNAIDS; c2020 [cited 2022 Dec 10]. Available from: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/documents/2020/prevailing-against-pandemics
  4. Kim K, Jung YH, Kim Y, Choi HY. HIV/AIDS notifications in the Republic of Korea, 2021. Public Health Weekly Report. 2022;15(33):2364-2369.
  5. The National Human Rights Commission of Korea (NHRCK). Survey of the medical discrimination status of patients with HIV [Internet]. Seoul: NHRC; c2016 [cited 2022 Jul 1]. Available from: http://www.hrarchive.or.kr/theme/basic/list.php?search_content=&make_where=&make_start_date=&make_end_date=&category=&shape=&detail_url=board_list&no=22430&page=94&develop_mode=.
  6. Swendeman D, Ingram BL, Rotheram-Borus MJ. Common elements in self-management of HIV and other chronic illnesses: An integrative framework. AIDS Care. 2009;21(10):1321-1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120902803158
  7. Kim GS, Shim MS, Yi J. Using decision tree analysis to understand the influence of social networks on disclosure of HIV infection status. AIDS Care. 2022;34(1):118-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2021.1954587
  8. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977;84(2):191-215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191
  9. Becker H, Stuifbergen A, Oh HS, Hall S. Self-rated abilities for health practices: A health self-efficacy measure. Health Values: The Journal of Health Behavior, Education & Promotion. 1993;17(5):42-50.
  10. Shively M, Smith TL, Bormann J, Gifford AL. Evaluating self-efficacy for HIV disease management skills. AIDS and Behavior. 2002;6(4):371-379. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021156914683
  11. Sturt J, Hearnshaw H, Wakelin M. Validity and reliability of the DMSES UK: A measure of self-efficacy for type 2 diabetes self-management. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2010;11(4):374-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423610000101
  12. Park YM, Shin G, Kim J. Factors influencing health-promoting behaviors in people living with HIV. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2014;26(2):234-243. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2014.26.2.234
  13. Shin SB. A study on health related quality of life in people living with HIV/AIDS in Korea. Health and Social Welfare Review. 2011;31(4):424-453. https://doi.org/10.15709/hswr.2011.31.4.424
  14. Kim YJ, Lee WK, Kim SW, Chang HH, Lee JM, Kim SJ. Impact of self-efficacy on medication adherence among people living with human immunodeficiency virus. The Korean Journal of Medicine. 2015;89(3):305-311. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2015.89.3.305
  15. Lorig K, Stewart A, Ritter P, Gonzalez V, Laurent D, Lynch J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1993. p. 1-9.
  16. Gifford AL, Laurent DD, Gonzales VM, Chesney MA, Lorig KR. Pilot randomized trial of education to improve self-management skills of men with symptomatic HIV/AIDS. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology: Official Publication of the International Retrovirology Association. 1998;18(2):136-144. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042560-199806010-00005
  17. Sharma N, Sokhey G. Role of self-efficacy in quality of life of people living with HIV/AIDS. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing. 2013;4(1):162-165.
  18. Huang L, Li L, Zhang Y, Li H, Li X, Wang H. Self-efficacy, medication adherence, and quality of life among people living with HIV in Hunan Province of China: A questionnaire survey. The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 2013;24(2):145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2012.04.006
  19. Li X, Huang L, Wang H, Fennie KP, He G, Williams AB. Stigma mediates the relationship between self-efficacy, medication adherence, and quality of life among people living with HIV/AIDS in China. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 2011;25(11):665-671. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2011.0174
  20. Flickinger TE, Saha S, Roter D, Korthuis PT, Sharp V, Cohn J, et al. Clinician empathy is associated with differences in patient-clinician communication behaviors and higher medication self-efficacy in HIV care. Patient Education and Counseling. 2016;99(2):220-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.001
  21. Costello AB, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2005;10(1):7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
  22. Arifin WN. Sample size calculator (web) [Internet]. Kota Bharu: Wan Nor Arifin; 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 23]. Available from: https://wnarifin.shinyapps.io/ss_sem_cfi_equal/
  23. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
  24. Awang Z, Afthanorhan A, Mamat M. The Likert scale analysis using parametric based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Computational Methods in Social Sciences. 2016;4(1):13-21.
  25. Chen G, Gully SM, Eden D. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods. 2001;4(1):62-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
  26. Oh IS. General self-efficacy: The concept, measurement issues, and implications for HRM. Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2002;15(3):49-72.
  27. World Health Organization (WHO). Process of translation and adaptation ofinstruments [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; [2018] [cited 2020 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.coursehero.com/file/30372721/WHO-Process-of-translation-and-adaptation-of-instrumentspdf/
  28. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health. 2007;30(4):459-467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
  29. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods. 1999;4(3):272-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  30. Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysi. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1998. p. 207-219.
  31. Kim SY, Kim EK, Lim HM, Lee MY, Park KO, Lee KA. Structural equation modeling on nursing productivity of nurses in Korea. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(1):20-29. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.1.20
  32. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research. 1981;18(1):39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  33. Shrestha N. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2021;9(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
  34. Farrell AM, Rudd JM. Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. In: Tojib D, editor. Proceedings of the Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2009; 2009 Nov 30-Dec 2; Melbourne, Australia. Canning Bridge: Promaco Conventions; c2009. p. 1-9.
  35. Lee K, Shin S. Validity of instrument development research in korean nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013;43(6):697-703. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697
  36. Charter RA. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes. The Journal of General Psychology. 2008;135(3):241-251. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.135.3.241-251
  37. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2016;15(2):155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 Erratum in: Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2017;16(4):346.
  38. Matore EM, Khairani AZ. The pattern of skewness and kurtosis using mean score and logit in measuring adversity quotient (AQ) for normality testing. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking. 2020;13(1):688-702.
  39. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88(3):588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  40. Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal. 1999;20(2):195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
  41. Tseng A, Seet J, Phillips EJ. The evolution of three decades of antiretroviral therapy: Challenges, triumphs and the promise of the future. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2015;79(2):182-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.12403
  42. Cutrell J, Bedimo R. Single-tablet regimens in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Federal Practitioner. 2016;33(Suppl 3):24S-30S.
  43. Airoldi M, Zaccarelli M, Bisi L, Bini T, Antinori A, Mussini C, et al. One-pill once-a-day HAART: A simplification strategy that improves adherence and quality of life of HIV-infected subjects. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2010;4:115-125. https://doi.org/10.2147/ppa.s10330
  44. O'Brien KK, Solomon P, Bayoumi AM. Measuring disability experienced by adults living with HIV: Assessing construct validity of the HIV Disability Questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e005456. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005456
  45. Wachira J, Naanyu V, Genberg B, Koech B, Akinyi J, Kamene R, et al. Health facility barriers to HIV linkage and retention in Western Kenya. BMC Health Services Research. 2014;14:646. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0646-6
  46. Parish C, Siegel K, Pereyra M, Liguori T, Metsch L. Barriers and facilitators to dental care among HIV-Infected adults. Special Care in Dentistry. 2015;35(6):294-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12132
  47. Korean Network of People Living With HIV/AIDS (KNP+). The people living with HIV stigma index South Korea 2016-2017 [Internet]. Seoul: KNP+; c2017 [cited 2022 Oct 28]. Available from: https://www.stigmaindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/South-Korea_PLHIV-Stigma-Index-Report_2017_Korean.pdf
  48. Zhou G, Li X, Qiao S, Shen Z, Zhou Y. HIV symptom management self-efficacy mediates the relationship of internalized stigma and quality of life among people living with HIV in China. Journal of Health Psychology. 2020;25(3):311-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105317715077
  49. Eller LS, Rivero-Mendez M, Voss J, Chen WT, Chaiphibalsarisdi P, Iipinge S, et al. Depressive symptoms, self-esteem, HIV symptom management self-efficacy and self-compassion in people living with HIV. AIDS Care. 2014;26(7):795-803. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2013.841842
  50. Sun L, Yang SM, Wu H, Chen B, Wang CJ, Li XF. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale in mainland China. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2017;28(8):829-837. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462416673922