참고문헌
- Arghode, V., Yalvac, B., Liew, J. (2013). Teacher empathy and science education: A collective case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 9(2), 89-99.
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Colley, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). Rigor in elementary science students' discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education, 100(6), 1009-1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21243
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. CA, US: Sage publications.
- Davidson S. G., Jaber, L. Z., & Southerland, S. A. (2020). Emotions in the doing of science: Exploring epistemic affect in elementary teachers' science research experiences. Science Education, 104(6), 1008-1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21596
- Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
- Han, M. H. (2020). Epistemic empathy of a teacher and emotional regulation of elementary students during human respiratory system modeling. Biology Education, 48(3), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2020.48.3.368
- Han, M. H., & Oh, P. S. (2022). A case study of an elementary science teacher's emotional responsive teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 42(2), 227-238.
- Jaber, L. Z. (2015). Attending to students' epistemic affect. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 162-188). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Jaber, L. Z. (2021). "He got a glimpse of the joys of understanding" -The role of epistemic empathy in teacher learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(3), 433-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1936534
- Jaber, L. Z., Dini, V., & Hammer, D. (2022). "Well that's how the kids feel!" -Epistemic empathy as a driver of responsive teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(2), 223-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21726
- Jaber, L., Z., Dini, V., Hammer, D., & Danahy, E. (2018a). Targeting disciplinary practices in an online learning environment. Science Education, 102(4), 668-692.
- Jaber, L. Z., Southerland, S., & Dake, F. (2018b). Cultivating epistemic empathy in preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 72, 13-23.
- Kang, H. (2022). Teacher responsiveness that promotes equity in secondary science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 40(2), 206-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1972423
- Kang, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teacher's ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863-895.
- Kang, E., & Kim, H. B. (2017). Elementary students' perceptions of role and epistemic authority in the activity about 'Making a pet poster'. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 587-597.
- Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students' meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
- Kim, K. W., Yang, H. S., & Kang, S. J. (2019). The effect on manifesting group creativity by empathy level of students in the elementary science class. The Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 38(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2019.38.1.1
- King, D., Ritchie, S., Sandhu, M., Henderson, S., & Borand, B. (2017). Temporality of emotion: Antecedent and successive variants of frustration when learning chemistry. Science Education, 101(4), 639-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21277
- Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J.-H., Min, B., Park, S. C., Bae, S., Son, Y.-A, Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K., Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Joung, Y. J., Joung, J. (2018). A development of Korean science education standards (KSES) for the next generation. Seoul: KOFAC.
- Kwon, J., & Kim, H.-B. (2016). Exploring small group argumentation shown in designing an experiment: Focusing on students' epistemic goals and epistemic considerations for activities. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0045
- Lee, D., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2015). The suggestion of design thinking process and its feasibility study for fostering group creativity of elementary-secondary school students in science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 443-453. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0443
- Lee, E.-J., & Son, Y.-A. (2022). The effects of class applying the empathy lens, and an suggestion of a science learning model using the empathy lens. Biology Education, 50(4), 598-617. https://doi.org/10.15717/BIOEDU.2022.50.4.598
- Lee, S., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2018). Exploring the possibility of design thinking program as a group creativity development strategy for elementary school students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(11), 525-544.
- Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Levrini, O., Levin, M., Fantini, P., & Tasquier, G. (2019). Orchestration of classroom discussions that foster appropriation. Science Education, 103(1), 206-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21475
- Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Mikkonen, K., Kyngas, H., & Kaariainen, M. (2015). Nursing students' experiences of the empathy of their teachers: A qualitative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 20(3), 669-682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-014-9554-0
- Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Science Curriculum (Notification No.2015-74 of the Ministry of Education). Sejong: Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education (2019). 5th Grade Elementary Science Guidebook. Seoul: Visang Press.
- Muis, K. R., Chevrier, M., Singh, C. A. (2018). The role of epistemic emotions in personal epistemology and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 53(3), 165-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1421465
- National Research Council (NRC). (2012). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Oh, P. S. (2011). "Unfillable cups": Meaning of science classes to elementary school teachers. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 31(2), 271-294.
- Oh, P. S., & Han, M. (2021). A review of the history of and recent trends on emotion research in science education. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 41(2), 103-114.
- Oxley, J. (2011). The moral dimensions of empathy: Limits and applications in ethical theory and practice. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Park, C. (2015). Study of sympathy in education of literature. Doctoral dissertation, Korea University, Seoul.
- Park, J., Tang, K.-S., & Chang, J. (2021). Plan-Draw-Evaluate (PDE) pattern in students' collaborative drawing: Interracial between visual and verbal modes of representation. Science Education, 105(5), 1013-1045. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21668
- Park, J. Y., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Exploring teacher's responsive teaching practice in argumentation-based science classroom: Focus on structural and dialogical aspects of argument. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(1), 69-85.
- Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., & Hammer, D. (2015). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Tucker-Raymond, E. (2016). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1571-1600.
- Stake, R. E. (2006).Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), 393-429. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_2
- utkur, N. (2019). Empathy in primary school life sciences course: The roles assumed by pre-service teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(4), 43-54.
- Yang, H., & Kang, S.-J. (2019). Scientific empathy discovered in scientists' problem-solving process. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(2), 249-261.
- Yang, H., Yoon, J., Park, J., & Kang S.-J. (2020). Analysis of empathy factors in science class: Focusing on comparison with general empathy factors. School Science Education, 14(2), 245-258.
- Zeyer, A., & Dillon, J. (2019). The role of empathy for learning in complex science, environment, health contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 297-315.