DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intervening in Mathematics Group Work in the Middle Grades

  • Tye Campbell (Department of Education, Crandall University) ;
  • Sheunghyun Yeo (Department of Mathematics Education, Daegu National University of Education) ;
  • Mindy Green (Revere School) ;
  • Erin Rich (Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The University of Alabama)
  • Received : 2023.02.27
  • Accepted : 2023.03.13
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

Over the last three decades, there has been an increasingly strong emphasis on group-centered approaches to mathematics teaching. One primary responsibility for teachers who use group-centered instruction is to "check in", or intervene, with groups to monitor group learning and provide mathematical support when necessary. While prior research has contributed valuable insight for successful teacher interventions in mathematics group work, there is a need for more fine-grained analyses of interactions between teachers and students. In this study, we co-conducted research with an exemplary middle grade teacher (Ms. Green) to learn about fine-grained details of her intervention practices, hoping to generate knowledge about successful teacher interventions that can be expanded, replicated, and/or contradicted in other contexts. Analyzing Ms. Green's practices as an exemplary case, we found that she used exceptionally short interventions (35 seconds on average), provided space for student dialogue, and applied four distinct strategies to support groups to make mathematical progress: (1) observing/listening before speaking; (2) using a combination of social and analytic scaffolds; (3) redirecting students to task instructions; (4) abruptly walking away. These findings imply that successful interventions may be characterized by brevity, shared dialogue between the teacher and students, and distinct (and sometimes unnatural) teaching moves.

Keywords

References

  1. Baxter, J. A., & Williams, S. (2010). Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9121-4 
  2. Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons. 
  3. Campbell, T. G., & Yeo, S. (2022). Professional noticing of coordinated mathematical thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 488-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3778 
  4. Campbell, T. G., Yeo, S. (2023). Exploring in-the-moment teaching moves that support sociomathematical and general social norms in dialogic instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10234-6 
  5. Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028402.10122.ff 
  6. Ding, M., Li, X., Piccolo, D., & Kulm, G. (2007). Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), 162-175. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.3.162-175 
  7. Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87, 499-518. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.60.5.549 
  8. Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. (2015). Student engagement with others' mathematical ideas: The role of teacher invitation and support moves. The Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 126-148. https://doi.org/10.1086/683174 
  9. Gillies, R. M. (2019). Promoting academically productive student dialogue during collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.014 
  10. Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2016). Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons. Language and Education, 30(5), 400-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1125363 
  11. Hunter, R. (2008). Facilitating communities of mathematical inquiry. In M. Goos, R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions: Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 31- 39). Brisbane, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. 
  12. Jackson, K., Garrison, A., Wilson, J., Gibbons, L. & Shahan, E. (2011). Investigating how setting up cognitively demanding tasks is related to opportunities to learn in middle-grades mathematics classrooms [Paper presentation]. Research Presession of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Meeting, Indianapolis, IN, United States. 
  13. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169-202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169 
  14. Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (2016). Responding to children's mathematical thinking in the moment: an emerging framework of teaching moves. ZDM, 48(1-2), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0717-0 
  15. Kotsopoulos, D. (2014). The case of Mitchell's cube: Interactive and reflexive positioning during collaborative learning in mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2013.790905 
  16. Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529 
  17. Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2017). Authority, identity, and collaborative mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0237 
  18. Liljedahl, P. (2020). Building thinking classrooms in mathematics, Grades K-12: 14 teaching practices for enhancing learning. Corwin. 
  19. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children's talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107 
  20. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass. 
  21. Munter, C., Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. A. (2015). Dialogic and direct instruction: Two distinct models of mathematics instruction and the debate(s) surrounding them. Teachers College Record, 117(11), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511701 
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author. 
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematics success for all. Author. 
  24. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691773384 
  25. O'Connor, C., & Michaels, S. (2019). Supporting teachers in taking up productive talk moves: The long road to professional learning at scale. International Journal of Education Research, 97, 166-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.11.003 
  26. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training. (2020). The Ontario curriculum Grades 1-8 mathematics, Available from https://www.dcp.edu.gov.on.ca/en/curriculum/elementary-mathematics. 
  27. Pak, B. (2022). Examining how teacher identities explain their interactions with students in small groups. Research in mathematical Education, 25(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2022.25.2.117 
  28. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675 
  29. Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Pearson. 
  30. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Turrou, A. C., Johnson, N. C., & Zimmerman, J. (2019). Teacher practices that promote productive dialogue and learning in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 97, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.07.009 
  31. Yeo, S., Colen, J., Kwon, N. Y., Cho, H., Kim, J., & Lim, W. (2022). Development of mathematical task analytic framework: Proactive and reactive features. Research in mathematical Education, 25(4), 285-309. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2022.25.4.285