DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CBAM에 기반한 화학 교사의 역량 평가에 관한 관심도와 실행 수준 분석

An Analysis of Chemistry Teachers' Stages of Concern and Level of Use on Competency Assessment Based on CBAM

  • 투고 : 2022.09.20
  • 심사 : 2023.02.01
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30

초록

이 연구에서는 2015 개정 교육과정에서 도입과 함께 강조된 역량 평가에 관해 화학 교사를 대상으로 관심도와 실행 수준을 알아보았다. CBAM에 기반하여 설문지가 개발되었으며, 총 123명의 화학교사 응답이 분석되었다. 관심도와 실행 수준은 단계별 빈도를 조사하였으며, 이후 인구통계학적 변인에 따른 교차 검증을 진행하였다. 관심도 분석 결과, 대부분의 교사가 3 단계(운영적 관심, 26.8%)와 2 단계(개인적 관심, 19.5%)에 머물러 있었다. 더불어 인구통계학적 변수 중 예비교사 기간 중 관련 교육 경험 여부가 통계적으로 유의미하였다. 실행 수준의 경우 III 수준(기계적)이 가장 높은 빈도로 나타났고(26.8%), 그다음으로 I 수준(오리엔테이션, 22.8%), II 수준(준비, 13.8%) 순이었다. 실행 수준 또한 예비교사 기간 중 관련 교육 경험 여부에 따라 실행 수준에 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 역량 평가에 대한 관심도와 실행 수준의 Spearman 상관계수가 .298로 정적 상관관계가 있었다. 이상의 결과를 바탕으로 화학 교사의 역량 평가에 대한 관심도와 실행 수준을 높이기 위한 시사점을 논의하였다.

In this study, we investigated chemistry teachers' the Stage of Concern (SoC) and the Level of Use (LoU) regarding competency assessment, which was emphasized along with the introduction of the 2015 revised curriculum. A questionnaire was developed based on the CBAM, and responses from 123 chemistry teachers were analyzed. The frequency was investigated for both SoC and LoU, and then the chi-square test was performed according to demographic variables. As a result of the SoC analysis, most of the teachers stayed in stage 3 (management concern, 26.8%) and stage 2 (personal concern, 19.5%). Additionally, among the demographic variables, there was a statistically significant difference in whether or not related education experience was present during the pre-service teacher period. In LoU analysis, Level III (mechanical) was the most frequent (26.8%), followed by Level I (orientation, 22.8%), Level II (preparation, 13.8%). In LoU, there was also a statistically significant difference in whether or not related education experience was present during the pre-service teacher period. The Spearman correlation coefficient between SoC and LoU in the competency assessment was .298 and there was a positive correlation. Based on the above results, educational implications for improving the concern and use of chemistry teachers for competency assessment were discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chae, H., & Noh, S. G. (2022). An analysis reflecting on the science core competency of certification textbooks in elementary school and teachers' and students' perceptions. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(2), 325-337.
  2. Chang, J. H., Kim, S. W., & Lee, S. B. (2015). Analysis on stages of concern and levels of use for achievement standards-based assessment in specialized high schools. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 18(2), 105-129. https://doi.org/10.29221/jce.2015.18.2.105
  3. Chea, H., & Noh, S. G. (2014). Analysis of teachers' stages of concern and levels of use on STEAM of the 2009 elementary science curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(4), 634-645.
  4. George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: The stages of concern questionnaire. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  5. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  6. Hall, G. E., Dirksen, D. J., & George, A. A. (2006). Measuring implementation in schools: Levels of use. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
  7. Hord, S. M., Rutherford, W. L., & Hall, G. E. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandira, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  8. Kim, H., & Kim, S. (2021). A comparative study on the science curriculum between Korea and Estonia: Focusing chemistry domain. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 65(5), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.5012/JKCS.2021.65.5.347
  9. Kim, I. S., Lee, M. B., Lee, C. H., Park, J. I., Song, M. H., & Choi, H. J. (2019). A study on the development of computer-based assessment system for core competencies (RRE 2019-4). Chungbuk: KICE.
  10. Kim, J. S., & Lee, J. M. (2020). An investigation of teachers' stages of concern and levels of use about SW education based on concerns-based adoption model. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(8), 75-87.
  11. Kim, S. W., Lee, D. Y., & Kang Y. I. (2011). Analysis of teachers' concern and levels of use on performance assessment in middle school teachers. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(1), 31-50.
  12. Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2022a). The effects of chemistry class using computer-based science inquiry program on positive experiences about science, science core competency, and academic achievement. Journal of Korean Chemical Society, 66(2), 107-123
  13. Kim, S., & Kim, H. (2022b). Exploring assessment method for science subject competency: Focusing on scientific inquiry ability. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 26(3), 279-292. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2022.26.3.279
  14. Kim, S., & Paik, S. H. (2016). An analysis of science teachers' stages of concern and levels of use on descriptive assessment. Journal of Korean Chemical Society, 60(5), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.353
  15. Kim, S., Yu, J. U., & Paik, S. H. (2020). The effect of science class emphasizing digital literacy on the science attitude and perception of growth of key competencies in 7th grade students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(2), 227-236.
  16. Koo, K. H., & Kim, S. W. (2018). An analysis on the stages of teachers' concern and levels of use for a free learning semester in middle schools. Teacher Education Research, 57(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.15812/TER.57.2.201806.169
  17. Kwak, E. R., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). The stages of concerns about maker education of elementary school teacher according to the concerns-based adoption model. The Journal of Elementary Education, 32(4), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.29096/JEE.32.4.06
  18. Kwak, Y. S., & Shin, Y. J. (2021). Exploring ways to improve integrated science and science laboratory experiments in preparation for the 2022 revisedcurriculum. Journal of Science Education, 45(2), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.21796/JSE.2021.45.2.143
  19. Lee, S. J., & Kim, M. J. (2018). An analytical study on the interest of interested parties of school and corporation in the apprenticeship school policy: Focusing on the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 36(6), 21-35.
  20. Lee, I. H., Park, S. B., Shim, H. P., & Lee, J. W. (2017). Development and application of an assessment procedure to enhance core competencies: Focusing on communication and social competencies (RRE 2017-7). Chungbuk: KICE.
  21. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015a). 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  22. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2015b). 2015 Revised National Science Curriculum. Sejong: Ministry of Education.
  23. Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2021). Announcement of the main points of the '2022 revised curriculum'. Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=294&boardSeq=89671&lev=0&searchType=null&statusYN=W&page=1&s=moe&m=020402&opType=N
  24. Ministry of Education & Korean Educational Development Institute [MOE & KEDI]. (2022). Competency diagnosis of teacher training institutions six times. Retrieved from https://necte.kedi.re.kr/referenceView.do?seq=94
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  27. Sim, J. H., Park, H. J., & Jeong, J. S. (2018). An investigation of teachers' STEAM education implementation using the concerns based adoption model. Teacher Education Research, 57(3), 325-340. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.57.3.201809.325
  28. Yi, J. E., & Shin, J. H. (2012). An analysis of teachers' stage of concerns and implementation on the 2007 revised curriculum based on CBAM. Teacher Education Research, 51(1), 137-151. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.51.1.201204.137