DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ethical Issue of Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia

  • Myung Ah Lee (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2023.02.10
  • Accepted : 2023.02.27
  • Published : 2023.06.01

Abstract

With the implementation of Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life, interests of the general public on self-determination right and dignified death of patients have increased markedly in Korea. However, "self-determination" on medical care is misunderstood as decision not to sustain life, and "dignified death" as terminating life before suffering from disease in terminal stage. This belief leads that physician-assisted suicide should be accommodated is being proliferated widely in the society even without accepting euthanasia. Artificially terminating the life of a human is an unethical act even though there is any rational or motivation by the person requesting euthanasia, and there is agreement thereof has been reached while there are overseas countries that allow euthanasia. Given the fact that the essence of medical care is to enable the human to live their lives in greater comfort by enhancing their health throughout their lives, physician-assisted suicide should be deemed as one of the means of euthanasia, not as a means of dignified death. Accordingly, institutional organization and improvement of the quality of hospice palliative care to assist the patients suffering from terminal stage or intractable diseases in putting their lives in order and to more comfortably accept the end of life physically, mentally, socially, psychologically and spiritually need to be implemented first to ensure their dignified death.

Keywords

References

  1. Enforcement Decree of the Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life. Enforcement Date Feb. 4. 2018. Sejong: Korea Legislation Research Institute; c 2019.
  2. Na JY, Park JT. Patients' self-decision and death in court decisions and the law of decision of life-sustaining medical care. Korean J Leg Med 2022;46:1-10. https://doi.org/10.7580/kjlm.2022.46.1.1
  3. Kim CS. Euthanasia and tort liability. Korean J Civil Law 2005;28:417-55.
  4. Kim ST. Global trends in legalization of physician-assisted suicide. Korean J Medicine Law 2018;26:27-73. https://doi.org/10.17215/kaml.2018.06.26.1.27
  5. Seong KS. A study on the acceptance of physician-assisted suicide. The Journal of Legal Studies 2019;27:211-40. https://doi.org/10.35223/GNULAW.27.4.9
  6. Jeffrey L, Shirelle P, eds. West's encyclopedia of American law Volumev.4. Death and dying, life and living. Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN:West Pub. Co.;c1998.
  7. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York, N.Y.:Oxford University Press;2003.
  8. Ha HS. Constitutional study on termination life-sustanining treatment : focused on right to self-determination [master's thesis]. Seoul: Graduate School of University of Seoul; 2020. Korean.
  9. Cheong KH, Kim KR, Seo JH, Yoo JE, Lee SH, Kim HJ. Ensuring dignity in old age with improved quality of death. Research report 2018-02-01. Sejong: Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2018.
  10. Statistics 2022 [Internet]. Seoul: Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy; 2022 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.nibp.kr.
  11. Chang HC. A study on the legal policy for the permit of the physician-assisted suicide. J Law Politics Research 2018;18:53-82. https://doi.org/10.17926/kaolp.2018.18.4.53
  12. Sung NI. The Law. 23rd ed. Paju: Bobmunsa: 2023.
  13. Jun JY. A study on the acceptance of euthanasia. Journal Hallym Law Forum 1995;4:113-60.
  14. Kim EC, Kim TI. Right of self-decision making about death and death with dignity. Study on American Constitution 2013;24:97-124.