DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정상운반조건 해석을 위한 사용후핵연료집합체 유한요소모델 최적화

Optimization of Spent Nuclear Fuel Assembly Finite Element Model for Normal Transportation Condition Analysis

  • 김민식 (경희대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 박민정 (경희대학교 원자력공학과) ;
  • 장윤석 (경희대학교 원자력공학과)
  • Min Seek Kim ;
  • Min Jeong Park ;
  • Yoon-Suk Chang
  • 투고 : 2023.11.17
  • 심사 : 2023.12.18
  • 발행 : 2023.12.30

초록

Since spent nuclear fuel assemblies (SFA) are transported to interim storage or final disposal facility after cooling the decay heat, finite element analysis (FEA) with simplification is widely used to show their integrity against cladding failure to cause dispersal of radioactive material. However, there is a lack of research addressing the comprehensive impact of shape and element simplification on analysis results. In this study, for the optimization of a typical pressurized water reactor SFA, different types of finite element models were generated by changing number of fuel rods, fuel rod element type and assembly length. A series of FEA in use of these different models were conducted under a shock load data obtained from surrogate fuel assembly transportation test. Effects of number of fuel rods, element type and length of assembly were also analyzed, which shows that the element type of fuel rod mainly affected on cladding strain. Finally, an optimal finite element model was determined for other practical application in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Shin J. C., Yang, J. D., Sung, U. H., Ryu, S. W. and Park, Y. W., 2020, "Technology Trends in Spent Nuclear Fuel Cask and Dry Storage," Trans. of the KPVP, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 110-116. doi:https://doi.org/1020466/KPVP.2020.16.1.110  1020466/KPVP.2020.16.1.110
  2. USNRC, 2014, "Spent Fuel Transportation Risk Assessment," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, NUREG-2125. 
  3. 10CFR.71, 2021, "Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Material," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC. 
  4. Lim, J. H. and Choi, W. S., 2022, "Preliminary Data Analysis of Surrogate Fuel-loaded Road Transportation Test under Normal Conditions of Transport," NUCL ENG DES, Vol. 54, pp. 4030-4048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.06.023 
  5. McConnell, P., Wauneka, R., Saltzstein, S. and Sorenson, K., 2014, "Normal Conditions of Transport Truck Test of a Surrogate Fuel Assembly," Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, SAND2014-20495. 
  6. Kalinina, E. A., Wright, C., Lujan, L., Gordon, N., Saltzstein, S. J. and Norman, K. M., 2018, "Data Analysis of ENSA/DOE Rail Cask Tests," Sandia National Lab, Albuquerque, SAND2018-13258R. 
  7. Wang, J., Wang, H., Jiang, H. and Bevard. B., 2018, "High Burn-up Spent Nuclear Fuel Transport Reliability Investigation," NUCL ENG DES, Vol 330, pp. 497-515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.02.007 
  8. Almomani, B. and Chang, Y. S., 2021, "Failure Probability Assessment of SNF Cladding Transverse Tearing under a Hypothetical Transportation Accident," NUCL ENG DES, Vol. 379, 111265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111265 
  9. Jiang, H. and Wang, J. J., 2016, "Spent Nuclear Fuel System Dynamic Stability under Normal Conditions of Transportation," NUCL ENG DES, Vol. 310, pp. 1-14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.09.033 
  10. Adkins, H., Geelhood, K., Koeppel, B., Coleman, J., Bignell, J., Flores, G., Wang, J., Sanborn, S., Spears, R. and Klymyshyn, N., 2013, "Used Nuclear Fuel Loading and Structural Performance under Normal Conditions of Transport - Demonstration of Approach and Results on Used Fuel Performance Characterization," U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, FCRD-UDF-2013000325. 
  11. Han, S. G., Jeong, G. E., Lee, H. B., Choi, W. S. and Kim, J. G., 2023, "Multi-body Dynamics Model for Spent Nuclear Fuel Transportation System under Normal Transport Test Conditions," NUCL ENG TECHNOL, Vol. 55, pp. 4125-4133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2023.07.033 
  12. Rashid, J., Dunham, B., Zhang, Y. and Montgomery, R., 2007, "Spent Fuel Transportation Applications: Longitudinal Tearing Resulting from Transportation Accidents - A Probabilistic Treatment," EPRI, Palo Alto, 1013448. 
  13. USNRC, 2014, "Spent Fuel Transportation Risk Assessment," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, NUREG-2125. 
  14. Klymyshyn, N., Jensen, P., Sanborn, S. and Hanson, B., 2014, "Fuel Assembly Shaker and Truck Test Simulation," Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, DC, PNNL-23688. 
  15. Lee, S. K., Lee, D. H., Park, J. K. and Kim, J. H., 2021, "Mechanical Integrity Evaluation on the Degraded Cladding Tube of Spent Nuclear Fuel under Axial and Bending Loads during Transportation," J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 491-501. doi:https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2021.041 
  16. Lee, S. H. and Kim, S. Y., 2019, "Simplified Beam Model of High Burnup Spent Fuel Rod under Lateral Load Considering Pellet-clad Interfacial Bonding Influence," NUCL ENG TECHNOL, Vol. 51, pp. 1333-1344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.03.010 
  17. Park, M. J., Shin, Y. G. and Chang, Y. S., 2023, "A Comparative Study on Spent Nuclear Fuels under Normal and Postulated Conditions of Transportation," Transaction of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, May. 18-19, Paper in CD-ROM. 
  18. Yoo, Y. I., Kim, J. J., Park, J. K. and Kim, H. K., 2023, "Development of Nuclear Fuel Assembly Finite Element Model for Mechanical Integrity Evaluation," NUCL ENG DES, Vol. 413, 112523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2023.112523 
  19. 정재학, 장윤석, 2017, 사용후핵연료관리 개론, 1, 한스하우스. 
  20. Geelhood, K. J., Beyer, C. E. and Luscher, W. G., 2008, "PNNL Stress/Strain Correlation for Zircaloy," Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, DC, PNNL-17700. 
  21. ABAQUS. Version 2021, 2021, User's manual, Inc. and Dassault systems. 
  22. USNRC, 2007, "A Pilot Probabilistric Risk Assessment of a Dry Cask Storage System at a Nuclear Power Plant," U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, NUREG-1864.