Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회지)

Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science (한국비블리아학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploratory Study of Natural Scientists' Information Seeking Behavior When Writing a Research Proposal

자연과학분야 연구자들의 연구계획서 작성을 위한 정보추구행동의 탐색적 연구

  • Received : 2023.02.10
  • Accepted : 2023.02.26
  • Published : 2023.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to explore information seeking behavior of natural scientists when they are writing a research proposal for applying to funding. It focuses on understanding their information needs and information seeking behavior, and factors influencing the behavior. Based on the conceptual framework of task-based information seeking, qualitative research methods including in-depth interviews and diary study are used. The results reveal that a variety of communicative subtasks take place in the process of research proposal writing. Also, the scientists tend to need information related funding opportunities and to research design, and access sources including human resources, documents, online databases and websites to meet their information needs. Finally, the study shows that the scientists' information seeking behavior when writing a proposal is influenced by personal, task-related, and sociocultural factors. This study will be helpful to design effective information services and strategies to assist science scholars applying to research funding.

본 연구는 자연과학분야 연구자들이 펀딩을 획득하기 위해 연구계획서를 작성할 때 발생하는 정보요구 및 정보추구행동과 이러한 정보행동에 영향을 미치는 요소를 파악하는 것을 목표로 한다. 정보행동의 하위분야인 과업중심 정보추구행동을 바탕으로, 질적연구방법인 심층면담과 다이어리 연구를 통해 연구자들의 정보행동에 대해 조사하였다. 연구결과로 자연과학분야 연구자들의 연구계획서 작성과 관련된 구체적인 하위업무가 드러났는데 커뮤니케이션 관련 업무가 제일 활발히 수행되었다. 그리고 펀딩 지원 관련, 연구 설계 관련 정보요구가 발생하였고 정보요구 해결을 위해 인적자원, 문서, 온라인 데이터베이스, 웹사이트가 주된 정보원으로 이용되었다. 이러한 정보행동에는 개인적 요소, 과업관련 요소, 사회문화적 요소가 영향을 주고 있는 것으로 드러났다. 본 연구의 결과는 연구자의 펀딩 확보 활동에 관련된 정보행동에 대한 이해를 높이고 연구자의 펀딩 지원을 돕기 위한 정보서비스 전략 수립의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Han, Jong Yup & Seo, Man Deok (2014). A study on the information usage behavior of researchers in the field of ocean science and technology. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(1), 163-187. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.1.163
  2. Han, Seung Hee & Lee, Jee Yeon (2006). Searching behavior of scientists and technologists based on their information needs. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management Proceeding, 8, 17-22.
  3. Kwon, Nanju & Lee, Jee Yeon (2022). Information behavior of foreign refugees staying in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 39(1), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.1.351
  4. Lee, Jee Yeon, Han, Seung Hee, & Joo, Soo Hyung (2008). The analysis of the information users' needs and information seeking behavior in the field of science and technology, Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 25(2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2008.25.2.127
  5. Lee, Jeongyeoun, Chung, Eunkyung, & Kwon, Nahyun (2012). Scientists' information behavior for bridging the gaps encountered in the process of the scientific research lifecycle. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 29(3), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.3.099
  6. Lee, Lan-Ju & Kim, Su-Jin (2015). A study on the literature review of information use behavior in specialized fields. The Journal of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(2), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.2.129
  7. Akers, K. G. & Doty, J. (2013). Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives. International Journal of Digital Curation, 8(2), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.263
  8. Algon, J. (1997). Classifications of tasks, steps, and information-related behaviors of individuals on project terms. Proceedings of an International Conference on Information Seeking in Context, 205-221.
  9. Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson.
  10. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher education, 19(2), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007
  11. Brand-Gruwel, Wopereis, & Vermetten (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computer in Human Behavior, 21(3), 487-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005
  12. Bystrom, K. & Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1050-1061. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20197
  13. Bystrom, K. & Jarvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31(2), 191-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(95)80035-R
  14. Bystrom, K. (2007). Approaches to "task" in contemporary information studies. Information Research, 12(4), 12-14. Available: http://InformationR.net/ir/12-1/colis/colis26.html
  15. Campbell, L. (2017). The information-seeking habits of architecture faculty. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 761. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.761
  16. Dill, D. D. (1986). Research as a scholarly activity: context and culture. New Directions for Institutional Research, 13(2), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.37019865003
  17. Donald, J. G. (1995). Disciplinary differences in knowledge validation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 64, 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219956404
  18. Fidel, R. & Green, M. (2004). The many faces of accessibility: engineers' perception of information sources. Information Processing & Management, 40(3), 563-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(03)00003-7
  19. Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. ed. (2005). Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
  20. Hartley, J. (2006). Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1194-1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20399
  21. Hemminger, B. M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K. T. L., & Adams, S. J. (2007). Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2205-2225. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20686
  22. Holland, M. P. & Powell, C. K. (1995). A longitudinal survey of the information seeking and use habits of some engineers. College & Research Libraries, 56(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_56_01_7
  23. Ingwersen, P. & Jarvelin, K. (2006). The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Vol. 18: The Information Retrieval Series. Netherland: Springer.
  24. Kim, J. (2006). Task difficulty as a predictor and indicator of web searching interaction. CHI'06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 959-964. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125636
  25. Kuhlthau, C. C. (1999). The role of experience in the information search process of an early career information worker: Perceptions of uncertainty, complexity, construction, and sources. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 50(5), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:5<399::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-L
  26. Kwasitsu, L. (2003). Information-seeking behavior of design, process, and manufacturing engineers. Library & Information Science Research, 25(4), 459-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(03)00054-9
  27. Kwon, N. (2017). How work positions affect the research activity and information behaviour of laboratory scientists in the research lifecycle: applying activity theory. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 22(1), n1. Available: http://InformationR.net/ir/22- 1/paper744.html
  28. Lambert, J. D. (2010). The information-seeking habits of Baptist ministers. Journal of Religious & Theological Information, 9(1-2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10477845.2010.508449
  29. Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  30. Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly, 66(2), 161-193. https://doi.org/10.1086/602864
  31. Li, Y. & Belkin, N. J. (2008). A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 44(6), 1822-1837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2008.07.005
  32. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  33. Murphy, J. (2001). Information Seeking Habits of Environmental Scientists: A Study of Interdisciplinary Scientists at the US Environmental Protection Agency in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Master's thesis, University of North Carolina. United States.
  34. Niu, X. & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). A study of factors that affect the information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 336-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21669
  35. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  36. Sahu, H. K. & Nath Singh, S. (2013). Information seeking behaviour of astronomy/astrophysics scientists. Aslib Proceedings, 65(2), 109-142. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531311313961
  37. Stvilia, B., Hinnant, C. C., Wu, S., Worrall, A., Lee, D. J., Burnett, K., Burnett, G., Kazmer, M. M., & Marty, P. F. (2015). Research project tasks, data, and perceptions of data quality in a condensed matter physics community. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23177
  38. Talja, S. & Nyce, J. M. (2015). The problem with problematic situations: Differences between practices, tasks, and situations as units of analysis. Library & Information Science Research, 37(1), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.06.005
  39. Toms, E. G. & O'Brien, H. L. (2008). Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e humanist. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 102-130. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844178
  40. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  41. Zach, L. (2006). Using a multiple-case studies design to investigate the information-seeking behavior of arts administrators. Library Trends, 55(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0055
  42. Zerubavel, E. (1995). The rigid, the fuzzy, and the flexible: Notes on the mental sculpting of academic identity. Social Research, 62(4), 1093-1106.