Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy

  • 제12권1호
  • /
  • Pages.75-100
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2287-1608(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1616(eISSN)
아시아기술혁신학회 (Asian Society for Innovation and Policy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Strengthening the Competitiveness, Productivity and Innovation of Cross-border Industrial Corridors

  • Charles Conteh (Department of Political Science and Director, Niagara Community Observatory Brock University) ;
  • JiYoung Park (Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University at Buffalo) ;
  • Kathryn Friedman (Department of Law & Policy, University at Buffalo) ;
  • Ha Hwang (Korea Institute of Public Administration) ;
  • Barry Wright (Brock University)
  • 투고 : 2023.04.27
  • 심사 : 2023.05.15
  • 발행 : 2023.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Over the past few decades, globalization has been shifting economic power upward to transnational actors on the one hand, and downward to subnational or regional spaces on the other. This phenomenon has resulted in the centrality of territorially delimited subnational regions acting as critical loci of economic governance within a complex and globally distributed value chain of trade and service flows. Within this broader context of industrial restructuring are economic regions that span national borders in their collective assets. The paper focuses on investigating the economic competitiveness and productivity of cross-border (or binational) economic regions. Using the conceptual framework of economic clusters, an econometric model that measures proxies of geographic proximity of firms in the life sciences cluster, and a new binational economic model, the paper examines the key characteristics, potentials and constraints of economic competitiveness and productivity in a cross-border region comprising counties in Western New York and regional municipalities in Southern Ontario. The findings demonstrate the direct and indirect benefits of closer cross-border economic cooperation. The paper then concludes with some policy observations about leveraging cross-border economic clusters for strategic industrial cooperation.

키워드

과제정보

The initial draft has been presented in the 3rd International Conference on Public Policy in Singapore. In addition to the current authors, we appreciate for the members of the Cross-Border Prosperity Research team that include Robert G. Shibley, Dean, University at Buffalo School of Architecture and Planning at Buffalo, USA; Carol Phillips, Research Coordinator, Brock University, Niagara Community Observatory, Ontario, Canada, and Nicole Ferguson, Research Assistant, Niagara Community Observatory, Ontario Canada. The authors also appreciate four anonymous reviewers of this paper, who improved the paper.

참고문헌

  1. Ahlqvist, T. (2014). Building Innovation Excellence of World Class: The Cluster as an Instrument of Spatial Governance in the E uropean U nion. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1712-1731. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12100
  2. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1992). Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. International journal of urban and regional research, 16(4), 571-587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1992.tb00197.x
  3. Andresen, M.A. (2010). The geography of the Canada-United States border effect. Regional Studies, 44(5), 579-594. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400802508794
  4. Aoyama, Y., Murphy, J.T., & Hanson, S. (2010). Key concepts in economic geography. Sage.
  5. Asheim, B.T., & Coenen, L. (2006). Contextualising regional innovation systems in a globalising learning economy: On knowledge bases and institutional frameworks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
  6. Asheim, B., Cooke, P., & Martin, R. (2006). The rise of the cluster concept in regional analysis and policy: a critical assessment. In Clusters and regional development (pp. 19-47). Routledge.
  7. Baycan, T., Nijkamp, P., & Stough, R. (2017). Spatial spillovers revisited: Innovation, human capital and local dynamics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 962-975. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12557
  8. Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration. Cambridge journal of economics, 6(2), 167-184.
  9. Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Caragliu, A. (2015). The rise of second-rank cities: what role for agglomeration economies?. European planning studies, 23(6), 1069-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.904999
  10. Campbell, M., Cooper, M.J., Friedman, K., & Anderson, W.P. (2015). The economy as a driver of change in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 41, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2014.11.016
  11. Capello, R., Caragliu, A., & Fratesi, U. (2018). Measuring border effects in European cross-border regions. Regional Studies, 52(7), 986-996. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1364843
  12. Capello, R. (2017). Towards a new conceptualization of innovation in space: Territorial patterns of innovation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 976-996. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12556
  13. Conteh, C. (2013). Policy governance in multi-level systems: Economic development and policy implementation in Canada. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP.
  14. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2016). World economy: EIU global forecast - 2015 begins in unstable fashion. Economist Intelligence Unit: Country ViewsWire.
  15. Eraydin, A., and Tuna T-K. (2013). Resilience Thinking in Urban Planning. Dordrecht; New York: Springer. Available online at http://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-5476-8.
  16. Faggian, A., Partridge, M., & Malecki, E.J. (2017). Creating an environment for economic growth: creativity, entrepreneurship or human capital?. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 997-1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12555
  17. Florida, R. (2008). Megaregions: The Importance of Place. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved on Dec. 11, 2016 at https://hbr.org/2008/03/megaregions-the-importance-of-place.
  18. Friedman, T.L. (2002). The world is flat: a brief history of the twenty-first century (Vol. 19). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  19. Fritsch, M., & Storey, D. (Eds.). (2017). Entrepreneurship in a regional context. Routledge.
  20. Gertler, M.S., & Wolfe, D.A. (2006). Spaces of knowledge flows: Clusters in a global context. In Clusters and regional development (pp. 236-253). Routledge.
  21. Gordon, P., Park, J., & Richardson, H.W. (2009). Modeling input-output impacts with substitutions in the household sector: A numerical example. Economic modelling, 26(3), 696-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2009.01.019
  22. Huber, P. (2003). On the determinants of cross-border cooperation of Austrian firms with Central and Eastern European partners. Regional Studies, 37(9), 947-955. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000143931
  23. Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Prokop, D., & Thompson, P. (2014). The global competitiveness of regions. Routledge.
  24. Kakderi, C., & Tasopoulou, A. (2017). Regional economic resilience: The role of national and regional policies. European Planning Studies, 25(8), 1435-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1322041
  25. Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2008). Economic geography: Critical concepts in the social sciences. Routledge.
  26. Miller, D., & Nelles, J. (2018). Discovering American regionalism: An introduction to regional intergovernmental organizations. Routledge.
  27. Nadalutti, E., and Otto K. (2018). Region-Making and Cross-Border Cooperation : New Evidence from Four Continents. Routledge Global Cooperation Series. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge
  28. OECD. (2013). Regions and Innovation: Collaborating across Borders. OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation. Paris : OECD Publishing.
  29. OECD. (2007). Globalisation and Regional Economies: Can OECD Regions Compete in Global Industries? Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Available online at https://www.oecd.org/gov/globalisationandregionaleconomies canoecdregionscompeteinglobalindustries.htm.
  30. Oliveira, E. (2015). Constructing regional advantage in branding the cross-border Euroregion Galicia-northern Portugal. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1044020
  31. Park, J. (2008). The economic impacts of dirty bomb attacks on the Los Angeles and Long Beach ports: Applying the supply-driven NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model). Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 5(1).
  32. Park, J., Gordon, P., Moore II, J.E., Richardson, H.W., & Wang, L. (2007), "Simulating The State-by-State Effects of Terrorist Attacks on Three Major US Ports: Applying NIEMO (National Interstate Economic Model)," p208-234, in HW Richardson, P Gordon and JE Moore II, eds, The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  33. Park, J., Moore, J.E., Gordon, P., & Richardson, H.W. (2017). A new approach to quantifying the impact of hurricane-disrupted oil refinery operations utilizing secondary data. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26, 1125-1144.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9537-7
  34. Park, J., & Richardson, H.W. (2014). "Refining the Isard Multiregional Input-Output Model Theory," p.35-54 in Peter Nijkamp, Adam Rose, and Karima Kourtit eds. Regional Science Matters: Studies Dedicated to Walter Isard, Springer-Verlag.
  35. Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and regional studies, 10(2), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002004
  36. Porter, M. (1998). On competition (Boston: Harvard Business Review Press).
  37. Regional Municipality of Niagara. (2018). Why Niagara: Strategic Location. https://niagaracanada.com/why-niagara/strategic-location/Accessed May 2018
  38. Russo, M. (1985). Technical change and the industrial district: the role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy. Research Policy, 14(6), 329-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90003-4
  39. Rutherford, T.D., & Holmes, J. (2013). (Small) differences that (still) matter? Crossborder regions and work place governance in the Southern Ontario and US Great Lakes automotive industry. Regional Studies, 47(1), 116-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.653334
  40. Schaffler, J., Hecht, V., & Moritz, M. (2017). Regional determinants of German FDI in the Czech Republic: new evidence on the role of border regions. Regional Studies, 51(9), 1399-1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1185516
  41. Scott, A.J. (Ed.). (2001). Global city-regions: trends, theory, policy. OUP Oxford.
  42. Scott, J.W. (1999). European and North American contexts for cross-border regionalism. Regional studies, 33(7), 605-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078657
  43. Snyder, J., Christopherson, K., Grimm, L., Orlando, A., & Galer, A. (2014). Global Models of Binational Regional Collaboration: The Potential for Great Lakes Regional Innovation. Michigan State University.
  44. Storper, M. (2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton University Press.
  45. Makkonen, T., & Williams, A.M. (2016). Border region studies: The structure of an 'offbeat'field of regional studies. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 3(1), 355-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2016.1209982
  46. U.S. Census Bureau (2016). American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, S0101. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=A CS_17_1YR_S0101&prodType=table (accessed October 21, 2018).
  47. U.S. Census Bureau (2011). American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, S0101. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=A CS_17_1YR_S0101&prodType=table (accessed October 21, 2018).
  48. U.S. Census Bureau (2015). American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, S2301. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=A CS_17_1YR_S2301&prodType=table (accessed November 2, 2018).
  49. Bureau of Economic Analysis (2016). Gross Domestic Product by Metropolitan Area, Advance 2015, and Revised 2001-2014, U.S. Department of Commerce. https://apps.bea.gov/regional/histdata/releases/0916gmp/index.cfm (accessed October 21, 2018).
  50. Statistics Canada (2017a). Hamilton [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Ontario [Province] (table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. Released November 29, 2017. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E (accessed October 21, 2018). 
  51. Statistics Canada (2017b). St. Catharines - Niagara [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Canada [Country] (table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. Released November 29, 2017. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E (accessed October 21, 2018).
  52. Statistics Canada (2012a). Hamilton [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Canada [Country] (table). Census Profile. 2011 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-311-XCB2011009. Ottawa. Released November May 29, 2012. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/tbt-tt/Rpeng.cfm?TABID=2&LANG=E&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=539&GK=10&GRP=1&PID=103151&PRID=10&PTYPE=101955&S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2011&THEME=88&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=(accessed October 21, 2018).
  53. Statistics Canada (2012b). St. Catharines - Niagara [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Canada [Country] (table). Census Profile. 2011 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-311-XCB2011009. Ottawa. Released November May 29, 2012.  https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/tbttt/Rpeng.cfm?TABID=2&LANG=E&A=R&APATH=3&DETAIL=0&DIM=0&FL=A&FREE=0&GC=539&GL=1&GID=1099022&GK=10&GRP=1&O=D&PID=103151&PRID=10&PTYPE=101955&S=0&SHOWALL=0&SUB=0&Temporal=2011&THEME=88&VID=0&VNAMEE=&VNAMEF=&D1=0&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=0&D6=0 (accessed October 21, 2018).
  54. Statistics Canada (2018a). Hamilton [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Canada [Country] (table). Employment by industry, annual, census metropolitan areas. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 14-10-0098-01 (formerly CANSIM 282-0131). Ottawa. Date modified: 2018-11-01.
  55. Statistics Canada (2018b). St. Catharines - Niagara [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Canada [Country] (table). Employment by industry, annual, census metropolitan areas. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 14-10-0098-01 (formerly CANSIM 282-0131). Ottawa. Date modified: 2018-11-01. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid= 1410009801&pickMembers%5B0%5D=1.18 (Accessed November 2, 2018).
  56. Merkel, L.S., Oppedahl, D., & Testa, W. (2000). The binational Great Lakes economy. Chicago Fed Letter, (May).
  57. Warrian, P., & Bramwell, A. (2018). 7. Innovation in an Industrial City: Economic Transformation in Hamilton. In Growing Urban Economies (pp. 181-210). University of Toronto Press.
  58. Webber, D.J., Healy, A., & Bristow, G. (2018). Regional growth paths and resilience: A European analysis. Economic Geography, 94(4), 355-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1419057
  59. Wolfe, D.A., & Gertler, M.S. (2016). Introduction to Innovation, Creativity and Governance in Canadian City-Regions, in David A. Wolfe and Meric S. Gertler (Eds). Growing urban economies : innovation, creativity, and governance in Canadian cityregions. n.p.: Toronto ; Buffalo ; London : University of Toronto Press. Pp. 5-48.