Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bibliographic Attribute Analysis of Reading Material Based on Book Usage Data

도서이용 데이터에 기반한 독서자료의 속성 분석

  • 심지영 (연세대학교 대학도서관발전연구소)
  • Received : 2023.11.20
  • Accepted : 2023.12.08
  • Published : 2023.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed bibliographic attributes related to the selection and use of reading materials based on data on books borrowed or purchased together in order to understand the properties of reading materials that have complex user needs from various perspectives. As a result of creating co-occurrence matrices of bibliographic attribute terms by dividing them into 26 sub-attribute units related to KDC main class, target reader, and user age, and performing network analyses, the details and prominent mediating role of bibliographic attributes of reading materials were identified. The results of this study will be helpful in designing facets of reading information systems, including library OPAC, in the future.

본 연구는 다양한 관점의 이용요구가 혼재되어있는 독서자료의 속성을 파악하기 위해, 도서의 동시이용 (동시대출, 동시구매) 데이터에 기반하여 독서자료의 선택 및 이용과 관계된 서지적 속성을 분석하였다. KDC 주제, 독자대상, 이용자 연령 관련 26개 하위 속성 단위로 구분하여 서지적 속성 용어의 동시출현행렬을 생성하고 네트워크 분석을 수행한 결과, 독서자료의 서지적 속성의 세부 내용 및 두드러진 매개 역할을 파악하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 도서관 OPAC을 비롯한 독서정보 시스템의 패싯 설계에 도움이 될 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2020S1A5B5A16084137).

References

  1. Choi, Sanghee (2014). An analysis of related movie information using the co-word method. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.161 
  2. Choi, Sanghee (2017). Analysis of author image based on book recommendation from readers. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(4), 153-171. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.4.153 
  3. Chung, Jin Soo (2011). A study on children's book selection behavior. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(1), 417-437. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.1.417 
  4. Han, Yoon-Ok & Cho, Mi Ah (2013). Analysis of difference of preferred loan books according to personality types of children and adolescents. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(4), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2013.47.4.255 
  5. Han, Yoon-Ok, Paek, Jin-Hwan, Jang, Hai Sook, & Lee, Bo Ra (2012). A study on the characteristics of preference books according to the children's personality type. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(3), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.3.005 
  6. ISNI KOREA [n.d.]. ISNI Search. Available: https://www.nl.go.kr/isni/search/simpleSearch
  7. Kim, Jung-Wha (2009). Elements affecting children's choosing a picturebook. Journal of Children's Media & Education, 8(1), 1-17. 
  8. Park, Ji Hye & Suh, Bomil (2013). The impact of influential's betweenness centrality on the WOM effect under the online social networking service environment. Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, 20(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.21219/JITAM.2013.20.2.127. 
  9. Pei, Yun-feng, Sohn, Jong-soo, Wang, Qing., Song, Tae-sung, & Chung, In-jeong (2011). Contents recommendation method using betweenness centrality analysis. Proceedings of the 2011 Korean Society for Internet Information Summer Conference, 167-168. 
  10. Publication Industry Promotion Agency of Korea [n.d.]. Publishing Distribution Integrated Computer Network Publisher Information Search. Available: https://bnk.kpipa.or.kr/home/v3/addition/adiPblshrInfoList
  11. Reading Culture Promotion Act, Act No. 18857. 
  12. Shim, Jiyoung (2022a). Towards the development of a reading material classification scheme based on a combination of book use facets. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(4), 347-373. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.4.347 
  13. Shim, Jiyoung (2022b). Exploring the contextual elements of book use to improve book recommender systems. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(2), 299-324. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.2.299
  14. Becnel, K. & Moeller, R. A. (2015). What, why, and how they read: reading preferences and patterns of rural young adults. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(3), 299-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.452 
  15. Borgman, C. L. & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 1-53. 
  16. Bornmann, L., Wray, K. B., & Haunschild, R. (2020). Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis rrevealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper. Scientometrics, 122, 1051-1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2 
  17. Chander, H. & Singh, K. P. (2020a). Frontline publishers of punjabi language books: a bibliometric study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 40(4), 230-237. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.4.15811 
  18. Chander, H. & Singh, K. P. (2020b). Subject mapping of punjabi language books: a bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 67(4), 251-256. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v67i4.34755 
  19. Davenport, T. H. & Beck, J. C. (2001). The Attention Economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 
  20. Diodato, V. P. (2012). Dictionary of Bibliometrics. New York: Routledge. 
  21. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543 
  22. Goldenberg, J., Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Reichman, S. (2012). The quest for content: how user-generated links can facilitate online exploration journal of marketing research. XLIX, 452-468. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0091
  23. Goldsmith, T. E. & Davenport, D. M. (1990). Assessing structural similarity of graphs. In. Schvaneveldt, R. W. eds. Pathfinder Associative Networks: Studies in Knowledge Organization. Norwoord, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing, 75-88. 
  24. Howard, V. & Jin, S. (2004). What are they reading? a survey of the reading habits and library usage patterns of teens in nova scotia. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 28(4), 25-44. 
  25. Larkin-Lieffers, P. A. (2001). Informational picture books in the library: do young children find them? Public Library Quarterly, 20(3), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1300/J118v20n03_02 
  26. Leem, B. & Chun, H. (2014). An impact of online recommendation network on demand. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(4), 1723-1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.071 
  27. Ray, P. P. & Sen, B. K. (2019). Paintings and drawings of rabindranath tagore: a bibliometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 66(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v66i1.21994 
  28. Ross, C. S., McKechnie, L., & Rothbauer, P. M. (2006). Reading Matters. Westport, Conn.: Libraries Unlimited. 
  29. Smith, M. C. (2000). The real-world reading practices of adults. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548063 
  30. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507087238 
  31. White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4 
  32. Svab, K. & Zumer, M. (2015). The value of a library catalog for selecting children's picture books. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(7), 717-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1044059