Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of different levels of organic chromium and selenomethionine cocktails in broilers

  • Jaewoo An (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Younggwang Kim (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Minho Song (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jungseok Choi (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hanjin Oh (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Seyeon Chang (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Dongcheol Song (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Hyunah Cho (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Sehyun Park (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kyeongho Jeon (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Yunhwan Park (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Gyutae Park (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Sehyuk Oh (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Yuna Kim (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Nayoung Choi (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Jongchun Kim (Soma) ;
  • Hyeunbum Kim (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Jinho Cho (Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2023.02.08
  • Accepted : 2023.03.17
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Selenium (Se) is an essential trace mineral that plays an important role in physiological processes by regulating the antioxidant defense system and enhancing immunity. Chromium is an essential mineral involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and also plays a role in maintaining normal insulin function. Based on these advantages, we hypothesized that the addition of selenomethionine (SeMet) and organic chromium (OC) to broiler diets would increase Se deposition, antioxidant capacity and immune response in meat. Therefore, this study analyzed the effects of OC and SeMet on growh performance, nutrients digestibility, blood profiles, intestinal morphology, meat quality characteristics, and taxonomic analysis of broilers. A total of 168 one-day-old broiler chicken (Arbor Acres) were randomly allotted to 3 groups based on the initial body weight of 37.33 ± 0.24 g with 7 replicate per 8 birds (mixed sex). The experiments period was 28 days. Dietary treatments were folloewd: Basal diets based on corn-soybean meal (CON), basal diet supplemented with 0.2 ppm OC and 0.2 ppm SeMet (CS4), and basal diet supplemented with 0.4 ppm OC and 0.4 ppm SeMet (CS8). Supplementation of OC and SeMet did not affect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility. However, CS8 supplementation increased in duodenum villus height and villus height : crypt depth, and increased in breast meat Se deposition. In addition, CS8 group showed higher uric acid and total antioxidant status than CON group. Taxonomic analysis at phylum level revealed that Proteobacteria and Firmicutes of CS4 and CS8 were lower than CON group. In genus level, the relative abundance of fecal Lactobacillus and Enterococcus of CS4 and CS8 groups were higher than CON group. In short, 0.4 ppm OC and 0.4 ppm SeMet supplementation to broiler diet supporitng positive gut microbiome change, also enhancing antioxidant capacity, and Se deposition in breast meat.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Poultry is the second most consumed meat by humans, providing protein and essential nutrients [1]. As the poultry industry has developed and awareness of health and nutrition has increased, the demand for high-quality meat has begun to increase. Factors affecting poultry meat quality are diverse and correlated with each other [2,3]. Among various factors determining meat quality, water holding capacity (WHC) is the most important parameter because WHC determines pH, drip loss (DL), cooking loss (CL), storage, and other qualities [3,4]. Bowker et al. [4] have reported that WHC is positively correlated with pH, but negatively correlated with DL.

Chromium (Cr) is known as a trace element that is present in feed at very small amounts. Although there is no requirement for Cr in poultry feed, many recent studies have determined effects of Cr on physiological, immunological, and growth performances of poultry [5-7]. Cr exists in its most stable trivalent form when supplemented with feed. However, inorganic Cr is poorly absorbed in broilers [8]. To improve this absorption rate problem, Cr can be chelated with substances such as yeast, methionine, and picolinate to supplement feed in the form of organic chromium (OC) [9]. When Cr is supplemented in the feed of broilers, it not only improves meat quality, but also improves antioxidant action [10,11]. Mir et al. [12] have reported that Cr supplementation in broiler feed can reduce DL and lipid oxidation in broilers.

Selenium (Se) is an essential trace element required by humans and animals. It is a nutrient that can improve nutritional value and quality of meat products [13,14]. The recommendation for Se supplementation in broiler diets is 0.15 ppm [5]. The FDA [15] has approved selenium supplementation up to 0.3 ppm in broiler diets. Previous studies have reported that 0.3 ppm Se supplementation in broiler feed is appropriate considering growth performance (e.g., body weight [BW] and feed conversion ratio [FCR]) [16–18]. Cemin et al. [19] have reported that broiler diets supplemented with Se at much higher than recommended levels can improve growth performance, carcass yield, and breast yield. Inorganic Se is toxic with a low bioavailability. It is mainly supplemented with organic Se in broiler feed, which has high bioavailability. Selenomethionine (SeMet) is a Se compound present in plants and feed grains with a high absorption rate similar to amino acids [20]. When broiler feed is supplemented with SeMet, it has antioxidant, intestinal immune function control, anti-stress, intramuscular Se deposition, and meat quality improvement effects [21–24].

Studies on effects of OC and SeMet cocktail supplementation in broiler feed are limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate effects of OC and SeMet cocktails in different ratios on broiler chickens when supplemented in feed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics

The experimental protocol was approved (CBNUA-2010-22-01) by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.

Animals and dietary design

A total of 168 one-day-old broiler chicken (Arbor Acres) were randomly allotted to 3 groups based on the initial body weight of 37.33 ± 0.24 g with 7 replicate per 8 birds (mixed sex). The experiments period was performed 28 days. Dietary treatments were folloewd Basal diets based on corn-soybean meal (CON), CON + 0.2 ppm OC and 0.2 ppm SeMet (CS4), and CON + 0.4 ppm OC and 0.4 ppm SeMet (CS8). The NRC [5] designed all diets to meet or exceed the nutritional needs for poultry. Compositions of basal diets are shown in Table 1. The birds were fed ad libitum and they had free access to the water.

Table 1. Ingredient composition of experimental diets

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0001.png 이미지

Supplied per kg diet: vitamin A, 9,000 IU; vitamin D3, 3,000 IU; vitamin E, 48 mg; vitamin K, 3 mg; thiamin, 1.8 mg; riboflavin, 6 mg; pyridoxine, 3 mg; vitamin B12, 0.012 mg; niacin, 42 mg; folic acid, 1.2 mg; biotin, 0.24 mg; pantothenic acid, 12 mg.

Supplied per kg of diet: manganese, 120 mg; zinc, 100 mg; iron, 80 mg; copper, 20 mg; iodine, 2 mg; selenium, 0.3 mg; cobalt, 0.5 mg.

DDGS, dried distiller’s grains with soluble; MDCP, mono-dicalcium phosphate; SAA, sulfur amino acids; AMEn, nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy; CP, crude protein.

Growth performance

Growth performance was measured by weekly BW and feed intake (FI). The body weight gain (BWG) was calculated by subtracting the BW of the previous week from the BW of this week, and the BWG of 1 to 7, 8 to 14, 15 to 21, 21 to 28, and 0 to 28 were measured. The FI was derived by subtracting the residual amount from the feed amount. FCR was calculated by dividing the measured FI by BWG.

Nutrients digestibility

All treatment groups were supplied with 0.2% Cr2O3 in the feed 3 days before the end of the experiment. Two days before the end of the experiment, fresh poop was collected through rectal massage, sealed, and stored at −20℃. The feed and feces of all treatment groups were dried in an oven at 50℃ for 72 hours and then ground to a fine powder. The sample was multiplied by 6.25 and the crude protein was determined by titrating N in accordance with the Kjeldahl Method. The equation for calculating apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) follow as: 100 − [(concentration of nutrient in fecal Cr2O3 feed) / (concentration of nutrient in diet Cr2O3 fecal) × 100].

Blood profiles

All broilers had 2 mL of blood drawn from the wing veins prior to slaughter, which was collected in vacuum tubes containing K3EDTA and a tube free of heparin for serum analysis. The collected blood samples were centrifuged for 20 minutes at 12,500×g at 4℃. An automatic hematology analyzer (XE2100D, Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) was used to examine red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), heterophil, and lymphocyte samples. For total antioxidant status (TAS) analysis, the serum samples obtained by centrifugation of the blood were measured using a total antioxidant capacity assay kit, such as the ELISA kit (EK780137, AFG Scientific, Northbrook, IL, USA). The uric acid levels were measured using the Qualigent UA (Qualigent UA, SEKISUI Medical, Tokyo, Japan) reagent through an enzymatic assay method (Labospect008AS, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).

Intestinal morphology

At the end of the experiment, all broilers had a 2 cm resection of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. The duodenum was resected midway, the jejunum was resected from the entrance of the bile duct, and the ileum was resected toward the junction of the Meckel’s diverticulum and the cecum. Samples taken for intestinal morphology analysis were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin ([NBF] Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The sample was put on the slide, then paraffined and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Using an Olympus IX51 inverted phase-contrast microscope, field morphology was examined. When analyzing intestinal morphology, it is important to consider the villus height (VH), crypt depth (CD), and villus height to crypt depth ratio (VH : CD).

Meat quality characteristics

At the end of the experiment, broiler breasts and drum stick meat were collected and stored in vacuum packs. Meat content analysis of breast meat and durm stick meat water, protein, fat, and ash contents were analyzed according to the AOAC method. The Laakkonoen et al. [25] method was used to analyze WHC. DL was calculated as the weight ratio (%) of the initial sample by measuring the DL produced during the circular shaping of a 2 cm thick breast and drum stick, placing it in a polypropylene bag, vacuum-packing it, and storing it in a refrigerator at 4℃ for 24 hours. The CL was calculated using the weight of a 3 cm thick chicken breast and drumstick meat that had been formed into a circle, heated in a hot water heater to 70℃, and allowed to cool for 30 minutes. A rheometer (Compac-100, Sun Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure shear force (SF) during a shear force cutting test. After homogenization with a homogenizer (Bihon seiki, Ace, Tokyo, Japan), the pH was determined using a pH meter (Mteeler Delta 340, Mettler-tolede, Leicester, UK). Using a spectro colormeter (Model JX-777, Color Techno. System, Tokyo, Japan) calibrated on a white plate, the meat’s color was assessed (L*, 94.04; a*, 0.13; b*, −0.51). Se analysis is performed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, ELAN DRCⅡ, Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) on a solution obtained by adding 0.5 g of breast meat and drumstick meat samples to a microwave digestion system and treating them with nitric acid.

Taxonomic analysis

The 16S amplicon sequencing was commercially commissiond to Sanigen (Sanigen, Anyang, Korea). In brief, the sequencing data were produced by MicroSeq with 300-bp paired-end. Raw reads were trimmed, quality filtered, pair-merged and denoised using divisive amplicon denoising algorithm 2 (DADA2) plugin [26] in Qiime2 software 2021.11 distrubution [27]. With end product of DADA2, amplicon sequence variants (ASV) were defined and used in downstream analyses. Taxonomic classification analysis was performed for the ASVs using Qiime2 Naïve bayes classifier.

Statistical analysis

The experimental unit in all studies was the cage, and the collected data were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Differences in statistical analysis were assessed using Tukey’s multiple range test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Growth performance

OC and SeMet cocktail supplementation were not significant in weekly measured BW (Table 2). BWG, FI, and FCR did not show significant differences by supplementation with different levels of OC and SeMet cocktails.

Table 2. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on growth performance in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0002.png 이미지

1) CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

SeMet, selenomethionine; BW, body weight; BWG, body weight gain; FI, feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio.

Nutrients digestibility

The ATTD of DM, CP, and GE did not show significant differences by supplementation with different levels of OC and SeMet cocktails (Table 3).

Table 3. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on nutrients digestibility in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0003.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

SeMet, selenomethionine; DM, dry matter; GE, gross energy; CP, crude protein.

Blood profiles

WBC, RBC, heterophil and lymphocyte were not significantly affected by OC and SeMet cocktail supplementation (Table 4). In uric acid, CS8 group was significantly lower than CON group. CS8 group was significantly (p < 0.05) higher TAS compared to CON group.

Table 4. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on blood profiles in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0004.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

a,bMeans within column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

SeMet, selenomethionine; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, red blood cell; TAS, total antioxidant status.

Intestinal morphology

In the jejunum and ileum, supplementation with OC and SeMet cocktail had no affected (Table 5). In the duodenum, the CS4 and CS8 groups had significant (p < 0.05) increased in VH compared to the CON group.

Table 5. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on intestinal morphology in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0005.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

a,bMeans within column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

VH, villus height; CD, crypt depth.

Meat quality characteristics

In breast meat content, Se deposition was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in CS8 group compared to CON group (Table 6). Also, in breast meat characteristics, WHC was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the CS8 group than in the CON group. CL was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in CS4 group compared to CON group.

Table 6. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on breast meat in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0006.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

a,bMeans within column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

WHC, water holding capacity; DL, drip loss; CL, cooking loss; SF, shear force.

In drum stick meat content, ash was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in CS8 group than in CON group (Table 7). In the groups supplemented with CS, the WHC was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than CON group. In CL, the CS-supplemented groups were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than CON group.

Table 7. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on drum stick meat in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0007.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

a,bMeans within column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

SeMet, selenomethionine; WHC, water holding capacity; DL, drip loss; CL, cooking loss; SF, shear force.

Taxonomic analysis

In genus level, the CS8 group showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher levels of Lactobacillus than the other groups (Table 8) (Fig. 1). In addition, Enterococcus was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in CON group compared to CS supplemented groups.

Table 8. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on fecal microbiota at the phylum level in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0008.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

a,bMeans within column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

SeMet, selenomethionine.

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on fecal microbiota at the phylum level in broilers. SeMet, selenomethionine.

In phylum level, Bacteroidota showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher CS8 compared to CON group (Table 9) (Fig. 2). Actinobacterota was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in CON group than in CS-supplemented groups.

Table 9. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on fecal microbiota at the genus level in broilers

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_t0009.png 이미지

1)CON, basal diet; CS4, CON + 0.2 ppm selenomethionine and 0.2 ppm organic chromium; CS8, CON + 0.4 ppm selenomethionine and 0.4 ppm organic chromium.

a,bMeans within column with different superscripts differ significantly (p < 0.05).

SeMet, selenomethionine.

DMJGDA_2023_v65n6_1226_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Effects of different levels of organic chromium and SeMet cocktails on fecal microbiota at the genus level in broilers. SeMet, selenomethionine.

DISCUSSION

Cr plays a role in regulating insulin action and improving glucose and lipid metabolism through regulation of fatty acid synthase and lipase [28–31]. Se is known to be an important trace element for the growth of broilers. It is involved in antioxidant reactions and hormone secretion pathways. However, in this study, it showed no effect on growth performance or nutrient digestibility. Cr and Se are supplements widely used to protect broilers from environmental stress. They are considered to have no effect under normal stress-free conditions like in this study.

Uric acid in blood can be used as an indicator of amino acids utilization. Changes in serum urea nitrogen and concentration are consistent [32]. Although uric acid has an antioxidant function, its high levels in blood can cause health problems in broilers [33]. Sun et al. [34] have reported that Se deficiency can increase blood uric acid. However, Cr supplementation is not known to reduce blood uric acid in broilers [35–37]. In this study, CS8 group decreased blood uric acid compared to CON group. This suggests that CS8 group can improve amino acid utilization in broilers and Se deficiency in CON group.

Se is incorporated into selenoproteins in the form of selenocysteine, an amino acid, to function as glutathione peroxidase and melanocytes to protect against oxidative stress [38]. Tang et al. [24] have reported an increase in total antioxidant capacity when feed is supplemented with OH-SeMet. Zduńczyk et al. [39] have reported that 0.3 ppm Se supplementation can increased TAS of laying hens compared to 0.15 ppm Se supplementation. Cr can act as an indirect antioxidant by reducing elevated insulin and preventing glucose oxidation [40,41]. In the existing environment, OC can enhance the antioxidant capacity compared to inorganic chromium [42]. In this study, the CS8 group showed higher TAS compared to the CON group.

Intestinal morphology characteristics of VH and CD are important for nutrient absorption and intestinal health [43]. When villi are shortened, the surface area is reduced and the rate of nutrient absorption is reduced [44]. Antioxidant supplementation can protect enterocytes from apoptotic oxidative stress and improve intestinal morphology [45]. Huang et al. [7] have reported that supplementation with chromium propionate in broiler diets can increase VH under heat stress conditions. However, the exact mechanism by which CS8 could improve growth performance of poultry is not clear. Cr and Se are mostly supplemented under heat stress [46,47]. Research in the existing environment is insufficient. Further studies are needed to determine effects of Cr and Se supplementation on intestinal morphology in the conventional environment.

Recently, research on the development of high-quality meat is increasing, in line with consumers who are increasingly aware of functional foods. In this study, CS was added to feed to improve meat quality. As a result, Se deposition in breast meat was improved. Characteristics of breast and drum stick meat were improved. Among meat quality factors, WHC is one of the most important characteristics of chicken related to DL, CL, pH, and protein with the ability to retain water [3,48,49]. Silva et al. [50] have reported that WHC could be measured by DL and CL. Supplementation of Nano-Se [51], SeMet [50], and OH-Met [24] to broilers could improve WHC. Mir et al. [12] have reported that WHCs of refrigerated breast and thigh meat are improved when broilers are supplemented with 1.5% chromium in flaxseed compared to flaxseed supplemented broilers. WHC and pH are known to be correlated. However, in this study, there was no significant difference in pH between breast and drumstick meat [4]. Cai et al. [51] has reported that WHC could be improved by reducing DL by improving antioxidant level. Considering that the CS8 group in this study had higher TAS than the CON group, WHC was improved by improving antioxidant ability regardless of pH. In this study, ash was significantly higher in the CS8 group in drum stick meat because the mineral intake due to supplementation of SeMet and OC was higher than that of the CON group. However, various studies reported no significant difference in the ash content of broiler meat due to chromoium supplementation. Based on this, the evidence of ash content in the drum stick meat of the CS8 group is considered to be Se or other minerals [52–54]. As a functional food, meat that can supply Se to humans is an important nutrient source [24]. Se is an essential component of the antioxidant enzyme system. It is an important nutrient for broilers as it interacts with vitamin E within the cell membrane [55]. Many researchers have conducted studies on Se supplementation in feed for broiler nutrition and Se deposition in meat [47,50,56]. In this study, the CS 8 group showed higher deposition of Se than CON group grow up. It coincided with a previous study reporting that organic selenium is more efficiently deposited in the body than inorganic selenium [57]. Various studies have reported that supplementation with 0.2 and 0.4 ppm Se can increase Se deposition and that improved antioxidant levels might contribute to selenoprotein expression [58,59]. Silva et al. [50] have reported that supplementing broilers with 0.6 ppm SeMet can promote deposition of 0.267 mg/kg breast meat, which is 40.05 μg, 70% of adult human requirement. In this study, 0.23 mg/kg Se was deposited in breast meat, which was 57% of adult human requirement. Taken together, these results suggest that CS8 supplementation in broiler feed is effective in improving meat quality and depositing selenium in meat.

The gut microbiome plays a crucial role in the health and gut environment of broiler chickens. The composition of this diverse microbiome is influenced by various factors, such as diet and stress [60,61]. Supplementing antioxidants in the feed can also impact the gut microbiome [62, 63]. Gangadoo et al. [64] reported that including nanoselenium (0.9 mg/kg) in the diet led to an increase in the abundance of Lactobacillus. In this study, similar results were observed at the genus level for the treatment groups supplemented with CS. However, the mechanism of OC and SeMet supplementation on the broiler gut microbiome has not yet been fully understood, and further research is needed. Therefore, further studies are required to investigate the changes in Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteriota at the phylum level.

CONCLUSION

When supplemented with 0.4 ppm of OC and SeMet in the broiler feed, Se deposition was the highest in breast meat, and uric acid, TAS, jejunum morphology, and meat quality were improved. In conclusion, OC and SeMet cocktail supplementation may have beneficial effects on high-quality meat production and physiology in broilers.

References

  1. WHO [World Health Organization]. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition: report of a joint WHO/FAO/UNU expert consultation. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2007. WHO technical report series: no. 935
  2. Wei R, Wang P, Han M, Chen T, Xu X, Zhou G. Effect of freezing on electrical properties and quality of thawed chicken breast meat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017;30:569-75. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0435
  3. Saelin S, Wattanachant S, Youravong W. Evaluation of water holding capacity in broiler breast meat by electrical conductivity. Int Food Res J. 2017;24:2593-8
  4. Bowker B, Zhuang H. Relationship between water-holding capacity and protein denaturation in broiler breast meat. Poult Sci. 2015;94:1657-64. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev120
  5. NRC [National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry]. 9th rev. ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1994.
  6. Rajalekshmi M, Sugumar C, Chirakkal H, Ramarao SV. Influence of chromium propionate on the carcass characteristics and immune response of commercial broiler birds under normal rearing conditions. Poult Sci. 2014;93:574-80. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03373
  7. Huang YL, Luo QH, Xiao F, Lin X, Spears JW. Research Note: responses of growth performance, immune traits, and small intestinal morphology to dietary supplementation of chromium propionate in heat-stressed broilers. Poult Sci. 2020;99:5070-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.005
  8. Lyons TP, Jacques KA. Biotechnology in the feed industry: proceedings of Alltech's 10th Annual Symposium. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 1994.
  9. Huang Y, Yang J, Xiao F, Lloyd K, Lin X. Effects of supplemental chromium source and concentration on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of broilers under heat stress conditions. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2016;170:216-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-015-0443-z
  10. Lukaski HC. Chromium as a supplement. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19:279-302. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.279
  11. Kroliczewska B, Zawadzki W, Dobrzanski Z, Kaczmarek-Oliwa A. Changes in selected serum parameters of broiler chicken fed supplemental chromium. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2004;88:393-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00496.x
  12. Mir NA, Tyagi PK, Biswas AK, Tyagi PK, Mandal AB, Sheikh SA, et al. Impact of feeding chromium supplemented flaxseed based diet on fatty acid profile, oxidative stability and other functional properties of broiler chicken meat. J Food Sci Technol. 2017;54:3899-907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2846-7
  13. Surai PF. Selenium in nutrition and health. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press; 2006.
  14. Rayman MP, Stranges S. Epidemiology of selenium and type 2 diabetes: can we make sense of it? Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;65:1557-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.04.003
  15. FDA [Food and Drug Administration]. Food additives permitted in feed and drinking water of animals: selenium. Fed Reg 1987;52:10,668.
  16. Yoon I, Werner TM, Butler JM. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2007;86:727-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.727
  17. Skrivan M, Dlouha G, Masata O, Sevcikova S. Effect of dietary selenium on lipid oxidation, selenium and vitamin E content in the meat of broiler chickens. Czech J Anim Sci. 2008;53:306-11. https://doi.org/10.17221/358-CJAS
  18. Wang YB, Xu BH. Effect of different selenium source (sodium selenite and selenium yeast) on broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2008;144:306-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.10.012
  19. Cemin HS, Vieira SL, Stefanello C, Kindlein L, Ferreira TZ, Fireman AK. Broiler responses to increasing selenium supplementation using Zn-L-selenomethionine with special attention to breast myopathies. Poult Sci. 2018;97:1832-40. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey001
  20. Schrauzer GN. The nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicology of selenomethionine. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2003;47:73-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(03)47002-2
  21. Eckers JC, Kalen AL, Xiao W, Sarsour EH, Goswami PC. Selenoprotein P inhibits radiation-induced late reactive oxygen species accumulation and normal cell injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.06.2063
  22. Boostani A, Sadeghi AA, Mousavi SN, Chamani M, Kashan N. Effects of organic, inorganic, and nano-Se on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, cellular and humoral immune responses in broiler chickens exposed to oxidative stress. Livest Sci. 2015;178:330-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.004
  23. Cui Y, Qu Y, Yin K, Zhang X, Lin H. Selenomethionine ameliorates LPS-induced intestinal immune dysfunction in chicken jejunum. Metallomics. 2021;13:mfab003. https://doi.org/10.1093/mtomcs/mfab003
  24. Tang JY, He Z, Liu YG, Jia G, Liu GM, Chen XL, et al. Effect of supplementing hydroxy selenomethionine on meat quality of yellow feather broiler. Poult Sci. 2021;100:101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101389
  25. Laakkonen E, Wellington GH, Sherbon JN. Low-temperature, long-time heating of bovine muscle 1. Changes in tenderness, water-binding capacity, pH and amount of water-soluble components. J Food Sci. 1970;35:175-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb12131.x
  26. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869
  27. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9
  28. Hayirli A. Chromium nutrition of livestock species. Nutr Abstr Rev. Ser B: Livest Feed Feed. 2005;75: 1N-14N.
  29. Hua Y, Clark S, Ren J, Sreejayan N. Molecular mechanisms of chromium in alleviating insulin resistance. J Nutr Biochem. 2012;23:313-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.11.001
  30. Emami A, Ganjkhanlou M, Zali A. Effects of Cr methionine on glucose metabolism, plasma metabolites, meat lipid peroxidation, and tissue chromium in Mahabadi goat kids. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2015;164:50-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-014-0190-6
  31. Chen G, Gao Z, Chu W, Cao Z, Li C, Zhao H. Effects of chromium picolinate on fat deposition, activity and genetic expression of lipid metabolism-related enzymes in 21 day old Ross broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31:569-75. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0289
  32. Donsbough AL, Powell S, Waguespack A, Bidner TD, Southern LL. Uric acid, urea, and ammonia concentrations in serum and uric acid concentration in excreta as indicators of amino acid utilization in diets for broilers. Poult Sci. 2010;89:287-94. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00401
  33. Jegede AV, Oduguwa OO, Bamgbose AM, Fanimo AO, Nollet L. Growth response, blood characteristics and copper accumulation in organs of broilers fed on diets supplemented with organic and inorganic dietary copper sources. Br Poult Sci. 2011;52:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.544714
  34. Sun D, Li C, Gao J, Li S, Wang H. Effects of selenium deficiency on principal indexes of chicken kidney function. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2015;164:58-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-014-0196-0
  35. Akbari M, Torki M. Effects of dietary chromium picolinate and peppermint essential oil on growth performance and blood biochemical parameters of broiler chicks reared under heat stress conditions. Int J Biometeorol. 2014;58:1383-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0740-1
  36. Tahir SK, Yousaf MS, Rashid MA, Khan AF, Ahmad S, Zaneb H, et al. Supplemental chromium-loaded chitosan nanoparticles affect growth, serum metabolites and intestinal histology in broilers. S Afr J Anim Sci. 2019;49:1072-82. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i6.11
  37. Spears JW, Lloyd KE, Pickworth CA, Huang YL, Krafka K, Hyda J, et al. Chromium propionate in broilers: human food and broiler safety. Poult Sci. 2019;98:6579-85. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez444
  38. Hardy G, Hardy I. Selenium: the Se-XY nutraceutical. Nutrition. 2004;20:590-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2004.03.014
  39. Zdunczyk Z, Drazbo A, Jankowski J, Juskiewicz J, Czech A, Antoszkiewicz Z. The effect of different dietary levels of vitamin E and selenium on antioxidant status and immunological markers in serum of laying hens. Pol J Vet Sci. 2013;16:333-9. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjvs2013-0045
  40. Piray AH, Foroutanifar S. Effect of chromium supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics, blood biochemistry, and immune response of unstressed broiler chickens: a dose-response meta-analysis. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199:4713-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02589-2
  41. Untea AE, Varzaru I, Turcu RP, Panaite TD, Saracila M. The use of dietary chromium associated with vitamins and minerals (synthetic and natural source) to improve some quality aspects of broiler thigh meat reared under heat stress condition. Ital J Anim Sci. 2021;20:1491-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2021.1978335
  42. Han M, Chen Y, Li J, Dong Y, Miao Z, Li J, et al. Effects of organic chromium sources on growth performance, lipid metabolism, antioxidant status, breast amino acid and fatty acid profiles in broilers. J Sci Food Agric. 2021;101:3917-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11053
  43. Quinteiro-Filho WM, Ribeiro A, Ferraz-de-Paula V, Pinheiro ML, Sakai M, Sa LRM, et al. Heat stress impairs performance parameters, induces intestinal injury, and decreases macrophage activity in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2010;89:1905-14. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00812
  44. Zhang AW, Lee BD, Lee SK, Lee KW, An GH, Song KB, et al. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cell components on growth performance, meat quality, and ileal mucosa development of broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2005;84:1015-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.7.1015
  45. Ahmadipour B, Hassanpour H, Rafiei F, Khajali F. Antioxidative, antihyperlipidemic, and growth-promoting effects of kelussia odoratissima in meat-type chickens. Poult Sci. 2015;3:37-46.
  46. Dalolio FS, Albino LFT, da Silva JN, Fireman AKAT, Burin AM Jr, Busanello M, et al. Dietary chromium-methionine supplementation and broiler (22-43 days) responses during heat stress. 1. Growth performance and carcass yield, metabolisable energy and serum biochemistry. Anim Prod Sci. 2021;61:586-95. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN20140
  47. Sun H, Zhao L, Xu ZJ, De Marco M, Briens M, Yan XH, et al. Hydroxy-selenomethionine improves the selenium status and helps to maintain broiler performances under a high stocking density and heat stress conditions through a better redox and immune response. Antioxidants. 2021;10:1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10101542
  48. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci. 2005;71:194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022
  49. Huff-Lonergan E. Water-holding capacity of fresh meat [Internet]. Pork Information Gateway. 2006 [cited 2023 Jan 23]. https://porkgateway.org/resource/water-holding-capacity-of-fresh-meat/
  50. Silva VA, Clemente AHS, Nogueira BRF, de Carvalho AC, de Freitas LFVB, Ramos ADLS, et al. Supplementation of selenomethionine at different ages and levels on meat quality, tissue deposition, and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2019;98:2150-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey569
  51. Cai SJ, Wu CX, Gong LM, Song T, Wu H, Zhang LY. Effects of nano-selenium on performance, meat quality, immune function, oxidation resistance, and tissue selenium content in broilers. Poult Sci. 2012;91:2532-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02160
  52. Zha LY, Zeng JW, Chu XW, Mao LM, Luo HJ. Efficacy of trivalent chromium on growth performance, carcass characteristics and tissue chromium in heat-stressed broiler chicks. J Sci Food Agric. 2009;89:1782-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3656
  53. Untea AE, Panaite TD, Oancea A, Turcu RP, Saracila M. Camelina meal and chromium picolinate effects on broiler thigh meat nutritional properties. Arch Zootech. 2021;24:96-104. https://doi.org/10.2478/azibna-2021-0016
  54. An J, Lee J, Song M, Oh H, Kim Y, Chang S, et al. Effects of supplemental different clay minerals in broiler chickens under cyclic heat stress. J Anim Sci Technol. 2023;65:113-31. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2022.e94
  55. Edens FW, Sefton AE. Sel-PlexTM, a source of organic selenium in selenised yeast protein, as a factor that influences meat quality. J Appl Anim Nutr. 2016;4:e10. https://doi.org/10.1017/jan.2016.8
  56. Dalia AM, Loh TC, Sazili AQ, Samsudin AA. Influence of bacterial organic selenium on blood parameters, immune response, selenium retention and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16:365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02587-x
  57. Schrauzer GN. Selenomethionine: a review of its nutritional significance, metabolism and toxicity. J Nutr. 2000;130:1653-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.7.1653
  58. Finley JW. Bioavailability of selenium from foods. Nutr Rev. 2006;64:146-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2006.tb00198.x
  59. Vignola G, Lambertini L, Mazzone G, Giammarco M, Tassinari M, Martelli G, et al. Effects of selenium source and level of supplementation on the performance and meat quality of lambs. Meat Sci. 2009;81:678-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.009
  60. Shi D, Bai L, Qu Q, Zhou S, Yang M, Guo S, et al. Impact of gut microbiota structure in heat-stressed broilers. Poult Sci. 2019;98:2405-13. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez026
  61. Calik A, Emami NK, Schyns G, White MB, Walsh MC, Romero LF, et al. Influence of dietary vitamin E and selenium supplementation on broilers subjected to heat stress, Part II: oxidative stress, immune response, gut integrity, and intestinal microbiota. Poult Sci. 2022;101:101858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101858
  62. Kasaikina MV, Kravtsova MA, Lee BC, Seravalli J, Peterson DA, Walter J, et al. Dietary selenium affects host selenoproteome expression by influencing the gut microbiota. FASEB J. 2011;25:2492-9. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.11-181990
  63. Yang Q, Liang Q, Balakrishnan B, Belobrajdic DP, Feng QJ, Zhang W. Role of dietary nutrients in the modulation of gut microbiota: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2020;12:381. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12020381
  64. Gangadoo S, Dinev I, Chapman J, Hughes RJ, Van TTH, Moore RJ, et al. Selenium nanoparticles in poultry feed modify gut microbiota and increase abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:1455-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8688-4