정보화정책 (Informatization Policy)

한국지능정보사회진흥원 (National Information Society Agency)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스마트제조 고도화를 위한 기술표준 정책영역 발굴 및 우선순위 도출: 전문가 AHP와 IPA를 중심으로

Technology Standards Policy Support Plans for the Advancement of Smart Manufacturing: Focusing on Experts AHP and IPA

  • 투고 : 2023.04.17
  • 심사 : 2023.08.12
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

제조업의 경쟁력 제고와 성장을 위한 전략으로 도입된 스마트공장 및 스마트제조는 미래의 국가 경쟁력이며, 국가 산업구조를 혁신하기 위한 제반 활동이라 할 수 있다. 한국 정부는 산업부의 제조업 혁신 3.0 전략부터 지속적으로 스마트제조혁신 정책을 추진하였다. 본 연구는 스마트공장 및 스마트제조산업에 대해 기술표준을 기반으로 정책영역을 발굴하고자 한다. 국제 기술표준에 부합하는 국내표준의 정립과 지원이 요구되는 현시점에 정책적 영역에 대한 분석 및 제조업 분야의 스마트제조 공정영역별 우선순위를 살펴봄으로써 국제표준화가 많이 이루어진 영역에 대해 맹목적인 국제표준화를 추진하기보다는 기술표준 정책영역을 구분하고 정책적 우선순위를 도출하는 것은 스마트제조 고도화를 위한 중요한 정책적 결정을 위한 근거가 될 수 있다. 이를 위해 전문가 인터뷰를 기반한 계층화분석방법과 5대 공정영역에 대한 중요도-성능 분석을 통해 국제표준화가 많이 이루어진 영역에 대한 정책 추진보다는 데이터와 보안 영역 등 신기술에 대한 탐색을 기반으로 선도적인 표준화 참여가 요구되며, 탄소배출과 에너지 비용 등과 관련된 국제환경대응에 따른 글로벌 정세에 따른 수출과 디지털 통상에 대한 정책적 고려가 필요하다.

The adoption of smart factories and smart manufacturing as strategies to enhance competitiveness and stimulate growth in the manufacturing sector is vital for a country's future competitiveness and industrial transformation. The government has consistently pursued smart manufacturing innovation policies starting with the Manufacturing Innovation 3.0 strategy in the Ministry of Industry. This study aims to identify policy areas for smart factories and smart manufacturing based on technical standards. Analyzing policy areas at the current stage where the establishment and support of domestic standards aligning with international technical standards are required is crucial. By prioritizing smart manufacturing process areas within the industry, policymakers can make well-informed decisions to advance smart manufacturing without blindly following international standardization in already well-established areas. To achieve this, the study utilizes a hierarchical analysis method including expert interviews and importance-performance analysis for the five major process areas. The findings underscore the importance of proactive participation in standardization for emerging technologies, such as data and security, instead of solely focusing on areas with extensive international standardization. Additionally, policymakers need to consider carbon emissions, energy costs, and global environmental challenges to address international trends in export and digital trade effectively.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Byun, J. W. (2021). "Analysis and Implications of Smart Factory Policy in the 4th Industrial Revolution: Case Studies of Germany and the USA." Journal of Culture Industry, 21(3), 143-150. 
  2. Choo, Y. & Lee, D. (2019). "A Study on Factors for Introducing Smart Factory to Improve Competitiveness of Small and Medium-Sized Metal Processing Companies." Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 45(1), 70-80.
  3. Creswell, J. W. & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications. 
  4. Fletcher, G. & Griffiths, M. (2020). "Digital transformation during a lockdown." International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102185. 
  5. Goo, B., Lee, J., Lee, M. & Shon, S. (2018), Domestic smart manufacturing policy, support status and improvement plan, KISTEP Issue Weekly, 219, 1-29.
  6. Huh, S. Y., Jo, M. & Lee, Y. G. (2016). "Analysis of Priorities of Constructive Factors of New and Renewable Energy Policy in South Korea using Analytic Hierarchical Process." Innovation Studies, 11(1), 29-69.
  7. Hwang, G. (2021). "The Competitiveness of Korean Manufacturing, the Bulwark of the Economic Crisis of COVID-19." i-KIET Industrial Economics Issues, (108).
  8. Jang, J, H., Kim, S. R., Kim, J. H., Bae, B. S. & Kim, S. Y. (2022). "Imporved Relability of Manufacturing Process Data Using FOMs(smart-Factory Operation Management) Solution." Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Technology Engineers, 31(3). 216-223, 
  9. Kang, H. M. & Hwang, K. T. (2018). "Analysis of Research Trends of Cyber Physical System(CPS) in the Manufacturing Industry." Informatization Policy, 25(3), 3-28.
  10. KDI EIEC (2021). "Smart Factory Activation Policy... Responses and Strategies of Countries around the World" https://eiec.kdi.re.kr/publish/reviewView.do?idx=84&fcode=000020003600003&ridx=8&pp=20&pg=1. (Retrieved on March 27, 2023)
  11. Oah, J. T. & Kim, E. H.(2021). "German Policy for SMEs' Digital Transformation and Implications: Focused on the Mittelstand 4.0 Competence Center." Korean Business Education Review, 36(4), 233-263.
  12. Park, C. & Yong, T. S. (2012). "Study on Conflicts and Coordination in Smart Grid." Informatization Policy, 19(4), 27-45.
  13. Park, J. (2017). "Analysis on Success Cases of Smart Factory in Korea: Leveraging from Large, Medium, and Small Size Enterprises." Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(5), 107-115.
  14. Seo, H. J. (2019). "A Preliminary Discussion on Policy Decision Making of AI in The Fourth Industrial Revolution." Informatization Policy, 26(3), 3-35.
  15. Smart Manufacturing Innovation Promotion Team (2020). "Project Introduction." https://www.smart-factory.kr/ (Retrieved on March 27, 2023) 
  16. Son, H. (2021). "A Study on Governance of Intelligent Information Society by Digital Transformation." Public Law, 49(3), 199-230.  https://doi.org/10.38176/PublicLaw.2021.02.49.3.199