East Asian mathematical journal

The Youngnam Mathematical Society (영남수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Tensions between Secondary Mathematics Teachers and Educational Policy Regulating Academic Acceleration in Korea

  • Received : 2023.02.20
  • Accepted : 2023.02.27
  • Published : 2023.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Korean government initiated an educational policy regulating academic acceleration in schools (e.g., regulating teaching or assessing above-grade-level content) in order to normalize public education and prevent the growth of private tutoring. To analyze whether the policy is achieving its intended goals, this study examined how high school mathematics teachers responded to the policy. The findings indicate four distinct teacher responses: the teachers would teach above-grade-level lessons in classes, but not assess them on a test; the teachers sought academic acceleration to prevent excessive private tutoring, although the policymakers thought that teachers' academic acceleration results in an excessive demand for private tutoring; the teachers were willing to teach above-grade-level content for students, but they were reluctant to teach below-grade-level content due to the time constraints; and the teachers recognized that the policy limited their curricular autonomy, even though it was intended to ensure their autonomy. Implications for mathematics teacher educators and policymakers are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers' opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 18-29.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4
  2. Allensworth, E., Nomi, T., Montgomery, N., & Lee, V. E. (2009). College preparatory curriculum for all: Academic consequences of requiring algebra and English I for ninth graders in Chicago. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 367-391.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709343471
  3. Arani, A. M., Kim, Y. C., & Malek, M. J. (2017). A comparative study of state social policies on education and its shadow in South Korea and Iran. Review of European Studies, 9(1), 80-92.  https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n1p80
  4. Ball, S. J., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge. 
  5. Ben-Peretz, M., & Flores, M. A. (2018). Tensions and paradoxes in teaching: implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 202-213.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1431216
  6. Bray, M. (2003). Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring. Paris: International Institute for Education and Planning. 
  7. Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank and Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre. 
  8. Brighton, C. M. (2002). Straddling the fence: Implementing best practices in an age of accountability. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 30-33.  https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2002-67
  9. Brown, M. W. (2002). Teaching by design: Understanding the intersection between teacher practice and the design of curricular innovations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. 
  10. Charalambous, C. Y., & Hill, H. C. (2012). Teacher knowledge, curriculum materials, and quality of instruction: Unpacking a complex relationship. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(4), 443-466.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.650215
  11. Choi, ?., Calero, J., & Escard?bul, J. O. (2012). Private tutoring and academic achievement in Korea: An approach through PISA-2006. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 9(2), 299-322.  https://doi.org/10.22804/KJEP.2012.9.2.006
  12. Choi, H., & Choi, ?. (2016). Regulating private tutoring consumption in Korea: Lessons from another failure. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 144-156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.03.002
  13. Choi, J., & Cho, R. M. (2016). Evaluating the effects of governmental regulations on South Korean private cram schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(4), 599-621.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2015.1064356
  14. Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2015). The aftermath of accelerating algebra evidence from district policy initiatives. Journal of Human Resources, 50(1), 159-188. 
  15. Coombe, A. (2018). Global education census report 2018. Cambridge Assessment International Education. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/514611-global-education-census-survey-report.pdf 
  16. Dolma, P., Nutchey, D., Watters, J. J., & Chandra, V. (2018). Investigating the alignment of Bhutanese mathematics teachers' planned approaches within the context of a reformed curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 581-602.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9791-1
  17. Finau, T., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2018). Effects of a mathematics cognitive acceleration program on student achievement and motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 183-202.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9763-5
  18. Flores, M. A. (2012). Teachers' work and lives: A European perspective. In C. Day (Ed), The Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development (pp.94-107). London: Routledge. 
  19. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (2011). Animating interview narratives. Qualitative Research, 3, 149-167. 
  20. Hong, W. P., & Youngs, P. (2016). Why are teachers afraid of curricular autonomy? Contradictory effects of the new national curriculum in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36, 20-33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2014.959471
  21. Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2011). Focus groups: Contingent articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 545-561). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 
  22. Kanevsky, L. S., & Clelland, D. (2013). Accelerating gifted students in Canada: Policies and possibilities. Canadian Journal of Education, 36(3), 229-271. 
  23. Kilpatrick, J. (2009). The mathematics teacher and curriculum change. PNA, 3(3), 107-121.  https://doi.org/10.30827/pna.v3i3.6185
  24. Kim, J. H., & Chang, J. (2010). Do governmental regulations for cram schools decrease the number of hours students spend on private tutoring?. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 7(1), 3-21.  https://doi.org/10.22804/KJEP.2010.7.1.001
  25. Kim, S. (2016). Effects of government's regulations on private education expenditures in Korea. Seoul Journal of Economics, 29, 181-211.  https://doi.org/10.22904/SJE.2016.29.2.003
  26. Kim, S., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259-296.  https://doi.org/10.1086/648186
  27. Kim, Y. C., & Jung, J. H. (2019). Conceptualizing shadow curriculum: definition, features and the changing landscapes of learning cultures. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 141-161.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1568583
  28. Kim, Y. C., Gough, N., & Jung, J. H. (2018). Shadow education as an emerging focus in worldwide curriculum studies. Curriculum Matters, 14, 8-30.  https://doi.org/10.18296/cm.0027
  29. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. (2015). A research on the actual condition and improvement of mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.askmath.re.kr/askmath/sub04/0002/?boardId=bbs_0000000000000004&mode=view&cntId=1699 
  30. Korean National Statistics Office (2011). The 2010 survey of private education expenditure. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/pressReleases/11/2/index.board 
  31. Korean Ministry of Education (2016). Special act on the promotion of public education normalization and regulation on pre-curriculum education. Retrieved from http://elaw.klri.re.kr/kor_service/lawView.do?hseq=43886&lang=ENG 
  32. Lambdin, D. V., & Preston, R. V. (1995). Caricatures in innovation: Teacher adaptation to an investigation-oriented middle school mathematics curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(2), 130-140.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487195046002007
  33. Lee, C. J., Lee, H., & Jang, H. M. (2010). The history of policy responses to shadow education in South Korea: Implications for the next cycle of policy responses. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 97-108.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9064-6
  34. Lee, J. (2007). Two worlds of private tutoring: The prevalence and causes of after-school mathematics tutoring in Korea and the United States. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1207-1234.  https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900507
  35. Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2000). States of excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44-69.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.44
  36. Ma, X. (2002). Early acceleration of mathematics students and its effect on growth in self-esteem: A longitudinal study. International Review of Education, 48(6), 443-468.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021334707732
  37. Ma, X. (2005). Early acceleration of students in mathematics: Does it promote growth and stability of growth in achievement across mathematical areas?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(4), 439-460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.02.001
  38. Ma, X. (2010). Effects of early acceleration of students in mathematics on taking advanced mathematics coursework in high school. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 43-63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2010.11790300
  39. Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332-1361.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309341375
  40. McDuffie, A. R., Choppin, J., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2018). Middle school mathematics teachers' orientations and noticing of features of mathematics curriculum materials. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 173-187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.019
  41. Osborn, M. (2006). Changing the context of teachers' work and professional development: A European perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 242-253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.008
  42. Palacios Gonzalez, P., & Jung, J. Y. (2021). The predictors of attitudes toward acceleration as an educational intervention: Primary school teachers in Mexico. High Ability Studies, 32(1), 27-49.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1692649
  43. Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29, 38-54. 
  44. Peters, S. J., Rambo-Hernandez, K. E., Makel, M. C., Matthews, M. S., & Plucker, J. A. (2017). Should millions of students take a gap year? Large numbers of students start the school year above grade level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 229-238.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701834
  45. Rabionet S.E. (2011) How I learned to design and conduct semistructured interviews: an ongoing and continuous journey. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563-566. 
  46. Rambo, K. E., & McCoach, D. B. (2012). Teacher attitudes toward subject-specific acceleration: Instrument development and validation. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(2), 129-152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212440591
  47. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211
  48. Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM, 46(5), 705-718.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4
  49. Remillard, J. T., & Kim, O. K. (2017). Knowledge of curriculum embedded mathematics: Exploring a critical domain of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 65-81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9757-4
  50. Ricento, T. K., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. Tesol Quarterly, 30(3), 401-427.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3587691
  51. Roach, A. T., Niebling, B. C., & Kurz, A. (2008). Evaluating the alignment among curriculum, instruction, and assessments: Implications and applications for research and practice. Psychology in the Schools, 45(2), 158-176.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20282
  52. Rogers, K. B. (2015). The academic, socialization, and psychological effects of acceleration: Research synthesis. In S. G. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplik (Eds.), A nation empowered. Volume 2 (pp. 19-29). Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. 
  53. Siegle, D., Wilson, H. E., & Little, C. A. (2013). A sample of gifted and talented educators' attitudes about academic acceleration. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24(1), 27-51  https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12472491
  54. Silver, R. E., & Steele, R. S. (2005). Priorities in English language education policy and classroom implementation. Language Policy, 4(1), 107-128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-004-6567-1
  55. Son, J. W., & Kim, O. K. (2015). Teachers' selection and enactment of mathematical problems from textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 491-518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0148-9
  56. Southern, W. T., & Jones, E. D. (2015). Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues. In S. G. Assouline, N. Colangelo, J. VanTassel-Baska, & A. Lupkowski-Shoplik (Eds.), A nation empowered. Volume 2 (pp. 9-18). Iowa City, IA: Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development. 
  57. Stamps, L. S. (2004). The effectiveness of curriculum compacting in first grade classrooms. Roeper Review, 27(1), 31-41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554286
  58. Stanley, J. C. (2000). Helping students learn only what they don't already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 216-222.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.216
  59. Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Moon, S. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(1), 39-53.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210383155
  60. Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K-12 students' academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675417
  61. Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319-369). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. 
  62. Tarr, J. E., Ch?vez, ?., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students' opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106(4), 191-201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18075.x
  63. Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM, 46(5), 781-795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0622-y
  64. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2017). More than one-half of children and adolescents are not learning worldwide. Fact Sheet No. 46, September 2017. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 
  65. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J. S., & Sinagub, J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 
  66. Vieira, F. (2007). Teacher autonomy: Why should we care? Independence, 41, 20-28. 
  67. Wang, H. (2008). Language policy implementation: A look at teachers' perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 30(1), 1-38. 
  68. Yang, H., & Clarke, M. (2018). Spaces of agency within contextual constraints: a case study of teacher's response to EFL reform in a Chinese university. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 187-201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460252
  69. Yin R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.