DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of the Priority Index for Selection between Repair and Reinforcement Methods of Dam Facilities

댐 시설물 보수·보강공법 선정을 위한 우선순위지수에 대한 고찰

  • 김동현 (홍익대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 박형준 (홍익대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 윤희정 (홍익대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 이승오 (홍익대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2023.03.02
  • Accepted : 2023.04.18
  • Published : 2023.06.30

Abstract

After the collapse of the Seongsu Bridge in the 1990s in Korea, attention was focused on the maintenance of facilities. The government has established various policies since the enactment of the Act in 1995 until recently. In general, safety inspections are performed to evaluate the safety grade of facilities, and facilities are maintained and managed by performing repairs and reinforcements for defects. However, since the budget is limited, it is impossible to carry out repair and reinforcement projects for all defects. It is necessary to prioritize repair and reinforcement measures. Then, the priority index (PI) is presented considering the importance of members, the seriousness of defects, and economic feasibility. In this index, the degree of influence can be adjusted within the range of 50 to 100% according to the expert's subjective judgment, and the same weight is set for some specific members. Also, the effect through repair and reinforcement is not taken into account decisively, and most of them have a limit in which priority is determined by economic feasibility. Therefore, in this study, through several case studies, problems with the priority index were reviewed and an equation was presented to improve them.

1990년대 성수대교 붕괴 이후 시설물의 유지관리에 대한 전국민적 관심이 집중되었다. 이에 정부는 1995년 법의 제정을 시작으로 최근까지 다양한 정책을 수립해왔다. 일반적으로 안전점검을 수행하여 시설물의 안전등급을 평가하고 결함에 대한 보수·보강을 실시하여 시설물을 유지·관리하고 있다. 그러나 유지관리 예산은 한정적이기 때문에 모든 결함에 대한 보수·보강 사업을 실시할 수 없는 실정이다. 이에 보수·보강 조치의 우선순위를 선정하는 것이 필요하다. 이를 위해 부재의 중요도, 결함의 심각성, 경제성을 고려한 우선순위지수(PI, Priority Index)를 제시하고 있다. 이 지수는 전문가의 주관적인 판단에 의해 영향도를 50~100%범위 안에서 조정할 수 있으며, 일부 특정 부재는 동일한 가중치가 설정되어 있다. 또한 결정적으로 보수보강을 통한 효과를 고려하지 못하고, 대부분 경제성에 의해 우선순위가 결정되는 한계점이 발생한다. 따라서, 본 연구에서는 몇 가지 사례분석을 통해 현재 우선순위지수에 대한 문제점을 고찰하고 이를 개선할 수 있는 우선순위 산정식(PI)을 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 행정안전부 재난안전 공동연구 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(2022-MOIS63-002).

References

  1. Choi, J. S., Shin, Y. J., and Baek, W. H. (2022), Investment Prioritization Method for Steep Slope Retaining Wall Considering the Disaster Risk and the Repair and Reinforcement Cost, Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, 38(12), 79-89. (in Korean)
  2. Evans, L. D., Romine, A. R., Patel, A. J., and Mojab, A. G. (1993), Concrete Pavement Repair Manuals of Practice (No. SHRP-H-349). SHRP-H-349, SHRP, National Research Council, Washington DC.
  3. Kang, C., Shin, J. Y., and Oh, K. J. (2013), Domestic and foreign facility repair/reinforcement manuals and guidelines, Journal of the Building Construction, 13(6), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.2.057
  4. KALIS (2022), Guideline and Commentary of Safety Inspection and In-depth Safety Inspection for Structures-Bridge, Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation, Korea. (in Korean)
  5. KALIS (2022), Guide of Calculation for Priority Index(PI), Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation, Korea. (in Korean)
  6. KSMI (2020), Establishment of evaluation criteria, such as performance evaluation guidelines for ancillary facilities and other facilities of dams and river facilities, KALIS. (in Korean)
  7. Lee, S. W., and Kim, S. H. (2004), Retrofit Measures Based on Seismic Retrofit Priority of Existing Bridges, Journal of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 8(3), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2004.8.3.077
  8. Oh, K. J., and Kang, C. (2012), Development of Program for Decision of Repair and Strengthen Level and Priority in Structures, Proceeding of Korea Concrete Institute, 519-520. (in Korean)
  9. Park, C. W., and Ju, M. K. (2013), A Decision Model for Repair Priority of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Magazine of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 17(1), 89-101. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2013.17.3.089
  10. Team, I. F. (2018). Oroville dam spillway incident. Dam & Safety, (1), 56.