DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Urban Greening: A Sustainable Method for Particulate Matter (PM) Reduction

  • Sanghee Park (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Myeong Ja Kwak (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Jongkyu Lee (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Yea Ji Lim (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Handong Kim (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Su Gyeong Jeong (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Joung-a Son (Urban Forests Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Hanna Chang (Urban Forests Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Sun Mi Je (Urban Forests Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Chang-Young Oh (Urban Forests Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science) ;
  • Kyongha Kim (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Su Young Woo (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.01
  • 심사 : 2022.12.23
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31

초록

Urbanization and industrialization associated with rapid economic development have resulted in air pollution in urban areas, which adversely affects human health and the environment around the world. Growing awareness of the health effects of airborne particulate matter (PM) has led to the emergence of urban greening as a promising eco-friendly, nature-based solution to reduce the concentration of PM (especially PM2.5) to which individuals are exposed, thereby promoting public health. In this review, we highlight fundamental insights about PM and recent research on the ability of urban greening to capture PM. Reports from the scientific literature on PM published from 1992 to 2021 were retrieved from Google Scholar. Here, we explore some of the main complex relationships between leaf traits and the ability to retain PM for research or management to optimize greenspaces.

키워드

Introduction

Rapid urbanization has brought urban air quality problems, including particulate pollution, worldwide (Hopke et al., 2008). Exposure to urban particulates has adverse effects on human health, especially on the cardiopulmonary system (Dockery et al., 1993; Kumar et al., 2007; Li et al., 2015). Humans can be exposed to heterogeneous mixtures of particles emitted from various sources. In addition, exposure to PM can disrupt the equilibrium between cell death and regeneration, which affects organismal homeostasis (Peixoto et al., 2017). Although PM is only one of several factors causing aggravation of human health, numerous epidemiological studies have reported both short and long-term exposure to PM can result in adverse effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems (Brook et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2014; Evans et al., 2017).

The atmospheric PM also called aerosol particles or particulates (Figure 1) is a suspended mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets in the air (Pöschl, 2005; Falcon-Rodriguez et al., 2016). PM is a heterogeneous mixture of particles differing in size, source, and chemical composition. Atmospheric aerosol particles range from 1 nm to 100 µm in aerodynamic diameters (dp). The United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) classified PM by different size fractions according to human inhalation toxicology for regulatory purposes (particulates with a dp ≤10 µm as PM10 and a dp of ≤2.5 µm as PM2.5) (Burkhardt, 2010; Kurth et al., 2014; Burkhardt and Grantz, 2016; Falcon-Rodriguez et al., 2016).

HOMHBJ_2023_v112n1_1_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Dynamic behavior modeling of particulate matter in the air (modified from Falcon-Rodriguez et al., 2016).

With 68% of the world’s population projected to live in cities by 2050 (UN, 2018), urban particle pollution is rapidly emerging as one of the most critical environmental problems in many parts of the world (Chen et al., 2015). Urban greenery can widely function as a biological filtration that intercepts airborne PM. Previous studies have demonstrated that PM capturing and retaining capacities on leaves depend on surface roughness and microstructure properties based on leaf macro‐ and micro‐morphology, anatomy, and chemistry (Chen et al., 2017; Kwak et al., 2020; Zhang et al, 2020). Therefore, a better understanding of the underlying physical processes between deposition and wash-off of PM particles on leaf macro- and micro-morphological variability is important to the potential merits of urban greenery to bolster urban air pollution control.

Urban green space is broadly defined in the current study as “any vegetation found in the urban environment, including parks, open spaces, residential gardens, or street trees” (Kabisch and Haase, 2013). The green infrastructure consists of all types of vegetation in urban areas, such as street trees, vegetation barriers (including roadside hedges), and green walls/roofs; in particular, trees are used as an effective tool to mitigate urban outdoor air quality, planted as part of the urban roadside landscape, in urban parks, and other extra spaces (Kumar et al., 2019). In urban environments, green space is considered one of the potential solutions to improve sustainability and alleviate air quality in response to the growing urban population (Salmond et al., 2016; Abhijith et al., 2017). The mechanism, process, and degree of fine dust reduction by green spaces are complex and attributed to various factors (Chen et al., 2019).

Prior investigations have demonstrated the PM capturing capacity of different plant species and identified which factors of leaves affect PM deposition on leaves (Sæbø et al., 2012; Liang et al., 2016; Chiam et al., 2019; Sgrigna et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Leaf characteristics affecting PM capturing ability could be divided into leaf morphology (macromorphology such as leaf size, shape, margin, and venation patterns and micromorphologies such as trichomes, stomata, and roughness) and physicochemical properties including leaf wax layer, which is attributable to surface wettability.

There are two techniques for quali-quantitative analysis of PM, using vacuum filtration or scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX) (Sgrigna et al., 2020). The washing/filtration procedure, also called separate gravimetric analyses, has been widely applied to quantify the mass of PM deposition on leaves in chemical fields (Dzierżanowski et al., 2011; Sgrigna et al., 2015; Song et al., 2015). The mass size distributions of PM can be measured by washing leaves with water or organic solvents such as chloroform and passing the solvents with PM through filters. This technique can reflect net aerosol because aerosols are removed from the atmosphere by resuspension, precipitation, and migration into the leaf by stomatal or cuticular uptake and deposited on the leaf surface via leaching from the leaf inside (Burkhardt and Grantz, 2016). The SEM/EDX is applied to measure the numerical density of PM adsorbed on leaf surfaces and identify the chemical composition of PM (Song et al., 2015; Baldacchini et al., 2017).

In this article, we first summarize the basic information on PM for a better understanding of this paper. We also review different topics regarding PM retention of urban greening species. We then offer the research evidence describing the relationship between leaf traits and PM retention for providing peer researchers and city planners to manage or design by utilizing urban greening as a sustainable method for PM reduction.

Data Source and Analysis

1. Search strategies

In this review, we analyze the bibliometric aspects of related studies on different scales of urban plant species for the removal efficiency of atmospheric particulate matter, as well as those addressing the particulate matter in general. We have also focused on the retrieval of information from quality scientific literature using the international bibliographic databases of Google Scholar from 1992 to 2021.

2. Author keyword analysis

This study performed author keyword analysis to investigate scientific publications based on particulate matter research topics. The following keywords were searched to retrieve relevant articles: ‘urban greening’, ‘PM2.5’, ‘PM10’, ‘particulate matter’, ‘PM emission’, ‘PM biofilter’, ‘PM sources’, ‘PM capture capacity’, ‘PM wash-off’, ‘PM adsorption’, ‘leaf macromorphology’, ‘leaf micromorphology’, and ‘leaf physicochemical traits’.

Sources and Generation Mechanism of PM

1. Sources of PM emissions

The atmospheric PM originates from natural and anthropogenic sources such as wind erosion, volcanic eruptions, marine salt formations, suspension of biological materials (microorganisms, pollens, etc.), combustion of coal and fossil fuels, industrial production, fertilizer production, and vehicle emissions (Pöschl, 2005; Dzierżanowski et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2015). Primary particles are liquids or solids directly emitted from various sources. In contrast, secondary particles are formed by gas-to-particle transformation, including nucleation and condensation of gaseous precursors, i.e., NOx, NH3, SO2, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the atmosphere (Pöschl, 2005; Fuzzi et al., 2015).

2. Transformation of PM

Atmospheric particles undergo aging and changing their size, physical structure, and chemical composition (Figure 2). As water vapor condenses on existing particles, PM acts as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nuclei (IN). The modified particles can be released from the cloud droplets or ice crystals in reevaporating clouds. Then, through wet deposition, the primary mechanism of aerosols, particles are carried to the earth’s surface, interacting with airborne water particles (hydrometeors, i.e., rainfalls, sleets, hail). In addition to eliminating PM by precipitation, dry deposition, which occurs without hydrometeors and affects local air quality and human health, is another removal mechanism of particles from the air (Pöschl, 2005).

HOMHBJ_2023_v112n1_1_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of cycle of atmospheric aerosols (modified from Pöschl, 2005).

3. PM components

The major chemical components of PM are inorganic ions, such as nitrate (NO3-), sulfate (SO42-), and ammonium (NH4+), mineral dust from geological sources, sea salt, toxic metals, and carbonaceous materials including secondary organic compounds, elemental carbon and black carbon (Fuzzi et al., 2015; Gajbhiye et al., 2019). In addition, atmospheric particles can be bound with various heavy metals, such as Pb, Cd, Cu, Zn, and Hg, emitted from industrial processes and vehicles (Gajbhiye et al., 2019). Therefore, the composition of PM is highly variable depending on time and space (Kaneyasu et al., 1995; Sisler and Malm, 2000).

Urban Greenery as PM bio-filters

1. Relationship between leaf traits and PM capturing capacity in tree

Urban green spaces influence the dispersion and deposition of PM (Janhäll, 2005), and the effect of green infrastructures on urban air quality has been extensively studied (Table 1). Previous studies relevant to the impact of urban plants on PM reduction have focused on the PM adsorption ability of different species on various sizes of particles and the factors influencing PM accumulation for selecting plant species effective in the adsorption and retention of atmospheric PM. For example, Sæbø et al. (2012) examined the PM accumulation of 22 trees and 25 shrubs in Norway and Poland. There were differences in the amount of PM adsorbed on leaf surfaces in different size fractions among species. Chen et al. (2017) reported that the groove area ratio and trichome density are important leaf traits for effective PM2.5 capturing. Importantly, leaves with trichomes and grooves on their surfaces retained PM more effectively than leaves with water-repellent behaviors (Kwak et al., 2019). Kwak et al. (2019) revealed that Ginkgo biloba can lead to repeated removal of particles by excellent water repellency on its leaf surfaces, indicating PM net removal by self-cleaning. Moreover, Sgrigna et al. (2020) analyzed the relationship between leaf traits and the amount of PM on leaf surfaces sampled from twelve tree species in an urban-industrial city in Italy and presented an accumulation index (AI) by scoring each leaf trait significantly influenced the PM adsorption.

Table 1. Research relevant to the ability to reduce PM of urban trees and forests.

HOMHBJ_2023_v112n1_1_t0001.png 이미지

2. Air purification ability of urban forests

As stated above, the micro-roughness of leaf surfaces such as trichomes, ridges, and grooves on broadleaved species can be used as an indicator of effectiveness for PM adsorption (Sæbø et al., 2012; Kwak et al., 2019; Sgrigna et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). However, it is particularly necessary to upscale the PM adsorption from leaf to canopy level using the total leaf area and/or leaf area index (LAI). In more detail, Kwak et al. (2019) have demonstrated that PM adsorption per unit leaf area was high in Zelkova serrata. However, based on the total leaf area, Platanus occidentalis had a relatively high DBH compared to other tree species, resulting in the highest PM adsorption (95 to 104 g tree-1) among the studied tree species. However, P. occidentalis and G. biloba have been reported as tree species to disperse the main allergenic pollens among urban trees in Seoul, Korea, so it is necessary to consider issues such as pollens when constructing urban infrastructure.

Urban forests, encompassing trees, bushes, grass, soil, and water in urban areas, are part of the green infrastructure and offer ecosystem services, including air purification and microclimate mitigation (Hirabayashi, 2021). Several studies estimated the air purifying effect of urban trees on forest scale. For example, Yang et al. (2005) investigated that 2.4 million trees in the center of Beijing remove 1261.4 tons of air pollutants annually, and 61% of removed pollutants (772 tons) were PM10. McDonald et al. (2007) simulated the effect of urban tree planting on depositions of PM10 in two conurbations of the United Kingdom (UK) using a geographic information system (GIS). It was found that urban trees can remove PM10 concentrations by 7-26%.

3. Wash-off of PM by rainfall

Washing off PM by rainfall events is considered a cleaning process of leaf surfaces as a filter for PM. To examine the role of urban green spaces as long-term sustainable measures for particle reduction, some studies the effect of rainwater on PM retention of leaf surfaces. Xu et al. (2017) reported the differences among four urban plant species in PM adsorption before rainfall, maximum PM wash-off during the different rainfall intensities, and maximum PM retention on leaf surfaces after wash-off by rainfall events. Zhang et al. (2019) studied the quantity of PM reduction and removal rates of five urban greening species by simulating different rainfall regimes. A schematic diagram of the decontamination process between leaf roughness and self-cleaning during rainfall events showed in Figure 3. Rainfall mostly redistributes PM particles on smooth leaf surfaces, whereas the particles adhere to the surface of the droplets on rough leaf surfaces and are washed off the leaves (Barthlott and Neinhuis, 1997).

HOMHBJ_2023_v112n1_1_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the decontamination process between leaf roughness and self-cleaning during rainfall events (modified from Barthlott and Neinhuis, 1997).

4. Seasonal changes of PM capturing

Wang et al. (2013) examined the seasonal changes in the amount of PM on leaf surfaces of three urban tree species during the growing seasons. They reported that PM accumulation increased from spring to autumn. This seasonal variation of PM loads is attributable to the increase in leaf surface wettability which the mechanical or chemical abrasion of leaf epicuticular wax layers might cause. Meanwhile, He et al. (2020) investigated the species-specific PM capturing capacity of evergreen species during the winter when the deciduous species lost their leaves and proposed the potential of evergreen species in winter.

5. Role of different organs of trees as scavenging PM

In addition to leaves, different vegetative organs, such as branches and tree barks, can interact with PM and alleviate air pollution. Xu et al. (2019b) demonstrated that the PM mitigation capacity of leaf, branch, and bark surfaces tended to adsorb the highest proportion of large particles with diameters of 10-100 µm, and branch and epicuticular leaf wax had a greater tendency to encapsulate fine particles with diameters of 0.2-3.0 µm.

Relationship between Leaf Traits and PM Accumulation on Leaves

1. Leaf morphological traits and PM adsorption

Interactive effects of different foliar traits could attribute to PM capture (Figure 4). The plant species with smaller leaves showed significantly higher mean PM densities on leaf surfaces (Weerakkody et al., 2017). Coniferous species with needle leaves have been reported as effective PM filters compared to broadleaved species (Song et al., 2015). A more turbulent flow could occur across conifer needles relative to broadleaves, resulting in a reduced thickness of the boundary layer in needle leaves. A boundary layer is relatively stationary and roles as a barrier between the surrounding air and the leaf surfaces (Chen et al., 2017).

HOMHBJ_2023_v112n1_1_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Leaf morphological, microstructural, and physiochemical parameters related to deposition/adsorption processes of particulate matter

Moreover, the needle-leaved coniferous species are more efficient in removing PM2.5 than broadleaved species (Chen et al., 2017); however, within broadleaved species, leaf macromorphology, such as leaf shape and venation pattern, don’t have a significant relationship with PM2.5 accumulations. Whereas Weerakkody et al. (2018) examined that the palmate-lobed leaves exhibited significantly higher PM densities in all particle size fractions (PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) than for both elliptical and linear-shaped leaves. Regarding leaf micromorphology, plant species with trichomes on leaf surfaces have a higher capacity for PM accumulation than those with smooth leaves (Sæbø et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2017; Chiam et al., 2019; Kwak et al., 2019). In addition, leaf surface roughness had a positive correlation with the PM capturing capacity of leaves (Chen et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020); however, some previous studies reported that there was no relationship between the two factors (Sæbø et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2015; Kwak et al., 2020).

2. Leaf physicochemical traits and PM adsorption

The PM not only adsorbs on leaf surfaces but also accumulates within cuticular wax layers of leaves (Dzierżanowski et al., 2011; Popek et al., 2013). The leaf surface is normally covered with a hydrophobic cuticle, which is coated by an epicuticular wax with considerable structural and chemical variability (Barthlott et al., 1998). Lipids called waxes are integrated and superimposed with cutin forming cuticles which are composite materials. Epicuticular waxes strongly affect the wettability of the leaf surface while intracuticular waxes play a role as a transpiration barrier of water (Koch and Ensikat, 2008). An epicuticular wax layers cover leaf surfaces with a variety of morphology, such as thin film, platelets, and tubules. Waxes are made up of a mixture of compounds.

Depending on the plant species (Figure 5), organ, or developmental stage, the amount, form, chemical composition, and constituents of waxes are varied (Prüm et al., 2012; Wang et al., 2014). PM containing organic pollutants (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), etc.) can have lipophilic properties and penetrate the wax layer of leaf surfaces (Kaupp et al., 2000; Jouraeva et al., 2002; Dzierżanowski et al., 2011). Thus, depending upon the thickness, chemical composition, and structure of the epicuticular wax layer, the foliar accumulation of PM can vary among species (Popek et al., 2013). Wang et al. (2015) found that the epicuticular wax ultrastructures affect the PM adsorption ability of plants; it decreases in the order of films, platelets, and tubules. In tested species, the epicuticular wax load showed no significant relationship with the amount of PM adsorbed on the leaf surfaces and exhibited a moderate correlation (r = 0.79) with the quantity of fine PM (0.2-2.5 μm) in waxes (Dzierżanowski et al., 2011).

HOMHBJ_2023_v112n1_1_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 5. Leaf surfaces with cuticular folds of different dimensions showing plant surfaces covered with epicuticular wax crystals and smooth surfaces (modified from Prüm et al., 2012).

Conclusion

In this paper, we summarized the basic information of particle pollution, which is emerging as a problem with rapid industrialization and urbanization. Next, we reviewed various research that studied the potential of urban greening as a sustainable PM bio-filter. There are mainly studies on quantifying the amount of PM adsorbed to leaves, where PM is mainly collected in tree species used for urban greening, and further on the characteristics of various leaves affecting the PM capturing capacity. In addition to the quantitative analysis of PM adsorbed on leaves, some studies conducted the qualitative analysis of PM. Some studies examined the PM reduction effect on the forest scale rather than the individual level. More recent research examined the PM mobility from leaves after rainfall intensity and duration and seasonal changes of PM capturing capacity of tree species because the potential impacts of climate and season related to PM retention, PM resuspension, and PM wash-off cannot be neglected regarding urban greening. Through these evaluations, the interaction with the PM adsorption of leaves and the leaf traits was reviewed in detail by dividing the traits into morphological characteristics and physicochemical characteristics to provide the most basic data for planning urban greenery.

Acknowledgement

This study was carried out with the support of ‘A Study on Mechanism and Function Improvement of Plants for Reducing Air Pollutants’ (Grant No. FE0000-2018-01-2021) from National Institute of Forest Science (NIFoS), Republic of Korea.

참고문헌

  1. Abhijith, K.V., Kumar, P., Gallagher, J., McNabola, A., Baldauf, R., Pilla, F., Broderick, B., Sabatino S.D. and Pulvirenti, B. 2017. Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments-A review. Atmospheric Environment 162: 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.014
  2. Baldacchini, C. et al. 2017. How does the amount and composition of PM deposited on Platanus acerifolia leaves change across different cities in Europe? Environmental Science & Technology 51(3): 1147-1156. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04052
  3. Barthlott, W. and Neinhuis, C. 1997. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050096
  4. Barthlott, W., Neinhuis, C., Cutler, D., Ditsch, F., Meusel, I., Theisen, I. and Wilhelmi, H. 1998. Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 126(3): 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.x
  5. Brook, R.D. et al. 2010. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: an update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121(21): 2331-2378. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1
  6. Burkhardt, J. and Grantz, D.A. 2016. Plants and atmospheric aerosols. pp. 369-406. In: Progress in Botany Vol. 78. Springer, Cham.
  7. Burkhardt, J. 2010. Hygroscopic particles on leaves: nutrients or desiccants? Ecological Monographs 80(3): 369-399. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-1988.1
  8. Chen, L., Liu, C., Zhang, L., Zou, R. and Zhang, Z. 2017. Variation in tree species ability to capture and retain airborne fine particulate matter (PM2.5). Scientific Reports 7(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x
  9. Chen, M., Dai, F., Yang, B. and Zhu, S. 2019. Effects of neighborhood green space on PM2.5 mitigation: Evidence from five megacities in China. Building and Environment 156: 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.007
  10. Chen, X., Pei, T; Zhou, Z., Teng, M., He, L., Luo, M. and Liu, X. 2015. Efficiency differences of roadside greenbelts with three configurations in removing coarse particles (PM10): A street scale investigation in Wuhan, China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14(2): 354-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.013
  11. Chiam, Z., Song, X.P., Lai, H.R. and Tan, H.T.W. 2019. Particulate matter mitigation via plants: Understanding complex relationships with leaf traits. Science of the Total Environment 688: 398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.263
  12. Dock ery, D.W., Pope, C.A., Xu, X., Spengler, J.D., Ware, J.H., Fay, M.E., FerrisJr., B.G. and Speizer, F.E. 1993. An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. New England Journal of Medicine 329(24): 1753-1759. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401
  13. Dzierzanowski, K., Popek, R., Gawronska, H., Saebo, A. and Gawronski, S.W. 2011. Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species. International Journal of Phytoremediation 13(10): 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2011.552929
  14. Evans, K.A., Hopk e, P.K., Utell, M.J., Kane, C., Thurston, S.W., Ling, F.S., Chalupa, D. and Rich, D.Q. 2017. Triggering of ST-elevation myocardial infarction by ambient wood smoke and other particulate and gaseous pollutants. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 27(2): 198-206. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.15
  15. Falcon-Rodriguez, C.I., Osornio-Vargas, A.R., Sada-Ovalle, I. and Segura-Medina, P. 2016. Aeroparticles, composition, and lung diseases. Frontiers in Immunology 7: 3.
  16. Freer-Smith, P.H., Beckett, K.P. and Taylor, G. 2005. Deposition velocities to Sorbus aria, Acer campestre, Populus deltoides × trichocarpa 'Beaupre', Pinus nigra and× Cupressocyparis leylandii for coarse, fine and ultra-fine particles in the urban environment. Environmental Pollution 133(1): 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.03.031
  17. Fuzzi, S. et al. Particulate matter, air quality and climate: lessons learned and future needs. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15: 8217-8299.
  18. Gajbhiye, T., Pandey, S.K., Lee, S.S. and Kim, K.H. 2019. Size fractionated phytomonitoring of airborne particulate matter (PM) and speciation of PM bound toxic metals pollution through Calotropis procera in an urban environment. Ecological Indicators 104: 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.072
  19. Gueguen, F., Stille, P., Geagea, M.L. and Boutin, R. 2012. Atmospheric pollution in an urban environment by tree bark biomonitoring-Part I: Trace element analysis. Chemosphere 86(10): 1013-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.040
  20. He, C., Qiu, K., Alahmad, A. and Pott, R. 2020. Particulate matter capturing capacity of roadside evergreen vegetation during the winter season. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 48: 126510.
  21. Hirabayashi, S. 2021. Technical specifications of urban forests for air purification: A case study in Tokyo, Japan. Trees, Forests and People 4: 100078.
  22. Hopke, P.K. et al. 2008. Urban air quality in the Asian region. Science of the Total Environment 404(1): 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.039
  23. Hwang, H.J., Yook, S.J. and Ahn, K.H. 2011. Experimental investigation of submicron and ultrafine soot particle removal by tree leaves. Atmospheric Environment 45(38): 6987-6994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.019
  24. Janhall, S. 2015. Review on urban vegetation and particle air pollution-Deposition and dispersion. Atmospheric Environment 105: 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.052
  25. Jouraeva, V.A., Johnson, D.L., Hassett, J.P. and Nowak, D.J. 2002. Differences in accumulation of PAHs and metals on the leaves of Tilia×euchlora and Pyrus calleryana. Environmental Pollution 120(2): 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00121-5
  26. Kabisch, N. and Haase, D. 2013. Green spaces of European cities revisited for 1990-2006. Landscape and Urban Planning 110: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.017
  27. Kaneyasu, N., Ohta, S. and Murao, N. 1995. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols and gaseous species in Sapporo, Japan. Atmospheric Environment 29(13): 1559-1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)00356-P
  28. Kardel, F., Wuyts, K., De Wael, K. and Samson, R. 2018. Biomonitoring of atmospheric particulate pollution via chemical composition and magnetic properties of roadside tree leaves. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 25994-26004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2592-z
  29. Kaupp, H., Blumenstock, M. and McLachlan, M.S. 2000. Retention and mobility of atmospheric particle-associated organic pollutant PCDD/Fs and PAHs in maize leaves. New Phytologist 148(3): 473-480.
  30. Koch, K. and Ensikat, H.J. 2008. The hydrophobic coatings of plant surfaces: epicuticular wax crystals and their morphologies, crystallinity and molecular self-assembly. Micron 39(7): 759-772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2007.11.010
  31. Kim, Y.H., Tong, H., Daniels, M., Boykin, E., Krantz, Q.T., McGee, J., Hays, M., Kovalcik, K., Dye, J.A. and Gilmour, M.I. 2014. Cardiopulmonary toxicity of peat wildfire particulate matter and the predictive utility of precision cut lung slices. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 11(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-11-1
  32. Kumar, P. et al. 2019. The nexus between air pollution, green infrastructure and human health. Environment International 133: 105181.
  33. Kumar, R., Nagar, J.K., Kumar, H., Kushwah, A.S., Meena, M., Kumar, P., Raj, N., Singhal, M.K. and Gaur, S.N. 2007. Association of indoor and outdoor air pollutant level with respiratory problems among children in an industrial area of Delhi, India. Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health 62(2): 75-80. https://doi.org/10.3200/AEOH.62.2.75-80
  34. Kurth, L.M., McCawley, M., Hendryx, M. and Lusk , S. 2014. Atmospheric particulate matter size distribution and concentration in West Virginia coal mining and nonmining areas. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 24(4): 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2014.2
  35. Kwak, M.J., Lee, J., Kim, H., Park, S., Lim, Y., Kim, J.E., Baek, S.G., Seo, S.M., Kim, K.N. and Woo, S.Y. 2019. The removal efficiencies of several temperate tree species at adsorbing airborne particulate matter in urban forests and roadsides. Forests 10(11): 960.
  36. Kwak, M.J., Lee, J.K., Park, S., Kim, H., Lim, Y.J., Lee, K.A., Son, J-a., Oh, C-Y., Kim, I. and Woo, S.Y. 2020. Surface-based analysis of leaf microstructures for adsorbing and retaining capability of airborne particulate matter in ten woody species. Forests 11(9): 946.
  37. Leonard, R.J., McArthur, C. and Hochuli, D.F. 2016. Particulate matter deposition on roadside plants and the importance of leaf trait combinations. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 20: 249-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.09.008
  38. Li, P., Xin, J., Wang, Y., Li, G., Pan, X., Wang, S., Cheng, M., Wen, T., Wang, G. and Liu, Z. 2015. Association between particulate matter and its chemical constituents of urban air pollution and daily mortality or morbidity in Beijing City. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22: 358-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3301-1
  39. Liang, D., Ma, C., Wang, Y.Q., Wang, Y.J. and Chenxi, Z. 2016. Quantifying PM2.5 capture capability of greening trees based on leaf factors analyzing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23: 21176-21186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7687-9
  40. Liu, J., Cao, Z., Zou, S., Liu, H., Hai, X., Wang, S., Duan, J., Xi, B., Yan, G., Zhang, S. and Jia, Z. 2018. An investigation of the leaf retention capacity, efficiency and mechanism for atmospheric particulate matter of five greening tree species in Beijing, China. Science of the Total Environment 616: 417-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.314
  41. Liu, L., Guan, D. and Peart, M.R. 2012. The morphological structure of leaves and the dust-retaining capability of afforested plants in urban Guangzhou, South China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19: 3440-3449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-0876-2
  42. Lukowski, A., Popek, R. and Karolewski, P. 2020. Particulate matter on foliage of Betula pendula, Quercus robur, and Tilia cordata: deposition and ecophysiology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27: 10296-10307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07672-0
  43. McDonald, A.G., Bealey, W.J., Fowler, D., Dragosits, U., Skiba, U., Smith, R.I., Donovan, R.G., Brett, H.E., Hewitt, C.N. and Nemitz, E. 2007. Quantifying the effect of urban tree planting on concentrations and depositions of PM10 in two UK conurbations. Atmospheric Environment 41(38): 8455-8467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.07.025
  44. Nowak, D.J. 2006. Institutionalizing urban forestry as a "biotechnology" to improve environmental quality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 5(2): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.04.002
  45. Peixoto, M.S., de Oliveira Galvao, M.F. and de Medeiros, S.R.B. 2017. Cell death pathways of particulate matter toxicity. Chemosphere 188: 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.076
  46. Peters, K. and Eiden, R. 1992. Modelling the dry deposition velocity of aerosol particles to a spruce forest. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics 26(14): 2555-2564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(92)90108-W
  47. Popek, R., Gawronska, H., Wrochna, M., Gawronski, S.W. and Saebo, A. 2012. Particulate matter on foliage of 13 woody species: deposition on surfaces and phytostabilisation in waxes-a 3-year study. International Journal of Phytoremediation 15(3): 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2012.694498
  48. Poschl, U. 2005. Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 44(46): 7520-7540. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122
  49. Prum, B., Seidel, R., Bohn, H.F. and Speck, T. 2012. Plant surfaces with cuticular folds are slippery for beetles. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9(66): 127-135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0202
  50. Saebo, A., Popek, R., Nawrot, B., Hanslin, H.M., Gawronska, H. and Gawronski, S.W. 2012. Plant species differences in particulate matter accumulation on leaf surfaces. Science of the Total Environment 427: 347-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.084
  51. Salmond, J.A. et al. 2016. Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environmental Health 15(1): 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-016-0178-0
  52. Schaubroeck, T., Deckmyn, G., Neirynck, J., Staelens, J., Adriaenssens, S., Dewulf, J., Muys, B. and Verheyen, K. 2014. Multilayered modeling of particulate matter removal by a growing forest over time, from plant surface deposition to washoff via rainfall. Environmental Science & Technology 48(18): 10785-10794. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5019724
  53. Sgrigna, G., Baldacchini, C., Dreveck, S., Cheng, Z. and Calfapietra, C. 2020. Relationships between air particulate matter capture efficiency and leaf traits in twelve tree species from an Italian urban-industrial environment. Science of the Total Environment 718: 137310.
  54. Sgrigna, G., Baldacchini, C., Esposito, R., Calandrelli, R., Tiwary, A. and Calfapietra, C. 2016. Characterization of leaf-level particulate matter for an industrial city using electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. Science of the Total Environment 548: 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.057
  55. Sgrigna, G., Saebo, A., Gawronski, S., Popek, R. and Calfapietra, C. 2015. Particulate Matter deposition on Quercus ilex leaves in an industrial city of central Italy. Environmental Pollution 197: 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.030
  56. Sisler, J.F. and Malm, W.C. 2000. Interpretation of Trends of PM2.5 and reconstructed visibility from the IMPROVE network. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 50(5): 775-789. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464127
  57. Song, Y., Maher, B.A., Li, F., Wang, X., Sun, X. and Zhang, H. 2015. Particulate matter deposited on leaf of five evergreen species in Beijing, China: Source identification and size distribution. Atmospheric Environment 105: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.032
  58. Tallis, M., Taylor, G., Sinnett, D. and Freer-Smith, P. 2011. Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 103(2): 129-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.07.003
  59. Tian, L., Yin, S., Ma, Y., Kang, H., Zhang, X., Tan, H., Meng, H. and Liu, C. 2019. Impact factor assessment of the uptake and accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by plant leaves: Morphological characteristics have the greatest impact. Science of the Total Environment 652: 1149-1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.357
  60. UN. World urbanization prospects 2018. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs. 1-126. Available online: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/
  61. Wang, H., Shi, H., Li, Y. and Wang, Y. 2014. The effects of leaf roughness, surface free energy and work of adhesion on leaf water drop adhesion. PLoS One 9(9): e107062.
  62. Wang, H., Shi, H., Li, Y., Yu, Y. and Zhang, J. 2013. Seasonal variations in leaf capturing of particulate matter, surface wettability and micromorphology in urban tree species. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering 7: 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0524-1
  63. Wang, H., Shi, H. and Wang, Y. 2015. Effects of weather, time, and pollution level on the amount of particulate matter deposited on leaves of Ligustrum lucidum. The Scientific World Journal 935942.
  64. Wang, L., Gong, H., Liao, W. and Wang, Z. 2015. Accumulation of particles on the surface of leaves during leaf expansion. Science of the Total Environment 532: 420-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.014
  65. Weerakkody, U., Dover, J.W., Mitchell, P. and Reiling, K. 2018. Evaluating the impact of individual leaf traits on atmospheric particulate matter accumulation using natural and synthetic leaves. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 30: 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.01.001
  66. Weerakkody, U., Dover, J.W., Mitchell, P. and Reiling, K. 2017. Particulate matter pollution capture by leaves of seventeen living wall species with special reference to railtraffic at a metropolitan station. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 27: 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.07.005
  67. Xie, C., Yan, L., Liang, A. and Che, S. 2019. Understanding the washoff processes of PM2.5 from leaf surfaces during rainfall events. Atmospheric Environment 214: 116844.
  68. Xu, H., Wang, W., Wang, H., Sun, Y., Zhong, Z. and Wang, S. 2019a. Differences in quantity and composition of leaf particulate matter and morphological structures in three evergreen trees and their association in Harbin, China. Environmental Pollution 252: 1772-1790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.124
  69. Xu, X., Yu, X., Mo, L., Xu, Y., Bao, L. and Lun, X. 2019b. Atmospheric particulate matter accumulation on trees: A comparison of boles, branches and leaves. Journal of Cleaner Production 226: 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.072
  70. Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Bao, L., Mo, L., Yu, X., Fan, D. and Lun, X. 2017. Influence of rainfall duration and intensity on particulate matter removal from plant leaves. Science of the Total Environment 609: 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.141
  71. Xu, Y., Xu, W., Mo, L., Heal, M.R., Xu, X. and Yu, X. 2018. Quantifying particulate matter accumulated on leaves by 17 species of urban trees in Beijing, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25: 12545-12556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1478-4
  72. Yang, J., McBride, J., Zhou, J. and Sun, Z. 2005. The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 3(2): 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2004.09.001
  73. Zhang, L., Zhang, Z., Chen, L. and McNulty, S. 2019. An investigation on the leaf accumulation removal efficiency of atmospheric particulate matter for five urban plant species under different rainfall regimes. Atmospheric Environment 208: 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.010
  74. Zhang, X., Lyu, J., Han, Y., Sun, N., Sun, W., Li, J., Liu, C. and Yin, S. 2020. Effects of the leaf functional traits of coniferous and broadleaved trees in subtropical monsoon regions on PM2.5 dry deposition velocities. Environmental Pollution 265: 114845.
  75. Zhao, X., Yan, H., Liu, M., Kang, L., Yu, J. and Yang, R. 2019. Relationship between PM2.5 adsorption and leaf surface morphology in ten urban tree species in Shenyang, China. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects 41(8): 1029-1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1539136