DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Toxic Concentration(T-LOC) Endpoint Distance Study for Fire Brigade Protection in Response to Chemical Accidents

화학사고 초기대응 소방대 보호를 위한 독성농도(T-LOC) 끝점거리 연구

  • Jong Chan Yun (Department of Disaster Prevention Engineering, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Chul Hee Cho (National Fire Research Institute) ;
  • Jeong Hun Won (Department of Safety Engineering & Disaster Prevention & Department of Big Data, Chungbuk National University)
  • 윤종찬 (충북대학교 방재공학 학과간협동과정) ;
  • 조철희 (국립소방연구원) ;
  • 원정훈 (충북대학교 안전공학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.01
  • Accepted : 2023.12.13
  • Published : 2023.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose a quantitative toxicity endpoint distance suitable for the initial response of firefighters by comparing and analyzing the commonly applied toxic level of concern (T-LOC), specifically emergency response planning guidelines (ERPG), acute exposure guideline levels (AEGL), and immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH). This is to protect the fire brigade, which responds to toxic chemical accidents first during the golden time. Using areal locations of hazardous atmospheres, a damage prediction program, the amount of leakage for both acidic and basic substances, along with the endpoint distance, were analyzed for alternative accident and worst-case accident scenarios. The results showed that the toxicity endpoint distance, serving as a compromise between Level-3 and Level-2 of T-LOC, was longer than ERPG-3 and shorter than ERPG-2 with IDLH, while its values were analyzed in the order of ERPG-2, AEGL-2, IDLH, AEGL-3, and ERPG-3. It is suggested that the application of IDLH in an emergency (red card) and ERPG-2 endpoint distance in a non-emergency (non-red card) can be utilized for the initial response of the fire brigade.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work is partially supported by Ministry of the Interior and Safety as Human Resource Development Project in Disaster Management.

References

  1. Y. W. Lim, J. Y. Yang, Y. J. Lee and D. C. Shim, "Chemical Classification based on Environmental and Health Toxicity and Implementation for GHS", J. Environ. Toxicol., Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 197-208, 2006.
  2. D. A. Crowl and J. F. Louvar, "Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications", Prentice Hall, 2011.
  3. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "Chemical Integrated Information System", Available From : https://icis.me.go.kr, 2023.
  4. National Fire Agency, "On-site Firefighting Activities Crew Safety Accident Statistics(2020~2022)", 2023.
  5. National Disaster Management Research Institute, "Establishment of National Principle for Disaster Response through the Features of Emergency Situation", 2019.
  6. National Fire Agency, "Standard Operation Procedures Disaster Site", 2023.
  7. National Fire Research Institute of Korea, "Chemical Incident Response Guide for Fire Fighters(CIRG-FF)", 2021.
  8. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "Key Info Guide for Accident Preparation Substance", 2022.
  9. National Fire Agency, "Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG)", 2022.
  10. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "ALOHA User Guide(ver 1.1)", 2015.
  11. Seoul Metropolitan Fire and Disaster Headquarters, "Standard Operation Procedures", 2019.
  12. W. S. Choi, T. K. Ryu, S. L. Kwak, H. J. Lim, J. H. Jung, J. E. Lee, J. K. Kim, J. B. Baek, J. H. Yoon and J. S. Ryu, "Discussion for Improvement of Decision System of Total Risk in Off-site Risk Assessment", Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Health, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 217-226, 2018.
  13. B. N. Lee and T. S. Kang, "The Use of Rapid Intervention Crew in Korean Fire Service", Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 562-570, 2019.
  14. Ministry of Environment, "Regulations on Preparation of Off-site Impact Assessment Reports - Table 1", 2018.
  15. National Institute of Chemical Safety, "Technical Guidelines for Accident Scenario Selection and Risk Analysis", 2021.
  16. B. H. Jeon and H. S. Kim, "A Study on Improvement Plan for Selecting Boundary Areas to Respond to Chemical Accidents and Terrorism", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol. 21, No. 8. pp. 60-66, 2020.
  17. Hazardous Materials First Response: Fundamentals with Applications, IFSTA, 2017.
  18. J. I. Jeon and H. S. Kong, "Changes in The Amount of Air Respirator Consumed by Field Fire-fighting Activities", The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology, Vol. 5, No. 4. pp. 93-98, 2019. https://doi.org/10.17703/JCCT.2019.5.4.93
  19. National Fire Agency, "On-site Firefighting Safety Management Practical Commentary", 2022.
  20. J International, "Level A Chemical Protective Clothing Specifications".
  21. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, "Technical Guidance on Selecting Worst-case and Alternative-case Accident Scenarios(KOSHA GUIDE P-107-2020)", 2020.
  22. H. S. Lee, T. H. Lee, K. S. Park and J. G. Kim, "A Study on the Evaluation of Effects of Chemical Accident Toxicity Using CARIS & ALOHA", Journal of the Korean Society for Environmental Technology, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 8-15, 2019. https://doi.org/10.26511/JKSET.20.1.2
  23. D. J. Lee, J, H. Ahn and C. G. Song, "Improvement of Damage Range Calculation for First Response to Chemical Accidents", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 59-65, 2017.
  24. T. E. Son and E. J. Lee, "Dispersion Model of Initial Consequence Analysis for Instantaneous Chemical Release", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 1-9, 2022.
  25. G. S. Cho and K. S. Park, "A Study on the Reasonable Estimation of Consequence of Chemical Release", Journal of the Korean Institute of Gas, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp 20-28, 2020.