정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제40권4호
  • /
  • Pages.259-277
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문헌정보학 분야 4개 학술지의 연구영역 중첩분석

Overlap Analysis of Research Areas in Four Library and Information Science Journals

  • 정유경 (한남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.20
  • 심사 : 2023.12.12
  • 발행 : 2023.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 4대 학술지를 대상으로 구조적토픽모델과 문헌 네트워크 분석을 사용하여 연구영역을 분석하고, 각 학술지의 공통 및 특화된 연구영역을 식별하여 문헌정보학 분야의 학술 지형을 파악하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 연구결과, 문헌정보학 분야의 학술지들이 각기 다른 연구영역에 중점을 두고 있는 것으로 나타났는데, 한국문헌정보학회지는 문헌정보학 분야의 전반적인 연구영역을 가장 포괄적으로 다루고 있으며, 한국비블리아학회지 또한 유사한 연구경향을 보였으나 도서관경영 및 도서관프로그램과 관련된 주제 선호도가 높았다. 한국도서관·정보학회지는 문헌정보학 전반의 연구주제 및 타 학술지에 비해 학교도서관이나 독서교육과 관련된 분야에 특화된 주제들을 많이 다루고 있으며, 정보관리학회지는 정보기술 및 정보학 전반에 대한 주제적 비중이 높아 다른 세 학술지와 비교했을 때 주제적 차별성이 있었다. 본 연구는 학술지별 주요 연구영역을 파악함으로써 연구자들의 논문투고와 학술지의 주제 특성화 및 다양화를 위한 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

This study aims to identify the academic landscape of the field of Library and Information Science by analyzing the research areas of the four major domestic journals using structural topic modeling and network analysis. The results show that each journal focuses on different research areas. The Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science covers the most comprehensive range of research areas in the field, while the Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science shows a similar research trend but with a higher preference for research areas related to library management and library programs. The Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society deals more with topics related to school libraries and reading education and the Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management focuses more on information technology and information science. This study is able to provide valuable foundational data for researchers in submitting their papers and for the topical specialization and diversification of the journals in the field of Library and Information Science.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문의 일부 내용은 문헌정보학 분야 4개 학술지의 발전방향을 모색하고자 개최된 2022년 12월 한국 문헌정보학 4개 학회 및 국립중앙도서관 공동학술대회에서 발표된 바 있습니다. 이 연구에 사용된 기초 데이터를 제공해주신 공주대학교 김혜진 교수님과 데이터 처리에 조언을 아끼지 않으신 이재윤 교수님께 감사드립니다. 더불어 논문 수정에 도움을 주신 세 분의 심사위원께도 감사의 말씀을 전합니다. 이 논문은 2023년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 인문사회분야 신진연구자지원사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구입니다(NRF-2023S1A5A8080534).

참고문헌

  1. Cho, Jane (2011). A study for research area of library and information science by network text analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.065
  2. Choi, Hyung Wook, Choi, Ye Jin, & Name, So-Yeon (2018). Time series analysis of intellectual structure and research trend changes in the field of library and information science: 2003 to 2017. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.089
  3. Heong, KiHye & Choi, MinGee (2019). A comparative analysis of the research trends on school social welfare and educational welfare in korea using text network analysis. Journal of School Social Work, 46, 25-51. https://doi.org/10.20993/jSSW.46.2
  4. Jeong, Dong-Youl (2016). A study on the historical process of library and information science domain in Korea: based on the subject analysis of academic journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.005
  5. Jeong, Yoo Kyung (2020). Journal citation network analysis of library and information science field in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(4), 221-238. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.4.221
  6. Lee, Jae Yun (2015). Identifying the research fronts in Korean library and information science by document co-citation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 77-106. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077
  7. Lee, Jae Yun (2023). A study on scholarly communication trends in Korean library and information science studies through author group analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(2), 409-434. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.2.409
  8. Lee, Jin Suk (2020). Domain analysis on the '2015 revised national curriculum' by semantic network analysis and overlay mapping. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(22), 617-638. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077
  9. Lee, Jongwook, Kim, Soojung, & Oh, Sanghee (2023). Perceptions of academic journals and scholarly events in library and information science: an online survey. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(1), 365-386. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.1.365
  10. Noh, Junhyeong & Baek, Young Min (2019). Topic change in corporate rumor issue and discursive struggles in crisis communication process - topic modeling approach. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 21(1), 147-189. https://doi.org/10.20993/jSSW.46.2
  11. Oh, Se-Hoon (2005). A study on the research trends of library & information science in Korea by analyzing journal articles and the cited literatures. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 379-408. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.379
  12. Park, Jahyun & Song, Min (2013). A study on the research trends in library & information science in Korea using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
  13. Park, Ji Yeon & Jeong, Dong-Youl (2013). A study on the intellectual structure of library and information science in Korea by author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031
  14. Seo, Eun-Gyuong, Lee, Won-Kyung, Park, Eun-Kyung, & Lee, Ock-Seong (2015). Informetric analysis of research trends in the journal of Korean biblio society for library and information science. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(3), 315-343. http://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.3.315
  15. Yoo, Yeong Jun (2003). A study on intellectual structure of library and information science in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 20(3), 277-297. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2003.20.3.277
  16. Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Khelfaoui, M., & Gingras, Y. (2020). Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00006
  17. Colavizza, G., Boyack, K. W., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). The closer the better: similarity of publication pairs at different cocitation levels. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(4), 600-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23981
  18. D' Souza, J. L. & Smalheiser, N. R. (2014). Three journal similarity metrics and their application to biomedical journals. PloS One, 9(12), e115681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115681
  19. Gavel, Y. & Iselid, L. (2008). Web of science and scopus: a journal title overlap study. Online Information Review, 32(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520810865958
  20. Griffiths, T. L. & Steyvers, M. (2004). Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(suppl_1), 5228-5235. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307752101
  21. Hicks, D. & Wang, J. (2011). Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(2), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21458
  22. Kimball, R. (2016). Journal overlap analysis of the georef and web of science databases. Science & Technology Libraries, 35(1), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2015.1128374
  23. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Mapping inter-disciplinarity at the interfaces between the science citation index and the social science citation index. Scientometrics, 71, 391-405. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1694-z
  24. Rahman, A. I. M., Guns, R., Rousseau, R., & Engels, T. C. (2015). Expertise Overlap between an Expert Panel and Research Groups in Global Journal Maps. 15th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics.
  25. Ristanti, P. Y., Wibawa, A. P., & Pujianto, U. (2019). Cosine similarity for title and abstract of economic journal classification. In 2019 5th International Conference on Science in Information Technology, 123-127. Institute of Electronical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSITech46713.2019.8987547
  26. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Airoldi, E. M. (2016). A model of text for experimentation in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 111(515), 988-1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684
  27. Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., & Airoldi, E. M. (2013). The structural topic model and applied social science. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Topic Models: Computation, Application, and Evaluation, 4(1), 1-20.
  28. Wolfram, D. & Zhao, Y. (2014). A comparison of journal similarity across six disciplines using citing discipline analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 840-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.08.003