• Title, Summary, Keyword: 비교 연구

Search Result 78,844, Processing Time 0.16 seconds

Analysis of Trend in Comparative Education Research Related to Curriculum in the 「Korean Journal of Comparative Education」 from Postcolonial Perspectives (탈식민주의 관점에서 본 국내 교육과정 관련 비교교육 연구 동향: 「비교교육연구」 학술지에 게재된 논문을 중심으로)

  • So, Kyung-Hee
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.27 no.4
    • /
    • pp.23-44
    • /
    • 2017
  • The purpose of this study is to review the trend in comparative education research related to curriculum published in the Korean Journal of Comparative Education, and to critically analyze its characteristics from the postcolonial perspectives. In this study, I analyzed 61 articles published in this journal from 1995 to 2016. The result showed that comparative studies related to curriculum were conducted mainly by benchmarking policies or contents related to curriculum and textbooks of Western countries including North America and Europe as well as Japan which colonized Korea. In addition, although Korea has been changing into multicultural society, studies on Asian countries such as China and Vietnam which are the nationalities of many foreigners living in Korea were rare. Based on the results, this study suggested that the expansion of comparative education research subjects, overcoming of coloniality in comparative education, and ontological reflection of comparative education researchers are necessary.

The Exploration of the Usefulness of Comparative Educational Approach in Education Policy Studies (교육정책탐구에서의 비교교육학적 접근방법의 유용성 탐색)

  • Chung, Il-Hwan
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.28 no.1
    • /
    • pp.153-173
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of the study is to identify the usefulness of comparative educational research approach for rational educational policy development and operation through the analysis of the area, contents, methods, and so on that comparative educational research approach in educational policy studies is used. For achieving the purpose, the study examined as the follows. First, the study discussed the academic traits and research target of educational policy and comparative education using the academic trait of definition method and the academic trait of approach method. Second, the study examined the contents of the exploration of educational policy studies in comparative education. For this, the study analyzed previous research on the relationship between comparative education and general education. And using articles published in Journal of Comparative Education, the study analyzed the contents of educational policy research in comparative education. Based on the main results, the discussions and suggestions are provided.

Current Status and Developments of Comparative Education at Universities in Korea and World Wide (세계적 동향에 비추어 본 우리나라 대학의 비교교육학 교육현황과 과제)

  • Hyun, Kyung S.;Park, Elisa L.
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.18 no.4
    • /
    • pp.1-26
    • /
    • 2008
  • The purpose of this study is to present the overall landscape of Comparative Education study in teacher training program at universities in Korea. The Comparative Education in Korea is relatively young without a lengthy tail on its name and still on the way of upgrading itself, however various efforts are gathering for the development of Comparative Education. With this understanding, this paper diagnoses the current status of Comparative Education in Korea by analyzing 1) the number of institutions which provide Comparative Education lectures for their teacher training program, 2) aims of Comparative Education teaching, 3) curricular and course titles, 4) teaching methods and textbooks, and 5) current issues and problems currently laid on Comparative Education in Korea designated by actual lecturers and professors who are in charge of Comparative Education lectures. The historical development of Comparative Education in Korea will be briefly presented at the beginning part of the chapter. To gauge the comparative position of Korean Comparative Education, the second half of this paper introduces the cases of Comparative Education at universities worldwide, presenting various countries' status of Comparative Education along with their developmental status. As the first research which pays an attention on the current figure of Comparative Education in Korea, it will form an impetus on why we should teach college students about comparative education and on what next step should be carried for further development of Comparative Education at universities based on the comparative understanding of other countries. Since it is in the transitional stage in terms of its development, it would be critical to have a self-analysis of the current status, which will help to lay the comprehensive understanding background for designating the future direction of its development.

The Comparative Education and History of Education: An Introductory Approach to Comparative Education History (비교교육학과 교육사학: 비교교육학사 서설(敍說))

  • Hahn, Yong-Jin
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.28 no.3
    • /
    • pp.243-263
    • /
    • 2018
  • In order to confirm the academic authenticity of comparative education, the academic methodology which is also appropriate for the historical arrangement is the history. In this sense, this article focuses on the study of comparative education from the viewpoint of history of education and aims for a tentative approach to comparative education history. In every discipline, it is essential to organize the history of the discipline both for those majoring in it and for the development of the discipline itself. The conclusions obtained from this study are as follows. First, in general, the method of studying comparative education includes not only 'comparative studies' but also 'regional studies', but it can add academic depth through the study of time series called 'comparative education history'. Second, the developmental process of the comparative education can be classified into four stages; the first stage is 'the pre-history' of the comparative education, the second stage is the 'embryo stage', the third stage is the 'establishment stage', and the fourth stage is the 'development stage'. Especially, in the era of globalization, the academic potential of comparative education is even higher, so it is possible to add an 'expanding period'. Third, it is necessary to understand the 'comparative education history' in order to secure the academic identity of the comparative education study. It is expected that it will be possible to more easily confirm the perspectives and issues of comparative education in the future, together with a good conceptual understanding of comparative education.

An Analysis on the Two Processes of Social Comparison and Self-Comparison (사회비교와 자기비교의 두 과정에 관한 분석)

  • Kang, Hye-Ja
    • Journal of Digital Convergence
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.445-452
    • /
    • 2016
  • The purposes of this study were to examine the two processes of social comparison and self-comparison, and to suggest the applications of social comparison theories and self-comparison theories. For these purposes, social comparison theory, self-evaluation maintenance model, control theory, self-discrepancy theory, regulatory focus theory, and temporal comparison theory were reviewed. The processes of social comparison and self-comparison are different, but both comparisons are similar in that they have some effects on self-evaluation, emotion, motivation and behaviors. Suggestions on education, health, economic justice and interpersonal relationships were discussed.

Comparative Education and Philosophy of Education: Toward a Philosophical Comparative Education (비교교육학과 교육철학: 비교교육철학을 지향하며)

  • Yoo, Jae-Bong
    • Korean Journal of Comparative Education
    • /
    • v.28 no.1
    • /
    • pp.117-133
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between philosophy of education and comparative education, and suggest what relationship between these are desirable. To this end, this paper examines the connection between philosophy of education and comparative education, shows trends in philosophical approach to comparative education, and suggests a desirable direction for comparative education should proceed in terms of philosophy of education. Philosophy of education needs a comparative dimension as much as comparative education needs a philosophical dimension. From the philosophical perspective, many researches should directed their research towards philosophical comparative education for the mutual enhancement of comparative education and philosophy of education. In conclusion, philosophers of education should actively conduct research, keeping both the identity of philosophical education and enlarging comparative education. The research should not be confined to either philosophy of education or comparative education.

Website interface design based on cultural differences - Comparison of China and the United States portal sites - (문화 차이에 따른 웹사이트 인터페이스 디자인 비교연구 - 중국과 미국의 포털사이트 비교 -)

  • Zhang, Ning;Kim, Se-Hwa
    • Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
    • /
    • /
    • pp.315-316
    • /
    • 2012
  • 본 연구에서는 문화 차이에 따른 웹사이트 인터페이스 디자인 비교연구를 위하여 Hofstede이 제안한 5가지 문화차원을 바탕으로 중국과 미국의 포털사이트 인터페이스 디자인을 비교 분석하였다.

  • PDF

Theory of Comparison Value and Online Comparison Challenge Advertising (비교가치이론과 온라인 비교도전 광고)

  • 이재원;이재규
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • /
    • pp.35-38
    • /
    • 2003
  • 비교도전 광고는 비교도전자에 의해 활성화되는 적시성 비교광고 방법이며 그 체계적인 구성을 위해 비교가치이론을 제안한다. 본 연구는 제안된 이론에 기반해 CompareMe와 CompareThem전략을 제시하고 비교주체와 객체간의 가격과 성능의 우열구분과 비교제품군의 특징적 사양의 근접도에 따라 8개의 비교도전 시나리오를 분류한 후 데스크탑PC 제품간 비교실험을 통해 시현한다. 여러 비교객체 제품들에 대한 비교도전 계획이 필요하며, 수리계획 모형을 사용하여 광고예산, 비교노출 한도 등의 제약조건에서 비교가치를 최대화한다. 광고효과에서 비교도전 광고가 무작위 배너 인터넷광고에 대비해서 4.77배, 그리고 유사성기반 표비교에 2.77배 좋은 가격과 성능을 제공한다.

  • PDF

연구보고서 - 수송부문 연료 및 차량의 공정경쟁성 비교와 국민경제적 파급효과 극대화 방안 연구

  • 한국기계연구원 그린카 연구센터
    • Korea Petroleum Association Journal
    • /
    • /
    • pp.51-60
    • /
    • 2011
  • 이 자료는 한국기계연구원 그린카연구센터가 CNG 버스와 클린디젤버스의 환경성과 경제성을 비교 검토하기 위해 한국경제학회에 의뢰하여 완성한 "수송부문 연료 및 차량의 공정경쟁성 비교와 국민경제적 파급효과 극대화 방안 연구"의 최종보고서를 요약한 내용이다.

  • PDF