Journal of Korean Academic Society of Home Health Care Nursing (가정간호학회지)

Korean Academic Society of Home Health Care Nursing (한국가정간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding the Current Trend of Home Care Assessment in the Post-COVID-19 Era by Comparing Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS)-D and E

미국 환자사정도구(OASIS) 개정 사례를 통한 포스트코로나 시대의 가정간호 환자사정 동향 파악

  • Hwang, Jinkyoung (College of Nursing, Seoul National University ․ University Staff of Level VII, Seoul National University Health Service Center) ;
  • Lee, Hana (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Aeri (College of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Woo, Kyungmi (Research Institute of Nursing Science.Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future by Brain Korea 21 (BK 21) four project, College of Nursing, Seoul National University)
  • 황진경 (서울대학교 간호대학, 서울대학교 보건진료소) ;
  • 이하나 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 김애리 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 우경미 (서울대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소.BK21 4단계 사업(미래간호인재양성사업단))
  • Received : 2023.04.06
  • Accepted : 2023.04.25
  • Published : 2023.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the recent revision of the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS)-D to version E in the United States to identify the most recent trends in home health care and provide suggestions for implementing home health care in Korea. Methods: This study is a comprehensive literature review. We compared all items in OASIS-D and OASIS-E and identified the most significant changes. Additionally, we have discussed the context in depth. Results: The addition of items related to health literacy and medication reconciliation, strengthening assessment in the cognitive and mood domains, and improving items related to pain assessment were identified. These major revisions resulted from a greater emphasis in the healthcare field on social determinants of health. Additionally, the COVID-19 outbreak highlighted the importance of monitoring and managing the symptoms of home care patients in the community. Conclusion: The key items of the OASIS amendment and their background analysis proposed in this study could serve as a cornerstone for the revision of home health care assessment tools or the development of systematic common assessment tools in Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the BK21 four project (Center for Human-Caring Nurse Leaders for the Future) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE, Korea) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF).

References

  1. Buhler-Wilkerson K. No place like home: A history of nursing and home care in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001.
  2. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. March 2022 Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. Research Report. Washington, United States: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2022 March. Report No.: Not applicable. Available from: https://www.medpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Mar22_MedPAC_ReportToCongress_Ch8_SEC.pdf
  3. Home Health Quality Reporting Program [Internet]. Baltimore: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service; 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 1]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HomeHealthQualityInits.
  4. Outcome Assessment Information Set Version D (OASIS-D) [Internet]. Baltimore: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service. [cited 2023 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HomeHealthQualityInits/Downloads/OASIS-D_All-Items_final.pdf
  5. Outcome Assessment Information Set Version E (OASIS-E) [Internet]. Baltimore: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/oasis-e-update-instrument51622.pdf
  6. Draft OASIS-E Guidance Manual [Internet]. Baltimore: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service; 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HomeHealthQualityInits/HHQIOASISUserManual
  7. Chen EK, Edelen MO, McMullen T, Ahluwalia SC, Dalton SE, Paddock S, Rodriguez A, Shier V, Mandl S, Mota T, Saliba D. Developing standardized patient assessment data elements for Medicare post-acute care assessments. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2022;70(4):981-990. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17648
  8. Mental Health and COVID-19: Early evidence of the pandemic's impact [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; [cited 2022 Aug 31]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/352189/WHO2019-nCoV-Sci-Brief-Mental-health-2022.1-eng.pdf
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare of Republic of Korea. Manual for Home Care Services in Medical Institutions [Internet]. Seoul, Korea; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 22]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/jb/sjb0406vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=030406&CONT_SEQ=374453
  10. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the Confusion Assessment Method: A new method for detection of delirium. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1990;113(12):941-948. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941
  11. Chodosh J, Edelen MO, Buchanan JL, Yosef JA, Ouslander JG, Berlowitz DR, Streim JE, Saliba D. Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: development and testing of a brief instrument of mental status. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2008;56(11):2069-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01944.x
  12. Shier V, Edelen MO, McMullen TL, Ahluwalia SC, Chen EK, Dalton SE, Paddock S, Rodriguez A, Sherbourne CD, Mandl S, Mota T. Standardized assessment of cognitive function of post-acute care patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2022;70(4):1001-1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17652
  13. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine. 2001;16(9):606-613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
  14. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. Rockville: Patient Safety Primer: Medication Reconciliation; [cited 2022 Sep 19]. Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/1/medication-reconciliation.
  15. Health Literacy [Internet]. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2018 - [cited 2022 Jun 2]. Available from: https://wayback.archive-it.org/5774/20220414160933/https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/social-determinants-health/interventions-resources/health-literacy.
  16. Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;155(2):97-107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005
  17. Sentell T, Braun KL. Low health literacy, limited English proficiency, and health status in Asians, Latinos, and other racial/ethnic groups in California. Journal of Health Communication. 2012;17(sup3):82-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.712621.
  18. Shaw SJ, Huebner C, Armin J, Orzech K, Vivian J. The role of culture in health literacy and chronic disease screening and management. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health. 2009;11(6):460-467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-008-9135-5
  19. Bruce ML, McAvay GJ, Raue PJ, Brown EL, Meyers BS, Keohane DJ, et al. Major depression in elderly home health care patients. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2002;159(8):1367-1374. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.8.1367
  20. Luppa M, Luck T, Matschinger H, Konig HH, Riedel-Heller SG. Predictors of nursing home admission of individuals without a dementia diagnosis before admission - results from the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+). BMC Health Services Research. 2010;10(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-186
  21. Nicholson Jr NR. Social isolation in older adults: An evolutionary concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2009;65(6):1342-1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04959.x
  22. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine. 2010;7(7):e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
  23. Sepulveda-Loyola W, Rodriguez-Sanchez I, Perez-Rodriguez P, Ganz F, Torralba R, Oliveira DV, Rodriguez-Manas L. Impact of social isolation due to COVID-19 on health in older people: Mental and physical effects and recommendations. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 2020;24(9):938-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1500-7
  24. Pronovost P, Weast B, Schwarz M, Wyskiel RM, Prow D, Milanovich SN, Berenholtz S, Dorman T, Lipsett P. Medication reconciliation: a practical tool to reduce the risk of medication errors. Journal of Critical Care. 2003;18(4): 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2003.10.001
  25. Setter SM, Corbett CF, Neumiller JJ, Gates BJ, Sclar DA, Sonnett TE. Effectiveness of a pharmacist-nurse intervention on resolving medication discrepancies for patients transitioning from hospital to home health care. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2009;66(22):2027-2031. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp080582
  26. Cotton BP, Lohman MC, Brooks J, Whiteman K, Bao Y, Greenberg RL, Bruce ML. Prevalence of and factors related to prescription opioids, benzodiazepines, and hypnotics among medicare home health recipients. Home Healthcare Now. 2017;35(6):304. https://doi.org/10.1097/NHH.0000000000000553
  27. Amtmann D, Cook KF, Jensen MP, Chen WH, Choi S, Revicki D, Cella D, Rothrock N, Keefe F, Callahan L, Lai JS. Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain. 2010;150(1):173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.025
  28. Ferreira OG, Maciel SC, Costa SM, Silva AO, Moreira MA. Active aging and its relationship to functional independence. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem. 2012;21:513-518. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000300004
  29. Davis MP, Srivastava M. Demographics, assessment and management of pain in the elderly. Drugs & Aging. 2003;20(1):23-57. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200320010-00003
  30. R3 Report Issue 22: Pain Assessment and Management Standards for Home Health Services [Internet]. Oakbrook Terrace: The Joint Commission. 2018 - [cited 2022 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/tjc/documents/standards/r3-reports/r3_22_pain_standards_hc_12_21_18_final.pdf.
  31. Wilson M. Integrating the concept of pain interference into pain management. Pain Management Nursing. 2014;15(2):499-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.004.
  32. Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152(10):2399-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005
  33. Lenz ER, Pugh LC, Milligan RA, Gift A, Suppe F. The middle-range theory of unpleasant symptoms: an update. Advances in Nursing Science. 1997;19(3):14-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-199703000-00003
  34. Ko JY, Yoon JY. Analysis of hospital-based home care service utilization using National health insurance claim data from 2008 to 2017. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Home Health Care Nursing. 2019;26(1):36-50. https://doi.org/10.22705/jkashcn.2019.26.1.36
  35. Herr K, Coyne PJ, McCaffery M, Manworren R, Merkel S. Pain assessment in the patient unable to self-report: position statement with clinical practice recommendations. Pain Management Nursing. 2011;12(4):230-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.10.002
  36. interRAI.org [Internet]. [cited 2023 Apr 24]. Available from: https://www.interrai.org/