Journal of Korean Academy of Dental Administration (대한치과의료관리학회지)

Korean Academy of Dental Administration (대한치과의료관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of surface gloss of composite resins

복합레진의 표면 광택에 대한 평가

  • Ji-Eun Byun (Department of Dental Hygiene, Chung Cheong University)
  • Received : 2023.11.26
  • Accepted : 2023.12.05
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Composite resins, commonly used in clinical practice, have been developed to improve aesthetics to obtain smooth surfaces. Although the restored composite resin has a smooth surface, it gradually becomes rough over time. Therefore, this study measured glossiness to evaluate the surface of various composite resins and attempted to evaluate the maintenance of glossiness of composite resins by observing surfaces that change to roughness. Specimens were produced using resin used in clinical practice: Gradia direct anterior (GA), Tetric N-Ceram (TN), Ceram.X Sphere TEC one (CX), Filtek Z350XT (FT), Estelite sigma quick (ES). After creating a smooth surface with slide glass, five locations were randomly selected to measure surface gloss, and the average was the representative value of the specimen. Roughness was applied to the specimen under water pouring at the same speed and pressure using SiC paper #2400, 1200, and 400. The gloss unit of different SiC papers was measured. To evaluate the gloss unit and gloss retention between composite resins, one-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons test were used. As a result of the study, there was a difference in gloss unit of specimens produced under the same conditions. Although the degree differed depending on the composite resin, there was also a difference in gloss retention. Based on the findings, composite resins show differences in gloss due to their different characteristics. Ceram.X Sphere TEC one (CX) showing the lowest gloss retention and Estelite sigma quick (ES) showing the highest.

Keywords

References

  1. Amaya-Pajares SP, Koi K, Watanabe H, da Costa JB, Ferracane JL. Development and maintenance of surface gloss of dental composites after polishing and brushing: review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34(1):15-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12875
  2. Batista GR, Zanatta RF, Borges AB, Torres CRG. The effects of polishing techniques on surface roughness and gloss of different composites. Gen Dent 2021;69(5):46-51.
  3. Burgess J, Cakir D. Comparative properties of lowshrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31 Spec No 2:10-5.
  4. Cavalcante LM, Ferraz LG, Antunes KB, Garcia IM, Schneider LFJ, Collares FM. Silane content influences physicochemical properties in nanostructured model composites. Dent Mater 2021;37(2):e85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.022
  5. Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Ionescu AC, Paolone G, Gherlone E, Ferracane JL, et al. In vitro biofilm formation on resin-based composites after different finishing and polishing procedures. J Dent 2017;67:43-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.07.012
  6. Chen MH. Update on dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010;89(6):549-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510363765
  7. da Costa JB, Goncalves F, Ferracane JL. Comparison of two-step versus four-step composite finishing/polishing disc systems: evaluation of a new two-step composite polishing disc system. Oper Dent 2011;36(2): 205-12. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-162-L
  8. Dhananjaya KM, Vadavadagi SV, Almalki SA, Verma T, Arora S, Kumar NN. In vitro analysis of different polishing systems on the color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. J Contemp Dent Pract 2019;20(11):1335-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2691
  9. Ergucu Z, Turkun LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007;32(2):185-92. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-56
  10. Ferracane JL. Resin composite--state of the art. Dent Mater 2011;27(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020
  11. Go E, Lee YH, Heo SJ. A study on factors related to satisfaction level with dental services. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2010;10(2):393-411.
  12. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite restorative materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56 Suppl 1:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2010.01296.x
  13. Jang JY. Dental health services patient satisfaction analysis. JKAIS 2013;14(12):6395-402.
  14. Janus J, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Pelletier H, Etienne O. Surface roughness and morphology of three nanocomposites after two different polishing treatments by a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater 2010;26(5):416-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.09.014
  15. Jung M, Eichelberger K, Klimek J. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after onestep and multiple-step polishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32(4):347-55. https://doi.org/10.2341/06-101
  16. Kamonkhantikul K, Arksornnukit M, Takahashi H, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. Polishing and toothbrushing alters the surface roughness and gloss of composite resins. Dent Mater J 2014;33(5):599-606. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-111
  17. Kemaloglu H, Karacolak G, Turkun LS. Can reduced-step polishers be as effective as multiple-step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness? J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29(1):31-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12233
  18. Kusumoto K, Yuasa S, Kawaguchi T. Development of new material for dental filling and restoration. Kagaku Kogyo 1989;63:57-64.
  19. Lee DG, Han SS, Yoo WK. Comparison of related influencing factors on medical services satisfaction between general dental patients and orthodontic patients. J Korea Contents Assoc 2018;18(6):257-66.
  20. Lee JY, Shin DH. Surface roughness of universal composites after polishing procedures. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2003;28(5):369-77. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.5.369
  21. Lee SY, Kim HC, Hur B, Park JK. Surface roughness and color stability of various composite resins. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007;32(6):542-9. https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.6.542
  22. Lee YK, Lu H, Oguri M, Powers JM. Changes in gloss after simulated generalized wear of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(4):370-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.006
  23. Lu H, Roeder LB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15(5):297-303; discussion 304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00300.x
  24. Malavasi CV, Macedo EM, da Costa Souza K, Rego GF, Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM. Surface texture and optical properties of self-adhering composite materials after toothbrush abrasion. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(10):775-82. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1756
  25. O'Neill C, Kreplak L, Rueggeberg FA, Labrie D, Shimokawa CAK, Price RB. Effect of tooth brushing on gloss retention and surface roughness of five bulk-fill resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30(1):59-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12350
  26. Pala K, Tekce N, Tuncer S, Serim ME, Demirci M. Evaluation of the surface hardness, roughness, gloss and color of composites after different finishing/polishing treatments and thermocycling using a multitechnique approach. Dent Mater J 2016;35(2):278-89. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-260
  27. Paolone G, Moratti E, Goracci C, Gherlone E, Vichi A. Effect of finishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of full-body bulk-fill resin composites. Materials (Basel) 2020;13(24):5657.
  28. Park EM, Yu SY, Jang JH. The effect of satisfaction of dental esthetics on life quality related to oral health (OHIP-14). J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2011;11(6):863-70.
  29. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, dos Santos Dias CT. The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2002;15(3):193-7.
  30. Samuel SP, Li S, Mukherjee I, Guo Y, Patel AC, Baran G, et al. Mechanical properties of experimental dental composites containing a combination of mesoporous and nonporous spherical silica as fillers. Dent Mater 2009;25(3):296-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.012
  31. Sang EJ, Song JS, Chung SH, Jin BH, Hyun HK. Influence of a new polishing system on changes in gloss and surface roughness of resin composites after polishing and brushing. Dent Mater J 2021;40(3):727-35. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-207
  32. Seong MG, Kim JH, Jang KA. Factors affecting the satisfaction for medical service and reuse intention of patients at dental clinic in Gyeongnam province. J Dent Hyg Sci 2015;15(2):106-12. https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.2.106
  33. Shetty P, Purayil TP, Ginjupalli K, Pentapati KC. Effect of polishing technique and immersion in beverages on color stability of nanoceramic composites. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2021;11(1):53-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.11.011
  34. Takanashi E, Kishikawa R, Ikeda M, Inai N, Otsuki M, Foxton RM, et al. Influence of abrasive particle size on surface properties of flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2008;27(6):780-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.780
  35. Zhang L, Yu P, Wang XY. Surface roughness and gloss of polished nanofilled and nanohybrid resin composites. J Dent Sci 2021;16(4):1198-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.03.003
  36. Zhou X, Huang X, Li M, Peng X, Wang S, Zhou X, et al. Development and status of resin composite as dental restorative materials. J Appl Polym Sci 2019;136(44):48180.