Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Metaliteracy Research Trends Analysis: Focused on the Difference from Information Literacy

메타리터러시 연구동향 분석 - 정보 리터러시와의 차이를 중심으로 -

  • 홍소람 (광주대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 장우권 (전남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.04.21
  • Accepted : 2023.05.13
  • Published : 2023.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Metaliteracy is a new framework that reframes information literacy. Metaliteracy is distinguished from information literacy through the intruduction of postmodernism, social constructivism and metacognition. However it has been not examined whether metaliteracy studies reflect the conceptual differences. Therefore, The purpose of the study is to observe research trends of metaliteracy on the difference from information literacy. In the study, literature reviews were conducted, and frequency analysis and knowledge network analysis(co-occurrence and bibliographic coupling) were conducted for 80 metaliteracy studies. The results of the study are as follows. As a result of co-occurrence analysis, metacognition(frequency 1st) and skills(degree centrality 1st, closeness centrality 1st, betweenness centrality 1st) appeared. Since metaliteracy criticizes skill-based information literacy, the result suggests that the concepts of information literacy and metaliteracy are mixed. On the other hand, as a result of bibliographic coupling analysis, studies with high bibliographic coupling explain the difference between information literacy and metaliteracy through metacognition.

메타리터러시는 정보 리터러시의 재구조화된 결과물이다. 메타리러러시는 포스트모더니즘, 사회적 구성주의, 메타인지의 도입을 통해 정보 리터러시와 구분되었다. 그러나 메타리터러시 연구들이 이 개념적 차이를 반영하고 있는지는 검토되지 않았다. 따라서 이 연구의 목적은 메타리터러시 이론을 연구한 학술논문들에서 이 개념적 차이를 어떻게 반영하고 있는지 연구동향을 관찰하는 것이다. 이 연구는 문헌연구를 실시하고, 메타리터러시 연구 80편을 대상으로 빈도분석 및 지식 네트워크 분석(동시출현·서지결합)을 실시하였다. 결과는 다음과 같다. 동시출현분석 결과, 메타인지(빈도 1위)와 더불어 스킬(연결중심성 1위, 근접중심성 1위, 매개중심성 1위)로 나타났다. 메타리터러시는 스킬 기반의 정보 리터러시를 비판하기 때문에 이 결과는 정보 리터러시와 메타리터러시 개념이 혼재되어 있음을 시사한다. 한편 서지결합분석 결과, 서지결합도가 높은 논문은 정보 리터러시와 메타리터러시의 차이를 메타인지를 통해 설명하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Jae-Hwang (2016). Considering core ideas of ACRL information literacy 'framework(2015)'. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(3), 171-191. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.3.171
  2. Kim, Bongje (2018). Analysis of trends in Character Education research through a systematic review of the literature: focusing on network text analysis and multidimensional scaling. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education, 59, 185-213. https://doi.org/10.18338/kojmee.2018..59.185
  3. Kim, Hyeyoun (2017). Research trends in collaborative writing: a systematic review. Writing Research, 34, 7-49. https://doi.org/10.31565/korrow.2017..34.001
  4. Ko, Youngman (2010). Information Literacy. Seoul: Korean Library Association.
  5. Kwahk, Kee-Young (2016). Social Network Analysis (Second Edition). Seoul: CrBooks.
  6. Lee, Soosang (2012). Network Analysis Methodology. Seoul: Nonhyung.
  7. Park, Jinseo & Hong, Ahjeong (2021). Analysis of the role of cultural intermediaries to activate civic engagement. Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(3), 171-197. http://doi.org/10.52758/kjle.2021.27.3.171
  8. Suh, Jinwon (2009). A comparative study on the constructivism and the structuralism as the educational methods. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(4), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.4.200912.81
  9. Yoo, Sarah (2018). A diagnostic analysis of LIS curriculum from the meta-literacy perspective. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 191-220. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.2.191
  10. Yoon, Woolahm & Chang, Juyoung (2022). A review of domestic creativity researches in design: a systematic literature review. The Korean Society of Science & Art, 40(2), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2022.03.30.255
  11. Association of College and Research Libraries (2000). Information Literacy Competence Standards for Higher Education. American Library Association. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/11213/7668
  12. Association of College and Research Libraries (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. American Library Association. Available: https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
  13. Beheshti, J., Bilal, D., Mackey, T. P., Limberg, L., Bartlett, J. C., Gwizdka, J., Jacobson, T. E., & Ishimura, Y. (2016). Information literacy: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301019
  14. Delello, J. A. & McWhorter, R. R. (2017). Reducing the digital divide: connecting older adults to iPad technology. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815589985
  15. ERIC Thesaurus (1966). Skills. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?qt=skill&ti=Skills
  16. Evans, D. L., Bailey, S. G., Thumser, A. E., Trinder, S. L., Winstone, N. E., & Bailey, I. G. (2020). The biochemical literacy framework: inviting pedagogical innovation in higher education. Febs Open Bio, 10(9), 1720-1736. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12938
  17. Fulkerson, D. M., Ariew, S, A., & Jacobson, T. E. (2017). Revisiting metacognition and metaliteracy in the ACRL framework. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.45
  18. George, R. & Luke, R. (1996). The critical place of information literacy in the trend towards flexible delivery in higher education contexts. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 27(3), 204-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.1996.10754977
  19. Giddens, A. & Sutton, P. W. (2017). Essential Concepts in Sociology (2nd edition). 김봉석 옮김 (2018). 사회학의 핵심 개념들 (개정증보판). 파주: 동녘.
  20. Goodsett, M. (2020a). Best practices for teaching and assessing critical thinking in information literacy online learning objects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(5), 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102163
  21. Goodsett, M. (2020b). Assessing the potential for critical thinking instruction in information literacy online learning objects using best practices. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2), 227-254. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.4
  22. Hartman, H. J. ed. (2002). Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  23. Hill, M., Salvaggio, M., Vinnedge, J., & Darden, A. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of a self-directed learning activity for first-year medical students. Medical Education Online, 25(1), 1717780. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1717780
  24. Ingraham, B., Levy, P., & McKenna, C. (2007). Academic literacy in the 21st century. In Conole, G. & Oliver, M. eds. Contemporary Perspectives in E-learning Research: Themes, Methods and Impact on Practice. London, England: Routledge, 160-173.
  25. Jacobson, T. & Mackey, T. (2013). Proposing a metaliteracy model to redefine information literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 7(2), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2013.7.2.138
  26. Kent, A., Lancour, H., & Narsi, W. Z. (2000). Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science (67). New York: Marcel Dekker.
  27. Limberg, L., Sundin, O., & Talja, S. (2012). Three theoretical perspectives on information literacy. Human IT, 11(2), 93-130. Available: https://humanit.hb.se/article/view/69
  28. Lloyd, A. (2006). Information literacy landscapes: an emerging picture. Journal of Documentation 62(5), 570-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610688723
  29. Lotherington, H. (2004). Emergent meta literacies: what the Xbox has to offer the EQAO. Linguistics and Education, 14, 305-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2004.02.007
  30. Ma, J., Li, C., & Liang, H. N. (2019). Enhancing students' blended learning experience through embedding metaliteracy. Education Research International, 2019, 6791058. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6791058
  31. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2010, June 23). Re-conceptualizing information literacy as a metaliteracy for social media. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science. London, England. Available: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:909868/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  32. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 76(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
  33. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information Literacy to Empower Learners. Cichago: Neal-Schuman.
  34. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2019). Metaliterate Learning for the Post-Truth World. Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
  35. Mackey, T. P. (2020). Embedding metaliteracy in the design of a post-truth MOOC: building communities of trust. Communications in Information Literacy, 14(2), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2020.14.2.9
  36. Nierenberg, E. & Dahl, T. I. (2021). Is information literacy ability, and metacognition of that ability, related to interest, gender, or education level? a cross-sectional study of higher education students. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006211058907
  37. O'Brien, K. L., Forte, M., Mackey, T. P., & Jacobson, T. E. (2017). Metaliteracy as pedagogical framework for learner-centered design in three MOOC platforms. Open Praxis, 9(3), 267-286. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.126417468022349
  38. O'Connell, J. (2012). Learning without frontiers: school libraries and meta-literacy in action. Access, 26(1), 4-7. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.038168567341804
  39. Odede, I. R. (2018). A comparative analysis of information literacy self-efficacy skills of postgraduate students in library schools in South-South, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1917. Available: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1917?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Flibphilprac%2F1917&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
  40. Onyancha, O. B. (2020). Knowledge visualization and mapping of information literacy, 1975-2018. IFLA Journal, 46(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035220906536
  41. Petrucco, C. & Ferranti, C. (2017). Developing critical thinking in online search. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3), 35-45. Available:https://www.learntechlib.org/p/180979/
  42. Pinto, M., Pulgarin, A., & Escalona, M. I. (2014). Viewing information literacy concepts: a comparison of two branches of knowledge. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2311-2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1166-6
  43. Pinto, Maria., Fernandez-Pascual, R., Caballero-Mariscal, D., Sales, D, Guerrero, D., & Uribe, A. (2019). Scientific production on mobile information literacy in higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2006-2017). Scientometrics, 120(1), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03115-x
  44. Raish, V. & Rimland, E. (2016). Employer perceptions of critical information literacy skills and digital badges. College & Research Libraries, 77(1), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.1.87
  45. Schirato, T. & Webb, J. (2003). Bourdieu's concept of reflexivity as metaliteracy. Cultural Studies, 17(3/4), 539-553. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950238032000083935
  46. Stopar, K. & Bartol, T. (2019). Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in secondary education: mapping and visualization of trends and concepts. Scientometrics, 118(2), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2990-5
  47. Stordy, P. H. (2011). Taxonomy of literacies. Journal of Documentation, 71(3), 456-476. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2013-0128
  48. Yu, C. & Zhao, C. G. (2021). Continuing the dialogue between writing experts and academic librarians: A conceptual model of information-based academic writing in higher education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(6), 102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102454
  49. Zimmerman, M. S. & Ni, C. (2021). What we talk about when we talk about information literacy. IFLA Journal, 47(4), 453-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035221989367
  50. Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The Information Service Environment Relationships and Priorities. Washington, D. C. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf