공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)

  • 제26권1호
  • /
  • Pages.27-36
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-6454(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8283(eISSN)
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소설 기반 STEAM 프로그램 적용과 학생 역량 연구: 창의적 사고, 비판적 사고, 의사소통, 협업, 디지털 역량

A Study on Students' Creativity Thinking, Critical Thinking, Communication, Collaboration, and Digital Competence by Implementing Science Fiction STEAM Program

  • 박현주 (조선대학교 화학교육과)
  • Park, HyunJu ( Department of Chemistry Education, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2023.01.11
  • 심사 : 2023.01.27
  • 발행 : 2023.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate high school students' competencies of creativity thinking, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, and digital competence by implementing science fiction STEAM program. Based on the story of 'Fritz Haber' and the 'Garden of Dawn', a STEAM program was developed according to the ADDIE model. In the analysis stage, the purpose of the teaching-learning program using novels was set, and learners and learning environments were analyzed. At the design stage, the novels 'Fritz Harbor' and 'Garden of Dawn' were selected, learning goals were set according to the achievement standards of the curriculum, and learning contents and learning activities were sequenced and designed. In the development stage, teaching and learning materials were developed in a module format, implemented to classes, and evaluated. Pre-test and post-tests were conducted to identify the five major competencies such as creativity thinking, critical thinking, communication, collaboration, digital competence. The collected data was verified by paired t-test using SPSS. The results of the study showed statistically significant results in creative thinking, critical thinking, and digital competency.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 2017년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2017S1A5A2A01026746)

참고문헌

  1. 고용우(2012). 소설교육 왜 실천하기 어려운가? 우리말교육현장연구, 6(2), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.23109/FSIKLE.2012.6.2.003
  2. 권순구(2020). 혁신교육과정 기반 핵심역량척도 개발 및 타당화 연구: 공과대학을 중심으로. 교육문화연구, 26(2), 129-152. https://doi.org/10.24159/JOEC.2020.26.2.129
  3. 김소영(2019). 학습역량 측정도구 개발 및 타당화 연구: CTL 비교과 교육 프로그램 기반의 학습역량을 중심으로. Global Creative Leader: Education & Learning, 9(5), 109-129. https://doi.org/10.34226/gcl.2019.9.5.109
  4. 김영민 외(2013). 초중등학교 교사의 초중등 공학교육에 대한 인식 분석. 공학교육연구, 16(5), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2013.16.5.9
  5. 김진수(2012). STEAM 교육론. 양서원
  6. 박재용(2019). 새벽 정원. 손바닥 소설로 읽는 과학자 이야기 3. BRIC. (2022.11.12). https://www.ibric.org/myboard/read.php?Board=news&id =308004&ksr=1&FindText=박재용
  7. 박현주 외(2012). STEAM 교육의 구성 요소와 수업설계를 위한 준거 틀의 개발. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 12(4), 533-557.
  8. 박현주･백윤수(2015). 로봇 STEAM 교수학습 프로그램 제안. 공학교육연구, 18(6), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2015.18.6.3
  9. 백순근 외(2017). 고등학생용 여섯 가지 핵심역량 측정도구 개발 및 타당화 연구. 교육평가연구, 30(3), 363-395.
  10. 송진웅 외(2019). 미래세대를 위한 과학교육표준의 주요 내용과 특징. 한국과학교육학회지, 39(3), 465-478. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2019.39.3.465
  11. 이수영(2019). 4차 산업혁명 시대의 창의성 계발을 위한 박물관 교육 환경 고찰. 학습자중심교과교육연구, 19(3), 947-966.
  12. 이하원･이화선(2017). 대학생용 핵심역량 진단 검사(K-CCCA)의 개발. 교양교육연구, 11(1), 97-127.
  13. 이현주 외(2020). 이공계 대학생의 사회적 책임감 함양을 위한 ENACT 모형의 개발과 교육적 함의. 공학교육연구, 23(6), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2020.23.6.3
  14. 이효녕(2011). 융합인재교육(STEAM) 시행을 위한 미국의 STEM 교육 고찰. 월간과학창의 2월호. 서울: 한국과학창의재단.
  15. 조헌국(2021). 미래교육 및 미래 학교의 전망을 통한 과학교육의 방향과 과제. 교과교육연구, 25(1), 61-78.
  16. Anggraini, P. A. D. & Putra, D. B. S.(2020). Developing learning video with addie model on science class for 4th grade elementary school students. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology and Educational Science (ICTES 2020). (2022, Nov 21) file:///C:/Users/chosun/Downloads/125955279.pdf
  17. Asunda, P.(2012). Standards for technological literacy and STEM education delivery through career and technical education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 23(2), 44
  18. Brake, M. & Thornton, R.(2003). Science fictions in the classroom. Physics Education, 38(1), 31-34. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/38/1/305
  19. Breiner, J. et al.(2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00115.x
  20. Brophy, S. et al.(2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
  21. Bybee, R. W.(2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70, 30-35.
  22. Campbell, M. E.(1999). Oh, now I get it!. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(4), 381-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00462.x
  23. Cunnihgham, J.(2014). Use science fiction to teach STEM, inspire innovation. (2022, Nov 15). Education World. https://www.educationworld.com/a_curr/science-fiction-stem-engagement-technology.shtml
  24. Dick, K. J., & Stimpson, B.(1999). A course in technology and society for engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(1), 113-117.
  25. Gooday, C. et al.(2008). Does science education need the history of science?. ISIS, 99(2), 322-330. https://doi.org/10.1086/588690
  26. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.(2005). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621052000341590
  27. Hadzigeorgiou, Y.(2016). Imaginative science education: The central role of imagination in science education. Springer Nature
  28. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Forions, N.(2007). Imaginative thinking and learning of science. The Scinece Education Review, 6(1), 15-23.
  29. Kurt, S.(2018). Addie model: Instructional design. Frameworks & Theories, December.
  30. National Research Council of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (2022, Nov 15). https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
  31. P21-Battelle for Kids. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21
  32. Roehrig, G. H. et al.(2012). Is adding the E enough? Investigating the impact of K-12 standards on the implementation of STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00112.x
  33. Sanders, M. E.(2009). Integrative STEM education for PK-12 education. Paper presented at the Triangle Coalition Conference, Washington, DC.
  34. Sanders, M. E. & Wells, J. G.(2007). New 'Integrative STEM Education' program: Courses & degree options. (2022, Nov 16). http://www.soe.vt.edu/istemed/.
  35. Segall, A.(2002). Science fiction in engineering instruction: To boldly go where no educator has gone before. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
  36. Stutler, S. L.(2011). From the twilight zone to avatar: Science fiction engages the intellect, touches the emotions, and fuels the imagination of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today, 34(2), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621751103400213
  37. Wickman, P. O.(2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 25(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10129
  38. Wickman, P.(2006). Aesthetic experience in science education learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Routledge.
  39. Wickman, P. & Ostman, L.(2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86(5), 601-623. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10036
  40. Williams, P.(2011). STEM education: Process with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26-35.
  41. Wilson, R.(1973). Bridging the gap between technology and the humanities. Engineering Education, 63(5), 349-351.
  42. Zollman, A.(2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00115.x