The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology (문화기술의 융합)

The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology (국제문화기술진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Risk

ESG 성과가 기업위험에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

  • Jung-Hyuck Choy (Dept. of Economics & Financial Asset Management, Hanyang Cyber Univ)
  • 최정혁 (한양사이버대학교 경제금융자산관리학과)
  • Received : 2023.02.06
  • Accepted : 2023.03.11
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The impact of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance on investors' decision-making is growing. Investors' focus on the financial performance of firms in the past is expanding to the non-financial performance of the interests of stakeholders surrounding firms. Against this backdrop, this study conducted a panel regression analysis on firms evaluated by Korea Corporate Governance Service to analyze the impact of ESG performance, a firm's non-financial performance, on firm risk. According to the analysis, ESG performance has a negative (-) effect on all three firm risks (systematic risk, unsystematic risk, and total risk), indicating that the stakeholder theory and risk management theory are supported. The implications of this study are: First, ESG reduces not only unsystematic risk but also broad and indiscriminate systematic risk; Second, investors can reduce the risk of their investment portfolio by executing ESG investments; Third, companies can achieve stable financial performance even in adverse circumstances by utilizing the insurance function of ESG management; Lastly, the government can enhance the stability of the financial market while improving the financial soundness of firms through reasonable ESG-related regulations.

환경·사회·지배구조(ESG) 성과가 투자자의 의사결정에 미치는 영향이 커지고 있다. 과거 기업의 재무적 성과에 집중하던 투자자의 시선이 기업을 둘러싼 이해관계자의 이익이라는 비재무적 성과로 확장하고 있는 것이다. 이런 배경에서 본 연구는 기업의 비재무적 성과인 ESG 성과가 기업위험에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위해 한국기업지배구조원이 평가하는 기업을 대상으로 패널회귀분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과 ESG 성과는 세 가지 기업위험(체계적위험, 비체계적위험, 총위험) 모두에 대해 음(-)의 영향을 미치고 있어 이해관계자이론과 위험관리이론을 지지하는 결과를 나타냈다. 본 연구의 시사점은 첫째, ESG는 비체계적위험 뿐만 아니라 광범위하고 무차별적인 체계적위험도 감소시키고, 둘째, 투자자는 ESG 투자를 집행함으로써 투자포트폴리오의 위험을 감소시킬 수 있고, 셋째, 기업은 ESG 경영의 보험기능을 활용함으로써 부정적인 상황에서도 안정적인 재무성과를 영위할 수 있으며, 마지막으로, 정부는 합리적인 ESG 관련 규제를 통해 기업의 재무적 건전성을 제고하면서 금융시장의 안정성을 높일 수 있다는 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Gregory, R. Tharyan, and J. Whittaker, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: Disaggregating the Effects on Cash Flow, Risk and Growth," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 633-657, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1898-5
  2. M. Plumlee, D. Brown, R.M. Hayes, and R.S. Marshall, "Voluntary Environmental Disclosure Quality and Firm Value: Further Evidence," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 336-361, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004
  3. S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, C.C. Kwok, and D.R. Mishra, "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, No. 9, pp. 2388-2406, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007
  4. X. Luo and C.B. Bhattacharya, "The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 73, No. 6, pp. 198-213, 2009.
  5. S. Ross, R. Westerfield, and J. Jefferey, Corporate Finance (4th ed.), Boston: Irwin, 1996.
  6. W.F. Sharpe, "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk," The Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 425-442, 1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
  7. R.E. Freeman, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman Publishing, 1984.
  8. J. Surroca, J.A. Tribo, and S. Waddock, "Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 463-490, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820
  9. K.S. Bardos, M. Ertugrul, and L.S. Gao, "Corporate Social Responsibility, Product Market Perception, and Firm Value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 62, pp. 935-948, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101588
  10. X.R. Luo, D. Wang, and J. Zhang, "Whose Call to Answer: Institutional Complexity and Firms' CSR Reporting," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 321-344, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0847
  11. K.A. Brekke and K. Nyborg, "Attracting Responsible Employees: Green Production as Labor Market Screening," Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 509-526, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2008.05.001
  12. A. McWilliams and D. Siegel, "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the FirmPerspective," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 117-127, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/259398
  13. P.C. Godfrey, "The Relationship between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 777-798, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378878
  14. ByoungJo Kim, "The Social Capital Building Approach to Corporate Sustainability Management," International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 117-125, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17703/IJACT.2022.10.4.117
  15. P.C. Godfrey, C.B. Merrill, and J.M. Hansen, "The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 425-445, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.750
  16. I. Oikonomou, C. Brooks, and S. Pavelin, "The Impact of Corporate Social Performance on Financial Risk and Utility: A Longitudinal Analysis," Financial Management, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 483-515, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2012.01190.x
  17. K.V. Lins, H. Servaes, and A. Tamayo, "Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis," The Journal of Finance, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 1785-1824, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
  18. H. Jo and H. Na, "Does CSR Reduce Firm Risk? Evidence from Controversial Industry Sectors," Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 110, No. 4, pp. 441-456, 2012.
  19. Hyun Il Lim ad Kyoungjin Choi, "A Study on the Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Risk : Evidence from Korea," Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 791-815, 2018. https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2018.06.31.3.791
  20. F. Korinth and R. Lueg, "Corporate Sustainability and Risk Management? The U-Shaped Relationships of Disaggregated ESG Rating Scores and Risk in the German Capital Market," Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 5735.
  21. R. Sassen, A.K. Hinze, and I. Hardeck, "Impact of ESG Factors on Firm Risk in Europe," Journal of Business Economics, Vol. 86, No. 8, pp. 867-904, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-016-0819-3
  22. M.H. Shakil, "Environmental, Social and Governance Performance and Financial Risk: Moderating Role of ESG Controversies and Board Gender Diversity," Resources Policy, Vol. 72, pp. 102144, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102144
  23. Z. Guo, S. Hou, and Q. Li, "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Value: The Moderating Effects of Financial Flexibility and R&D Investment," Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 20, pp. 8452, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208452
  24. Xuehao Xia and Soo Hyun Bae, "Social Responsibility Activities and Financial Performance of the Financial Industry," The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 71-78, 2019