Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Purpose and Method of the Reading on the Reading Theory in the Cho-seon Dynasty

조선시대 독서론에서의 독서 목적과 방법에 관한 연구

  • 소병문 (공주대학교 사범대학 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2023.04.21
  • Accepted : 2023.05.19
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore the purpose and method of reading by examining relevant research from various academic fields. According to the reading theory in the Cho-seon Dynasty, reading was classified as either a way of gaining fame, becoming a gentle man, or solving problems. However, this views have been largely replaced by the belief that reading serves two main purposes: self-discipline and practical usage in this study (Confucian perspectives have been excluded from this approach). The traditional reading method, known as sukookdok-jeongsa, influenced by Chu-tzu's reading, emphasized a fluent reading and a deep reading. A fluent reading (sukookdok) method involved a reading aloud, memorizing, and a repeated reading for the literal decoding. After decoding, a deep reading (jeongsa) involved a reading while taking notes, a reading with reference and a repeated reading for the optimal comprehension. A fluent reading in the traditional reading theory is succeeded by 'a reading for liberal arts' and a deep reading is succeeded by 'a reading for learning'. The sukookdok-jeongsa's various reading methods are useful enough to apply to reading education in the school library. But 'a reading for fun' did not appear in the traditional reading theory.

이 연구의 목적은 학문 분야별 전통적 독서론의 선행연구를 참고해 문헌정보학 분야에 있어 조선시대의 독서 목적과 방법을 재구성하는데 있다. 선행연구에서 조선시대의 독서 목적은 입신양명형과 도학주의형, 그리고 문제해결형으로 구분하였으나 이 연구는 유교 사상적 용어를 배제하고 교육적 의미로 조정해 '수양을 위한 독서'와 '실용을 위한 독서'로 대별하였다. 또한 조선시대의 독서 방법은 주자의 다양한 독서법 가운데 '숙독정사'의 방법을 포괄적으로 수용하여 설명하였다. 숙독은 한자로 쓰인 독서 자료에 대한 축어적 해독을 위하여 소리내어 읽기, 외워 읽기, 반복해서 읽기를 독서 방법으로 한다. 정사는 해독 이후 깊이 있는 내용의 이해를 위하여 기록하며 읽기, 엮어 읽기, 반복해서 읽기를 독서 방법으로 하였다. 이와 같은 숙독정사의 다양한 독서 방법은 오늘날 독서 방법으로 적용할 수 있을 만큼 유용하다. 아울러 조선시대 독서 목적인 수양을 위한 독서는 오늘날 교양 독서로, 실용을 위한 독서는 학습독서로 이어지는 반면, 문학 중심의 흥미를 위한 독서는 조선시대 독서론에는 나타나지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Byun, Woo-Yeoul (2015). Understanding of Reading Instruction. Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  2. Byun, Woo-Yeoul (2016). A study on the academic system of science of reading. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(2), 27-50.
  3. Cha, Mi-Hee (2012). A trends and prospects about Mungwa of Joseon period research. History Education Review, 49, 287-320.
  4. Eom, Kyung-Seob (2016). A research trends and prospects of reading theory in Joseon dynasty. Dongnam Journal of Korean Language & Literature, 41(5), 5-38.
  5. Han, Mi-Kyung (2013). A study on the development of reading theory in Chosun dynasty. Journal of the Institute of Bibliography, 56, 249-273.
  6. Huziwarasizuo (1998). The theory of reading in Chu. The Toe Gye Hak Non Chong, 4, 143-153.
  7. Jung, Byung-Heon (1996). A traditional reading and its modern meaning. Journal of the Reading Research, 1, 35-54.
  8. Jung, Min (2005). The aspects and layers of the reading methodology in Chosun dynasty. Journal of Chinese Characters Education in Korea, 25, 515-547.
  9. Kang, Young-Ahn (2009). Chu his on reading. Journal of the Society of Philosophical Studies, 53, 5-24.
  10. Kim, Eun-Kyung (2006a). A Study on Reading-Theory in the Joseon Dynasty Period and It's Application of Classical Chinese Class. Doctoral dissertation, Major in Sino-Korean Language Education, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  11. Kim, Eun-Kyung (2006b). A study about the reading methodology in the Joseon dynasty. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 13, 303-346.
  12. Kim, Hye-Jin (2002). A Discussion of the Relative Acceptance of Traditional Reading Method. Master's thesis, Major in Korean Education, Graduate School of Education Sookmyung Women's University.
  13. Kim, Jong-Sung (2013). A trends analysis of reading research in the field of library and information science. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(3), 99-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.3.201309.99
  14. Kim, Jun-Seok, Park, Kwang-Yong, Lee, Yong-Hoon, & Han, Sang-Kwan (1995). How to view Joseon society. Quarterly Review of Korean History, 18, 111-153.
  15. Kim, Ki-Ho (2009). The present status and further task of the studies on classical reading theory. Korean Thought and Culture, 50, 43-82.
  16. Kim, Ki-Ho (2010). The Shin-ui theory in reading method of Juja-eolyu and its significance in a reading theory. The Journal of the Humanities, 59, 1-36.
  17. Kim, Ki-Ho (2018). The paradox of language and Zhu Xi's epistemology of reading. Toegye-HakLon-Gib, 23, 323-354. https://doi.org/10.33213/THLJ.2018.0.23.323
  18. Kim, Moon-Sik (2011). The publication and use of the Zhuzi Yulei in Korea. The Historical Journal, 45, 63-87.
  19. Kim, Phan-Jun (2015). An analytical study on research trends of reading and reading instruction in overseas: focused on library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(3), 69-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.3.069
  20. Kim, Soo-Kyoung (2002). A study on the characters of reading theory in the age of Yi dynasty. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 13(2), 243-263.
  21. Kim, Wang-Kyu (1999). A study on the reading method of the Joseon dynasty. Chinese Character and Literature Education, 5, 137-199.
  22. Kim, Young (1989). A study on the theory of reading in the Joseon dynasty. Journal of Korean Literature in Classical Chinese, 12, 203-225.
  23. Kim, Young (1993). Social Meaning of Chinese Literature in the Late Joseon Period. Seoul: Jipmundang.
  24. Kim, Young (2003). A shilhak-scholar's method of reading. Journal of the Reading Research, 12, 1-18.
  25. Korea Library Association Special Committee on Korean Library Standards (2013). Korean Library Standard (ed. 2013). Seoul: Korea Library Association.
  26. Lee, Kyung-Hwa (2001). Principles and Methods of Reading Education. Seoul: Pakijung.
  27. Lee, Man-Soo (2004). A study in the reading education. Reading Culture Research Institute Journal, 3, 27-41.
  28. Lee, Soon-Young, Choi, Suk-Ki, Kim, Ju-Hwan, Seo, Heok, & Park, Young-Min (2015). The Theory of Reading Education. Seoul: Sahoipyunglon.
  29. Lee, Sung-Hee (2007). A study of reading theory of middle class at Chosun dynasty. Reading Culture Research Institute Journal, 6, 93-137.
  30. Lee, Yong-Ju (2001). A reading and cultivation. the Journal of the Korean Association for the History of Religions, 15, 229-258.
  31. Park, Soo-Ja (2001). Understanding of Reading Instruction. Seoul: SNU Press.
  32. Park, Su-Mil (2005), The change of the reading theory and the reading ways of late Chosun dynasty. Korean Language and Literature in International Context, 33, 133-167.
  33. Park, Yong-Chul (2001). The Significance and the Modern Succession of the Theories of Reading Books of the Four Masters of a Realistic School. Master's thesis, Major in the Education of Chinese Writing, Graduate School of Education Sungkyunkwan University.
  34. Park, Young-Mok (2008). The Theory of Reading Education. Seoul: Jipmundang.
  35. Roh, Byung-Sung (2006). A study on Chu-Ja's thoughts of reading. Studies of Korean Science, 51, 131-172.
  36. Schwanenflugel, P. J. & Flanagan, N. K. (2015). The Psychology of Reading. New York: the Guilford press.
  37. Shim, Woo-Jun (1974). A review and prospect of Korean library studies. the Monthly Report of KLA, 15(12), 17-21.
  38. Won, Jae-Rin (2009). A comparative review of the teaching theory of Toegye Yi Hwang and Seongho Yi Ik. the Academy of Korean Studies, 32(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.25024/ksq.32.1.200903.81
  39. Yun, Byung-Tae (1978). Toegye and Hsin-Cjing-Fu-Chu. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 5, 67-87.