DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating Essential Aspects of Novel Architectural Products: An In-depth Application of Importance-Performance Analysis

중요도-성취도 분석을 통한 건축 신제품의 요구사항 분석 연구

  • Lee, Ung-Kyun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Catholic Kwandong University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Yeob (Department of Architectural Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • Received : 2023.05.30
  • Accepted : 2023.06.05
  • Published : 2023.06.20

Abstract

With an increasing interest in the commercialization of research results in the present societal climate, especially in the construction industry, preliminary product analysis plays a critical role when introducing a new product to the market. It significantly influences the product's success or failure. In this context, this study aims to investigate the utility of Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) as a management strategy tool for preliminary analysis in the commercialization of new architectural technologies. The study specifically assesses a smart ball product engineered for pipeline inspection. The evaluation is carried out based on product quality, convenience, and usability categories. Seventeen factors are recognized as sub-items, and a survey is conducted among relevant experts and consumer groups. From the survey, four key items are chosen: "Keep up the good work," "Concentrate here," "Low priority," and "Possible overkill." Suitable strategic measures are derived for each item. By conducting a correlation analysis between product importance and performance, this study offers a method to establish priority directions for future development. This analysis assists in identifying areas that necessitate improvement or additional focus to increase the product's commercial potential. On the whole, this study contributes to understanding and applying Importance-Performance Analysis as a valuable tool in the preliminary analysis and commercialization of novel technologies in the field of architecture.

최근의 사회적 분위기에 따라 연구 결과의 사업화에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 건축 시공 분야 역시 신기술에 대한 제품화가 활발히 이루어지고 있는 실정이다. 제품에 대한 사전 분석은 향후 신제품의 시장 진출시 성패를 좌우할 수 있는 중요한 절차 중 하나이다. 따라서 본 연구는 건축 분야에서 개발된 신기술의 제품화를 위한 사전 분석 방법 중의 하나로 경영전략도구로 활용되고 있는 중요도-성취도 분석을 실시하고 이의 적용 가능성을 모색하고자 한다. 본 연구에서는 기 개발된 파이프 라인 검사용 스마트볼 제품을 평가하며, 이를 위하여 제품의 품질, 편리성, 활용가능성의 범주를 설정하였다. 하위 항목으로 17개의 요인을 설정하여 관련 전문가 및 소비 집단을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 그 결과 좋은 작업상태 지속 유지 항목, 노력 집중화의 지향 항목, 우선 순위 낮음 항목, 과잉 낭비 가능성 항목을 선정하였으며 각각 항목에 적절한 전략적 방안을 도출하였다. 본 연구는 제품의 중요도 및 성취도 측면에서 상호관계 분석을 실시함으로써 향후 개발을 위한 우선 방향을 도출할 수 있는 방안을 제공하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper is developed version of an article that has been previously published in the conference of the Korea Institute of Building Construction.

References

  1. Han SE. A study on analysis of factors and relative importance of technology transfer and commercialization policy means [PhD thesis]. [Busan (Korea)]: Pukyong National University; 2023.173
  2. Won JS. Design thinking-based educational program for the capstone design course in architectural engineering. Proceeding of Architectural Institute of Korea; 2017 Oct 25-27; Gyeongju, Korea. Seoul (Korea): the Architectural Institute of Korea; 2017. p. 869-72. 
  3. Jo JH, Lee UK, Jeong JH, Lee SS. Comparatively testing concrete permeability for wireless communications of a pipe-cleaning. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2021 Oct;6(3):946-50. 
  4. Yoon SM. A comparison for experience factor toward ancient palace of Seoul applied to the traditional IPA and revised IPA. The Institute of business management. 2018 Feb;41(1):71-90.  https://doi.org/10.33932/rir.41.1.4
  5. An SY, Kim SY, Lim SM. A study on the improvement of R&D demonstration project from the consumer perspective using IPA analysis. Eumseong (Korea): Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning. 2018. p. 3-25. 
  6. Choi YH, Min BJ, Kim YS. Analysis of the importance of client's requirements through the AHP method for cultural facilities. Proceeding of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management for Undergraduate student; 2010 Nov 11-12; Incheon, Korea. Seoul (Korea): the Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management; 2010. p. 174-7. 
  7. Lee UK. Decision making model for a public construction project delivery method selection based on analytic hierarchy process. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2017 Dec;17(6):559-66. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2017.17.6.559 
  8. Yeom DJ, Han JH, Jung EH, Kim YS. Development of all-in-one attachment based steel pipe pile cutting robot prototype. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2018 Nov;19(6):115-23. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2018.19.6.115 
  9. Lim HS, Seo JH, Yoo WS, Kim CW. Critical impact factors affecting the performance of domestic construction projects through megatrend analysis. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2022 Apr;22(2):207-18. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2022.22.2.207 
  10. Cho NS, Kim CW, Cho HH, Kang KI. Critical management factor of elemental techniques for construction automation system in high-rise building. Proceeding of Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2011 Nov 18; Suwon, Korea. Seoul (Korea): the Korea Institute of Building Construction; 2011. p. 15-6. 
  11. Jung HG, Yang JK, Lee SB. A Systematization model of the design phase VE selection by the analysis of the required items in the apartment. Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management; 2007 Nov 8-9; Busan, Korea. Seoul (Korea): the Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management; 2007. p.1015-8. 
  12. Park HJ, Eom YB, Jeong UJ, Kim DY. A study on analysis of defect types and measures for reduction of tile construction for apartment houses. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2021 Dec;21(6):701-12. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2021.21.6.701 
  13. Cha MS, Lee MD. Decision support model for selecting of lifting methods for large spatial roof construction. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2018 Oct;18(5):489-98. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2018.18.5.489 
  14. Kim JY, Jung YC, Kim GH. Importance ranking of accident factors of remote control tower crane by AHP. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2020 Dec;20(6):497-504. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2020.20.6.497 
  15. Martilla JA, James JC. Importance performance analysis. Journal of Marketing. 1977 Jan;41(1):77-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112 
  16. Choi JW. An application of importance-performance analysis to management of hangang park. Journal of The Korean Urban Management Association. 2008 Dec;21(3):135-55. 
  17. Jung DG, Seo YJ, Shin SW, Kim DY. Analyzing the relationship between the critical safety management tasks and their effects for preventing construction accidents using IPA method. Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management. 2022 Sep;23(5):77-86. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2022.23.5.077 
  18. Zhang HQ, Chow I.Application of importance-performance model in tour guides' performance: evidence form mainland Chinese outbound visitors in Hong Kong. Tourism Management. 2004 Feb;25(1):81-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00064-5