문화기술의 융합 (The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology)

  • 제9권2호
  • /
  • Pages.275-284
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2384-0358(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0366(eISSN)
국제문화기술진흥원 (The International Promotion Agency of Culture Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개인-직무적합성이 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 직무기반 심리적 주인의식의 매개효과

The Effect of person-job fit on job performance: The Mediating effect of job-based psychological ownership

  • 변희섭 (숭실대학교 대학원 경영학과) ;
  • 이태식 (숭실대학교 경영학부)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.05
  • 심사 : 2023.03.11
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 기존 선행연구가 부족했던 개인-직무적합성과 직무기반 심리적 주인의식과의 관계를 규명하고 나아가 직무기반 심리적 주인의식이 개인-직무적합성과 직무성과의 관계를 매개한다는 결과를 국내에서 최초로 확인한 것에 학문적 의의가 있다. 이와 더불어 능력적합이 직무성과에 미친다는 기대이론과 요구적합이 직무성과에 미치는 사회교환이론을 뒷받침해주는데도 연구의 의의가 있다고 할 수 있다. 또한 기업의 인적자원관리 부서에게는 인적자원 선발시 직무에 적합한 인재를 선발하는 것에 대한 중요성을 다시 한번 확인 시키고, 조직구성원들의 능력적합이 요구적합보다 더 큰 효과를 미치는 것을 감안하면 자기 능력에 맞는 직무에 배치하는 것이 정신적, 물질적 보상보다 더 높은 직무성과를 낼 수 있다는 점이 인적자원관리에 대한 실무적인 시사점이라고 할 수 있다.

This study is of academic significance to investigate the relationship between person-job fit and job-based psychological ownership, which previous studies lacked, and further confirmed for the first time in Korea that job-based psychological ownership mediates the relationship between person-job fit and job performance. In addition, the study supports the expectation theory that competency suitability affects job performance and the social exchange theory that requirement suitability affects job performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry (2022). A Survey of Corporate Recruitment Trends in 2022, http://korcham.net.
  2. Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from a historical perspective. Psychological bulletin, 81(12), 1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037457
  3. Pervin, L. A. (1968). Performance and satisfaction as a function of individual-environment fit. Psychological bulletin, 69(1),56. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025271
  4. Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of management Review,14(3),333-349. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.11989. 4279063
  5. Pierce, J. L., Rubenfeld, S. A., & Morgan, S. (1991). Employee ownership: A conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management review, 16(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279000
  6. Lee Yu-an, Kim In-shin, and Noh Ho-jung (2015). The Effects of Person-Environment Fit and Rewards Systems on Hotel Employees' Psychological Ownership, Knowledge Sharing Behaviors and Innovative Behaviors : Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership. Hotel Management Studies 24.1, 147-162.
  7. Batool, U., & Zafar, M. Z. (2019). Psychological Ownership for Person-Job Fit and Job-based Psychological Ownership. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 27(4), 2585-2602.
  8. Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person- organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 67(3), 294-311. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0081
  9. Lauver, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2001). Distinguishing between employees' perceptions of person-job and person-organization fit. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 454-470. https://doi..org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1807
  10. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences OF INDIVIDUALS'FIT at work: A meta-analysis OF person-job, person-organization, person- group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel psychology, 58(2), 281-342. https://doi.org/10.111/j1744-6570.2005.00672.x
  11. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(5), 875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
  12. Lee Ju-yong and Kwon Seok-kyun (2019). The Effect of Person-Environment Fit on Task Performance and Turnover Intention, and the Mediating Effect of Work Motivation in SMEs. Small Business Research. 41.3, 23-47.
  13. Ahn Jae-hyun and Lee Sun-ok (2018). The mediating role of organizational attractiveness in the relationship between PEF and the intention to accept job offers: Focusing on the recruitment selection scene of small and medium-sized companies. Global Management Research = Journal of global business research 30.2, 17-35.
  14. Caldwell, D. F., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1990). Measuring person-job fit with a profile-comparison process. Journal of applied psychology, 75(6), 648. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.648
  15. Kim Mi-hee, Shin Hyung-hyung, and Moon Chul-woo (2012). Perceived Person-Job Fit and Task and Contextual Performance : The Moderating Effects of Task Significance and Autonomy. Human Resources Organization Study 20.1, 93-128.
  16. Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
  17. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  18. Kim Hyung-woo (2018). Structural relationships between intrinsic leadership, individual-job suitability, job commitment, performance within roles, and organizational citizenship behavior.
  19. Guan, Y., Deng, H., Bond, M. H., Chen, S. X., & Chan, C. C. H. (2010). Person-job fit and work-related attitudes among Chinese employees: Need for cognitive closure as moderator. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2010.495664
  20. Memon, M. A., Salleh, R., & Baharom, M. N. R. (2015). Linking Person-Job Fit , Person-organization fit, employee engagement and turnover intention: A three-step conceptual model. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 313. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n2p313
  21. Yoon Kyung-shin (2019). The structural relationship among job performance, job crafting, person-job fit, informal learning and job challenge and moderating effects of LMX and workload of office workers in large corporations
  22. Han, T., Chiang, H., & Chiang, C. (2013, September). The Investigation of the Relation between Person organization Fit, Person-job Fit, Psychological Ownership, and Contextual Performance: A Longitudinal Approach. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Marketing, Logistics, and Business (MLB).
  23. Rahmayanti, N., & Kurniawan, J. E. (2020). Relationship between person job fit and psychological ownership in the successor of family business. KnE Social Sciences, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i3.6377
  24. Wagner, S. H., Parker, C. P., & Christiansen, N. D. (2003). Employees that think and act like owners: Effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 56(4),847-871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00242.x
  25. Shin Sun Hae(2020). The Relationships of Positive Psychological Capital, Psychological Ownership, Job Satisfaction and Job Performance. https://doi.org/10.22558/jieb.2020.8.33.4.1035
  26. Van Dyne, L., & Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249
  27. Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T., & Gardner, J. (2007). A study of the antecedents and consequences of psychological ownership in organizational settings. The Journal of social psychology, 147(5),477-500. https://doi.org/10.3200/socp.147.5.477-500
  28. Brown, G., Crossley, C., & Robinson, S. L. (2014). Psychological ownership, territorial behavior, and being perceived as a team contributor: The critical role of trust in the work environment. Personnel psychology, 67(2), 463-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12048
  29. Dirks, K. T. Cummings, LL.. & Pierce, JL (1996). Psychological ownership in organisations: Conditions under which individuals promote and resist change Research in Organisational Change and Development, 9, 1-23.
  30. Pierce, J. L., Jussila, I., & Cummings, A. (2009). Psychological ownership within the job design context: Revision of the job characteristics model. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(4), 477-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.550
  31. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  32. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods,40(3),879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
  33. Ehrhart, K. H. (2006). Job characteristic beliefs and personality as antecedents of subjective person-job fit. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(2), 193-226. https://doi.org/10.1007s10869-006-9025-6 https://doi.org/10.1007s10869-006-9025-6
  34. Hall, J., & Williams, M. S. (1966). A comparison of decision-making performances in established and ad hoc groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(2), 214. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022896
  35. Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. D., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 30(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583